California
California Approves Bill to Punish Doctors Who Spread False Information
Making an attempt to strike a steadiness between free speech and public well being, California’s Legislature on Monday authorised a invoice that will enable regulators to punish docs for spreading false details about Covid-19 vaccinations and coverings.
The laws, if signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, would make the state the primary to attempt to legislate a treatment to an issue that the American Medical Affiliation, amongst different medical teams and consultants, says has worsened the impression of the pandemic, leading to 1000’s of pointless hospitalizations and deaths.
The legislation would designate spreading false or deceptive medical info to sufferers as “unprofessional conduct,” topic to punishment by the company that licenses docs, the Medical Board of California. That might embrace suspending or revoking a health care provider’s license to follow drugs within the state.
Whereas the laws has raised considerations over freedom of speech, the invoice’s sponsors mentioned the intensive hurt brought on by false info required holding incompetent or ill-intentioned docs accountable.
“To ensure that a affected person to provide knowledgeable consent, they should be effectively knowledgeable,” mentioned State Senator Richard Pan, a Democrat from Sacramento and a co-author of the invoice. A pediatrician himself and a outstanding proponent of stronger vaccination necessities, he mentioned the legislation was supposed to handle “probably the most egregious instances” of intentionally deceptive sufferers.
Extra on Misinformation and Falsehoods
California’s laws displays the rising political and regional divisions which have dogged the pandemic from the start. Different states have gone within the different course, in search of to guard docs from punishment by regulatory boards, together with for advocating therapies involving hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and different drugs that the American Medical Affiliation says stay unproven.
If enacted, the legislation might face a authorized problem. Governor Newsom, who has three weeks to signal the laws, has not but taken a public place on it.
Whereas different nations have criminalized the unfold of vaccine misinformation — and have increased vaccination charges — the response by states and the U.S. authorities has largely been restricted to combating misconceptions with correct info, mentioned Michelle M. Mello, a professor of legislation and well being coverage at Stanford College.
She famous that even legal guidelines that cited a “compelling curiosity,” like public well being and security, to police disinformation ran the chance of getting a chilling impact, a First Modification customary for a lot of courts.
“Initiatives like this can be challenged in courtroom and can be exhausting to maintain,” she mentioned in an interview. “That doesn’t imply it’s not a good suggestion.”
California’s response follows a warning final yr by the nationwide Federation of State Medical Boards that licensing boards ought to do extra to self-discipline docs who share false claims. The American Medical Affiliation has additionally warned that spreading disinformation violates the code of ethics that licensed docs comply with observe.
The measure was amongst a flurry of Covid-related payments proposed by a legislative working group that drew fierce opposition from lawmakers and voters. A few of the most contentious payments have stalled or died, together with one that will have required all California schoolchildren to be vaccinated.
Because the laws moved by way of the Legislature, its sponsors narrowed its scope to deal instantly with docs’ direct interplay with sufferers. It doesn’t tackle feedback on-line or on tv, although these have been the reason for a number of the most impactful situations of Covid misinformation and disinformation.
“Inaccurate info unfold by physicians can have pernicious influences on people with widespread damaging impression, particularly by way of the ubiquity of smartphones and different internet-connected devises on wrists, desktops and laptops reaching throughout 1000’s of miles to different people immediately,” the Federation of State Medical Boards wrote in a report in April. “Physicians’ standing and titles lend credence to their claims.”
The laws wouldn’t require the suspension or revocation of a health care provider’s license, leaving such determinations to the Medical Board of California. It’s supposed to make the dissemination of false details about Covid-19 topic to the identical guidelines as different kinds of “unprofessional conduct” taken up by the board.
The laws defines disinformation as falsehoods “intentionally disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead.” Treading into the at occasions contentious debates over various, typically unproven Covid therapies, the invoice defines misinformation as spreading info “that’s contradicted by modern scientific consensus opposite to the usual of care.”
It says docs have “an obligation to offer their sufferers with correct, science-based info.” That would come with the usage of authorised vaccines, which have been topic to fierce debates and political activism throughout the nation, although there may be broad settlement amongst medical professionals about their effectiveness.
A gaggle known as Physicians for Knowledgeable Consent opposed the laws, saying it will silence docs. The group filed a lawsuit this month to hunt an injunction stopping the Medical Board of California from disciplining docs based mostly on accusations of disinformation. In its lawsuit, it known as the laws’s definition of misinformation “hopelessly imprecise.”
In a latest letter to Surgeon Common Vivek H. Murthy, James L. Madara, chief government of the American Medical Affiliation, mentioned disinformation swirling round vaccines had contributed to ignorance among the many public that had worsened the pandemic’s impression.
“Probably the most unlucky results of this has been important vaccine hesitancy and refusal amongst sure communities and inside sure demographics, finally leading to continued increased charges of extreme sickness, hospitalization and dying because of Covid-19 in these populations — outcomes largely preventable with vaccination,” he wrote.
California
California proposes its own EV buyer credit — which could cut out Elon Musk's Tesla
- Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to revive California’s EV rebate if Trump ends the federal tax credit.
- But Tesla, the largest maker of EVs, would be excluded under the proposal.
- Elon Musk criticized Tesla’s potential exclusion from the rebate.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is preparing to step in if President-elect Donald Trump fulfills his promise to axe the federal electric-vehicle tax credit — but one notable EV maker could be left out.
Newsom said Monday if the $7,500 federal tax credit is eliminated he would restart the state’s zero-emission vehicle rebate program, which was phased out in 2023.
“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The rebates for EV buyers would come from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters of greenhouse gases under a cap-and-trade program, according to the governor’s office.
But Tesla’s vehicles could be excluded under the proposal’s market-share limitations, Bloomberg News first reported.
The governor’s office confirmed to Business Insider that the rebate program could include a market-share cap which could in turn exclude Tesla or other EV makers. The office did not share details about what market-share limit could be proposed and also noted the proposal would be subject to negotiations in the state legislature.
A market-share cap would exclude companies whose sales account for a certain amount of total electric vehicle sales. For instance, Tesla accounted for nearly 55% off all new electric vehicles registered in California in the first three quarters of 2024, according to a report from the California New Car Dealers Association. By comparison, the companies with the next highest EV market share in California were Hyundai and BMW with 5.6% and 5% respectively.
Tesla sales in California, the US’s largest EV market, have recently declined even as overall EV sales in the state have grown. Though the company still accounted for a majority of EV sales in California this year as of September, its market share fell year-over-year from 64% to 55%.
The governor’s office said the market-share cap would be aimed at promoting competition and innovation in the industry.
Elon Musk, who has expressed support for ending the federal tax credit, said in an X post it was “insane” for the California proposal exclude Tesla.
The federal electric vehicle tax credit, which was passed as part of the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, provides a $7,500 tax credit to some EV buyers.
Musk, who is working closely with the incoming Trump administration, has expressed support for ending the tax credit. He’s set to co-lead an advisory commission, the Department of Government Efficiency, which is aimed at slashing federal spending.
The Tesla CEO said on an earnings call in July that ending the federal tax credit might actually benefit the company.
“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said. “But long-term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”
BI’s Graham Rapier previously reported that ending the tax credit could help Tesla maintain its strong standing in the EV market by slowing its competitors growth.
Prior to the EV rebate proposal, Newsom has already positioned himself as a foil to the incoming Trump administration. Following Trump’s election win the governor called on California lawmakers to convene for a special session to discuss protecting the state from Trump’s second term.
“The freedoms we hold dear in California are under attack — and we won’t sit idle,” Newsom said in a statement at the time.
California
California Gov. Gavin Newsom says state will provide rebates if Trump removes tax credit for electric vehicles
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will provide rebates to residents if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration does away with a federal tax credit for electric vehicles.
In a news release issued Monday, Newsom said he would restart the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which provided financial incentives on more than 590,000 vehicles before it was phased out late 2023.
“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom said. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The federal rebates on new and used electric vehicles were implemented in the Inflation Reduction Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. When Trump’s second term in office begins next year, he could work with Congress to change the rules around those rebates. Those potential changes could limit the federal rebates, including by reducing the amount of money available or limiting who is eligible.
Limiting federal subsidies on electric vehicle purchases would hurt many American automakers, including Ford, General Motors and the EV startup Rivian. Tesla, which also builds its automobiles in the United States, would take a smaller hit since that company currently sells more EVs and has a higher profit margin than any other EV manufacturer.
Newsom also announced earlier this month that he will convene a special session “to protect California values,” including fundamental civil rights and reproductive rights, that he said “are under attack by this incoming administration.”
“Whether it be our fundamental civil rights, reproductive freedom, or climate action — we refuse to turn back the clock and allow our values and laws to be attacked,” Newsom said on X on Nov. 7.
A spokesperson for Trump did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This isn’t the first time California will be taking action against the Trump’s administration concerning clean transportation legislation.
In 2019, California and 22 other states sued his administration for revoking its ability to set standards for greenhouse gas emission and fuel economy standards for vehicles, The Associated Press reported.
California sued the Trump administration over 100 times during his first term, primarily on matters including gun control, health care, education and immigration, the Los Angeles Times reported.
California
45 Years Later, California Murder Mystery Solved Through DNA Evidence
A 45-year-old cold case of a 17-year-old girl brutally raped and murdered has been resolved, bringing closure to the family. On February 9, 1979, Esther Gonzalez walked from her parents’ home to her sister’s in Banning, California, roughly 137 km east of Los Angeles. She never arrived. The next day, her body was discovered in a snowpack near a highway in Riverside County, California. Authorities determined she had been raped and bludgeoned to death, leading to an investigation that spanned decades.
The lab was able to match the DNA to a man named Lewis Randolph “Randy” Williamson, who died in 2014. Williamson, a US Marine Corps veteran, called authorities on the fateful day to report finding Ms Gonzalez’s body. At the time, he claimed he could not identify whether the body was male or female. Described as “argumentative” by deputies, Williamson was asked to take a polygraph test, which he passed, clearing him of suspicion in the pre-DNA era. He had faced assault allegations in the past but was never convicted of any violent crimes, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Despite limited leads, the Riverside County cold case homicide team didn’t give up. A semen sample recovered from Ms Gonzalez’s body in 1979 was preserved but remained unmatched in the national Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) for decades.
In 2023, forensic technology finally caught up. The homicide team collaborated with a genetic lab in Texas that specialises in forensic genealogy. A sample of Williamson’s blood from his 2014 autopsy provided the DNA match needed to confirm him as the 17-year-old’s rapist and killer.
The Gonzalez family had mixed emotions—relief at finally having answers and sadness knowing Williamson would not face justice, as he died in Florida ten years ago. Ms Gonzalez, remembered by her family as a shy yet funny and mild-mannered young woman, was the fourth of seven children. Her oldest brother, Eddie Gonzalez, wrote on Facebook, “The Gonzalez family would like to thank the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department on a job well done. After 40 years, the Gonzalez family has closure.”
“We are very happy that we finally have closure,” Ms Gonzalez’s sister, Elizabeth, 64, shared with CNN. “We are happy about it but, since the guy has died, a little sad that he won’t spend any time for her murder.”
-
Business1 week ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science6 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health3 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony