Connect with us

Alaska

U.S. House candidates headline annual convention of Alaska GOP

Published

on

U.S. House candidates headline annual convention of Alaska GOP


The Alaska Republican Party signaled during its annual convention on Friday and Saturday that it would not formally pick favorites among the Republicans running for U.S. House.

Two Republican candidates are currently running to unseat Rep. Mary Peltola, who has served as Alaska’s lone representative in the U.S. House since 2022. The filing deadline for the race is June 1.

The Republican candidates are Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, who entered the race in November with backing from national GOP leaders, and businessman Nick Begich, who announced he would run again last year after losing twice to Peltola in 2022.

Advertisement

Alaska Republican Party leaders had a unified message during their state convention: “rank the red.”

“You can support Nick Begich 100%. You can support Nancy Dahlstrom 100%. Just make sure that if both of them make it onto the general ballot, that you vote for the other one second,” said outgoing Party Chair Ann Brown.

This year will be the second election cycle in which Alaska uses ranked choice voting in its statewide races. That means that both Dahlstrom and Begich are expected to advance to the general election when the open, nonpartisan primary election is held in August. The top four vote getters in the primary, regardless of party affiliation, will compete in a ranked general election in November.

Brown said the U.S. House race was “the most important statewide race for Alaska, now and into the future.” Peltola’s “first reelection is our best chance to take our at-large congressional seat back,” Brown told convention delegates.

[Alaska GOP elects Carmela Warfield as new party chair]

Advertisement

“Rank the red” is an Alaska Republican Party strategy first used — unsuccessfully — in the 2022 House races. An August 2022 special election to replace former Rep. Don Young, who died earlier that year, featured a three-way race between Peltola, Begich, and former Gov. Sarah Palin. Peltola came away with the victory after Palin and Begich supporters did not rank the other Republican candidate in the race in sufficient numbers. Palin and Begich spent much of the campaign attacking each other.

“This is not the time for intra-party bickering and nitpicking about one or the other Republican congressional candidates. If Republican voters had done as the party advocated in 2022 and voted for Begich one and Palin two or vice versa, Mary Peltola would not be in D.C. playing Princess Leia of the U.S. House today,” said Brown.

While the party did not formally endorse a candidate, there were signs that at least among the party faithful, Begich had an early advantage over Dahlstrom. He was greeted with a standing ovation before he began a Saturday afternoon speech, with delegates waiving campaign signs and wearing Begich-branded hats as he spoke. Begich also received more than double the stage time as Dahlstrom — with over 40 minutes of prepared remarks and audience question for Begich compared to Dahlstrom’s 20 minutes on Friday evening.

Dahlstrom’s comments were preceded by a video introduction from the U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana, who said “winning Alaska is our top priority.”

“The person to flip this seat is Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom,” Johnson said. That assertion has been backed with some national GOP funding flowing to Dahlstrom’s campaign, though both Republicans are lagging far behind Peltola in contributions.

Advertisement

Dahlstrom said “the most critical issue” she sought to address in Congress was border security.

On Saturday, Peltola voted in favor of a border security legislation package in the U.S. House — one of only five Democrats to join Republicans in voting in favor of it.

“No one can deny we face an ongoing crisis at our Southern border,” Peltola said in a prepared statement, adding that she voted in favor of the measure to address Alaska’s fentanyl crisis.

“Though no legislation is perfect, I have an obligation to protect Alaskans and secure our borders,” Peltola said, adding that she will “press” her colleagues in the House to take up a bipartisan border security bill that the Senate passed but that the House has so far declined to take up. Neither Dahlstrom nor Begich said they would support the legislation during their remarks on Friday and Saturday.

Dahlstrom’s speech hewed closely to Republican national priorities. She called for a “remain in Mexico” policy, adding resources for border patrol, and “permanent physical barriers” at the border. Dahlstrom also said the U.S. “must have laws that protect the victim, not the criminal.” She criticized Biden’s foreign policy, and said she would promote tax cuts.

Advertisement

Begich’s comments were much more Alaska-specific. He spoke in favor of an Alaska gasline to reduce Alaska’s energy prices; dismissed environmental concerns about resource extraction in the Arctic; called for new federal roads to be built in Alaska; spoke in favor of book bans and limiting transgender athletes in women’s sports; and cited what he said was the cost of sending a 12-pack of soda from Anchorage to the North Slope: “10 bucks in shipping alone.”

Both Begich and Dahlstrom have endorsed former President Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential bid. There was no mention of Trump’s ongoing criminal trial during the convention proceedings — though bedazzled Trump paraphernalia and a larger-than-life image of him greeted convention-goers in the hallway.

In the absence of Alaska’s statewide Republican elected officials — Gov. Mike Dunleavy and U.S. Senators Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan did not attend the convention — the two U.S. House candidates drew much of the attention in the two day event.

Some members of the party sought to have Dahlstrom and Begich commit that if either of them came in third place in the primary, they would drop out to increase the odds that the more popular Republican can win with limited intra-party competition.

If a candidate drops out of the race shortly after the primary, their name will be replaced on the general election ballot by the Division of Election with the fifth-place finisher in the primary.

Advertisement

Dahlstrom said that if she came in behind Begich and Peltola in the primary election, she would call a meeting with Begich and the chair of the Republican Party.

“Let’s look at the numbers and run the numbers and say, ‘what does it take to get a Republican in Congress?’” she said. However, Dahlstrom repeated the call for voters to rank both her and Begich on the general election ballot.

“If you will support me, it’s fantastic, and I am begging you to vote for Nick number two, and if you’re a Nick person — fantastic. Please vote for me number two. That way we will have — we will — it guarantees us a Republican in our congressional seat,” she said.

Begich did not mention Dahlstrom a single time during his 45 minutes on stage.

Ranked choice voting

Supporters of Alaska’s voting system, which was adopted by ballot initiative in 2020, have long said that Peltola’s victory was not a bug, but a feature of a voting method that is meant to encourage consensus-building.

Advertisement

Many Republicans don’t view it that way. Party leaders said they hoped the system would be repealed. A ballot group has sought to put the question of returning to Alaska’s closed partisan primaries and pick-one general elections on the November ballot.

“Ranked choice voting is a disaster,” said Republican former Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell. “It’s a crapshoot. It’s a game.”

Campbell and other GOP state leaders said they will support the ballot initiative to reinstate the pre-2022 voting system. Closed primaries gave the party outsize power in choosing which candidates would appear on the general election ballot. Only registered Republicans or nonpartisan voters could participate in the GOP primary.

“We want a primary that’s closed and we choose our Republican candidate who then runs against the Democrat candidate,” said national committeewoman Cynthia Henry.

The backers of the ballot initiative to repeal ranked choice voting have faced allegations related to campaign finance law violations. On Thursday, a new anti-ranked choice voting ballot group registered with the state. The group, called “Yes on 2,” handed out fliers at the convention, and its leader — Mikaela Emswiler, was in attendance at the convention. Emswiler previously worked to collect signatures for the ballot initiative.

Advertisement

The group stated on its flier that Alaska’s voting system is “dangerous” because it takes away the party’s ability to “screen candidates” and allows candidates to run “without vetting.”

Early voting

Party leaders tried to sell Republicans on early and by-mail voting, methods that have long been used by many Alaska voters but have been widely shunned by Trump, leading to skepticism among some of his supporters. Alaska is just one of several states where Republican leaders are playing catch-up with Democrats on pre-Election Day voting.

Campbell, the former lieutenant governor, told convention delegates “the election is almost done” by Election Day, when most Republicans cast their ballots, and that Democratic campaigns have more effectively encouraged voters to cast their ballots early.

“One of the biggest problems we’ve had is being beaten by Democrats who take a system, use it within the law, but manipulate it against us,” said Campbell.

Campbell presented findings by an elections-related committee convened by the state party. He said Republicans should “look at ballot harvesting,” referring to the practice of ensuring that by-mail ballots are filled out and submitted before Election Day. He also said the party should have poll watchers and ensure that ballot drop boxes are located in areas with a high concentration of conservative voters.

Advertisement

“Republicans like to vote on Election Day, but things come up,” said Henry, the GOP committeewoman. “There are a lot of people with kids and jobs and car trouble and they say, ‘I didn’t vote.’”

“We just have to put on a new fresh face about early voting,” Henry added.

• • •





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Wayne and Wanda: I’m ready to break up with Alaska but facing resistance from everyone

Published

on

Wayne and Wanda: I’m ready to break up with Alaska but facing resistance from everyone


Dear Wanda and Wayne,

I never thought I’d be the person writing this letter, but after this winter, I think I might be done with Alaska. I was born here, grew up here, raised my family here, and never imagined living anywhere else. I defended Alaska to the haters. I rolled my eyes at people who retired to Arizona. I told myself long winters are worth it because summers are the best.

But this winter broke something in me. It was so long, dark, icy and relentless. By the time spring finally arrived, I felt angry that winter took so much out of me and that I spent months feeling trapped by weather, darkness and road conditions. Angry that I’m getting older and still structuring my life around surviving winters instead of enjoying my life. And at the time I’m writing this, this spring has sucked! My heat is still coming on every day. I’m still wearing my puffer jackets!

Part of me wonders if it’s not really about the winter at all. I’m divorced and my two kids are grown and doing their own thing, both staying in Alaska for now. For the first time in my life, nothing is really anchoring me to a place. And if I’m being honest with myself, in addition to feeling trapped by the weather, I’m bored with it here. The dating scene feels impossibly small. Every time I open a dating app, it’s the same people. Half the time I already know them, or know someone who dated them (and broken up with them for a good reason!).

Advertisement

So I’m sketching out plans to move somewhere warmer, bigger and completely unfamiliar. I think I want to know what life feels like somewhere else while I’m still young enough to enjoy it. I really feel this is a moment for a big change.

The problem is that nobody seems supportive. When I bring it up, people act like I’m having a midlife crisis. Friends tell me I’ll regret it. Family members remind me that the kids are here. Other Alaskans give me the usual speech about how the Lower 48 is generic. It’s gotten to the point where I almost don’t talk about it anymore because I’m tired of defending myself.

But all the resistance has me questioning myself and whether moving is a legitimate and logical step, or whether I’m just exhausted from a hard winter and romanticizing a different life. How do you know the difference between running toward something and simply running away?

Wanda says:

You’re asking whether you’re running toward or away from something — essentially if you’re taking a positive step or being reactive. Those aren’t mutually exclusive. Sometimes we leave both because we’re exhausted by what we’ve been carrying, and also because we are moving toward something new at the same time.

Advertisement

Every reason you listed for staying in Alaska has changed. You raised your children here? They’re grown. You had a marriage here? That chapter is closed. You tolerated winters for the sunny payoff? Nailed it: This spring has sucked.

Now you’re primed for a reset, and questioning how you want the near term and future of your life to unfold is not a crisis, it’s taking action. And it’s way more productive than floating along season to season in a fog of monotony, settling for an unfulfilling existence. Your friends and family may genuinely believe they’re protecting you from a mistake, but they’re also protecting their own worldview. Your decision to leave can feel like an implicit criticism of their choices.

But this isn’t a committee decision, and you’re a grown woman capable of major decisions, who absolutely should explore life’s possibilities without defending it to everyone you know. So go explore. Visit places. Rent before you buy. Spend a winter somewhere else. Gather information instead of arguments. And know that no matter where you land, you can always come home again — even if it’s just for a long visit in the middle of summer.

Wayne says:

This isn’t a midlife crisis that can be glossed over with a motorcycle, lip filler, a 20-something boyfriend (who probably went to high school with your kids — yikes), or kicking off your Cowgirl Era with a hat, boots and a two-week Nashville dive bar tour.

Advertisement

This is an existential crisis with your health and happiness at risk. And you’ve faced it thoughtfully, sat with it thoroughly, and are now making the best decisions selfishly. Good for you! You can’t fault your family and friends for also being selfish and wanting you to stay in AK. Of course they don’t want their mom and friend moving far away. But you’ve got to mute that noise and focus on what’s best for you.

Yes, Alaska life is special, but it sure isn’t easy. And we don’t get medals for stubbornly battling through decades of winters. What we do get is some sweet and fleeting summer moments followed by more winters. You know that, and it’s not enough for you anymore.

Most people would totally understand an 18-to-20-year-old Alaska kid taking off to see what else is out there in the world. What, we’re supposed to stop being interested in new experiences once we hit a certain age? And we’re expected to stick around someplace forever just because we’ve always been there?

It’s time for you to go. See what life feels like when you’re not scraping ice off your windshield in May. See how much fun you can have with new people in new places. It’s exciting, it’s living, and you deserve it.

[Wayne and Wanda: Is it the winter blues I can’t shake off, or something more?]

Advertisement

[Wayne and Wanda: Rebuilding my social life after a divorce]

[Wayne and Wanda: My relationship is poised for big steps, and I’m anxious]





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Here’s Why Alaska Air Shares Popped Higher This Week | The Motley Fool

Published

on

Here’s Why Alaska Air Shares Popped Higher This Week | The Motley Fool


Shares in Alaska Air Group (ALK 1.16%) rose by 12.7% in an excellent week for airline stocks. The move comes as the sector climbs a wall of worry driven by soaring jet fuel prices stemming from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. While the market’s prior concerns are understandable, there’s growing anecdotal evidence suggesting that airlines, including Alaska Air, might emerge from the period in better shape than many expect.

This week’s airline updates

Southwest Airlines (LUV 0.83%) CEO Robert Jordan gave a presentation at the Bernstein 42nd Annual Strategic Decisions Conference, and his remarks surprised the market. It’s no secret that jet fuel prices have soared, and that’s challenging airlines’ profitability. Still, it doesn’t appear to have affected end demand, with Delta Air Lines previously telling investors that strong demand in the first quarter was continuing into the second quarter, even as it raised prices.

Today’s Change

(-1.16%) $-0.54

Advertisement

Current Price

$46.05

That positive trend, with Southwest’s Jordan telling investors that Southwest had participated in seven consecutive fare increases with “no drop off in demand at all.” Jordan went on to note that “I’m becoming increasingly bullish that we will be able to cover these fuel increases with revenue increases,” and also believes that “the industry will retain a much higher percent of the fare increases that would be typical historically.”

Advertisement

What it means to Alaska Air

Given that Alaska competes with Southwest on some routes and is suffering from rising jet fuel prices, the news from Southwest is particularly relevant. For example, in its recent first-quarter earnings report, Alaska’s management said higher fuel costs would impact earnings per share (EPS) by $0.70 in the first quarter and by more than $3 in the second quarter.

Air passengers.

Image source: Getty Images.

These are significant numbers from an airline that analysts expect to report a $0.77-per-share loss in 2026 and then $6.32 in EPS in 2027. However, if Alaska can offset fuel costs with higher prices, then those estimates might need a positive revision.

Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Alaska Air Group, Delta Air Lines, and Southwest Airlines. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska Secures Win in Fight for Transparency Around Oil Development

Published

on

State of Alaska Secures Win in Fight for Transparency Around Oil Development


 

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Image-SOM

(Bethel, AK) –Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a favorable opinion for the State of Alaska in ConocoPhillips Alaska v. Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC), agreeing that State laws requiring disclosure of oil well data are not preempted by federal law.

“Alaska relies heavily on our resources and resource development,” said Acting Alaska Attorney General Cori Mills. “We are also stewards of those resources for the citizens of Alaska. Alaska’s law both allows resource development now, and encourages further development and exploration in the future. We’re pleased that the Ninth Circuit recognized that federal law has not overridden Alaska’s balanced approach.”

The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission regulates oil and gas operations throughout Alaska, including within the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska (NPR–A). Under Alaska law, companies need permits from the AOGCC to drill and must submit well data. The AOGCC is required to keep well data confidential for 24 months.

Advertisement

ConocoPhillips drilled several wells on lease holdings within the NPR–A and submitted data to the AOGCC. When the 24-month period expired, the AOGCC notified ConocoPhillips of the upcoming well data disclosure. ConocoPhillips sued in federal court to stop the disclosure process claiming that the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act, the federal law allowing private exploration in the NPR–A, preempted Alaska’s 24-month disclosure law. The federal district court found Alaska law preempted, and the AOGCC sought appellate review by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit agreed with the AOGCC. The federal Production Act does not preempt state law. The Ninth Circuit therefore reversed the district court’s holding to the contrary.

“The Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission is pleased with the court’s decision upholding Alaska law,” said AOGCC Commissioner Jessie Chmielowski in a declaration filed in the litigation court. “Alaska’s balanced approach to well data confidentiality leads to increased exploration activity, not less. Alaska law allows for a two-year confidentiality period on exploration well data to leverage a company’s investment in drilling. Thereafter, making the data public has incentivized exploration on the North Slope. Placing well data in the public record allows competing companies to evaluate different exploration concepts or interpretations based on seismic data that, without well data, are just educated guesses.”

# # #



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending