Connect with us

California

California budget to cover some out-of-state abortion travel

Published

on

California budget to cover some out-of-state abortion travel


California is making ready to spend as much as $20m (£17m) to carry girls from different states to its abortion clinics, a coverage aimed toward growing entry to a process that has been outlawed or restricted in lots of states for the reason that US supreme courtroom overturned Roe v Wade.

California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, had beforehand restricted the cash within the state’s “abortion sensible help fund” for in-state journey solely, saying “we now have to be real looking about what we will take in”. That call stunned pro-choice advocates, particularly since Newsom, a Democrat, had vowed to make California a sanctuary for ladies in different states searching for abortions.

Professional-choice advocates spent weeks lobbying the governor’s workplace on the problem. On Friday, days earlier than the tip of the legislative session, Newsom and legislative leaders revealed an modification to the finances that may enable the state to spend public cash on out-of-state journey for abortions. Lawmakers are scheduled to vote on it subsequent week.

Whereas the fund will obtain public cash, it additionally accepts personal donations – one thing the Newsom administration mentioned can be vital to cowl prices.

Advertisement

“Because the governor has said, California is doing its half, however we can not do all of it – personal donations and philanthropy can be vital to those efforts,” Newsom’s spokesperson, Alex Stack, mentioned.

“All of us must step as much as help girls who’re being denied reproductive freedoms by their state governments and are pressured to come back to California for abortion care.”

Jodi Hicks, the CEO and president of Deliberate Parenthood Associates of California, mentioned the change was important provided that state officers had been working for months to extend the state’s capability to supply abortions within the aftermath of the US supreme courtroom resolution.

“None of that issues if we’re not additionally making certain that sufferers can get to the place they should go,” she mentioned. “Everybody deserves to get healthcare, together with abortion, and sadly for half the nation they should journey exterior the state they reside in to be able to get that.”

As some states transfer to outlaw or prohibit abortion entry, some state and native governments have acted to make use of public cash to assist girls in these states journey to get the process. In Republican-led states, metropolis leaders in St Louis, Cleveland and Columbus, Ohio, have pledged to make use of public cash to assist girls get abortions.

Advertisement

State lawmakers in Oregon – anticipating an abortion ban in neighbouring Idaho – agreed to spend $15m to assist girls search abortions. Thus far, $1m has gone to the Northwest Abortion Entry Fund, a nonprofit that helps sufferers pay for journey and the process itself.

The fund exhausted its deliberate working finances this yr and needed to approve further emergency funds amid rising demand for journey support, in line with Riley Keane, sensible help lead for the group.

In California, a number of the cash may go to Entry Reproductive Justice, the state’s solely statewide abortion help fund. The group normally helps about 500 individuals a yr get abortions, however director Jessica Pinckney mentioned they’d seen a rise for the reason that supreme courtroom resolution.

Pinckney mentioned the group just lately in a single week helped extra girls who lived in different states than they did from California.

Advertisement

“We’re undoubtedly seeing a rise of Texans and Arizonians. We’re additionally beginning to see of us coming from Louisiana, Alabama – a lot additional than we’d have even anticipated,” Pinckney mentioned. “I nonetheless don’t essentially suppose we now have the total story of what issues are going to appear like now on this post-Roe period.”

The California Household Council, a nonprofit that opposes abortion rights, has been lobbying in opposition to the spending this yr. Jonathan Keller, the group’s president, mentioned the state must be spending tax {dollars} on what he says are extra urgent points, resembling homelessness and housing.

“The concept that essentially the most urgent use of state funds can be to pay for individuals from crimson states to fly right here to have abortions on the California taxpayer dime is absolutely only a travesty,” he mentioned.

The state finances this yr authorises $4.8bn in spending over three years on housing and homelessness programmes, along with the $9bn lawmakers authorized final yr, in line with the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Workplace.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla

Published

on

California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla


  • Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
  • But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
  • Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.

Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

Advertisement

The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.

But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.

The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.

A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.

Advertisement

Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.

The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.

Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.

The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.

Advertisement

Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.

The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.

“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”

Advertisement

BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.

Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.

“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles

Published

on

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles


California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.

In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.

“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”

The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.

Advertisement

Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.

Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”

“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.

A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.

Advertisement

In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.

California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence

Published

on

45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence


A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.

The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Advertisement

Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.

In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.

The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”

Advertisement

“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending