Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska will fly nonstop Sea-Tac to Europe in 2026, CEO Ben Minicucci says

Published

on

Alaska will fly nonstop Sea-Tac to Europe in 2026, CEO Ben Minicucci says


This Thursday, Feb. 13, 2020 file photo shows Alaska Airlines’ then-president Ben Minicucci in Seattle. (AP Photo/Elaine Thompson)

Alaska Airlines’ next new nonstop route from Seattle will be to Europe in 2026, CEO Ben Minicucci confirmed this week in an interview where he laid out his vision for the next few years at Alaska.

Minicucci, a 20-year Alaska Air veteran who was named CEO in 2021, said the recent merger with Hawaiian Airlines is a “step change” for the airline, one that will allow it to expand its reach from the West Coast to other trans-Pacific hubs. Seattle will be at the center of that expansion, with plans to add 12 nonstop global routes with long-haul widebody airplanes by 2030.

Alaska has already announced two of those routes: one to Seoul, South Korea, starting in September and another to Tokyo Narita starting Monday. Hawaiian Airlines was already flying to those destinations, so Alaska was able to capitalize on the infrastructure and expertise it inherited through the $1.9 billion merger that closed in September.

The undisclosed European destination coming next could be a bigger lift. Neither Alaska nor Hawaiian has a presence there.

Advertisement

But Minicucci isn’t worried about the risks. For one thing, he said, Alaska knows what Seattle travelers want and believes the airline could stimulate demand with the new offering. For another, he encourages daring moves at the company, Minicucci said in a recent interview with The Seattle Times, striking a tone reminiscent of Big Tech CEOs out to disrupt industries.

“I want to give our people the ability not to be afraid. I want you to be bold, aggressive, try things. Because nobody ever does great things if you’re always safe,” Minicucci said. “Sometimes you have to put yourself out there and take a little bit of a chance, and feel a little bit that nervousness in your stomach and say ‘Wow, is this going to work?’ ”

Minicucci matches the demeanor of his edict to be fearless. Seated in a nook off the hallway on the upper floor of Alaska’s SeaTac headquarters, he was relaxed as he spoke about the airline’s future. Minicucci said hello to colleagues that walked by, giving off the air of a CEO who is often present in the office overlooking Sea-Tac Airport.

Originally from Montreal, Minicucci joined Alaska in 2004. He worked as vice president of maintenance, vice president of Seattle operations and president of Alaska Airlines, overseeing Alaska’s 2016 acquisition of Virgin America. He took over as CEO from Brad Tilden in 2021. On Thursday, Alaska shareholders approved a compensation package worth $8.6 million for Minicucci in 2024, a dip from the $10.3 million awarded a year earlier.

Nearly five years into his tenure as CEO and nine months into Alaska’s merger with Hawaiian Airlines, Minicucci said he’s moving with more conviction than before.

Advertisement

With the Virgin acquisition, Alaska went slowly, spent a lot of time analyzing decisions and often said “we’re not sure,” Minicucci said. This time, “We made a lot of the decisions out of the gate.”

Betting on new routes

The calculation that goes into picking a new route is a mix of science and art, said Kirsten Amrine, who is in charge of planning Alaska’s network of flights.

The science comes from numbers: Alaska can use industry data to see where and how frequently people are flying, and how much they are willing to pay.

The art is the reason Amrine and her team have jobs, Amrine joked in a recent interview. That side of the equation comes with knowing travelers and anticipating where Alaska’s customers may want to go.

As an example, Amrine pointed to Alaska’s decision to add a direct flight from Seattle to Belize in 2021.

Advertisement

The science didn’t necessarily support that decision, Amrine said. But Alaska’s network planning team knew Seattleites liked adventure and destinations that allowed them to get off the grid. Flights to Costa Rica performed well, so Alaska was willing to bet Belize would be the same.

Amrine considers that decision a success. The number of people flying from Seattle to Belize tripled.

Those types of route calculations are happening all the time. Amrine starts every Saturday morning looking at what changes Alaska’s competitors have made to their network.

Alaska makes weekly changes as well. Those decisions are finalized by Wednesday morning, Amrine said.

But the airline’s plans have a long tail. Alaska books out 331 days in advance, so the decisions made this Wednesday will affect flights in April 2026.

Advertisement

If Alaska is wrong on the science and the art of a destination, the biggest risk is “opportunity cost,” Amrine said. Every destination the airline picks means it can’t take a chance on a different destination, so “you want to think long-term,” Amrine said.

Minicucci holds a similar view. Unlike construction, which can be hard to reverse, airplanes are meant to move, he said.

He pointed to a recent attempt to start nonstop routes from Seattle to the Bahamas in 2023. Alaska ended that Nassau flight this year, determining that the market wasn’t there.

“It didn’t work,” Minicucci said. “We’re going to flip that and put that airplane somewhere else.”

Seattle is somewhat of a testing ground for Alaska, Minicucci said. When the airline expanded routes to Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington, D.C., for example, it started offering flights from Seattle, then Portland, then San Francisco and Los Angeles, and now San Diego.

Advertisement

Alaska’s international expansion similarly is focused on Seattle now because “we know that’s going to work,” Minicucci said. “But in 10 years, in 20 years, as our airline continues to grow and do better, who knows where we’ll fly (out of) internationally?”

No longer “all Boeing”

The Hawaiian acquisition will put Alaska at odds with the tagline displayed on the nose of many of its planes: “Proudly all Boeing.”

As it integrates the two fleets, Alaska will inherit 24 widebody planes from Boeing’s European rival Airbus.

It’s not the first time Alaska has inherited Airbus planes — it added 60 Airbus aircraft when it acquired Virgin America in a 2016 deal. But it spent the next few years retiring those Airbus planes, hoping to capitalize on the efficiency of operating just one type of plane. That can make it easier and less expensive to train pilots and keep up with maintenance. Alaska was finally “proudly all Boeing” in September 2023.

This time around, Alaska will keep the Airbus planes, Minicucci said, and is relying on them to prop up its trans-Pacific expansion.

Advertisement

The Airbus A319 and A320 narrowbody planes Alaska inherited when it acquired Virgin were too similar to the Boeing 737 planes it was already flying, Minicucci said. Comparatively, the A330 widebodies Alaska inherited from Hawaiian will add new capabilities to Alaska’s fleet, allowing it to reach markets it couldn’t access with the 737.

Alaska also expects to receive 12 of Boeing’s widebody equivalent, the 787 Dreamliner, by 2028.

Alaska’s growing widebody fleet

As Alaska works to expand across the Pacific, it’s relying on a new fleet of widebody aircraft that will allow it to travel farther than the narrowbody planes it already operates.

“We have all the arrows in our quiver,” Minicucci said. “That gives us the possibility of reaching pretty much wherever we want to go out of Seattle.”

Because both Boeing and Airbus have such a large backlog of orders, it would have taken years for Alaska to receive the same Airbus widebody planes it is now gearing up to integrate into its fleet.

Advertisement

Moving away from “proudly all Boeing,” will add some complexities, Minicucci said, adding that he was confident his team could handle it smoothly. Pilots will go through additional training and simulations. Maintenance will require new facilities and tools. Even loading baggage on widebodies requires different equipment than that for the 737.

The Airbus A330s will be housed in Honolulu, using Hawaiian’s existing infrastructure. Alaska will build a new hangar to accommodate the Boeing 787 planes on the West Coast, though Minicucci couldn’t yet say where.

Finalizing the merger

Alaska laid out four milestones on its path to integrate the two airlines.

First, it will combine frequent flyer programs. Then, it must receive a single operating certificate from the Federal Aviation Administration, meaning the safety regulator has signed off that one set of management is in charge of both airlines and the combined carrier is operating safely.

Alaska plans to cross both those milestones by the end of the year.

Advertisement

After that, it will bring both airlines under one reservation system by mid-2026.

Lastly, it will combine the two unionized workforces and settle joint collective bargaining agreements. Those negotiations have already started and Alaska hopes to finalize agreements by 2027.

While Alaska is integrating Hawaiian into its operations, it wants to keep both brands distinct. So, even though customers will be able to use the same reservation system to book a flight on Alaska or Hawaiian, the onboard experience will be different. Flights to, from and within Hawaii will keep the Pualani logo on the plane’s tail.

Operating two distinct brands isn’t something airlines usually do after a merger and Minicucci said he faced some skepticism about the decision. But he’s “totally convicted” on doing so.

“That brand is just too special. It has a lot of equity and value, especially in the state of Hawaii,” he said. “I am convicted and resolute that brand is there forever.”

Advertisement

The concerns don’t faze him, Minicucci continued. “Just because it’s never been done, doesn’t mean it can’t be done.”





Source link

Alaska

Senate committee strips homeschool funding overhaul from education bill, adds one-time ‘energy relief’ funding

Published

on

Senate committee strips homeschool funding overhaul from education bill, adds one-time ‘energy relief’ funding


Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage, talks with colleagues on the Senate floor on Jan. 22, 2025. (Marc Lester / ADN)

JUNEAU — The Alaska Senate Education Committee on Monday replaced a school funding bill introduced in March with a new version that strips out a controversial overhaul of publicly funded homeschooling programs.

The new version instead would require more legislative oversight over Alaska’s correspondence education programs, and removes additional correspondence funding in favor of broader one-time education funding measures.

The bill now includes a $58 million one-time school energy relief payment to offset high fuel prices, and a bump to student transportation funding. It still includes incentive grants for districts where students improve reading proficiency under the Alaska Reads Act.

Sen. Löki Tobin, an Anchorage Democrat and chair of the Senate Education Committee that sponsored the bill, said that removing the most controversial parts of the bill — how correspondence programs are funded — makes the bill more straightforward.

Advertisement

“I think the part that was most infuriating was the mis- and disinformation that was promulgated by certain entities that the outreach we received would talk to components or pieces that weren’t in the legislation at all, or the legislation didn’t do what they were claiming it did,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

She said the “deep trove of mal-information” created a response and pushback she “was unwilling to continue to bear.”

The bill originally sought to funnel funding for homeschoolers through the school districts in which they reside, potentially with significant impacts to large correspondence programs that are administered by rural school districts. That funding change came alongside a 10% increase in per-student funding for correspondence students overall. Both of those elements are removed from the new version of the bill.

There are over 30 correspondence programs enrolling more than 24,000 students across Alaska, as of last year. More than half of those students were enrolled in correspondence programs administered by districts outside of the district where they reside.

That includes programs like IDEA, run by the Galena City School District, the state’s largest correspondence program. IDEA serves over 7,000 students statewide.

Advertisement

Superintendents and families of correspondence students pushed back against the original bill, saying that it represented an existential threat to correspondence programs. The bill received hundreds of letters and public testimony opposing the changes to correspondence funding.

The new version of the bill removes some of the bill’s most controversial aspects.

Jason Johnson, the superintendent of the Galena City School District, sent an email to IDEA families prior to the bill’s first hearing urging them to contact their representatives to oppose the bill and asserting that under the bill as written, correspondence programs would receive zero state funding.

Tobin said in an interview in March following the influx of opposition that the bill would not have diverted all state funding away from correspondence programs.

Johnson said as of Tuesday morning, he had not yet reviewed the new version of the bill.

Advertisement

Homeschool reporting requirements

The new version of the bill requires that Alaska school districts provide an annual report to the Legislature with details on the correspondence programs they operate, including how much money the district provides to students in the programs, how many students are in the programs, where those students live, what the allotments are used for, and more.

The new reporting requirements mirror those included in a 2024 bill that called for a one-time report to the Legislature on correspondence allotment spending.

At the time, state spending on homeschooled students was scrutinized following litigation challenging a practice by some Alaska families — including that of former Attorney General Treg Taylor — to subsidize tuition in private Christian schools using public correspondence school allotments.

Tobin said last year that the 2024 report revealed there is “just a lot we don’t know about how public dollars are being used.”

A much larger percentage of students in non-correspondence schools take AK STAR state standardized tests compared to those in correspondence programs. Correspondence programs often see lower graduation rates than standard public schools in Alaska.

Advertisement

Families whose students are enrolled in IDEA, for example, receive an allotment of $2,700 per student per year, according to IDEA’s website. There is little clarity or government oversight on how that money can be spent. A pending lawsuit will answer whether or not correspondence allotments can cover the cost of tuition at a private school.

Tobin says these discrepancies and outstanding questions call for more state oversight on correspondence programs.

“We’re asking for all that information because it’s difficult, as we’ve learned, to create good public policy that helps support our correspondence students, if we don’t have the information that is needed to inform how that policy is created,” Tobin said.

Education funding prospects

The committee substitute to the Senate bill also cuts the $125 increase to the state’s annual per-student formula funding, intended as inflation-proofing in the bill’s original version, which would have raised the Base Student Allocation from $6,660 to roughly $6,785.

Tobin said removing the increase to annual per-student funding in favor of a one-time payment is more politically feasible in the Legislature this session.

Advertisement

“Whether it’s inflationary or it’s additional funds for this year, there is a disinterest in increasing the Base Student Allocation this cycle, and so we’re trying to figure out other ways that we can target funding and support students and communities and schools,” Tobin said Tuesday. It is unlikely that the Legislature can muster the votes needed to override a governor’s veto of additional education funding, she said.

Tobin also said she thinks one-time funding is more likely to get the governor’s signature. The Legislature narrowly voted last session to override Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto of an increase in the Base Student Allocation.

But Alaska’s public schools still say they don’t have the money they need, with districts such as the Anchorage School District voting to close schools and reducing staff positions and programs to mitigate severe deficits.

The latest version of the Senate bill is in conflict with a spending plan adopted by the House this week.

The House operating budget calls for adding $147 million in one-time funding for K-12 school operations along with nearly $11 million in new funding for student transportation. The House figure, majority members say, is needed to make up for years of inflation.

Advertisement

That funding in the operating budget was included to guarantee some additional education funding this year. During debates on the House floor, members of the Republican minority repeatedly spoke out against one-time spending on education, including arguments that they wanted a more specific plan for how the funds would be used and that it could lead districts to expect funding to continue at that level in future years.

The Senate bill proposes to increase student transportation funding by roughly $15 million, distribute just under $59 million in energy relief payments to K-12 schools, and spend around $22 million on incentive payments for reading improvement.

All told, the Senate proposal calls for close to $100 million in new education spending, far below the amount identified by the House.

Daily News reporter Iris Samuels contributed to this report.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska AG Enters Into $800K Settlement With Car Dealer Group (via Passle)

Published

on

Alaska AG Enters Into 0K Settlement With Car Dealer Group (via Passle)


Last month, Alaska Attorney General Stephen J. Cox announced that his office entered into a settlement with a group of Swickard car dealerships, resolving false advertising allegations against the dealers.  As part of the settlement, the dealers agree to pay a civil penalty of $800,000.  

The Alaska AG alleged that the dealers engaged in bait and switch advertising by promoting vehicles that were not actually available for purchase in order to draw customers to its lots.  The AG also alleged that the dealers refused to honor advertised prices, requiring customers to purchase expensive dealer add-ons.  

In announcing the settlement, Cox said, “Car dealers don’t get to advertise one price and charge another—or advertise cars that aren’t really there.  That’s a bait-and-switch, and it’s unlawful. Alaskans already face higher costs than most—this settlement holds Swickard accountable and reinforces that the price you see should be the price you pay.”

Interestingly, the consent decree includes a provision that says that if the dealers engage “in a reckless violation or persistent violations” of Alaska’s consumer protection laws in the future, the court may impose an additional penalty of up to $200,000. 

Advertisement

This enforcement action is yet another example of the heightened scrutiny that car dealer advertising is under right now.  Earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission settled a similar action.  And, in March, the FTC sent warning letters to nearly 100 car dealers. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Palmer high school robotics team makes Alaska history with regional win

Published

on

Palmer high school robotics team makes Alaska history with regional win


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Palmer’s Colony High School Northern Knights Robotics won the First Robotics Competition (FRC) regional championship on April 4, becoming the first team from Alaska to win the title.

The Northern Knights’ business manager, sophomore Carter Fickes, said that the FRC is one of the most prestigious robotics competitions in the world.

“The game elements are a lot bigger,” he said.

“There’s a lot of more coding challenges as well, because you have what is called an autonomous period where your robot’s running strictly on code, and then you have a teleop period where it’s driver controlled.”

Advertisement

According to Fickes, the regional competition in Minneapolis saw the team paired with and against groups from Minnesota, Illinois, the Czech Republic, Japan, and China.

Teams were required to make “alliances” with each other, before competing together in the quarterfinals.

“Being collaborative with other teams and being open to their strategy is great.” he said.

“We were telling them our main marketing strategy was ‘we’re flexible, and if you want us to do something, we can do it.’”

Fickes told Alaska’s News Source that the competition required teams to program and direct their robots to shoot balls towards targets in order to score points.

Advertisement

The Northern Knights programmed their 85-pound robot to focus on defense, blocking shots from the opposing team.

“Our alliance partners had semi-automatic turrets that could shoot like hundreds of balls in a minute,” he said.

“We were blocking the other robots from getting on the other side and scoring fuel.”

Fickes said this was the first year that their team was selected to be a part of an alliance.

After the quarterfinals, the Northern Knights went on to dominate the rest of the competition.

Advertisement

“We were untouched,” he said.

“We were outscoring them by 200 points, and then the finals matches, I think it ended up being like 400 to 200 or 300.”

By winning both the finals match, as well as the Rookie Team of the Year award, the Northern Knights earned themselves a ticket to the FRC Worlds Competition in Texas beginning on April 29.

“Our mentality is kind of like, ‘we’ve made it this far, so why not try our best?’” he said.

“If we don’t win the whole competition, it’s not the end of the world. A team from Alaska has never done this before, and if we like our goal is to win and to qualify and do good.”

Advertisement

Unlike many other robotics teams across the country, Ficker said the Northern Knights are entirely funded through private donations.

“We built our robot in our team captain’s basement. He let us use his house, and we spent hours upon hours upon hours in his basement building and testing.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending