• A video appearing to depict a fight within an Arizona prison, involving makeshift weapons, has surfaced on social media.
• Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry officials have stated they will address inquiries about the video next week.
• The incident’s location and date remain unconfirmed.

A video capturing a fight in what appears to be an Arizona prison was posted on social media, showing a man bloodied and being followed by two others with makeshift flails — metal locks hanging from the ends of tethers.

Representatives of Arizona’s prison system declined to immediately comment on the 3-minute video.

The combatants were dressed in orange pants and shirts with “ADC” stamped on them.

It’s not clear when or where the video was shot. It follows a fight between one man and two others that moves from inside a building, through a doorway and outside into a prison yard. No correctional officers or prison personnel are visible at any point in the footage that appears to be shot on a cell phone.

Cell phones are considered contraband in Arizona prisons and are prohibited. How the person filming the video obtained the device was unclear.

Arizona’s prison system is run by the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry. Reached by email on May 16, department officials said they would respond to The Arizona Republic’s inquiries about the video, including whether they could confirm it had been filmed in an Arizona prison, next week.

On April 4, three men were killed inside the Cimarron Unit at the Arizona State Prison Complex in Tucson. The Department of Corrections identified Ricky Wassenaar, a violent repeat offender serving 16 life sentences for a 2004 attempted prison escape that turned into a hostage crisis, as the sole suspect in the triple homicide. Saul Alvarez, 51, Thorne Harnage, 42, and Donald Lashley, 75, were the men killed.

The incident prompted strong criticism from state lawmakers, including House Judiciary Chair Quang Nguyen, R-Prescott Valley, who demanded accountability from the department and questioned why Wassenaar was placed in a lower-security unit despite repeated warnings and past disciplinary violations.

3-minute video shows conflict move through multiple prison areas

The video begins with two men on the ground, legs interlocked, wrestling away from each other.

One man, with long black hair, stands up holding an orange tether. At the end of it swings a metal combination lock — he holds it like a weapon.

Another man, with short black hair, still on the ground, pushes himself backward. His face and clothes are bloodied.

In the background, voices can be heard.

“Joseph, give me the password.”

“Get the (expletive) out of here.”

“You want the password?”

“Let him go. Let him go, man.”

The bloodied man stumbles to his feet and backs out of the frame. The man with the makeshift flail follows, and another man, also in orange, holding a tethered lock, joins behind him.

The room comes into view: white cinderblock walls, waist-high dividers, rows of bunk beds and two long, rectangular windows letting in sunlight.

The second man with a flail steps forward and feigns a move. The man with short hair picks up a chair, trying to shield himself.

Heavy breathing fills the audio. Someone off-camera says, “Go on, get out of here.”

The camera dips behind a wall and then shows the scene again. One man holds his lock by his shoulder, ready to strike. The other crouches behind the chair, blood on his face and shoulder.

“You want me to leave or not? Move,” says the bloodied man.

“Leave right now,” one of the men replies, pointing.

Then to the other: “Bro, just get the (expletive) over here, on this side. Hurry up.”

“There — go,” the man with long hair says, motioning at the man with the chair.

“Alright. Password?” the man with the chair asks, holding his hand up.

“I don’t give a (expletive),” comes the response.

The bloodied man walks away through an open doorway, and the long-haired man with the flail follows.

“Leave. Leave, (expletive),” the man with long hair yells, walking out the door.

The camera follows them outside.

A cement walkway cuts between blue buildings on one side and a tall metal fence on the other.

The two men face off again. The bloodied man, still carrying the chair, suddenly throws it and runs.

The man with the flail catches him. Grabs him. The second man with a weapon rushes in, swinging his lock. It hits.

The bloodied man falls, a trail of dust lifting as he rolls away.

He gets back up near the metal fence, barbed wire above him, then takes off along the edge.

“(Expletive) the rat,” someone says off camera.

The bloodied man walks off into the distance. The two men stalk after him.

In the background, a loud banging sound — like wheels hitting seams in the concrete — echoes as the camera trails far behind and the video ends.

Video reflects known dangers in Arizona prisons, advocate says

Maria Morris, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Prison Project, reviewed the video and said it reflected troubling patterns reported by incarcerated people in Arizona, including assaults involving improvised weapons such as locks in socks.

Morris, whose work focuses on solitary confinement, said many people are placed into general population units despite warning staff that they do not feel safe.

Prisoners often feel unsafe after they opt out of prison gang affiliation by signing what’s known as an “Integrated Housing Program agreement,” which indicates a willingness to be housed with people of any race, Morris said. In Arizona prisons, that decision can mark someone as a target.

Often, prison staff tell them they must go into the general housing unit anyway, she said.

“They are told that they need to stay on the unit until they are threatened or assaulted,” she said.

Afterward, they’re typically moved into solitary confinement — sometimes for months — before the cycle repeats, Morris said.

PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Arizonans might now hear construction crews working earlier in the morning during summertime.

This week, Gov. Katie Hobbs signed SB1182, which prohibits any restrictions by city, town or county governments on early morning construction work from May 1 to Oct. 15.

This new law allows for construction activities from 5 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Monday through Friday and from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Saturdays.

It also states that concrete must be allowed to be poured at least an hour before the time that construction activities are scheduled to begin.

ANSWER THE POLL: Is 5 a.m. on weekdays in the summer too early for construction projects to begin?

The new law is aimed at protecting workers from the extreme Arizona summer heat, but some are concerned about the noise coming earlier.

“More than 50% of cities in Arizona already allow construction to start at 5 a.m., and this is only during the extreme heat of the summer months, so I think it’s important for people to realize for people to build our cities, that build our communities are safe,” State Sen. Analise Ortiz (D-24) said.

SB1182 takes effect immediately.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2025 KTVK/KPHO. All rights reserved.

The age verification law passed by the Legislature only works if Arizona is providing meaningful instruction on human sexuality, which it isn’t.

• Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs signed a bill requiring age verification for pornographic websites.
• Arizona public schools are not required to teach sex education, leaving pornography as a primary source of information for too many students.
• Comprehensive sex education in schools is a better solution than restricting access to pornography.

Earlier this week, Gov. Katie Hobbs signed a bill requiring websites and social media platforms that are more than a third pornography to verify that their users are at least 18 years old.

The sponsor of House Bill 2112, Republican Rep. Nick Kupper, said, “Arizona families have had enough. Hardcore pornography has been just one click away from kids for too long, and the companies behind it have looked the other way while cashing in. This law forces them to take responsibility and keeps minors off their platforms.”

All of that is a good thing.

Lawmakers in more than 20 states have passed age verification laws like this.

There are problems with them, however, in that they may have a hard time withstanding court challenges.

Porn should not be the only sex ed available

For instance, can a viewer’s privacy actually be protected? Is language like “material harmful to minors” too vague? Are there First Amendment issues?

When this bill and others like it were working their way through the Legislature, Marilyn Rodriguez, a lobbyist who works on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, said, “State and local government codifying what is and isn’t explicit would immediately trigger First Amendment concerns. And almost certainly would be struck down in court.”

However, there is another, even more important problem that Arizona lawmakers have yet to solve.

Opinion: GOP proves there is no transgender problem in AZ schools

For too long, online pornography has been the only sex education that many Arizona students have been able to access.

Under Arizona law, Arizona public schools are not required to teach sex education at any level, and there are no requirements to teach students about child assault awareness, sexually transmitted diseases or infections, dating abuse, abuse prevention and more.

An investigation by LOOKOUT, a nonprofit that covers Arizona’s LGBTQ+ community, found that thousands of Arizona students got no sex education at all, while others received a woefully inadequate form.

Arizona lawmakers are asking the wrong question

As it is, even in those schools with sex education classes, parents must agree to have their children participate.

In the past, a few Arizona lawmakers introduced bills that replace the state’s “opt-in” policy with an “opt-out” policy, as well as mandating that sex education to be both medically accurate and comprehensive. But those bills failed.

What that has left many students with is porn.

And while I agree with efforts to restrict access to those sites, I’d guess we all know that laws like this aren’t going to prevent our very clever young people from finding ways around firewalls.

Laws like the one the Legislature passed and Hobbs signed make grownups feel like they’re doing something.

But the real question we should be asking ourselves is: Do we want Arizona’s kids to learn about human sexuality from pornographers … or teachers?

Reach Montini at ed.montini@arizonarepublic.com.

Like this column? Get more opinions in your email inbox by signing up for our free opinions newsletter, which publishes Monday through Friday.