The independent federal agency that provides Alaska with utilities, infrastructure and economic support is considering a number of new environmental hazards as it updates its statewide threat assessment.
In 2019, the Denali Commission published a detailed listing of climate change-related threats to communities around the state. The document, written for the commission by experts from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the University of Alaska Fairbanks, scored 187 communities according to the threats they faced from flooding, erosion, permafrost thaw or a combination of those impacts.
Now an updated report is in the works, with five more hazards added to the analysis: landslides, tsunamis, wildfires, earthquakes and volcanoes.
Advertisement
Experts working on the updated Denali Commission report outlined the project at a panel discussion held Wednesday at the Alaska Forum on the Environment, a weeklong conference underway in Anchorage.
“It didn’t make sense to just look at permafrost thaw, erosion and flooding when there are new hazards that our communities are facing,” said Courtney Brozovsky, a geographic information systems specialist with a consulting firm contracted by the Corps of Engineers.
The list of new hazards can be further expanded or defined. “We’re also talking about ways that we can incorporate some other additional hazards such as glacial outburst flooding, typhoon and drought,” Jessica Evans, an environmental planner with the same contractor, AECOM, told the gathering.
The Denali Commission, an independent federal agency established by Congress in 1998, coordinates investments in rural Alaska infrastructure, economic development and public health. The 2019 threat assessment has been used to help guide those investments. The commission continues to function, despite attempts by the Trump administration to abolish it.
Of the new hazards that are slated to be added to the updated assessment, three have connections or possible connections to climate change. Landslides of different types are occurring around Alaska and are tied to forces like glacial retreat, permafrost thaw and heavier precipitation events. A University of Alaska Fairbanks and National Weather Service study published in November correlates the increase in reported Alaska landslides to reported average temperature increases of 1.2-3.4 degrees Celsius — roughly 2-6 degrees Fahrenheit — and 3-27% increases in precipitation over the last 50 years across Alaska.
Advertisement
Landslides can cause dangerous localized tsunamis, as happened in Southeast Alaska’s Tracy Arm in August. And wildfire frequency and intensity have increased in Alaska as the climate has warmed.
Along with adding hazards to evaluate, other updates are intended to fill in past data gaps and to refine scoring methodology, Evans said.
The next step in the process is gathering public information, she said. After that, the team will try to figure out which hazards to aggregate, she said. The intended result is a more refined ranking system that focuses on relevant hazards for different geographic locations rather than grouping them all together, she said.
A draft report is expected in the summer, which will give more opportunities for public input. The final report is expected by the end of the year.
The Denali Commission has scheduled three events this month to gather public input on the project. The first is scheduled for Friday morning at the Atwood Building in downtown Anchorage. The second is scheduled for Feb. 10 at the Southeast Conference’s Mid-Session Summit. The third is scheduled for Feb. 26 at Zach’s Restaurant in Fairbanks.
Advertisement
Alaska Beacon is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Alaska Beacon maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Claire Stremple for questions: info@alaskabeacon.com.
JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.
The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.
The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.
According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.
Advertisement
This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)
This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.
Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?
It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.
Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.
Advertisement
A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.
Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.
Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.
That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.
Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.
Advertisement
This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.
Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”
• • •
The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.
