Connect with us

Alaska

Rocket builder ABL’s inaugural launch fails shortly after liftoff, damages launchpad

Published

on

Rocket builder ABL’s inaugural launch fails shortly after liftoff, damages launchpad


The corporate’s RS1 rocket lifts off on its inaugural launch try from Kodiak, Alaska on Jan. 10, 2023.

ABL House

The primary mission by ABL House obtained off the bottom on Tuesday, however the firm’s RS1 rocket suffered a problem early within the flight that triggered it to fail shortly after lifting off.

Advertisement

ABL President Dan Piemont informed CNBC that the RS1 rocket stayed throughout the predefined “acceptable flight hall” in the course of the quick launch, however after rocket’s engines shut down, the automobile “impacted instantly on the launch pad,” inflicting harm.

It wasn’t instantly clear what triggered the problem that interrupted the flight. The corporate is investigating the mishap and assessing the harm alongside the Federal Aviation Administration and Alaska Aerospace, the latter which operates the Pacific Spaceport Advanced on Kodiak Island, Alaska.

Enroll right here to obtain weekly editions of CNBC’s Investing in House e-newsletter.

“We hoped to fly a bit farther as we speak, however we ready for and accepted the chance of any end result together with a failure on the pad. The Flight 2 automobile is totally assembled and we’re excited to make the required pad repairs and get again to it,” Piemont wrote in a response to CNBC on Wednesday.

Advertisement

ABL’s RS1 rocket stands about 90 toes tall, and is designed to launch as a lot as 1,350 kilograms (or practically 1.5 tons) of payload to low Earth orbit – at a worth of $12 million per launch. That places RS1 in the course of the industrial launch market, between Rocket Lab’s smaller Electron and SpaceX’s heavy-class Falcon 9.

The corporate has raised $420 million up to now, with a $2.4 billion valuation as of its most up-to-date fundraise in October 2021, from traders together with T. Rowe Worth, Constancy, and Lockheed Martin Ventures. Its purpose has been to succeed in orbit with RS1 spending lower than $100 million.

ABL’s failure to succeed in orbit is an additional instance of the excessive danger within the improvement and early flights of an orbital rocket, which has been notably difficult for corporations focusing on the small and medium weight courses of the market.

On Monday, Virgin Orbit’s sixth mission additionally suffered a mid-flight anomaly, and Astra has been grounded since its most up-to-date flight final yr resulted in failure and it pivoted to creating a brand new rocket. Firefly Aerospace reached orbit for the primary time on its second flight try in October, and even Rocket Lab – the present chief within the small launch class after a flawless 2022 – has had its shares of launch failures over the previous few years.

The corporate’s RS1 rocket stands in preparation for launch from Kodiak, Alaska.

Advertisement

ABL House



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Letter: Alaska Women's Hall of Fame nomination

Published

on

Letter: Alaska Women's Hall of Fame nomination


By Pat Jarrett

Updated: 15 minutes ago Published: 15 minutes ago

The board of directors for the Alaska Women’s Hall of Fame encourages all Alaskans to nominate a woman who has made a significant contribution to our state. She must be 65 years old by June 1 of this year or deceased.

Nominations are accepted through our website. Go to alaskawomenshalloffame. org and click the Nominate button. The easy-to-follow instructions will explain how to fill out and submit the electronic form. Please nominate one or more outstanding women by the June 1 deadline!

Advertisement

— Pat Jarrett

Vice president, Alaska Women’s Hall of Fame board of directors

Anchorage

Have something on your mind? Send to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Letters under 200 words have the best chance of being published. Writers should disclose any personal or professional connections with the subjects of their letters. Letters are edited for accuracy, clarity and length.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Robert Seitz: Energy bills of the 33rd Legislature didn't address long-term plan for Railbelt

Published

on

Robert Seitz: Energy bills of the 33rd Legislature didn't address long-term plan for Railbelt


By ROBERT SEITZ

I was excited the Alaska Legislature engaged in efforts to encourage production of Cook Inlet gas.  

I was, however, very disappointed when a legislator could not move forward a bill to reduce royalty payments on Cook Inlet gas because he could find no certainty it would work to increase production.

This much is clear: It can’t work if not passed. Whether or not it would work is not the point, but that it might work is worth a try.  

Advertisement

Southcentral Alaska is desperate for increased production of Cook Inlet gas. I’m not sure what the other Cook Inlet gas bills that died would have done, had they passed, but I will do more research to understand the driving force behind the reluctance to get on board for energy security in Alaska.

Carbon sequestration is something possibly useful for gasification of coal or some other energy process, so it could be a beneficial tool for our state’s energy tool box. Simply storing someone else’s CO2 does not excite me, but if it can bring in some money while we figure out just what our energy policy needs to be — green or  hydrocarbon — it’s worth a try.

House Bill 307 was greatly modified from the original submission on Feb. 2, especially modified on the last day of session, May 15. I remain concerned much of the text may contain hidden landmines that could be used to deviate from the original intent and force more renewable sources to the system, even if the system is not ready for more variable sources.  

The ERO (Electrical Reliability Organization) and the RTO (Railbelt Transmission Organization) discussed in H.B. 307 seem patterned after similar organizations in other states for the sole purpose of forcing wind and solar expansion to local utilities. We could have done better in Alaska to plan for altering our electrical power system to match the severity of our winters, thus ensuring we all survive the cold and dark. 

Long-term planning with step-by-step engineering is needed for the long-duration energy storage necessary, and to make sure we have the means to capture excess variable energy produced, so we have it when we need it most. Mandating is not the solution.

Advertisement

I am also concerned that with H.B. 307, additional power generation from hydrocarbon fuel could be denied and there is no provision or recommendation for planning for the Railbelt system.

As I have been stating for eight years, for wind and solar distributed resources to be successful, we need energy storage means, such as pumped hydro, which would allow all excess solar and wind generation to be captured for use during the cold and dark months.

I was certain that the Railbelt Transmission Organization would not be fully implemented until the new transmission line was designed and being installed. It may be quite difficult to identify portions of the system which are transmission line within some of the utilities and for them to be given over to the RTO.

The key to the healthy growth of the Railbelt power system is continued production of Cook Inlet gas, which will provide time for the development of whatever wind and solar might be added, inclusion of pumped hydro or other energy storage and any other less variable sources such as geo thermal or Cook Inlet tidal. One major goal is to develop our system to produce more and cheaper energy to support refining processes for the ore produced in Alaska, so we can build whatever our future economy will be driven by.

The Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference is this week. I look forward to hearing more about viable solutions to Alaska’s energy needs.  

Advertisement

My next commentary will address the claim that Alaska is warming two to four times faster than the rest of the planet. It doesn’t feel like it to me, so I dug into the data.

Robert Seitz is a professionally licensed electrical engineer and lifelong Alaskan.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Moose Kills Alaska Man

Published

on

Moose Kills Alaska Man


An Alaska man’s attempt to take pictures of two newborn moose calves turned fatal Sunday morning, when the calves’ mother attacked the 70-year-old, killing him. Dale Chorman of Homer was with a second unidentified man when they came upon the animals in the brush, a spokesperson for the state’s Department of Public Safety says. Chorman was attacked as the two were running away, the AP reports. The cow moose charged the men and kicked Chorman, according to an official statement. He died on the scene, the Anchorage Daily News reports. The moose left the area, and the investigation is ongoing.

About 737,000 humans and 200,000 moose live in Alaska, and the animals can be aggressive if provoked—especially moms with babies. A 71-year-old man was stomped to death in 1995 after students reportedly harassed a moose and its calf for hours on the University of Alaska Anchorage campus; the man then tried to walk past the animals to enter a building. “Calving season for moose is the time when you definitely want to give them extra space,” the public safety spokesperson says. “Cow moose with calves are going to be some of the more aggressive moose you’re going to come in contact with.” (More Alaska stories.)

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending