California
44% of California renters ‘not satisfied’ with their finances
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64ecd/64ecd41eceb0730009319537c9b016005e4056f5" alt="44% of California renters ‘not satisfied’ with their finances 44% of California renters ‘not satisfied’ with their finances"
California renters are twice as glum about their monetary picture than Golden State homeowners, a new survey shows.
The Public Policy Institute of California’s statewide polling for September reinforces a key economic divide – renters vs. homeowners. Consider that 44% of renters told pollsters they’re “not satisfied” with their financial situation, compared with only 22% of unsatisfied homeowners.
Or ponder the flip side of the query: Just 8% of California renters toll pollsters that they were “very satisfied” with their finances vs. 26% of homeowners.
It’s zero secret that renters typically earn less money, with the state’s lofty housing costs making those financial headaches even more painful. Despite those admitted challenges, though, renters seem to have a tiny bit more hope for their household budgets.
Looking ahead six months, 26% of California renters expected their monetary position would be stronger vs. 20% of owners. But 24% of tenants foresee weaker finances vs. 22% for owners.
When asked for a bigger picture view, California renters were more downbeat about the statewide economy in the next 12 months.
The poll found 63% of renters saw “bad times” ahead vs. 60% for owners, compared with 36% of tenants eyeing “good times” vs. 38% for owners.
The national outlook was equally glum, as 63% of California renters saw “bad times” coming for the US economy vs. 59% for owners. Contrast that with the 35% of renters eyeing “good times” vs. 37% for owners.
Blue tint
Let’s note that California renters lean bluer in this blue state.
When asked their opinion of political parties, 51% of California renters said “favorable” to the Democrats vs. 48% of owners. Republicans got 22% “favorable” from renters vs. 30% of owners.
Interestingly, when asked about satisfaction with political parties overall, the need for a third party was the top reply from 66% of California renters and 69% of owners.
Bottom line
High-cost California makes for sour outlooks, no matter the economic or political cycle.
This poll found very few happy folks, no matter their housing status. Consider the big-picture “right direction or wrong direction” question that pollsters love to ask.
As for the state vibes, California renters had slightly less negative feelings – 53% said wrong direction vs. 45% for right direction. That’s a smidgen more upbeat than owners, with 56% saying wrong vs. 42% saying right.
There’s an even more uniform sour sentiment about the nation, with 71% of both California renters and homeowners giving a thumbs-down on the US direction. (FYI: 28% of renters said right direction, vs. 26% of owners.)
Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6781a/6781a0fd8834eed59ed9ab9ebc47c1517b716739" alt=""
California
'Limited to no impact': Why a pro-housing group says California’s pro-housing laws aren’t producing more
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6692a/6692ac6a14d3d75e302972306bd74b8b618eb193" alt="'Limited to no impact': Why a pro-housing group says California’s pro-housing laws aren’t producing more 'Limited to no impact': Why a pro-housing group says California’s pro-housing laws aren’t producing more"
In summary
A passel of recent California laws were supposed to supercharge the construction of desperately needed housing. According to YIMBY Law, they haven’t even come close.
One California law was supposed to flip defunct strip malls across California into apartment-lined corridors.
Another was designed to turn under-used church parking lots into fonts of new affordable housing.
A third would, according to supporters and opponents alike, “end single-family zoning as we know it.”
Fast-forward to 2025 and this spate of recent California laws, and others like it intended to supercharge the construction of desperately needed housing, have had “limited to no impact on the state’s housing supply.”
That damning conclusion comes from a surprising source: A new report by YIMBY Law, a pro-development nonprofit that would very much like to see these laws work.
The analysis, released today, studied five state laws passed since 2021 that have swept away regulatory barriers to building apartment buildings and other dense residential developments in places where such housing has been historically barred.
The laws under review include:
- SB 9 from 2021, which allows people to split their single-family homes into duplexes, thus ending single-family-home-only zoning across California. In practice, according to the report, building permits for only 140 units were issued under the law in 2023.
- AB 2011 from 2022 was designed to make it easier for developers to convert office parks, strip malls and parking lots into apartment buildings. In 2023, developers on just two projects were given local regulatory approval to start work under the law. In 2024, the total was eight. The report found no projects that have made use of SB 6, a similar bill passed that same year but with stricter labor requirements.
- SB 4 from 2024, the so-called Yes In God’s Backyard law, which lets churches, other houses of worship and some schools to repurpose their land for affordable housing. The report found no takers on that bill too.
“It’s grim,” said Sonja Trauss, executive director of YIMBY Law. Though she acknowledged some of the laws are still new, she blamed their early ineffectiveness on the legislative process which saddled these bills with unworkable requirements and glaring loopholes.
“Everybody wants a piece,” she said. “The pieces taken out during the process wind up derailing the initial concept.”
What are these requirements and loopholes that have prevented these laws from succeeding? Maybe not surprisingly, they are the frequent objects of critique by YIMBY Law and the Yes In My Backyard movement more generally.
One is the inclusion of requirements that developers only hire union-affiliated workers or pay their workers higher wages.
Another are affordability mandates which force developers to sell or rent the units they build at below-market prices.
A third is the strenuous opposition by local governments and the failure of these state laws to override it. In the two years following the passage of SB 9, for example, YIMBY Law tracked 140 local ordinances that, in the view of the report, were “designed to reduce or prevent” the bill from working on the ground. They included tight limits on the size of buildings, affordability requirements, or restrictions on which types of owners can make use of the law.
“The ADU boom stands alone. No other form of housing production took off in California during this period.”Law paper by UC Davis professor Chris Elmendorf and UC Santa Barbara professor Clayton Nall
Last year, the state Legislature passed a “clean up” bill meant to void some of these local add-ons.
There are plenty of other possible impediments to construction in California, which may explain why these bills have seen such tepid uptake. Sky high interest rates, chronic shortages of construction workers and high material costs (all of which could be exacerbated by current or expected changes to federal tariff, immigration and fiscal policy) all work to make residential housing development a less appealing financial proposition. Insufficient public funds and expected cuts to federal housing programs may weigh down on the affordable housing sector too.
But the report is not the first to point to the preconditions and omissions included in so many of the state’s legislative efforts to goose housing development as the reason for their lack of impact.
In a recent law paper, UC Davis law professor Chris Elmendorf and UC Santa Barbara political scientist Clayton Nall wrote that the relative success of California’s efforts to boost the construction of accessory dwelling units is the exception that proves the rule. Over the last decade, a cavalcade of state laws have stripped local governments of their ability to subject backyard cottage projects with environmental review mandates, significant fees, affordability mandates, union-hire rules, confining size or aesthetic limitations or added parking requirements.
“The ADU boom stands alone. No other form of housing production took off in California during this period,” the authors wrote. A likely reason why, they argue, is that ADU projects don’t come with nearly as many strings attached as other forms of dense development permitted by various California laws.
In 2023, the state permitted more than 28,000 ADUs, according to state data.
The history of ADU legislation in California is instructive, said Trauss. “It took about like five years of revisions before they were really getting going.”
The YIMBY Law report is based on self-reported permitting data submitted by cities and counties to the California Housing and Community Development department. The nonprofit complemented that messy database with its own internal collection harvested from its own litigation and activism. That means the data on what is actually getting built — and therefore how effective any of these laws really are — is imperfect.
That fact isn’t lost on many legislators.
The Assembly housing committee’s first hearing of the year was dedicated not to new legislation, but to evaluating the state’s existing “pro-production” laws.
“We shouldn’t just keep passing more and more bills just because we can,” Chair Matt Haney, a San Francisco Democrat, said. “We should actually look at what is working, why it’s working, how we can do more of what’s working and if it’s not working, we should do more to fix it or change it.”
Source link
California
New program aims to boost salmon in Northern California river
For the first time in more 80 years, Chinook salmon are swimming in the North Yuba River in Northern California thanks to an innovative wildlife program.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, along with federal and local agencies, launched a pilot program to reintroduce Chinook salmon into their historic spawning grounds in the North Yuba River in Plumas County. This stretch of cool water, according to the state, is considered some of the highest quality and most climate-resilient in California.
But Chinook salmon disappeared from the waterway after the construction of the Englebright Dam prevented fish from swimming upstream.
In October, the state Department of Fish and Wildlife constructed a series of nests along the 12-mile stretch of gravel riverbed and then filled them with fertilized Chinook salmon eggs from a nearby hatchery. Four months later, these salmon eggs have begun to hatch and the first young salmon were observed Feb. 11, according to the state Department of Fish and Wildlife.
“The North Yuba represents a really unique location for us. Between the main stem and its tributaries there is somewhere around 40 to 50 miles of habitat that is ideal for spring-run Chinook salmon for holding, spawning and rearing,” said Colin Purdy, a fisheries environmental program manager for the state. “If we can develop this pilot effort into a full reintroduction program, we would be able to more than double the amount of available salmon habitat in the Yuba River watershed. And that’s a huge win for spring-run Chinook salmon.”
The state project is one of many initiatives that aim to reintroduce salmon to California’s cold-water habitats upstream of dams and other fish barriers. This includes several dam removal projects, including along the Klamath River, the largest dam removal in U.S. history.
However, unlike the Klamath River, there are no plans to remove dams in the Yuba River, which the state says are critical to maintaining water supply and flood protection. Because dams will remain in place, the state is collecting the newly hatched Chinook salmon in the North Yuba River, and they will be trucked downstream and released in the lower Yuba River, where they can continue their migration to the Pacific Ocean.
“This is a habitat that salmon haven’t been into for a long time so we have very little data to understand how salmon will respond,” Purdy said. “… So there are a number of different things that we’re going to be able to learn from this.”
California
Subliminal Projects' 'Visual Languages: Vistas' Exhibition Is a Love Letter to California
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5da1/f5da13c6c1ba5d03c0c84a90c9a3bbb7b0c5d474" alt="Subliminal Projects' 'Visual Languages: Vistas' Exhibition Is a Love Letter to California Subliminal Projects' 'Visual Languages: Vistas' Exhibition Is a Love Letter to California"
Los Angeles multi-functional gallery Subliminal Projects has just opened a new exhibition, titled Visual Languages: Vistas, nodding to California’s landscapes and communities through the work of several artists. The show, which marks the third iteration of Subliminal Projects’ Visual Languages series, is curated in collaboration with UK-based Coates & Scarry.
“California has long been regarded as a cultural and geographical frontier, celebrated globally as a symbol of beauty, freedom, and opportunity,” reads the exhibition’s official description.”The state is home to 39 million people and comprises six of the world’s major biomes: marine, freshwater, forest, grassland, desert, and tundra. The relationship between these diverse ecosystems and the interconnected urban landscapes has historically inspired powerful artistic expression.”
Participating artists include Aliyah Salmon, Brian Lotti, Dean Coates, Deedee Cheriel, Devon Tsuno, Ed Ruscha, Eric Diehl, Esther Pearl Watson, Evan Hecox, Isaac Pelayo,
Jason Filipow, Jen Hitchings, Joan Nelson, Lars Bergquist, Matt McCormick, Myrna Quiñonez, Ruhee Maknojia, Seonna Hong, Seth Armstrong, Shepard Fairey, Terra Keck, Tyler Krasowski and Vince Palacios.
Open through April 5, Visual Languages: Vistas is a “love letter to California” in the aftermath of the Los Angeles fires. A portion of the proceeds from the show will be donated to the LA Arts Community Fire Relief Fund, which offers emergency support for artists and arts workers. Take a look at some of the works in the gallery above, and check out the full exhibition at the below address.
SUBLIMINAL PROJECTS
1331 W Sunset Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90026
-
Culture1 week ago
The impact of being only player from your country to play in the Premier League
-
Politics1 week ago
Federal department slashes millions in contracts, including $230K for 'Brazilian forest and gender consultant'
-
Technology1 week ago
YouTube TV has a deal to keep Paramount content
-
Politics1 week ago
Some Dems already turning on Hogg two weeks into DNC vice chair gig: report
-
Culture1 week ago
Tilted Axis Press Took a Big Risk on Translated Literature. It Paid Off.
-
World1 week ago
UN commander injured as Lebanese protesters torch car near Beirut airport
-
Business7 days ago
One Fix for Ailing Movie Theaters? Becoming Nonprofits.
-
News5 days ago
Kamala Harris Has Scrambled the California Governor’s Race Without Entering It