Connect with us

West

California surfer survives encounter with shark who displayed ‘aggressive’ behavior

Published

on

California surfer survives encounter with shark who displayed ‘aggressive’ behavior

A California surfer recently survived a harrowing encounter with a shark who was displaying “aggressive behavior,” officials said.

The Sunday encounter in the vicinity of T-Street Beach in San Clemente, California prompted the city to close the beach “due to confirmed aggressive shark behavior.”

“The beaches will remain open, but water access will remain closed until 8 p.m. Monday, pending no additional shark sightings,” the city said in a notice.

The surfer, Evan Garcia, showed FOX 11 the bite mark on his surfboard, measuring nearly a foot in diameter.

GRANDMA BRAVES SHARKS, JELLYFISH IN 17-HOUR SWIM TO REMOTE ISLAND

Advertisement

Surfer Evan Garcia told FOX 11 that he encountered an aggressive shark. (iStock / FOX 11 Los Angeles)

He said a juvenile shark, measuring around four to six feet, knocked him off his board while he was in the water.

Garcia told the outlet he notified a lifeguard after the encounter and showed him the surfboard. After confirming the bite mark with a shark expert, officials ordered everyone out of the water.

ULTRA-RARE FISH, ALMOST NEVER SEEN BY HUMANS, WASHES UP ON OREGON COAST FOR FIRST TIME

The bite mark on Garcia’s surfboard measured nearly a foot in diameter. (FOX 11 Los Angeles)

Advertisement

“When that thing hit me from below, I knew right away that it was a shark. There’s people out there who have been injured by sharks. And I’m so lucky that it only got my board,” Garcia told FOX 11.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

The shark incident happened at T-Street Beach in San Clemente, California. (FOX 11 Los Angeles)

No additional details about the incident are known at this time.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hawaii

Hawaii commemoration of America’s birthday funded on a shoestring – The Garden Island

Published

on

Hawaii commemoration of America’s birthday funded on a shoestring – The Garden Island






Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Montana

Dodging rocks and chasing memories on Montana’s Smith River

Published

on

Dodging rocks and chasing memories on Montana’s Smith River


play

For the first time that I can recall, I found myself jealous of waterfowl.

And as vigilant as one must be in dodging rocks, they’re much easier to evade than raindrops.

Advertisement

Or hail, for that matter.

It had been nearly 20 years since I’d floated the Smith River, one of the premier locations for outdoor excursions in the state of Montana.

Despite its close proximity to Great Falls and the privilege of less stringent access, I hadn’t made the effort as an adult to enjoy the scenic journey practically in my backyard.

The trek was not easy, and by day’s end I was overcome with a lethargy almost two decades in the making.

However, as I’ve been reminded, a day’s effort was a small price to pay for enduring memories.

Advertisement

What and where is Montana’s Smith River?

The Smith River is a tributary of the Missouri River that spans 121 miles starting near White Sulphur Springs in Meagher County.

It flows between several mountain ranges to the mouth, where it dumps into the Missouri near Ulm, about 10 miles south of Great Falls.

The river was named after Robert Smith, the Secretary of the Navy under President Thomas Jefferson, by the Lewis and Clark Expedition. Meriwether Lewis dubbed it in an 1805 journal recording, “Smith’s River,” according to Montana State Library archives.

Advertisement

Located in historic Blackfeet territory, the area was eventually occupied by white settlers through various treaties between the tribe and the U.S. government.

The Act of Congress of 1874 moved the southern border of the Blackfeet territory 200 miles north, formally making settlement legal under U.S. law, according to educational materials from the Office of Public Instruction, although no compensation to the Blackfeet was given for the territory ceded.

Today, the Smith River Corridor — the 59-mile stretch of the river open to permitted floating in Smith River State Park — is managed by the Parks and Outdoor Recreation Division of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service.

Permitted floaters launch at Camp Baker, and the full journey to the Eden Bridge takes a minimum of three full days and two nights at approved camp sites, according to FWP.

Advertisement

A place for family

My dad, Mark Higgins, and his brothers frequented the Smith River area in their youth through a connection of their father, Alan “Lefty” Higgins.

My dad was able to purchase a cabin in the Castle Bar section of the Smith in the mid-1980s. It has now evolved into a family cabin, owned and curated by members of the extended family.

Some of my fondest memories come from times at the Smith, as family from California, Oregon and Washington all congregate at our place at various times each summer.

The Higgins cabin is one of the many things in my life that I am privileged to be a part of, and one that I strive to never take for granted.

Advertisement

 The float begins at Camp Baker

The commute to Camp Baker is aesthetically identical to the one from Great Falls to the family cabin, moving along stretches of gravel backroads meandering through rolling hills and grasslands. The trip is scenic in its own way yet doesn’t give much of a hint of the views to come.

Unlike the usual gathering of cows from adjoining cattle ranches stopping to graze along the road, on this morning we were temporarily stopped by a small herd of elk making its way across — a sight I have only seen a handful of times in 30-some years.

The last time I floated the Smith was around the Fourth of July in 2007. My most vivid memory from the trip, aside from the scenery, was being inadvertently hit in the head by an oar and breaking the pair of knockoff Oakley sunglasses I’d bought on the street in New York on vacation.

As we set out from Camp Baker in our four-person raft and accompanying kayaker, I was reminded early and often how less-than-leisurely the float is, particularly in the conditions of the day.

On float day, the Smith was flowing at just over 160 cubic feet per second, according to the rangers at Camp Baker, which is a little over half of the “normal” flow of 300 cfs designated by FWP.

Advertisement

It seemed as soon as you’d evade one rock or shoot the gap between a pair, there was another right in your path.

I quickly became jealous of the ducks and geese we encountered frequently throughout, who navigated the river unconcerned with ducklings and goslings in tow, and whose instincts always seemed to point to the perfect “V” in the water’s flow.

Most rock encounters ended harmlessly with scrapes along the bottom of the raft or, at most, would stop us dead in our tracks. However, one passenger did take an involuntary dip as we collided sideways with a large rock, thankfully ending only in wet clothes and a soaked raincoat.

So went about the first half of our 21-mile, one-day float, as we attempted to dodge rocks through several bursts of heavy rain and another of hail.

Thankfully, as Mother Nature can humble you in one moment, it can also be quite generous.

Advertisement

If these walls could talk

Even if you were unencumbered by the task of navigating the river, it’d be impossible to take in the full picture of the Smith River Corridor, situated between the Big Belt Mountains to the west and Little Belt and Castle ranges to the east.

You see hillsides often greater than a 45-degree angle densely filled with tall skinny trees, with rock formations dug into and jutting out from the earth.

The cliff walls can reach over 100 feet high in places, each with its own distinct shape and pattern after millennia of erosion.

The cliff formations are almost as perfect as they are imperfect, as ornate as they are abstract, sometimes forming shelves, steps or ledges. Some of the bigger cliffs are commonly equated to cathedrals, almost as if chiseled in intricate and deliberate detail.

Advertisement

Each formation tells its own story, as if structures from an ancient civilization had been overcome by nature.

Past the Tenderfoot Creek — nearing the end of our day’s float — approaching the Castle Bar area is maybe the most beautiful stretch. The story goes that the area was named for the castle-like cliffs, with smaller rock formations on top resembling guards keeping a lookout from on high.

It’s easy to get caught up in your surroundings, falling into a dream state as you imagine the stories this landscape could tell.

The end of the journey

The flow of the river picked up significantly past the Tenderfoot, covering up most of the pesky rocks like those that had stymied the group early on.

Advertisement

The last five or six miles of the trip were far more serene as we took in the sights unencumbered and began to recognize the landmarks signaling our approach to Castle Bar.

There was a strong sense of accomplishment as the raft made its final landing on the shore of our destination, with the sun beginning to creep below the cliff line after a nearly 11-hour day on the water.

One participant declared this was their last float down the Smith, which seemed a reasonable decision as we wearily organized our gear on the riverbank.

After some rest, I hope that it wasn’t my last long float down the river that has come to mean so much to me and my family.

Advertisement

Maybe I’ll give it a go in another 20 years.  

***

How can I float the Smith River?

Due to its popularity, the Smith is the only river in Montana to run on a permit system. Permits are granted through a lottery, and roughly 10% of those who enter receive permits — and only 10 % of those granted can go to out-of-state residents.

Applications for the lottery open on Jan. 1 and can be submitted to FWP until mid-February each year, with the lottery drawing occurring shortly after. Those who draw a permit are assigned a float day in the typical floating season from mid-April to mid-July, aside from one Super Permit winner, who is allowed to pick a day of their choosing.

Groups can consist of up to 15 people, and 9-10 groups per day set out from Camp Baker. The cost per floater is $25 for Montana residents 13 and older, $15 for children ages 6-12 and $60 for non-resident floaters over 13.

Advertisement

Groups are limited to four nights on the Smith and must camp at assigned campgrounds.

Those who don’t enter the lottery can also hire a private outfitter to float the river. There are seven outfitters who are approved by Montana State Parks and U.S. Forest Service to provide services on the Smith River.

For more information and FAQs on the float, visit fwp.mt.gov/stateparks/smith-river.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

US Supreme Court: Nevada, other states can accept late-arriving mail ballots

Published

on

US Supreme Court: Nevada, other states can accept late-arriving mail ballots


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that states with laws that allow late-arriving mail ballots, including Nevada, can continue counting them in future elections.

In a 5-4 decision that had potential to affect November’s midterms, the high court upheld a Mississippi law that lets mail votes be counted up to five days after Election Day.

Nevada allows ballots postmarked on or before Election Day to be accepted for up to four days after the election. Mail returned without a legible postmark is accepted for up to three days.

“Nevada’s elections will not change — we will continue to run safe, secure and accessible elections this year without the interference and intimidation of the federal government,” said Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar in a statement.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court case originated in Mississippi, where the Republican National Committee, Mississippi Republican Party and the state’s Libertarian Party sued the state. Plaintiffs argued that the laws undermine trust and confidence in the election process. Their position centered around federal statutes that set a uniform Election Day.

President Donald Trump, who issued a 2025 executive order that called for an Election Day counting deadline, called the ruling a “tremendous loss” for voter rights.

In a statement, Gov. Joe Lombardo said he agreed with the court’s ruling and called for legislative changes in Nevada.

“Today’s ruling from the Supreme Court reaffirms my stance that states should determine how their own elections are conducted, but there is still a need to enhance transparency and security in Nevada’s elections,” the governor said in a statement. “I fully support the Voter ID ballot measure and will work to ensure our election laws reflect a simple, common-sense principle: Election Day should mean the end of voting, and ballots should be received by Election Day so the results are timely, secure, and trusted by the public.”

Nevada officials react

Attorney General Aaron Ford had signed Nevada onto a Supreme Court amicus brief in support of Mississippi, which argued that establishing an Election Day deadline could lead to a flood of litigation related to ballots that were cast on time but had delayed arrivals.

Advertisement

“Nevada’s elections are free, fair and safe, and Nevadans benefit from a range of choices in how to cast their vote — mail ballots included,” he said in a Monday statement. “Our state has made it clear that we believe our citizens deserve to cast their ballots in the way that is easiest for them, and today’s decision ensures that Nevadans who cast their mail ballot by Election Day will have their legal votes counted.”

Aguilar, Nevada’s chief election officer, earlier said that the state was preparing for the possibility that the high court would issue an opinion reversing the Nevada law. And, he said, recent elections had not seen a high volume of late-arriving ballots. In the 2024 general election, for example, under 10 had arrived by the fourth day after Election Day, he said in April.

Justices split vote

Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, both conservatives, joined the three liberal justices in the majority ruling.

“When voting on different days in different states sparked allegations of fraud, Congress set a nationally uniform deadline for voting,” Barrett wrote in the majority opinion. “If varied deadlines for ballot receipt similarly call for a national solution, the American people must choose it through their elected representatives.”

She wrote that about 30 states accept at least some absentee ballots sent by Election Day to be counted afterward.

Advertisement

“Although the election-day statutes refer to a particular ‘day’ for the election, plaintiffs do not contend that everything must occur on that day,” Barrett said.

Justice Samuel Alito penned the dissenting opinion.

“If ballots received after Election Day are added to the set of ballots that dictate the election’s outcome, the electorate’s choice does not occur on election day, and the federal election-day statutes are violated,” he wrote.

Call for voter ID law renewed

After the ruling, Trump repeated his demand for senators to pass the Save America Act, a bill that would require voters to present a photo ID, proof of citizenship and outlaw most mail voting.

“There is no excuse for a politician, or otherwise, to be against the above three requirements. There is only one reason to oppose — CHEATING!,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “The House of Representatives has approved this vital Act, THREE TIMES. The United States Senate seems unable to do so.”

Advertisement

The Repair the Vote PAC, which is leading a ballot initiative in Nevada to institute voter ID requirements, supports an Election Day deadline.

“This decision makes passing Question 7 even more important, as we must have verification that every ballot that is mailed in was sent in by a legally registered Nevada voter, regardless of when it was received,” said PAC Chairman David Gibbs in a statement, “but especially for those received after the polls have closed.”

Democratic senators Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen celebrated the Supreme Court’s decision, adding that Nevada’s elections already are safe and secure.

“Today’s Supreme Court decision preserves that right so that Americans can continue to make their voices heard in the democratic process,” Cortez Masto wrote on X. “This administration will continue to lose in court as it tries to illegally control our elections.”

Added Rosen in her own post: “All eligible voters have a right to make their voice heard, and Trump won’t get away with his attacks on Americans’ voting rights.”

Advertisement

Contact Ricardo Torres-Cortez at rtorres@reviewjournal.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending