Alaska
Alaska House votes down constitutional guarantee for Permanent Fund dividend – Local First Media Group
By: James Brooks, Alaska Beacon
The Alaska House of Representatives on Thursday rejected a long-awaited constitutional amendment that would have guaranteed payment of the annual Permanent Fund dividend.
The final vote was 22-18, five votes short of the supermajority required to advance the amendment to the Senate for further debate.
The amendment was part of a plan created in 2021 by a bipartisan, bicameral working group after the state came within a week of a government shutdown due to disputes over the size of the dividend.
Rep. Ben Carpenter, R-Nikiski, was a member of the working group and is the author of the amendment. He said Thursday’s failed vote doesn’t mean the end of the end of the plan envisioned by the working group.
“There’s enough people who want to see something happen,” he said.
“We’ll just regroup,” Carpenter said.
From 1982 through 2015, the size of the dividend was set by a formula in state law. In 2016, amid falling oil revenue, then-Gov. Bill Walker vetoed half the dividend to balance the state budget.
After a subsequent lawsuit, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the dividend is subject to the state’s annual budget process, even though the traditional formula remains in state law.
“Absent another constitutional amendment, the Permanent Fund dividend program must compete for annual legislative funding just as other state programs,” Supreme Court Justice Daniel Winfree wrote at the time.
Every year since that decision, the Alaska Legislature has set the dividend by fiat, and debates over the dividend’s proper size have repeatedly brought the state to the brink of a government shutdown.
House Joint Resolution 7, written by Carpenter, would require the state — starting in 2025 — to pay a Permanent Fund dividend “according to a formula set out in law.”
The problem with that idea, said Rep. Andy Josephson, D-Anchorage and one of its most vocal opponents, is that the current formula in state law would create a deficit of more than $1.5 billion.
This year, for example, the traditional formula calls for a roughly $3,500 dividend that would cost $2.27 billion. That’s more than 50% above the $2,270 dividend proposed by the House in its latest budget draft, which has been attacked as unaffordable.
“We already know that’s not going to happen,” said Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, of the House’s proposed budgetary dividend.
Carpenter and other supporters of the amendment responded to Josephson’s criticism by saying that nothing prevents the Legislature from simply changing the formula in state law.
After Josephson said there were zero signs that the Legislature would be willing to do that — or that Gov. Mike Dunleavy would allow it to happen — members of the House voted 37-3 to discharge a proposed formula change from the House Finance Committee without a hearing, bringing it one step closer to a vote.
That’s an unusual step, and it leaves Senate Bill 107, the formula change, awaiting scheduling for a vote of the full House.
As currently written, that bill proposes a so-called “50-50 dividend” worth $1.83 billion this year.
Rep. Sarah Vance, R-Homer and a supporter of the amendment, urged her fellow lawmakers to have “faith” that the Legislature will be able to change the dividend formula, and Rep. Craig Johnson, R-Anchorage, said that passage of the amendment would be a spur to action.
“All this bill does is it forces us to make a decision,” he said.
“What this comes down to for me is trust,” said Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna and a supporter of the amendment. “I think there is a lack of trust … about whether or not we can actually pass all of the pieces that go along with this piece for a fiscal plan.”
Many House Democrats said they don’t believe Republican lawmakers are willing to vote for taxes that would be needed to hold spending on services flat while also paying for a dividend like the one envisioned by Senate Bill 107.
Democrats weren’t alone in raising those concerns. Rep. Will Stapp, R-Fairbanks, voted in favor of the amendment but warned about the costs.
“The only way that’s sustainable is if you tax people — and oil companies too — or massively cut government spending,” he said.
In a pair of parliamentary maneuvers, Reps. Alyse Galvin, I-Anchorage, and Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage, attempted to advance an income tax bill and a sales tax bill, respectively, to the House Finance Committee without a hearing.
Galvin’s motion, dealing with House Bill 156, failed by a 20-20 vote, one short of what was needed. Gray’s motion, dealing with House Bill 142 — written by Carpenter — failed 17-23.
Afterward, Rep. Donna Mears, D-Anchorage, said that the failed votes reinforced why there’s a lack of trust about the dividend amendment.
“This resolution no longer has my vote,” she said.
Alaska
Sand Point teen found 3 days after going missing in lake
SAND POINT, Alaska (KTUU) – A teenage boy who was last seen Monday when the canoe he was in tipped over has been found by a dive team in a lake near Sand Point, according to a person familiar with the situation.
Alaska’s News Source confirmed with the person, who is close to the search efforts, that the dive team found 15-year-old Kaipo Kaminanga deceased Thursday in Red Cove Lake, located a short drive from the town of Sand Point on the Aleutian Island chain.
Kaminanga was last seen canoeing with three other friends on Monday when the boat tipped over.
A search and rescue operation ensued shortly after.
Alaska Dive Search Rescue and Recovery Team posted on Facebook Thursday night that they were able to “locate and recover” Kaminanga at around 5 p.m. Thursday.
“We are glad we could bring closure to his family, friends and community,” the post said.
This is a breaking news story and will be updated when more details become available.
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.
Alaska
Opinion: Homework for Alaska: Sales tax or income tax?
This is a tax tutorial for gubernatorial candidates, for legislators who will report to work next year and for the Alaska public.
Think of it as homework, with more than eight months to complete the assignment that is not due until the November election. The homework is intended to inform, not settle the debate over a state sales tax or state income tax — or neither, which is the preferred option for many Alaskans.
But for those Alaskans willing to consider a tax as a personal responsibility to help fund schools, roads, public safety, child care, state troopers, prisons, foster care and everything else necessary for healthy and productive lives, someday they will need to decide on a state income tax or a state sales tax after they accept the checkbook reality that oil and Permanent Fund earnings are not enough.
This homework assignment is intended to get people thinking with facts, not emotions. Electing the right candidates will be the first test.
Alaskans have until the next election because nothing will change this year. It will take a new political alignment led by a reality-based governor to organize support in the Legislature and among the public.
But next year, maybe, with the right elected leadership, Alaskans can debate a state sales tax or personal income tax. Plus, of course, corporate taxes and oil production taxes, but those are for another school day.
One of the biggest arguments in favor of a state sales tax is that visitors would pay it. Yes, they would, but not as much as many Alaskans think.
Air travel is exempt from sales taxes. So are cruise ship tickets. That’s federal law, which means much of what tourists spend on their Alaska vacation is beyond the reach of a state sales tax.
Cutting further into potential revenues, state and federal law exempts flightseeing tours from sales tax, which is a particularly costly exemption when you think about how much visitors spend on airplane and helicopter tours.
That leaves sales tax supporters collecting from tourists on T-shirts, gifts for grandchildren, artwork, postcards, hotels, Airbnb, car rentals and restaurant meals. Still a substantial take for taxes, but far short of total tourism spending.
An argument against a state sales tax is that more than 100 cities and boroughs already depend on local sales taxes to pay for schools and other public services. Try to imagine what a state tax piled on top of a local tax would do to kill shopping in Homer, already at 7.85%, or Kodiak, Wrangell and Cordova, all at 7%, and all the other municipalities.
Supporters of an income tax say it would share the responsibility burden with nonresidents who earn income in Alaska and then return home to spend their money.
Almost one in four workers in Alaska in 2024 were nonresidents, as reported by the state Department of Labor in January. That doesn’t include federal employees, active-duty military or self-employed people.
Nonresidents earned roughly $3.8 billion, or about 17% of every dollar covered in the report.
However, many of those nonresident workers are lower-wage and seasonal, employed in the seafood processing and tourism industries, unlikely to pay much in income taxes. But a tax could be structured so that they pay something, which is fair.
Meanwhile, higher-wage workers in oil and gas, mining, construction and airlines (freight and passenger service) would pay taxes on their income earned in Alaska, which also is fair.
It comes down to what would direct more of the tax burden to nonresidents: a tax on income or on visitor spending. Wages or wasabi-crusted salmon dinners.
Larry Persily is a longtime Alaska journalist, with breaks for federal, state and municipal public policy work in Alaska and Washington, D.C. He lives in Anchorage and is publisher of the Wrangell Sentinel weekly newspaper.
• • •
The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.
Alaska
Nome brothers summit Mt. Kilimanjaro, carry Alaska flag to third major peak
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Two brothers from Nome recently stood at the summit of Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, planting an Alaska flag at 19,000 feet above the African plains.
The Hoogendorns completed the seven-day climb — five and a half days up and a day and a half down — trekking through rainforest, desert, and alpine terrain before reaching snow near the summit. The climb marks their third of the world’s seven summits.
Night hike to the top
The brothers began their final summit push at midnight, hiking through the night to reach the top by dawn.
“It was almost like a dream,” Oliver said. “Because we hiked through the night. We started the summit hike at midnight when you’re supposed to be sleeping. So, it was kind of like, not mind boggling, but disorienting. Because you’re hiking all night, but then you get to the top and you can finally see. It’s totally different from what you’d expect.”
At the summit, temperatures hovered around 10 degrees — a familiar range for the Nome brothers. Their guides repeatedly urged them to put on jackets, but the brothers declined.
“We got to the crater, and it was dark out and then it started getting brighter out,” Wilson said. “And then you could slowly see the crater like illuminating and it’s huge. It’s like 3 miles across or something. Like you could fly a plane down on the crater and be circles if you want to. Really dramatic view.”
A team of 17 for two climbers
Unlike their previous expeditions, the brothers were supported by a crew of 17 — including porters, a cook, guides, a summit assistant, and a tent setup crew.
The experience deviated from their earlier climbs, where they carried their own food, melted snow for water, and navigated routes independently.
“I felt spoiled,” Wilson said. “I was like, man, the next mountain’s gonna be kind of hard after being spoiled.”
Alaska flag on every summit
Oliver carried the same full-size Alaska flag on all three of his major summits, including in South America and Denali in North America, despite the added weight in his pack.
“I take it everywhere these days,” Oliver said. “It’s always cool to bring it out. And then people ask, you know, ‘where’s that flag from?’ Say Alaska.”
When asked about his motivation for the expeditions, Wilson said “I guess to like inspire other people. Because it seems like a lot of people think they can’t do something, but if you just try it, you probably won’t do good the first time, but second time you’ll do better. Because you just got to try it out. Believe in yourself.”
Background and next goals
The Hoogendorns won the reality competition series “Race to Survive: Alaska” in 2023. In 2019, they were the first to climb Mount McKinley and ski down that season. Oliver also started a biking trip from the tip of South America to Prudhoe Bay with hopes of still completing it.
Kilimanjaro is their third summit. The brothers said they hope to eventually complete all seven summits, with Mount Vinson in Antarctica among the peaks they are considering next… all while taking Alaska with them every step of the way.
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Louisiana4 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Technology6 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology6 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making