Connect with us

Arizona

Republicans helped Arizona champion voting by mail. Now they want it gone.

Published

on

Republicans helped Arizona champion voting by mail. Now they want it gone.


“This text was initially printed by Votebeat,
a nonprofit information group masking native election integrity and
voting entry.”

Republicans made Arizona an early vote-by-mail innovator in 1991,
enacting one of many first legal guidelines within the nation allowing voters to ship
in a mail poll early with out an excuse. The state then doubled down,
organising a system in 2007 for voters who wished to robotically and
completely get ballots within the mail.

Advertisement

The tactic has change into broadly
fashionable within the state, with about 89% of Arizona voters casting ballots
early, principally by mail, within the 2020 normal election. However now, some
Republicans within the state are doggedly making an attempt to dismantle the system
their celebration helped create.

There’s the continued courtroom case filed by the Arizona Republican Social gathering difficult the constitutionality of no-excuse mail-in voting. There’s the brand new legislation and poll referendum
backed by Republicans within the Legislature and handed on party-line votes
that intend to restrict or prohibit voting by mail. And there are calls
for state lawmakers to take a remaining vote on an excessive and sweeping measure that may, amongst different issues, get rid of all early voting within the state. 

On Monday, a Mohave County Superior Courtroom decide dominated in opposition to the Arizona Republican Social gathering on a associated courtroom case, stating that the state’s vote-by-mail system is constitutional.

However Arizona voters mustn’t count on the battle to finish.

Arizona
Republican Social gathering Chairwoman Kelli Ward stated on far-right information outlet
Actual America’s Voice on Monday that the celebration is “in all probability going to be
interesting to a better courtroom.”  If appealed, the following cease could be the
state’s Courtroom of Appeals or Supreme Courtroom.

Advertisement

The efforts are fueled by inaccurate claims promoted by former President Donald Trump: That voting by mail shouldn’t be safe and mail-in voter fraud precipitated his 2020 loss to President Joe Biden. A number of courtroom circumstances and investigations in Arizona and
throughout the nation failed to seek out any proof of widespread voter
fraud in 2020, and Republican election officers right here and elsewhere have
repeatedly defended the safety of mail-in voting and the integrity of
the election.

The decades-long efforts to develop vote-by-mail in Arizona have been bipartisan.

In
an interview, former Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell, a
Republican who was in workplace when no-excuse mail voting grew to become authorized,
instructed Votebeat that voters themselves pushed the state to make voting by
mail simpler, and Republicans inspired the system from the beginning.
Former Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican who was a state senator on the time
the Legislature voted to approve the no-excuse mail voting system, instructed
Votebeat she’s “very proud” of what her celebration helped create.

Republicans
within the state overwhelmingly use it. Of the greater than 1 million
Republicans who voted within the 2020 normal election, greater than 80% are on
the state’s early voting checklist, in line with Phoenix-based Republican
consulting group HighGround.

“Previous to 2020, early voting closely
favored Republicans — significantly within the early returns,” Paul Bentz,
senior vp at HighGround, stated in an electronic mail. “The information would
begin a lot older and closely Republican after which pattern youthful and extra
Democratic because the election drew nearer. The final cycle was the primary
time Democrats surpassed Republicans in early voting going into Election
Day (they in the end caught up).”

Advertisement

However state-level Republicans are nonetheless main the cost to interrupt mail voting down.

In
response to the courtroom resolution Monday, Home Democratic chief Reginald
Bolding, a candidate for secretary of state, stated the case “underscores
the more and more determined and absurd lengths that right-wing
extremists have gone to persuade themselves that Donald Trump was not
crushed in 2020, and to place their thumb on the dimensions for 2022 and
past.”

Arizona led manner in mail voting

Western and Southwestern states, particularly, have led the nation on mail-in voting initiatives. 

Oregon
within the early Eighties was the primary state to check out all-mail elections,
stated Priscilla Southwell, a political science professor on the
College of Oregon. California within the Eighties
grew to become the primary state to permit for no-excuse vote-by-mail and
Washington state enacted no-excuse mail voting a yr after Arizona, in
1992.

Even right this moment, no-excuse absentee voting continues to be way more widespread in Western states, in line with the Nationwide Convention of State Legislatures. Voters can vote by mail with out an excuse in 26 states and Washington, D.C.

Advertisement

Oregon’s
authentic mail-voting check began as a approach to cut back prices by decreasing
the variety of polling locations and election staff, Southwell stated, and
voters there now overwhelmingly help it..

The geographic
expanse of Western states, which results in many rural voters touring
lengthy distances to the polls, is a part of what boosted the concept, Southwell
stated. However these states even have many retirees who just like the comfort
of voting by mail, she stated — declaring that these are extra doubtless
Republican voters. Younger voters with busy schedules additionally respect the
system, she stated.

Earlier than passing its no-excuse legislation in 1991,
Arizona for many years allowed particular sorts of voters to vote by mail.
For instance, energetic navy personnel have been first permitted to vote
early by mail in 1918.

In 1925, the state started permitting folks
who could be out of the county on Election Day to vote early by mail. In
subsequent a long time, it was expanded to different teams, corresponding to disabled
voters and voters over the age of 65.

The push to extra broadly
develop mail voting within the early ‘90s got here not from politicians, however from
voters themselves, stated Purcell, who was Maricopa County’s recorder
from 1988 to 2017.

Advertisement

“Individuals stored coming to us and saying, ‘How come I can’t do it?’” Purcell stated.

The
requests got here in from snowbirds who didn’t dwell in Arizona through the
main election and older adults who didn’t wish to go to their polling
place within the warmth, Purcell stated.

And plenty of of these voters, she stated, have been Republicans.

Early opponents not influenced by politics

Throughout
the 1991 legislative session, Purcell stated, county recorders obtained
collectively and pushed the Legislature to undertake the no-excuse mail voting
legislation. The invoice was sponsored by a Republican, in line with the Arizona Mirror, and handed with practically unanimous help.

Brewer, the previous Republican governor and secretary of state, stated
she remembers there was some debate within the Legislature over whether or not to
change the system, however with out significantly partisan overtones.

Advertisement

“It
was extra of the sensation of ‘purple, white and blue’ democracy, we should always
all present up on Election Day,” Brewer stated in an interview. 

Traditionally,
voting by mail, and getting voters on the everlasting early voting checklist,
was at all times extra fashionable with Republicans and the Republican Social gathering in
Arizona, Purcell stated. “The celebration actually did push it,” she stated.

Prior
to the creation of the early voting checklist, Bentz with HighGround stated,
most GOP campaigns carried out their very own early poll request efforts,
sending voters unsolicited mail that had self-addressed, pre-paid return
playing cards included.

Voting by mail steadily elevated within the ‘90s and early 2000s. Nevertheless it
wasn’t till 2007 that it grew to become broadly fashionable, when the state
established what was referred to as the Everlasting Early Voting Checklist. Voters have been
then ready to decide on to robotically obtain a poll within the mail.

Arizona voters now depend on the system.

Advertisement

Bullhead Metropolis resident Ann Tosh wrote to Mohave County Superior Courtroom Decide Lee Jantzen,
the decide presiding over the GOP case, emphasizing that she was
“extraordinarily involved” at the potential of banning mail-in voting. 

Tosh
instructed Votebeat that she was a lifelong Republican till simply after the
2020 election, when she was turned off by the celebration’s unfounded claims
of voter fraud, and she or he has voted by mail in each election since 1988. 

The
first few years, as a Tennessee resident, she was in a position to vote by mail
as a result of she was dwelling abroad, she stated. She moved to Arizona within the
early Nineties and has been utilizing the no-excuse system since then.

She
requested Jantzen to contemplate the wants of older and disabled voters and
working voters with conflicts, the state’s lengthy historical past of voting by
mail, and the low incidence of voter fraud. She instructed Votebeat there may be
no good cause to do away with a system that encourages extra voter
participation.

“I’m appalled at what I see happening as I
watch our democracy and freedoms being systematically eradicated,” she
wrote to Jantzen.

Advertisement

Roughly 75% of Arizona voters are on the state’s
early voter checklist as of some weeks in the past, which suggests they’ll
robotically be despatched a poll within the mail. The deadline for voters to request a one-time poll within the mail or be a part of the early voting checklist is July 22 for the Aug. 2 main.

Early
voting jumped for the 2020 main election, when greater than 90% of
voters voted early for the primary time. The state doesn’t know precisely
what number of of these early voters forged their ballots by mail versus in
particular person, as a result of it’s not one thing counties report. However anecdotally,
most of Arizona’s early voters ship their early ballots again within the
mail.

Efforts to limit vote-by-mail

Over the previous
yr, Republicans have made some progress proscribing mail voting,
together with starting to chip away on the early voting checklist.

In Might 2021, Ducey signed a legislation that eliminated the “everlasting” characteristic
of the checklist. Underneath the brand new legislation, if a voter on the checklist doesn’t vote
early a minimum of as soon as throughout two consecutive election cycles, election
officers should ship them a discover that they are going to be faraway from the
checklist in the event that they don’t act.

Republicans stated on the time that the measure is supposed to make sure the early voting checklist stays correct.

Advertisement

There’s
debate over whether or not the brand new legislation is retroactive or not and subsequently
over when voters will first be notified they are going to be taken off the checklist.
Secretary of State Katie Hobbs’ workplace believes voters ought to be
notified after the 2026 election cycle, however Legal professional Normal Mark
Brnovich’s workplace argues they need to be notified after the 2022 cycle.

In one other effort Republicans say was aimed toward stopping voter fraud, in February the Legislature authorised a poll measure for November wherein voters can be requested whether or not to require folks casting early ballots to offer extra identification.

Voters
should present some figuring out quantity on their mail-in poll —
corresponding to their driver’s license quantity, the final 4 digits of their
Social Safety quantity or their voter identification quantity — or the
poll gained’t be counted.

In Texas, the same legislation enacted final yr has resulted in a excessive share of absentee poll purposes being rejected in some counties.

In
the GOP courtroom case that Ward has stated could now be appealed to a state
courtroom, the celebration argued that the state’s no-excuse early voting system
violated the state Structure’s necessities for poll secrecy.

Advertisement

Jantzen
concluded Monday that was not the case. He stated state lawmakers have been
legally in a position to enact the 1991 no-excuse early voting legislation.

He
cited a number of methods wherein state legislation ensures poll secrecy, corresponding to
requiring poll envelopes that don’t reveal voter alternatives and would
present proof of tampering

“It is very important word that this case
shouldn’t be about allegations of fraud within the voting course of,” Jantzen
wrote. “It isn’t about politics. It isn’t even about whether or not the
events consider mail-in voting is acceptable. It’s about one factor: Is
the Arizona legislature prohibited by the Arizona Structure from
enacting voting legal guidelines that embrace no-excuse mail-in voting? … The reply
isn’t any.”

Purcell referred to as the state GOP’s mission to disband early
voting “ridiculous.” She defended the vote-by-mail system as being secure,
and touted the county’s multi-layered and bipartisan verification
course of for the voter signatures required on early ballots.

“It’s at all times been a really safe system and I feel it nonetheless is,” she stated.

Advertisement

Brewer additionally criticized the celebration’s efforts on the matter, saying she has “no thought why” they’re doing this.

“They’re undermining the integrity of the election,” she stated.

“Votebeat is a nonprofit information group masking
native election integrity and voting entry. Join their
newsletters right here.”

– 30 –





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arizona

Report of shots fired at Phoenix Sky Harbor prompts heavy police presence

Published

on

Report of shots fired at Phoenix Sky Harbor prompts heavy police presence


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Gunshots reportedly rang out at Terminal 4 of Phoenix Sky Harbor on Christmas night.

Airport officials tell Arizona’s Family that police responded to reports of gunfire around 9:40 p.m. on Wednesday.

One security checkpoint and the PHX Sky Train was temporarily closed as part of the investigation, however the areas have since reopened.

At this time, police have not confirmed if anyone is injured or if anyone has been taken into custody in connection with the shooting.

Advertisement

Arizona’s Family has a crew on scene. Check back for updates

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Harkins Theatres invites Sun Devil fans to watch Peach Bowl

Published

on

Harkins Theatres invites Sun Devil fans to watch Peach Bowl


Can’t make the trip to Atlanta for Arizona State football’s Peach Bowl matchup versus Texas? Harkins Theatres has you covered.

The Valley-owned theatre is inviting Sun Devil fans to watch the Peach Bowl live on the big screen at two locations: Harkins Tempe Marketplace and Camelview at Scottsdale Fashion Square.

Fans can show off their Sun Devil pride and experience the “ultimate gameday setting” with tickets for $22 that include a complimentary small popcorn.

Kickoff is at 11 a.m. on Jan. 1. A win over Texas would propel Arizona State into the College Football semifinals, where it’ll play the winner of Oregon-Ohio State.

Advertisement

Fans can get their tickets on Harkins’ website or in person at the Camelview at Scottsdale Fashion Square or Tempe Marketplace box offices.

Sun Devils grateful for support

Arizona State getting into the College Football Playoff, or even winning the Big 12 alone, was unprecedented.

The Sun Devils are the talk of the Valley right now, and whether it’s from those traveling across the country to watch in person or cheering from home in the Valley, the team is thankful for all the support they’re getting.

“I’m grateful and blessed to be in the corner that (Sun Devil fans) want to be supporting,” Arizona State running back Cam Skattebo said. “I know what it costs and what it takes to get there. It’s nice to have those people that try their hardest to get there and could be spending every dollar in their bank account to get there.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

‘We are united’: how Arizona’s attorney general plans to manage border chaos

Published

on

‘We are united’: how Arizona’s attorney general plans to manage border chaos


Kris Mayes, the attorney general of Arizona, has vowed to fight the incoming Trump administration over key aspects of its immigration policy, including any attempt to set up deportation camps on Arizonan soil or remove thousands of migrant “dreamers” who came to the US as children.

In an interview with the Guardian, Mayes said that any move by Donald Trump in his second presidential term to unpick the rights of dreamers to remain and work in the US would be a “bright red line for me. I will not stand for an attempt to deport them, or undermine them.”

Arizona, a critical border state that will be on the frontline of the struggle over Trump’s plans for mass deportations, has more than 30,000 dreamers, undocumented migrants who entered the US unlawfully as children but who were afforded rights under Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca). The program was introduced by Barack Obama in 2012 but has been under relentless attack by Republicans ever since.

“I definitely will be fighting on behalf of dreamers,” Mayes said. “These folks are firefighters, police officers, teachers – they are part of the very fabric of our state and we will protect them.”

Advertisement

Trump tried to scrap Daca protections during his first presidency and was only stopped by a narrow ruling from the US supreme court. He recently softened his position, telling NBC News that he wanted to find a way to allow dreamers to stay in the country, though his apparent U-turn has left many skeptical of his intentions.

The Daca program is already being challenged by Republican states in a lawsuit that is currently before the ultra-conservative fifth circuit court of appeals. The case is almost certain to reach the supreme court, which has a six-to-three supermajority of rightwing justices.

Despite the hurdles facing dreamers, Mayes said she remains optimistic.

“I think the supreme court will ultimately see the merits of protecting them. We want to give the courts the opportunity to make the right decision here, and we’ll be making very strong arguments on that proposition,” she said.

Arizona’s attorney general also had strong words about any attempt by Trump to construct detention camps in her state as part of his plans to mass-deport millions of undocumented immigrants. She said her army of lawyers were also primed to push back on any move to renew family separation, the policy under which thousands of children were taken away from their parents at the Mexican border as part of a “zero tolerance” strategy.

Advertisement

“If Trump tries to engage in family separation, or build mass deportation camps, I will do everything I can legally to fight that. That is not happening in Arizona, not on our soil,” she said.

Mayes added that family separation – which has left up to 1,000 families still rent apart six years later – was “fundamentally anathema to who Arizonans are”.

Mayes and her team have been preparing for months for the anticipated whirlwind of activity as soon as Trump re-enters the White House on 20 January. They have “scoured”, as she put it, Project 2025, the rightwing playbook for a Trump second term compiled by the Heritage Foundation.

She has also been working closely with other Democratic state attorneys general, noting that between them they filed more than 100 lawsuits during Trump’s first presidency, winning 80% of them.

“One of our strengths is that we are doing this very much together, we are united and we are organized,” Mayes said.

Advertisement

The importance of cross-state cooperation is likely to be all the more critical over border issues.

Mayes said that she was working with her Democratic counterparts Rob Bonta of California and Raúl Torrez of New Mexico – with only the Republican attorney general of Texas, Ken Paxton, taking a very different, anti-immigrant approach.

“Three of the four border states have attorneys general in Democratic hands and we are going to fight for due process and for individual rights,” she explained.

A complicating factor is Proposition 314, the ballot measure passed in Arizona in November with a resounding 63% of the vote. It allows state police to arrest any undocumented person who crosses into the US other than at legal ports of entry.

skip past newsletter promotion
Advertisement

Mayes said that the decision would not deter her from resisting Trump’s unconstitutional moves.

“Proposition 314 tells us that Arizonans are fed up with a dysfunctional border,” she said.

Advertisement

“We are facing a serious fentanyl crisis in our state, and there’s no doubt that Arizonans want our border addressed. But when Arizonans voted for Donald Trump they did not vote to shred the Arizona and US constitution – I strongly believe that.”

What was needed at the border was more federal resources to increase border patrol boots on the ground, boost the interception of fentanyl, and enhance prosecution of drug cartels. What was not needed, Mayes insisted, was Trump’s threatened plan to send in the national guard and even the US military to act as a souped-up deportation force.

“There’s nothing more unAmerican than using the military against Americans,” she said. “It’s clearly unconstitutional, and it’s not something Arizonans want to see.”

Since being elected to the position of Arizona’s top law enforcement officer in 2022, Mayes has established herself as a rising star in the Democratic party capable of negotiating the at times fraught politics of a border state. Her most high-profile act came in April when she indicted 18 people including Trump’s former lawyer Rudy Giuliani and former chief of staff Mark Meadows for participating in the 2020 “fake electors” conspiracy.

A similar prosecution of fake electors in Georgia was recently upended after an appeals court disqualified the Atlanta prosecutor in charge of the case, Fani Willis.

Advertisement

Mayes told the Guardian that despite Trump’s victory in November, she had no intention of dropping the fake electors case. “These indictments were handed down by a state grand jury, and you don’t do justice by popular vote. The case is in the courts now, and that’s where it’s going to stay until it’s over.”

Such a prominent prosecution could place her in the crosshairs of Kash Patel, Trump’s pick for director of the FBI. Should Patel be confirmed for the job by the US Senate, he has made it clear he will pursue revenge investigations against those deemed to be Trump’s enemies.

Mayes didn’t want to discuss Patel’s nomination. But she did say: “I’m not afraid of anyone. I’m going to do my job, uphold the law and protect Arizonans. I’m going to do it no matter who is at the helm of the FBI.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending