Alaska
Inside the 'titanic' legal case that will help determine Alaska's energy future: an analysis
Should Anchorage residents who consume more electricity, and use up more of the region’s dwindling supplies of natural gas, have to pay a higher price to reflect the steeper cost of the imported fuel that will replace it?
How much will developers of wind and solar projects have to pay to move the electricity they generate across power lines they don’t own?
And how can businesses and residents be encouraged to reduce their energy use and thereby delay the need for expensive gas imports?
All those are questions that now must be answered by the gubernatorially appointed members of the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, following the recent conclusion of a month-long public hearing.
Their ruling will help decide the future of Anchorage’s energy supply; the price of electricity for the city’s residents, businesses and other users; and the costs that developers of wind and solar farms could face to connect their projects to the grid.
The wide-ranging hearing addressed a request by Anchorage-based Chugach Electric Association, the state’s largest utility and one of its largest buyers of natural gas, to raise its rates for all types of customers by an average of 5.5%.
The proceeding, known as a rate case, involves a sprawling array of subjects connected to Chugach’s operations and its 90,000 members — including efforts to delay the impending depletion of the region’s natural gas deposits.
That’s where a request from Renewable Energy Alaska Project, or REAP, an advocacy group that intervened in Chugach’s case, comes in.
Citing a state law that calls for the “conservation of resources” in electricity generation, the Anchorage-based advocacy group is making an unprecedented request: that the commissioners force Chugach to create a new payment scheme for its residential customers to reward reduced consumption.
Chugach wants to charge those customers 15 cents per kilowatt-hour of electricity, regardless of their total use. REAP, with help from the environmental law firm Earthjustice, is asking for two tiers of charges.
The first tier would charge residential customers 13 cents per kilowatt-hour to use up to 450 kilowatt-hours a month — roughly the same amount that the median Chugach member household now uses.
The second tier would boost rates to 17 cents per kilowatt-hour for each one above 450 — an increase of roughly 30%.
That increase, REAP says, would align the second tier with the higher prices Chugach customers will face once the company fuels its power plants with imported liquefied natural gas, instead of local supplies. REAP says the bump in cost would send “an appropriate price signal to consumers.”
“The gas supply crunch will arrive sooner if the commission does not promote conservation of gas through Chugach’s rates,” Hannah Payne Foster, an Earthjustice attorney working with REAP, said in her closing arguments at the hearing last month. “Our proposal is to send real cost signals to consumers that reflect the true cost of their consumption decisions.”
Chugach’s attorney, Dean Thompson, didn’t directly address REAP’s proposal in his closing arguments, and a spokeswoman for the utility, Julie Hasquet, declined to comment.
But in its final written brief, filed last week, Chugach said that REAP’s expert witness, under cross examination, couldn’t predict just how much gas would be saved by the organization’s “drastic and novel recommendations.” The proposal, Chugach added, would “arbitrarily” boost prices above costs and send “signals to consumers that may not be in the consumer’s best interest.”
A $10,000-an-hour hearing
REAP’s proposal is far from the only one that asks the commissioners to adjust the rate increase requested by Chugach: A dozen other parties, from businesses to utilities to government agencies, also intervened in the case.
Each is asking the commission to adjust the proposed rates that Chugach wants its members to pay.
The monthly checks that those members have to write to the utility are not solely tied to the number of kilowatt-hours of electricity each of them uses. Instead, they hinge on complex formulas that divide up the utility’s different cost categories — like fuel, power plant construction and customer service — and assign shares to different classes of members, like residential customers or large users like hospitals and universities.
Though they have drawn little public attention, the technical arguments over those components, and how they’re divided and assigned in the future, have filled hundreds of pages of written testimony to the commission.
That’s in part because of the huge stakes of the rate case, with commissioners asked to decide how to apportion payments of the roughly $260 million in yearly revenue that Chugach needs to operate.
Some of Anchorage’s biggest power consumers — including the federal government, the University of Alaska Anchorage and JL Properties, a major commercial real estate developer — are participating in the case. At the commission’s month-long hearing, so many attorneys and experts were present that one of them referred to the proceedings as “titanic” and estimated they were costing the parties, collectively, some $10,000 an hour.
Several key areas of dispute have emerged since Chugach initially filed its rate request in June 2023.
One is the profit margin that the commissioners allow for Chugach, calculated using a financial benchmark called “times interest earned ratio,” or TIER. Chugach wants to raise its TIER — a ratio expressing how much the utility’s yearly earnings exceed its required debt payments — to 1.75 from 1.55.
Critics, like JL Properties, say the TIER increase would add $9 million to Chugach’s profit margin and isn’t needed because the utility’s financial health is already sound. Chugach argues that the higher TIER would allow it to borrow money at lower rates, better respond to unexpected costs and emergencies and maximize its options as it brings renewable power projects online and contends with the natural gas shortage.
Another major disagreement is over Chugach’s proposed 19% increase in the rate it charges other utilities to ship electricity across its transmission lines.
Chugach says that hike aligns with inflation over the years since the rate last went up, and would help cover the cost of infrastructure Chugach acquired when it bought Anchorage’s city-owned utility in 2020.
That infrastructure sits between a major power plant on the Kenai Peninsula that sometimes ships power through Anchorage toward Fairbanks.
But the city-owned utility did not previously require payment from the other utilities whose electricity traveled across its lines.That’s one of the objections that those other utilities, including Kenai Peninsula-based Homer Electric Association and Fairbanks-based Golden Valley Electric Association, are making to Chugach’s proposed boost in transmission charges.
The other utilities also argue that higher transmission rates will discourage construction of large-scale renewable power projects, which would face steeper costs to ship their electricity through Chugach’s territory.
REAP targets “gas supply crunch”
The proposal from REAP, meanwhile, is most focused on Chugach’s residential customers, as is a proposal from the Alaska branch of the AARP, a group that advocates for the interests of Americans over 50 years old.
Broadly, the two organizations want Chugach’s rates to be more reflective of the overall amount of electricity used by customers and less influenced by other elements of the cost-setting formula — a structure that would give those customers more ability to control the size of their bills.
If adopted by the commission, they say, their proposals would encourage consumers to use less natural gas. They say their proposals would also give Chugach flexibility to tinker with per-kilowatt-hour rates to help match demand with the variable power supplies generated by wind and solar projects.
One of AARP’s arguments targets Chugach’s request to boost its monthly flat-rate, customer service fee for its pre-existing households — those that were members before the 2020 acquisition.
Those pre-existing households had been charged a flat fee, regardless of the amount of power they used, of $8 a month, in addition to their per-kilowatt-hour bills. Chugach now wants to raise those flat fees to $13.68, to match the higher service fees charged to former members of the city-owned utility who are now Chugach customers .
The AARP’s expert witness, in his written testimony, said that proposal could boost overall monthly bills as much as 16% for the Chugach households that consume the least amount of power. The witness, Ron Nelson, proposes that the flat fees instead be set at $10 for both sets of customers.
Both the AARP and REAP also target substantial charges in Chugach’s current pricing formula, and its proposed new one, that are tied to customers’ highest single hour of electricity use over the course of a year.
Those charges are intended to account for the fact that utilities must build and maintain power plants to meet the peak demand of their entire system — even if far less power is being used during the rest of the year. As a result, rates are often designed to assign the cost of maintaining plants to meet peak demand to customers that contribute to that demand the most.
REAP argues that Chugach has long had more than enough generating capacity to meet peak demand — and that its newest power plants were built not to meet its system’s maximum load, but to boost efficiency and reduce fuel consumption.
As a result, REAP argues, the demand charges should be reduced, since the newest power plants weren’t built to meet the system’s peak load. Instead, the group says, Chugach’s rates should be more tightly linked to the overall amount of electricity each customer consumes. That would give customers even more incentive to reduce their power use — and, consequently, Chugach’s use of natural gas.
“We are in a system with significant excess capacity built primarily not to serve peak demand, but to produce energy more efficiently,” Foster, REAP’s attorney, said in her closing arguments. “And this system runs primarily on natural gas, for which we are facing a major supply crunch within this decade.”
The public hearing on Chugach’s requested rate increase ended July 18.
The commissioners are expected to issue their final ruling within the next two months. Any of the parties involved can appeal the decision to the courts.
Nathaniel Herz welcomes tips at natherz@gmail.com or (907) 793-0312. This article was originally published in Northern Journal, a newsletter from Herz. Subscribe at this link.
Alaska
Former Alaska corrections officer sentenced to 150 years in prison for killing wife and teen daughter
A former Alaska corrections officer who pleaded guilty to the 2022 killings of his wife and daughter earlier this year was sentenced this week to 150 years in prison.
Anchorage Superior Court Judge Josie Garton on Tuesday sentenced Jalonni Blackshear to consecutive 75-year sentences for first- and second-degree murder in the 2022 killings of his wife, Raechyl Blackshear, and their 14-year-old daughter, Jayla, according to filings in the case.
The sentence came after Blackshear pleaded guilty to the charges in late January. Blackshear, in a plea agreement affidavit, said that he shot and killed his wife and daughter in their Scenic Foothills neighborhood home on April 4, 2022, amid a police investigation into suspicions that Blackshear had sexually abused his daughter.
The plea agreement called for a 150-year sentence, according to a May 11 sentencing memorandum signed by Assistant District Attorney Rachel Gernat.

Nearly a dozen other charges, including murder, sexual abuse of a minor and incest, were dismissed as part of the plea agreement with prosecutors, according to the memorandum.
Blackshear had a history of abusing and terrorizing his family, Gernat said in the memo. He shot his family members in the head to avoid prosecution on sexual abuse charges after he failed to coerce his daughter to recant statements given to Anchorage police about being sexually assaulted in late March of that year, she wrote.
In his plea agreement affidavit, Blackshear admitted that the murders were unprovoked and that he was likely to face charges for sexually abusing his daughter.
The mother and daughter were last seen on April 3, 2022, after Blackshear convinced his wife to take their daughter to Anchorage police to try to get her to retract her sexual assault allegations, prosecutors said.
Blackshear quit his job and fled Alaska several days later after he was charged with sexually abusing his daughter. Prosecutors said he used the mother and daughter’s phones to impersonate them in an effort to convince others they were alive.
Raechyl and Jayla Blackshear were found dead in the family home days later after Raechyl Blackshear missed a medical appointment, according to police. Tracking data from their phones led to Blackshear’s arrest in New York weeks later, according to prosecutors.
Blackshear was jailed at the Mat-Su Pretrial facility as of Thursday afternoon.
Alaska
Tomorrow Alaska Burns $190 Million Of Taxpayer Money To Drag Oil Companies Into The Arctic Refuge
There’s a place in the far northeast corner of Alaska that almost no American has ever seen and almost every American would tell you to protect. In June the sun never sets. The light is low and golden for twenty hours and soft and golden for the other four. The tundra goes electric green with cottongrass and dwarf willow and Arctic poppy. The Porcupine River runs cold and clear off the Brooks Range. And 143,000 caribou fan out across the coastal plain to give birth to their calves. They’ve been doing this for thousands of years. The herd walks 1,500 miles from interior Alaska and the Canadian Yukon to the same patch of tundra, every spring, to deliver the next generation onto the same ground their grandmothers were born on.
Right now, this week, the herd is on the plain. The calves are being born. Polar bear mothers, the sea ice failing them, have moved their dens onshore. Snow geese feed in the wetlands. Musk oxen, brought back from extinction in the 1930s, move in slow shaggy ranks across the high ground. More than two hundred bird species nest here every summer. Some flew in from Argentina. Some flew in from New Zealand. Some flew in from the edge of Antarctica. The Gwich’in people, who’ve shared this country with the Porcupine herd for thousands of years, call this place Iizhik Gwats’an Gwandaii Goodlit. The Sacred Place Where Life Begins.
Tomorrow morning at 10 a.m. Alaska time, in an office building in downtown Anchorage, the Bureau of Land Management will open sealed bids on the right to drill it. The only confirmed bidder is the State of Alaska itself, putting up $190 million in taxpayer money to drag oil companies into a refuge they’ve already refused to drill twice.
The only entity that has confirmed it will bid tomorrow is the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority. AIDEA is a state-owned Alaska corporation. Its money is Alaska taxpayer money. Three weeks ago, AIDEA’s board voted 6-1 to authorize $190 million for tomorrow’s bidding and the seismic exploration that would follow if it wins anything. That’s on top of the roughly $12 million in Alaska public money AIDEA already spent in 2021 buying refuge leases that have, five years later, produced zero barrels of oil, zero dollars in revenue, and a pile of pending litigation. AIDEA’s existing leases were canceled by the Biden administration, reinstated by a federal judge, and tied up in court ever since.
Let me explain what’s happening here, because the official press releases will not.
AIDEA wants the drilling. The Alaska political establishment has wanted the drilling for fifty years. Two prior federal lease sales on this same land asked whether private industry actually wanted to drill it, and private industry said no. The 2021 sale drew almost no major oil company bids. The 2025 sale drew zero bids of any kind. None. Exxon sat out. So did Chevron. So did Shell and ConocoPhillips. Every one of the six largest American banks refuses to finance Arctic Refuge drilling. Every major oil company has, on the record, in repeated lease sales, walked away.
So the Alaska political class is using state public money to bring the drillers in. AIDEA director Randy Ruaro told the Anchorage Daily News in May, “We’re absolutely interested.” His board voted to spend $190 million the next week. The lone no vote came from Andrew Guy, president of the Indigenous-owned Calista Corp., who said the agency hadn’t explained what the $190 million was actually for. The board went ahead anyway.
AIDEA’s bid serves a single purpose. The state’s development bank locks up acreage tomorrow so that an oil major can take a sublease later, when political weather changes or new federal infrastructure makes the project feasible. Call it what it is. A $190 million Alaska taxpayer downpayment on the destruction of the most pristine wildlife refuge in the country. Alaska is paying nearly a quarter of a billion dollars to make sure the drilling pipeline stays alive when the actual market has rejected it twice.
The Trump administration will call the result a successful sale tomorrow afternoon. The Alaska delegation will call it industry vindication. Alaska taxpayers will eat the $190 million. The federal government will pocket the bid money. The polar bears and the caribou will be one auction closer to gone.
When Congress opened the refuge to drilling in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the two mandated lease sales would generate $1.82 billion over ten years. Pro-drilling members of Congress sold the program as a $1 billion offset against the bill’s $1.9 trillion price tag. The actual federal take from the 2021 sale was $8.2 million. The take from the 2025 sale was zero.
When Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last summer and mandated four more sales, CBO revised the revenue estimate down to $452 million across the entire ten-year window. Taxpayers for Common Sense, the nonpartisan watchdog that’s tracked this program for a decade, calls even that estimate wildly inflated. Their projection based on twenty years of actual North Slope bidding data is $3 to $30 million in total federal revenue across all four sales combined.
To translate that, 2017 voters were told the program would pay for itself. The actual pace at which the program is paying for itself is roughly the cost of an elevator retrofit on a single Senate office building. We’ve written before about the lie behind ‘unused’ public land and the math that doesn’t add up on public lands logging. This is the same con, run on the same talking points, for the same beneficiaries. The pattern repeats. The federal government promises billions in extractive revenue. Actual revenue arrives in the low millions. The land is ruined regardless.
The reason the math doesn’t work is structural. There are no roads on the coastal plain. The Trans-Alaska Pipeline stops a hundred and twenty miles to the west at Prudhoe Bay. The airstrips, the housing, the processing capacity that any commercial operation would require, all of it would have to be built from scratch, in a place where winter lasts nine months and the working window for surface infrastructure is measured in weeks. A new field in the Refuge would take seven to ten years to develop before the first barrel reached a refinery. Whatever crisis the Trump administration cites tomorrow to justify the sale will be eight years in the rearview by the time any oil moves.
Goldman Sachs ran these numbers in 2017 and called Arctic exploration economically unjustifiable. The market agreed twice. Tomorrow, Alaska public money will try to override the market.
The man running tomorrow’s sale is Doug Burgum, the former North Dakota governor that Trump confirmed as Interior Secretary in January 2025 with a mandate to maximize fossil fuel extraction from federal lands. Burgum’s previous job was running the third-largest oil-producing state in the country. The Associated Press, citing state records, reported that his administration coordinated with oil industry lobbyists on regulatory strategy while his own family was leasing land to oil companies.
In October 2025, Burgum reopened the entire 1.56-million-acre coastal plain to leasing. In December 2025, Trump signed six Congressional Review Act resolutions overturning BLM management plans that had protected the coastal plain along with five other major federal land units. The CRA carries a permanent bar against the agency issuing comparable protections without new congressional action. The same Interior Department also opened the entire Gulf of Mexico oil and gas program by convening the God Squad for the first time in thirty years to exempt the program from the Endangered Species Act. Over the heads of fifty-one Rice’s whales. Tomorrow’s auction is one move in a campaign.
The Gwich’in Steering Committee was unequivocal. “Secretary Burgum’s intentions to pilfer sacred land in the Arctic Refuge to the highest bidder flies in the face of the rights of the Gwich’in as Indigenous people and, quite frankly, in the face of common sense.” On April 28, Steering Committee Executive Director Kristen Moreland sent letters to eight major oil company executives formally requesting they decline to bid tomorrow. The day after, 13 conservation organizations sent a parallel letter to 11 oil executives reminding them of the reputational risk of bidding. As of this writing, none of those companies has publicly confirmed they will. None has publicly confirmed they won’t.
Look at the numbers, then think about what they mean.
The Porcupine caribou herd has dropped from 218,000 animals in 2017 to 143,000 in the most recent 2026 survey. A thirty-five percent decline in nine years. The coastal plain is their calving ground. The geographic reason there’s still a Porcupine herd at all.
The Southern Beaufort Sea polar bear population, the bears that den on the coastal plain, has dropped to a draft 2025 estimate of 819 bears. The 1980s estimate was upwards of 1,500. They’ve been listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act since 2008, the law Doug Burgum’s Interior Department is currently dismantling through regulation. Three-quarters of the coastal plain is now their primary denning habitat, because sea ice denning is no longer viable. The mothers dig their dens in snowdrifts behind the dunes. They give birth in those dens in winter. The cubs are smaller than a softball when they’re born and weigh roughly a pound. They cannot be moved.
Seismic exploration uses 90,000-pound thumper trucks that pound the tundra in winter to map subsurface geology. The forward-looking infrared technology the oil industry uses to locate polar bear dens before driving over them has been documented missing more than half of known dens in field-tested conditions. When the technology misses a den, the truck drives over it. When the mother bear flees her den early, the cubs die.
Read that again. The technology misses more than half the time. When it misses, the cubs die. Tomorrow morning, Alaska is committing $190 million of public money to bring that equipment into the highest-density polar bear denning habitat in the United States. The hunters and anglers who love the Refuge know this as well as the scientists do. The same audience who saw the 1.4 million acres of the Dalton Corridor transferred to Alaska last month, severing the wildlife corridor between Gates of the Arctic, the Arctic Refuge, and two adjacent refuges. The same audience who watched 58 million acres of national forest get opened to industrial logging in March. The pattern is the pattern. The country we hand to our kids will have less of this in it every year we tolerate this.
Two full ANWR lease sales under the original 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act mandate happened. Both flopped. CBO cut its revenue forecast in half. The banks won’t finance. The majors won’t bid. The Indigenous nation whose existence depends on the caribou opposes it. The polar bears are at a fraction of their historical numbers. The hunters and anglers who rely on those public lands are watching the access disappear. And the State of Alaska is throwing a quarter of a billion dollars in public money at the problem tomorrow to keep the political show alive.
Ninety-nine percent of one million public comments on the original program opposed drilling. Two-thirds of registered voters consistently oppose drilling in polling. The United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination has sounded alarms three times about the human rights violations entailed in opening the calving grounds without Gwich’in consent. Multiple federal lawsuits are pending against the 2025 Record of Decision under the APA, the Wilderness Act, ANILCA, the Refuge Act, NEPA, the ESA, and the underlying statutory authorities. The Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife have served notice of intent to sue under the Endangered Species Act over polar bear impacts. The administration is conducting the sale anyway.
It’s a familiar pattern from this Interior Department. Move fast. Transfer the asset. Generate facts on the ground. Let the courts try to unwind them later. Once a lease sells, it encumbers the land for years. Active leases generate environmental reviews and seismic permits and road petitions and infrastructure proposals and an institutional momentum the courts struggle to undo even after they rule the underlying decisions unlawful. That’s the point of holding the sale anyway.
We Will Never Forgive or Forget Those Who Sell Our Public Lands is the name of a piece we ran last summer. It feels more applicable every week. Tomorrow morning, the State of Alaska is adding a $190 million line item to that ledger.
The U.S. House and Senate hold the keys here. The OBBBA mandate that compels tomorrow’s sale was written by Congress and signed by the president, and only Congress can rescind it. Find out how your senators and representative voted on every public lands measure of 2025 and 2026 in the Congressional Public Lands Scorecard. Call them. Tell them you want HR 3067, the Arctic Refuge Protection Act, advanced. Tell them you want the OBBBA Arctic Refuge mandate repealed. Tell them you noticed.
Tell them you noticed that the only confirmed bidder is using public money to bring oil companies to a place those companies don’t want to be.
Tell them you noticed the math has never worked.
Tell them you noticed what they’re selling, and you know we don’t get this one back.
Raise some hell,
Will
If you value reporting like this, become a paid subscriber. We’re funded entirely by readers. There are no other revenue streams. Two brothers and the people who read us. That’s the whole operation.
Alaska
First Alaska mule deer harvest follows years of fleeting appearances in the state
When Westin Nelson of Skagway became the first Alaska hunter on record to harvest a mule deer, he may have been doing the state a favor.
Mule deer, better known as inhabitants of the Rocky Mountain and Great Plains regions, have been expanding their range northward, including into Alaska. As they do so, they are expanding the risks of parasites and some contagious diseases.
The most concerning issue is the winter tick, or Dermacentor albipictus. It has yet to be documented in Alaska, but it has wiped out much of the moose population in New England and started causing problems for moose populations as far north as Canada’s Yukon and Northwest Territories.
In recent years, nearly half of the mule deer examined in the Whitehorse area were found to be tick-infested, said Dr. Kimberlee Beckmen, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s wildlife biologist. That is ominous for Alaska, she said.
“All it takes is one mule deer with one female tick on it to come into Alaska, and that would completely devastate our moose population,” Beckmen said.
Mule deer have been well-established in the Yukon Territory since at least the 1980s, and in Alaska, people have been spotting them on sometimes fleeting occasions for a little over a decade.
Most sightings have been in the northern part of the Southeast Panhandle, but some were as far north as Interior Alaska. Three mule deer were reported in 2013 near Delta Junction, one was photographed near the Fort Knox mine outside of Fairbanks in 2016 and one was struck by a vehicle and killed in North Pole in 2017, according to the Department of Fish and Game.
Though they are related to the Sitka black-tailed deer that live in territory stretching from the British Columbia rainforest to the Kodiak Archipelago, mule deer are different from their Alaska cousins.
The contrast is striking, said Nelson, the Skagway hunter.
“These deer are big, maybe twice the size of Sitka black-tailed deer,” he said. “Mule deer have enormous ears. They have ears like a mule.”
Adult Sitka black-tailed deer generally weigh 80 to 120 pounds, according to the Department of Fish and Game, while adult mule deer often weigh more than 200 pounds.
Nelson said he has seen mule deer occasionally in the Skagway area over the past few years. He had a light-hearted competition with a friend about who would be the first to hunt one. It was not until April when circumstances came together to result in a successful hunt — right in that friend’s yard.
“I just happened to kind of get lucky,” Nelson said.
The rules for hunting mule deer in Alaska, where the species is non-native and considered “deleterious,” are liberal. There are no seasonal restrictions and no bag limits. Even though it took until this year for Nelson to become the first hunter on record to harvest a mule deer in Alaska, state officials first authorized mule deer hunting in 2019.
The caveat for mule deer hunters is that the Department of Fish and Game wants them to submit tissue samples for testing. That is to screen for signs of tick infestations and for numerous problems like brain worm, also known as “moose sickness,” chronic wasting disease, different types of hemorrhagic diseases, bluetongue, worm infestation and other diseases or parasites.
Nelson provided abundant samples to the department: the hide, head and neck, liver, heart, lungs, spleen, lower colon and two lower legs with the hooves attached, according to officials with the Department of Fish and Game.
Importantly, Beckmen with the department said, there were no signs of hair loss or breakage in the hide, indicating that any tick infestation during the past winter was unlikely.
Nelson said he has been reading up on mule deer and the state’s concerns about ticks and other dangers. But he downplayed any contributions he might have made to state wildlife safety. “I wouldn’t say I’m super-noble or anything. I just wanted to get one,” he said.
Climate change, along with factors like road-building and agricultural development, have allowed mule deer to thrive in new territory even as some habitat is lost to development, according to the Department of Fish and Game.
Climate change is also helping spread the winter tick northward and westward.
The ticks do not travel on their own. Rather, they grow from eggs that are laid on the ground in the spring that grow into larvae that climb up plants in packs to latch onto passing hosts in the fall, a process known as “questing.” If they stay attached all winter, they develop into adults that repeat the cycle by dropping from their hosts in spring to lay eggs. Shorter winters and later snowfalls are increasing opportunities for successful questing by the ticks, scientists say.
In New England, moose have been found with tens of thousands of winter ticks embedded in their skin. The blood loss they cause can be fatal, especially to young moose. In Maine, for example, biologists in 2022 found that 86% of the moose calves they had collared died from tick infestations. In New Hampshire, the moose population now is only about half of what it was in the 1990s, according to state biologists there.
While mule deer can become infested with winter ticks, they also are able to get rid of them fairly effectively through self-grooming.
Moose lack those grooming skills. That results in moose rubbing and scratching off so much of their hair that they are called “ghost moose” because their bald spots make them look white.
Mule deer are not the only species expanding their range to Alaska.
Another such species is the mountain lion, also known as cougar. The Alaska Board of Game early this year approved a first hunting and trapping season for mountain lions. It is set to start on Aug. 1 in parts of Southeast Alaska.
Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.
-
Los Angeles, Ca14 minutes ago'Top Gun: Maverick' actor identified as victim stabbed to death in Tarzana
-
Detroit, MI36 minutes agoStorm chances return, which could impact Motor City Pride, graduations this weekend across Metro Detroit
-
San Francisco, CA44 minutes agoHilton campaigns in San Francisco as California primary votes still being counted
-
Dallas, TX51 minutes agoCrews cover up AT&T branding as stadium becomes
-
Miami, FL54 minutes agoMiami leaders gather for FIFA World Cup Host Committee Gala
-
Boston, MA59 minutes agoPackage fire outside Boston’s Museum of African American History under investigation
-
Denver, CO1 hour agoRockies beat reporter Patrick Saunders to leave Denver Post
-
Seattle, WA1 hour agoSeattle granted NFL Franchise on this day 52 years ago





