Connect with us

Arizona

Republicans helped Arizona champion voting by mail. Now they want it gone.

Published

on

Republicans helped Arizona champion voting by mail. Now they want it gone.


“This text was initially printed by Votebeat,
a nonprofit information group masking native election integrity and
voting entry.”

Republicans made Arizona an early vote-by-mail innovator in 1991,
enacting one of many first legal guidelines within the nation allowing voters to ship
in a mail poll early with out an excuse. The state then doubled down,
organising a system in 2007 for voters who wished to robotically and
completely get ballots within the mail.

Advertisement

The tactic has change into broadly
fashionable within the state, with about 89% of Arizona voters casting ballots
early, principally by mail, within the 2020 normal election. However now, some
Republicans within the state are doggedly making an attempt to dismantle the system
their celebration helped create.

There’s the continued courtroom case filed by the Arizona Republican Social gathering difficult the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in voting. There’s the brand new legislation and poll referendum
backed by Republicans within the Legislature and handed on party-line votes
that intend to restrict or prohibit voting by mail. And there are calls
for state lawmakers to take a remaining vote on an excessive and sweeping measure that may, amongst different issues, get rid of all early voting within the state. 

On Monday, a Mohave County Superior Courtroom decide dominated in opposition to the Arizona Republican Social gathering on a associated courtroom case, stating that the state’s vote-by-mail system is constitutional.

However Arizona voters mustn’t count on the battle to finish.

Arizona
Republican Social gathering Chairwoman Kelli Ward stated on far-right information outlet
Actual America’s Voice on Monday that the celebration is “in all probability going to be
interesting to a better courtroom.”  If appealed, the following cease could be the
state’s Courtroom of Appeals or Supreme Courtroom.

Advertisement

The efforts are fueled by inaccurate claims promoted by former President Donald Trump: That voting by mail shouldn’t be safe and mail-in voter fraud precipitated his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden. A number of courtroom circumstances and investigations in Arizona and
throughout the nation failed to seek out any proof of widespread voter
fraud in 2020, and Republican election officers right here and elsewhere have
repeatedly defended the safety of mail-in voting and the integrity of
the election.

The decades-long efforts to develop vote-by-mail in Arizona have been bipartisan.

In
an interview, former Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell, a
Republican who was in workplace when no-excuse mail voting grew to become authorized,
instructed Votebeat that voters themselves pushed the state to make voting by
mail simpler, and Republicans inspired the system from the beginning.
Former Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican who was a state senator on the time
the Legislature voted to approve the no-excuse mail voting system, instructed
Votebeat she’s “very proud” of what her celebration helped create.

Republicans
within the state overwhelmingly use it. Of the greater than 1 million
Republicans who voted within the 2020 normal election, greater than 80% are on
the state’s early voting checklist, in line with Phoenix-based Republican
consulting group HighGround.

“Previous to 2020, early voting closely
favored Republicans — significantly within the early returns,” Paul Bentz,
senior vp at HighGround, stated in an electronic mail. “The information would
begin a lot older and closely Republican after which pattern youthful and extra
Democratic because the election drew nearer. The final cycle was the primary
time Democrats surpassed Republicans in early voting going into Election
Day (they in the end caught up).”

Advertisement

However state-level Republicans are nonetheless main the cost to interrupt mail voting down.

In
response to the courtroom resolution Monday, Home Democratic chief Reginald
Bolding, a candidate for secretary of state, stated the case “underscores
the more and more determined and absurd lengths that right-wing
extremists have gone to persuade themselves that Donald Trump was not
crushed in 2020, and to place their thumb on the dimensions for 2022 and
past.”

Arizona led manner in mail voting

Western and Southwestern states, particularly, have led the nation on mail-in voting initiatives. 

Oregon
within the early Eighties was the primary state to check out all-mail elections,
stated Priscilla Southwell, a political science professor on the
College of Oregon. California within the Eighties
grew to become the primary state to permit for no-excuse vote-by-mail and
Washington state enacted no-excuse mail voting a yr after Arizona, in
1992.

Even right this moment, no-excuse absentee voting continues to be way more widespread in Western states, in line with the Nationwide Convention of State Legislatures. Voters can vote by mail with out an excuse in 26 states and Washington, D.C.

Advertisement

Oregon’s
authentic mail-voting check began as a approach to cut back prices by decreasing
the variety of polling locations and election staff, Southwell stated, and
voters there now overwhelmingly help it..

The geographic
expanse of Western states, which results in many rural voters touring
lengthy distances to the polls, is a part of what boosted the concept, Southwell
stated. However these states even have many retirees who just like the comfort
of voting by mail, she stated — declaring that these are extra doubtless
Republican voters. Younger voters with busy schedules additionally respect the
system, she stated.

Earlier than passing its no-excuse legislation in 1991,
Arizona for many years allowed particular sorts of voters to vote by mail.
For instance, energetic navy personnel have been first permitted to vote
early by mail in 1918.

In 1925, the state started permitting folks
who could be out of the county on Election Day to vote early by mail. In
subsequent a long time, it was expanded to different teams, corresponding to disabled
voters and voters over the age of 65.

The push to extra broadly
develop mail voting within the early ‘90s got here not from politicians, however from
voters themselves, stated Purcell, who was Maricopa County’s recorder
from 1988 to 2017.

Advertisement

“Individuals stored coming to us and saying, ‘How come I can’t do it?’” Purcell stated.

The
requests got here in from snowbirds who didn’t dwell in Arizona through the
main election and older adults who didn’t wish to go to their polling
place within the warmth, Purcell stated.

And plenty of of these voters, she stated, have been Republicans.

Early opponents not influenced by politics

Throughout
the 1991 legislative session, Purcell stated, county recorders obtained
collectively and pushed the Legislature to undertake the no-excuse mail voting
legislation. The invoice was sponsored by a Republican, in line with the Arizona Mirror, and handed with practically unanimous help.

Brewer, the previous Republican governor and secretary of state, stated
she remembers there was some debate within the Legislature over whether or not to
change the system, however with out significantly partisan overtones.

Advertisement

“It
was extra of the sensation of ‘purple, white and blue’ democracy, we should always
all present up on Election Day,” Brewer stated in an interview. 

Traditionally,
voting by mail, and getting voters on the everlasting early voting checklist,
was at all times extra fashionable with Republicans and the Republican Social gathering in
Arizona, Purcell stated. “The celebration actually did push it,” she stated.

Prior
to the creation of the early voting checklist, Bentz with HighGround stated,
most GOP campaigns carried out their very own early poll request efforts,
sending voters unsolicited mail that had self-addressed, pre-paid return
playing cards included.

Voting by mail steadily elevated within the ‘90s and early 2000s. Nevertheless it
wasn’t till 2007 that it grew to become broadly fashionable, when the state
established what was referred to as the Everlasting Early Voting Checklist. Voters have been
then ready to decide on to robotically obtain a poll within the mail.

Arizona voters now depend on the system.

Advertisement

Bullhead Metropolis resident Ann Tosh wrote to Mohave County Superior Courtroom Decide Lee Jantzen,
the decide presiding over the GOP case, emphasizing that she was
“extraordinarily involved” at the potential of banning mail-in voting. 

Tosh
instructed Votebeat that she was a lifelong Republican till simply after the
2020 election, when she was turned off by the celebration’s unfounded claims
of voter fraud, and she or he has voted by mail in each election since 1988. 

The
first few years, as a Tennessee resident, she was in a position to vote by mail
as a result of she was dwelling abroad, she stated. She moved to Arizona within the
early Nineties and has been utilizing the no-excuse system since then.

She
requested Jantzen to contemplate the wants of older and disabled voters and
working voters with conflicts, the state’s lengthy historical past of voting by
mail, and the low incidence of voter fraud. She instructed Votebeat there may be
no good cause to do away with a system that encourages extra voter
participation.

“I’m appalled at what I see happening as I
watch our democracy and freedoms being systematically eradicated,” she
wrote to Jantzen.

Advertisement

Roughly 75% of Arizona voters are on the state’s
early voter checklist as of some weeks in the past, which suggests they’ll
robotically be despatched a poll within the mail. The deadline for voters to request a one-time poll within the mail or be a part of the early voting checklist is July 22 for the Aug. 2 main.

Early
voting jumped for the 2020 main election, when greater than 90% of
voters voted early for the primary time. The state doesn’t know precisely
what number of of these early voters forged their ballots by mail versus in
particular person, as a result of it’s not one thing counties report. However anecdotally,
most of Arizona’s early voters ship their early ballots again within the
mail.

Efforts to limit vote-by-mail

Over the previous
yr, Republicans have made some progress proscribing mail voting,
together with starting to chip away on the early voting checklist.

In Might 2021, Ducey signed a legislation that eliminated the “everlasting” characteristic
of the checklist. Underneath the brand new legislation, if a voter on the checklist doesn’t vote
early a minimum of as soon as throughout two consecutive election cycles, election
officers should ship them a discover that they are going to be faraway from the
checklist in the event that they don’t act.

Republicans stated on the time that the measure is supposed to make sure the early voting checklist stays correct.

Advertisement

There’s
debate over whether or not the brand new legislation is retroactive or not and subsequently
over when voters will first be notified they are going to be taken off the checklist.
Secretary of State Katie Hobbs’ workplace believes voters ought to be
notified after the 2026 election cycle, however Legal professional Normal Mark
Brnovich’s workplace argues they need to be notified after the 2022 cycle.

In one other effort Republicans say was aimed toward stopping voter fraud, in February the Legislature authorised a poll measure for November wherein voters can be requested whether or not to require folks casting early ballots to offer extra identification.

Voters
should present some figuring out quantity on their mail-in poll —
corresponding to their driver’s license quantity, the final 4 digits of their
Social Safety quantity or their voter identification quantity — or the
poll gained’t be counted.

In Texas, the same legislation enacted final yr has resulted in a excessive share of absentee poll purposes being rejected in some counties.

In
the GOP courtroom case that Ward has stated could now be appealed to a state
courtroom, the celebration argued that the state’s no-excuse early voting system
violated the state Structure’s necessities for poll secrecy.

Advertisement

Jantzen
concluded Monday that was not the case. He stated state lawmakers have been
legally in a position to enact the 1991 no-excuse early voting legislation.

He
cited a number of methods wherein state legislation ensures poll secrecy, corresponding to
requiring poll envelopes that don’t reveal voter alternatives and would
present proof of tampering

“It is very important word that this case
shouldn’t be about allegations of fraud within the voting course of,” Jantzen
wrote. “It isn’t about politics. It isn’t even about whether or not the
events consider mail-in voting is acceptable. It’s about one factor: Is
the Arizona legislature prohibited by the Arizona Structure from
enacting voting legal guidelines that embrace no-excuse mail-in voting? … The reply
isn’t any.”

Purcell referred to as the state GOP’s mission to disband early
voting “ridiculous.” She defended the vote-by-mail system as being secure,
and touted the county’s multi-layered and bipartisan verification
course of for the voter signatures required on early ballots.

“It’s at all times been a really safe system and I feel it nonetheless is,” she stated.

Advertisement

Brewer additionally criticized the celebration’s efforts on the matter, saying she has “no thought why” they’re doing this.

“They’re undermining the integrity of the election,” she stated.

“Votebeat is a nonprofit information group masking
native election integrity and voting entry. Join their
newsletters right here.”

– 30 –





Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Back in the lineup, Teoscar Hernández provides the offense as Dodgers beat Arizona

Published

on

Back in the lineup, Teoscar Hernández provides the offense as Dodgers beat Arizona


On Tuesday, Dodgers manager Dave Roberts made a decision.

A day after Teoscar Hernández returned to the Dodgers’ lineup, activated from the injured list Monday following a two-week absence because of an adductor strain, Roberts decided to sit the veteran slugger for the second of a three-game series against the Arizona Diamondbacks.

It was a surprise choice, but with a simple reason.

Knowing Hernández would play only twice this week coming off his injury, Roberts wanted to ensure he would be available Wednesday to face former Cy Young Award winner Corbin Burnes.

Advertisement

“I just felt like having him in there tomorrow,” Roberts said Tuesday, “I feel good with.”

Twenty-four hours later, the result was even greater than he expected.

In the Dodgers’ 3-1 rubber-match victory over the Diamondbacks, Hernández delivered the night’s biggest swing in the bottom of the sixth, taking a wrecking ball to what had been a flawless outing from Burnes with a three-run home run that turned the game upside down.

Entering the sixth, the Dodgers (31-19) had managed just one hit against Burnes, the four-time All-Star and 2021 Cy Young winner who had just blanked them over six innings at Chase Field two weekends ago. They were in danger of squandering their own strong start from right-hander Dustin May, whose only blemish in a six-inning, eight-strikeout outing came on a solo home run by Ketel Marte in the fourth. And they were staring down a potential series defeat to the Diamondbacks (26-24), one that would have further underscored the tight early-season battle they are facing in a competitive National League West.

Second baseman Miguel Rojas stretches out for a ball in the sixth inning.

Advertisement

(Gina Ferazzi/Los Angeles Times)

“Obviously,” Hernández said, “we’re not playing the baseball that we know we can play.”

But on Wednesday, all they needed was one big inning to steal another win.

Miguel Rojas led off the inning with an infield single. Mookie Betts rolled another base hit through the left side to put two runners aboard. And with two out, up stepped Hernández, the second-year Dodger who has endeared himself in Los Angeles with his ability to produce clutch hits and game-changing moments.

Advertisement

“He relishes those spots,” Roberts said. “He’s really in the elite class of the ability to drive in runs.”

After a first-pitch ball, Burnes beat Hernández with his trademark cutter, dialing up the pitch for consecutive whiffs that put Hernández in a two-strike hole.

Hernández, however, didn’t panic, even though he later acknowledged he’s still working to get his feel for his swing back.

After his second empty hack, Hernández walked a lap around the hitting circle, called for a timeout and took a deep breath.

Dustin May gave up only one run in six innings.

Dustin May gave up only one run in six innings.

(Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

“I chased two out of the strike zone after the first pitch,” Hernández said, “so [I was] just trying to walk around, talking to myself. Stay calm and just try to hit the ball.”

When Hernández dug back in, Burnes fired a slider that didn’t have nearly enough break. The pitch stayed over the outer half. Hernández barreled it up with a one-handed finish. And as the ball sailed out to straightaway center, he admired it all the way, watching his 10th long ball of the season travel every bit of 413 feet.

“I think that was the only pitch that he missed all night,” Hernández quipped.

It was the only scoring the Dodgers did Wednesday, finishing the game with just five hits.

Advertisement

But between May’s solid start (which dropped his ERA to 4.09), a four-out relief appearance from Lou Trivino (a recent minor league signing called into action with the Dodgers woefully short on right-handed relief options), and a bounceback save from closer Tanner Scott (who gave up two home runs in Tuesday’s come-from-behind win), it proved to be just enough — Hernández’s well-timed day off resulting in an even better-timed home run.

“It worked out that way, yeah,” Roberts laughed postgame. “It was certainly helpful for him to hit a three-run homer.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona prison guard union head says attack on video not ‘one-off’

Published

on

Arizona prison guard union head says attack on video not ‘one-off’


play

  • A video has surfaced showing an inmate assault in an Arizona prison, raising concerns about systemic issues within the facility.
  • Critics of prison administration say the video highlights a lack of staff intervention and inadequate supervision.
  • The Arizona Department of Corrections is investigating the incident, saying it was isolated despite acknowledging a recent increase in prison violence.

A video showing inmates using locks as weapons during an attack inside an Arizona prison is not the only of its kind, according to a prison reform advocate and a corrections union leader.

Both said the footage reflects deeper, systemic failures that prison officials have ignored.

Advertisement

The nearly three-minute cell phone video, posted online May 14, shows a bloodied inmate being chased and beaten by two others swinging padlocks tied to straps.

The attack moves from an interior dormitory space to an outdoor area at the Winchester Unit at Arizona State Prison Complex–Tucson. At no point do correctional staff appear on screen.

“This was not a ‘one-off,’” said Carlos Garcia, executive director of the Arizona Correctional Peace Officers Association.

The association has discovered multiple videos of “illegal conduct with little or no staff intervention,” Garcia said in a statement.

Administrators who work for Corrections Director Ryan Thornell “have relinquished control to the inmate population,” Garcia said.

Advertisement

Donna Hamm, founder and director of Middle Ground Prison Reform, which watchdogs Arizona’s prison system, echoed Garcia’s concerns in an email to The Arizona Republic. She said there is little supervision in the prisons.

“In many cases of inmate-on-inmate assault, no staff will intervene,” she said. “They simply don’t want to get hurt themselves, and the inmates usually far outnumber the staff.”

She also said that open dorms have poor visibility and limited camera coverage, and that an “override” classification system has allowed high-risk inmates to be placed in lower-security housing.

The Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry released a statement on May 20 saying the attack occurred on May 14 and that the department became aware of the video a day after it was posted online.

Advertisement

The statement said the fight was under investigation and that people involved, including the one in possession of a cell phone, would “be held accountable.”

While the department described the attack as an “isolated incident,” the statement said there had been a “recent spike in violence among the inmate population.”

As the department “continues the challenging work of corrections statewide, we are increasing our calls for better support for our staff, including funding for higher pay and better retention, recognizing the critical public safety and high-risk work officers manage each day,” the statement said.

No inmates suffered serious injuries, the department’s statement said. The bloodied man was treated at a hospital and returned to the prison the same day, it said.

Advertisement

The department did not describe the nature of the man’s injuries or define what it considered “serious.”

The department’s Incident Command System, which is tasked with dealing with these kinds of incidents, was activated that same day, the statement said.

The department did not say when staff began responding to the assault. The video shows no signs of intervention.

The department warned that public speculation by “third-party persons” created “intentional obstructions” to safety and diverted resources from its mission.

Hamm argued the department was downplaying the incident.

Advertisement

She said Thornell needed to focus on security and safety, including staff recruitment and training.

“The public doesn’t seem to understand that prisoners far outnumber the guards and that guards actually use prisoners (and need them) for cooperation and even for safety-related issues,” she wrote.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona AG demands answers over Social Security service ‘breakdowns’

Published

on

Arizona AG demands answers over Social Security service ‘breakdowns’


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes says her office is demanding answers after reported failures and disruptions at the Social Security Administration.

In a letter dated Tuesday, the attorney general asked for steps to be taken to address a service crisis reported by seniors, people with disabilities, and low-income residents in Arizona. According to state officials, the AG’s office has received hundreds of reports related to delayed payments, wrongful benefit suspensions, and an inability to reach the office by phone or in person.

“The Social Security Administration is failing the very people it was created to serve,” said Mayes. “From lost payments to seven-hour hold times to field offices turning away walk-ins, the stories we’ve heard from Arizonans are heartbreaking — and completely unacceptable. The Trump administration has an obligation to deliver these benefits promptly, and right now it is not meeting those obligations.”

The AG’s office is calling out Elon Musk, who led the Department of Government Efficiency and claimed that Social Security is “riddled” with fraud, despite the SSA’s Inspector General stating less than 1% of payments over a seven-year period were improper.

Advertisement

“Arizonans deserve a Social Security Administration that works — not one hollowed out by misinformation, mismanagement, and neglect,” said Mayes. “I urge the Trump administration to act now and restore lawful, accessible, and appropriate service for the people of Arizona.”

Mayes’ actions come after Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a fellow Democrat, also called out the new anti-fraud checks following a report from NextGov, a news publication that covers technology within the federal government, found only two out of 110,000 were potentially fraudulent.

Last month, CNN reported that the Social Security Administration was pushing back the rollout of the new measure.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending