Connect with us

Arizona

Series 37 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks at Cleveland Guardians

Published

on

Series 37 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks at Cleveland Guardians


Arizona and Cleveland. Two teams that just roll off the tongue together, no? Really? Not for you? Strange.

Cleveland made some waves in 2022, winning the AL Central, reaching Game 5 of the ALDS, having defeated the Tampa Bay Rays in the Wild Card. They stretched the Yankees to the limit as well, but a young team fell short. Hopes were high for 2023 and…were not met. Now another year removed, they look to replicate and surpass those 2022 highs. They enter the series with the best record in baseball. They have an offense that is terrifying when it all comes together (which it often does). They have an established pitching factory that seemingly creates effective arms (both starting and relief) at will. They have a World Class Closer in Clase. An MVP candidate in Jose Ramirez. A better version of Luis Arraez in Steven Kwan. And a true-rookie manager well on his way to unanimously winning AL Manager of the Year in Stephen Vogt.

Arizona meanwhile is experiencing a season of ups and downs. Expectations were high entering 2024, and have not been met, but contention is still occurring. Despite atrocious results from Jordan Montgomery, no results from Eduardo Rodriguez, and a sophomore slump of epic proportions the team currently holds the final NL Wild Card and even has a tiny amount of breathing room. ERod is likely to return this series. Brandon Pfaadt and Zac Gallen get to pitch on either side of him. Suarez might be slowing down after a torrid July, but Ketel appears to be picking back up in his own MVP race.

This series could end up being a precursor for a World Series! One I would be able to experience in person here in Ohio! It could also end up a footnote in two otherwise forgotten seasons. But in the moment, the stakes are high for both teams.

Advertisement
Monday 8/5/2024 at 3:40pm Arizona Time in Progressive Field: Zac Gallen (9-5, 3.56 ERA, 93.2 IP, 92 K) vs. Logan Allen (8-4, 5.67 ERA, 87.1 IP, 76 K)

This Logan Allen is the one some people got very excited about last winter when we collected the other one. His 2024 has not been as exciting as 2023 was, but he’s been working some stuff out in Columbus for Cleveland’s AAA affiliate since July 7. He’s been far better in the capitol of Ohio, but against lesser opponents than Arizona.

Gallen meanwhile has posted fairly good starts recently when you check the box score, but has struggled and worked hard to reach those results. Unfortunately the last 4 teams he’s faced have been: Toronto, Chicago North, Pittsburgh and Washington. While none are pushovers exactly in 2024, none are pinnacles of excellence either. Against an offense like Cleveland’s, his could be another rough outing. But if anyone is going to break through in a big way against a team that we don’t expect, it’s totally Gallen right?

Scales tip toward Cleveland in the opener, but it could be closer to a draw!

Tuesday 8/6/2024 at 3:40pm Arizona Time in Progressive Field: TBD – Likely Eduardo Rodriguez (Season Debut?) vs. Ben Lively (10-6, 3.42 ERA, 105.1 IP, 90 K)

Game two is a weird game. It’s looking to be the season debut of Eduardo Rodriguez for Arizona. He’s the first big rotation free agency splurge for Mike Hazen of last winter, but he’s been on the shelf the whole season with “minor” injuries that keep delaying him. What to expect from him is a fools prospect as he entered free agency after a career year and is basically made of bubble gum and hopes. To say nothing of the lack of a rehab stint with any minor league affiliates…

The offense may need to bail him out against Ben Lively, which could be a tall order. He has been sharp for a team on a season-long roll. Just before the All Star Break, he had a hiccup of allowing 6ER against Detroit over 5.1 innings. But that was mid-slide for Cleveland and he met one of the hottest teams in MLB at the time in the Tigers. He hasn’t gone less than 5 full innings since June 16. His opposing teams over that stretch aren’t the most impressive, but baseball is all about timing as well. He will look to continue his stretch of solidly providing his team with a chance to win.

Advertisement

Scales tip toward Cleveland pretty heavily here. Who knows what sort of Rodriguez Arizona will get (dare we ask ….if? still at this point). And in Lively, the offense could have a gritty starter to really work at bats against.

Wednesday 8/7/2024 at 11:10am Arizona Time in Progressive Field: Brandon Pfaadt (5-6, 3.97 ERA, 131.1 IP, 118 K) vs. Carlos Carrasco (3-9, 5.53 ERA, 99.1 IP, 84 K)

On paper at least, this game feels the most obtainable for Arizona. On the mound you have Pfaadt who has fairly easily been the ace of the staff in 2024. He hasn’t taken a loss since June 19 and he has a single game all season where he went less than 5 innings (July 6 in San Diego – 4.1 IP). On top of being a work horse, he has put up solid production as well. Not too shabby for the former top prospect many were ready to trade about 12 months ago!

On the reverse side is Carrasco… The veteran who may lose his rotation spot to trade deadline acquisitions soon. He has been a healthy enough arm for Cleveland to “rely” on in 2024, but that’s about where the good ends. He is coming off an impressive start against Baltimore, but that ended a streak of 3 consecutive losses for him. And he still only went 4.1 innings. For a 37 year-old, it’s not too horrid. But for a team with eyes on ending the longest active World Series draught in baseball, he’s not cutting it.

Scales favor Arizona here.

Poll

Predict the Outcome of the Series

  • 0%
    Arizona Rattles its way to making some waves

    (0 votes)

  • 0%
    Cleveland Guards the best record in baseball

    (0 votes)

  • 0%
    Cleveland SWEEP

    (0 votes)



0 votes total

Vote Now



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Arizona volleyball notebook: Spring tournament happenings

Published

on

Arizona volleyball notebook: Spring tournament happenings


Arizona volleyball hosted its spring volleyball tournament on Saturday, Mar. 22 in McKale Center. It was the first chance to get a look at most of the team that will compete with the Wildcats next season.

Arizona faced UTEP, GCU, and Western New Mexico in the first of three tournaments they will play this spring. The Wildcats play ASU in Tempe on Mar. 29. They go to San Diego on Apr. 5, then follow that with a return trip to UTEP on Apr. 12.

The Wildcats want to take a step forward after winning the NIVC last year. Spring tournaments w

On choosing tournaments and opponents

Different sports and coaches have different philosophies about opponents in their off-season scrimmages. Some don’t like to play teams they usually play in the regular season. That’s not the mindset of Arizona head coach Rita Stubbs.

Advertisement

“I wanted to play teams who made the tournament last year in a non-threatening environment,” she said.

That means teams like ASU and UTEP. The Sun Devils have been one of the best stories in the sport the last two seasons, making a complete turnaround under JJ Van Niel. They have made two straight trips to the NCAA Tournament after being a stranger to late fall play for years.

UTEP is on a similar rise, albeit one that stretches longer. The Miners started their turnaround in the pandemic-shortened season in the spring of 2021. A 5-21 record in 2018 was 13-15 in 2019 then 10-7 in 2020-21. The 2021 fall season marked their first year with 20 or more wins since 2005. They’ve had at least 20 wins in two of three seasons since and at least 17 wins in each of the past four years.

The Miners showed that they have the potential to be that kind of team again in 2025. They also showed where Arizona needs to improve, with Stubbs noting that UTEP controlled the serve and pass game in their scrimmage.

On the other hand, having at least one team that isn’t your equal can be helpful, too. Stubbs had the opportunity to play freshmen Chloe Giehtbrock and Maya Flemister against Western New Mexico. Giehtbrock will redshirt this season. Flemister is adapting to the speed of the game.

Advertisement

On fostering volleyball IQ

The spring tournaments also provide an opportunity for young players to learn the game beyond their own positions. During timeouts, Stubbs picked players to talk to the group about what they were seeing in the games. Two players were given the chance without advance warning.

Stubbs said that most of them talk about the game only as it pertains to their own contributions. She was trying to get them to see the entire game.

On roster needs

It’s unlikely that the roster that plays this spring is the final roster that will play this fall. There is still need for a middle blocker and at least one more pin. There have been no losses to the portal so far, but current members of the team could still enter.

The Wildcats lost fifth-year pin Jaelyn Hodge after last year. Middle blockers Kiari Robey and Alayna Johnson also exhausted their eligibility. Defensive specialist Ava Tortorello and opposite Amanda DeWitt played their last game in college last fall, as well. As of now, the seniors are the only roster losses.

The team should get its other main pieces back, though. Setters Avery Scoggins and Ana Heath, outside hitters Jordan Wilson and Carlie Cisneros, middle blocker Journey Tucker, and liberos Haven Wray and Brenna Ginder were all critical in Arizona’s turnaround and NIVC title last year. There is every indication that those players will be back in cardinal and navy in the fall.

Advertisement

What happens on the right side, which Hodge patrolled last season, might be the biggest question. As far as the current roster goes, the frontrunner is probably Sydney Vanek. Vanek didn’t get a lot of playing time last season, but the two-sport athlete has considerable potential and athleticism. She’s not alone at opp, though.

Heath also played the position during the spring tournament. She played in a 6-2 as a setter and was occasionally listed as a pin on recruiting sites during her prep days. She also got some run at opposite her freshman season under former head coach Dave Rubio. Stubbs said last year that she would like to find more ways to use Heath, and this might be one of them.

The other primary option is freshman Renee Jones. Jones reclassified from the 2024 class, spending two years in the new volleyball program at IMG Academy.

Jones comes from a very athletic family with a great deal of volleyball success. Her older sister was a record-setting middle blocker at Maryland. Her twin was a freshman on the Pitt Panthers’ Final Four team this past season. She is trying to make her mark on the other end of the country.

Arizona needs experience and offense at middle blocker. Tucker will be a junior and she made a huge jump last season, but she’s more of a blocker than an offensive threat. She was a latecomer to the sport, so some of her skills are still in the development stage. She was working on the slide a bit during the spring scrimmages, but it’s a timing issue that may not come together quickly.

Advertisement

Adrianna Bridges got very little time on the court last year as a freshman. She appears to have more offensive variety than Tucker, but she’s extremely inexperienced and has a very slight frame.

The only other option on the current roster is Flemister. It’s a huge adjustment for freshmen to come into college and jump right in, especially if Arizona wants to take another step forward this season.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Devyn Netz throws perfect game, hits home run in Arizona softball’s run-rule defeat of BYU

Published

on

Devyn Netz throws perfect game, hits home run in Arizona softball’s run-rule defeat of BYU


Devyn Netz can do it all. She proved it against BYU on Thursday afternoon, throwing a perfect game and hitting a home run in a five-inning run-rule victory. The No. 11 Arizona Wildcats defeated the Cougars 8-0 at Gail Miller Field in Provo, Utah.

Netz commanded the zone and got some strong play from her defense behind her. Freshman third baseman Jenna Sniffen was a machine all game, starting the 5-3 putout time and again.

The best play was the final one, and it came from second baseman Kiki Escobar. BYU pinch hitter Keila Kamoku hit a hard ball toward Escobar, who knocked it down. The question was whether she could get it and throw to Miranda Stoddard at first in time. Escobar kept her cool and made the play just in time.

Netz was the star of the show, though. Arizona had a combined perfect game thrown by Brooke Mannon and Ali Blanchard last season, but the last time a pitcher threw a solo perfect game was in 2017. Michelle Floyd performed the feat against Hartford that year. The last to do it in conference play was Kenzie Fowler against Oregon State in 2010.

Advertisement

Netz became just the sixth Arizona pitcher to throw a solo perfect game in program history. Eight pitchers have achieved it either solo or combined. Thirty-one Wildcat pitchers have now thrown a no-hitter, either solo or combined.

Netz is a complete player. It didn’t stop at her pitching performance. She also made strong plays on defense and showed her prowess in the batter’s box.

Arizona came into the top of the fifth with a 6-0 lead. They needed two runs to be in position to close the game out in five innings in the bottom of the inning. The redshirt senior provided the RBI to reach the eight-run plateau.

Kaiah Altmeyer walked on four straight pitches to lead off. Netz took one ball then smacked the next pitch over the fence.

Arizona’s all-around dominance took a little while to get going. While Netz was locked in as a pitcher from the beginning, the offense took a few at-bats to take over.

Advertisement

The middle of the order had a tough time in their last game at Arizona State on Sunday. That wasn’t the case in Provo.

While Netz struck out to end the first and had a foul-out in a prime scoring opportunity in the third, the four through seven hitters did a ton of damage overall. Five-hole hitter Sydney Stewart walked to lead off the second inning. No. 6 hitter Stoddard took two strikes before knocking the ball out of the park to give Arizona a 2-0 lead in the second.

The scoring in the third inning was a prime example of scoring runs any way you can, which head coach Caitlin Lowe talked about before the team left for BYU.

It started with a single by Dakota Kennedy. Regan Shockey put two on with no outs with an error on the shortstop that could have been ruled a hit. Kaiah Altmeyer moved both into scoring position with a flyout to centerfield.

That brought Netz up just needing to repeat Altemeyer’s at-bat to get another run across. The foul-out made it more difficult for Arizona to tack on some runs.

Advertisement

Stewart’s infield single pushed Kennedy across and moved Shockey to third. Stoddard walked to load the bases with two outs.

It was on freshman Anyssa Wild to make something happen. It was a big occasion for Arizona’s designated player. She was once committed to play for BYU but took the field for her hometown Wildcats.

Wild grounded out in her first at-bat. This time, she knocked a ball all the way to the wall, driving in three runs with her first career double. It put the Wildcats up 6-0 and set up the fifth-inning heroics of Netz.

Netz threw just 45 pitches to 15 batters in five innings. She struck out two.

The Wildcats’ offense had six hits, including a double and two home runs. They also took advantage of five walks and one BYU error.

Advertisement

All eight RBI came from the four through seven hitters as did five of the six hits. Stewart was 2 for 3 with one RBI at the plate. Stoddard was 1 for 2 with a walk and a home run. She had two RBI. Wild led the team with three RBI while going 1 for 2 and drawing a walk.

Arizona improved to 30-5 on the season and 7-3 in Big 12 play. BYU is now 20-7 overall and 4-3 in league play.

Lead photo courtesy of Arizona Athletics



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Bill aiming to keep Axon from leaving Arizona advances as battle lines are drawn

Published

on

Bill aiming to keep Axon from leaving Arizona advances as battle lines are drawn


play

  • Taser company Axon wants to build a new headquarters in Scottsdale, Arizona, but plans for apartments are causing controversy.
  • Opponents argue Scottsdale has enough apartments and want Axon to build without housing, while the company says it’s essential for attracting employees.
  • The Arizona House is considering a bill that would override local zoning laws and allow the project to proceed, despite a referendum challenging the development.

A bill that would pave the way for Taser maker Axon to build its campus in north Scottsdale cleared its first hurdle, but the company’s desire to build apartments remains the crux of a controversy in which neither side is willing to budge.

Opponents to the bill, which would loosen zoning laws to allow apartments and hotels to be built as ancillary developments to corporate global headquarters, contend that Scottsdale has thousands of apartments in the development pipeline, and has no need for more.

Advertisement

Supporters of the bill claim the company headquarters is not viable without the apartments, which will include units reserved for Axon employees. Axon, which posted revenues of $2.1 billion in 2024, says it will employ 5,500 people at the new headquarters, if it gets built.

Axon’s proposal includes an expanded global headquarters for the law enforcement technology company, along with a hotel and about 1,900 multifamily housing units, including both for-sale and for-rent units.

The proposal has been subject to intense controversy after a group opposing the project, called Taxpayers Awful Apartment Zoning Exemptions (TAAAZE) gathered enough signatures to force an election over the Scottsdale City Council’s late 2024 approval of the project.

The bill would effectively nullify any outcome of the referendum election, because if passed, the project would be allowed to be built with the site’s existing zoning without the change that has been challenged.

Advertisement

The Arizona House of Representatives’ International Trade committee voted unanimously March 26 to advance the bill, with two members absent from voting.

The bill is still in the hearing process and requires approval from both the legislature and the governor before it could be enacted into law.

Apartments ‘100%’ the source of the Axon HQ controversy

At the committee hearing, all three speakers who spoke in opposition to the bill said without the apartments, they would embrace Axon. Two Scottsdale councilmembers, Vice Mayor Jan Dubauskas and Councilman Barry Graham, spoke in opposition to the bill, along with former Arizona legislator Michelle Ugenti-Rita, who spoke on behalf of TAAAZE.

When questioned by legislators on the committee, Ugenti-Rita said apartments were “100%” the reason behind her group’s opposition, but said the bill’s subversion of the referendum process denies Scottsdale residents their right to vote on the issue.

Advertisement

“This isn’t about taking care of jobs or economic growth,” she said in the hearing, which was standing room only, full of Axon employees wearing matching yellow shirts. “This is about one man who wants to avoid an election.”  

Ugenti-Rita said the issue should be decided by Scottsdale residents and leadership, not at the state level.

If the proposal was so strong, she said, Axon executives would be in Scottsdale working to gain support, not trying to avoid a potential loss at the election.

TAAAZE members who have led the charge opposing Axon have said they are prepared to sue the state over the bill if it is passed into law.

“Axon can expect a tooth-and-nail fight in court if its bill survives,” Bob Littlefield, former Scottsdale Councilman and leader of TAAAZE, said in an email. “In addition, TAAAZE is prepared to challenge this legislation via referendum at the ballot box, assuming Axon doesn’t convince the legislature to take away more voting rights.”

Advertisement

Both Dubauskas and Graham echoed that their opposition only hinged on the apartments.

“Residents would look me in the eye and say, ‘Can you stop the apartments?’” Dubauskas said of her time campaigning for City Council.

Scottsdale is proud to have Axon in the community, she said, adding there is no opposition over the hotel and restaurant uses proposed on the site.

Graham was on the city’s Planning Commission when Axon brought forward the first version of the plan, which involved only the company’s global headquarters. He said at the time he supported the proposal, which did not include apartments.

However, Graham said he hoped his opposition to the apartments did not drive Axon away from the city.

Advertisement

“They purchased their property with the zoning, and we hope they use it to its fullest extent,” he said.

Scottsdale’s ‘anti-development’ stance criticized

However, lawmakers on the committee said they felt frustrated with the opposition to the development without effort to compromise, and said they felt there was an overall anti-development sentiment from Scottsdale.

Graham said he disagreed with the notion that Scottsdale is anti-development and said there are many new developments in the pipeline that were approved by the city.

House Majority Leader Michael Carbone, a Republican from Buckeye, said Scottsdale has not supported statewide legislation that promotes housing or attempts to make homeownership more affordable. They city, he said, has done little to make housing accessible for essential workers.

Justin Wilmeth, a Republican from north Phoenix, pointed to the Arizona Coyotes’ attempt to develop a site in Phoenix that bordered Scottsdale. While the site was in Phoenix, then-Scottsdale Mayor David Ortega voiced opposition for the project because of its proximity to Scottsdale.

Advertisement

“The Arizona Coyotes should be on (that site) and you guys helped mess that up,” Wilmeth said of the Scottsdale City Council.  

Consuelo Hernandez, a Democrat from Tucson, said the opposition to the apartments “screams ‘not in my backyard.’”

The three speakers who addressed the committee opposing the bill said they would be willing to meet with Axon to negotiate, but did not provide specific points that would lead to a consensus.

Bill supporters: Keeping a global headquarters in Arizona is essential

Without the bill, the Axon proposed development is scheduled to go before Scottsdale voters in November 2026. However, company executives have repeatedly said there is no willingness to wait that long for a decision on the future headquarters location.

Advertisement

Axon CEO Rick Smith said the company’s board of directors has given him a deadline of the end of the legislative session to decide.

Supporters of the bill who spoke at the hearing were Peoria Mayor Jason Beck, Greater Phoenix Leadership CEO Neil Giuliano and Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry CEO Danny Seiden.

Guiliano said having a company’s global headquarters in Arizona can drive further economic development, and said a campus like the one Axon is proposing is a sustainable approach that allows people to live near their jobs if they choose.

Having housing options in a city for workers who work there is important, Seiden said.

New businesses, new jobs and company relocations to Arizona are things that any city would want and celebrate, he said.

Advertisement

“To say we don’t want workers to be able to afford to live in the same city, that’s just not right,” he said.

When asked by Rep. Stacey Travers, a Democrat from Phoenix, if there were any other businesses that would also be able to use the proposed benefits in the legislation, Seiden said he did not know of any others, but that the bill would set the stage for others to consider Arizona as a corporate headquarters location.

Beck, mayor of Peoria and CEO of Tyr Tactical, a manufacturer of law enforcement safety equipment, said the consequences of not finding a way to secure Axon in Arizona would be “catastrophic to economic development.”

“I’d take this opportunity in a heartbeat, and I would beg for it,” Beck told the committee.

Legislators request negotiation between Axon, Scottsdale

Several members of the committee said they voted in favor of moving the bill forward, but would prefer to see a productive dialogue between the city and Axon.

Advertisement

While they could not require the two groups to meet, legislators said they hoped there could be a solution worked out between parties.

After the hearing, Scottsdale Mayor Lisa Borowksy said in a statement she would like to work with the company on a compromise.

“I stand ready to work with Axon to achieve reasonable goals with their leadership while protecting our city and our residents’ interests,” she said in a statement. “I am a strong believer in ‘the art of the possible’ and I am confident we can achieve a workable solution, if all in good faith. I hope I can count on Rick Smith and his team to do the same.”

Like this story? Get more East Valley news straight into your email inbox by signing up for our free weekly East Valley Newsletter, which comes out on Wednesdays.

Corina Vanek covers development for The Arizona Republic. Reach her at cvanek@arizonarepublic.com. Follow her on X @CorinaVanek.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending