Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska experiencing widespread 911 outage

Published

on

Alaska experiencing widespread 911 outage


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – A national technology-related outage is causing issues for many 911 and non-emergency call centers across America.

Alaska State Troopers say emergency call systems statewide are also experiencing extensive problems and not working correctly.

If you have an emergency in the Anchorage, the Anchorage Police Department says you can still call 911, as its system is still working as of publishing time.

If 911 is not working in your area, AST says you can use the following numbers instead:

Advertisement
  • Interior Alaska: (907) 474-2568
  • Southeast Alaska: (907) 474-2568
  • Western Alaska: (907) 474-2568
  • Mat-Su and Valley area: (907) 376-5486
  • Kenai Peninsula: (907) 262-4453



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Federal appeals court appears unlikely to halt Southeast Alaska king trolling for now • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Federal appeals court appears unlikely to halt Southeast Alaska king trolling for now • Alaska Beacon


In closely watched oral arguments on Thursday, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals indicated that it is unlikely to grant an environmental group’s petition for an order that could halt — at least temporarily — a valuable Southeast Alaska king salmon fishery.

In May 2023, a judge in the U.S. District Court covering western Washington issued an order stating that federal officials were allowing Alaska fishermen to harvest king salmon at rates that harmed an endangered population of killer whales in Puget Sound.

That order could have halted Southeast Alaska’s troll king salmon fishery, critical for residents in the region, but the 9th Circuit stayed the lower court’s ruling, putting it on hold.

The Washington-based Wild Fish Conservancy, which brought the initial lawsuit, is seeking to lift the hold and thus stop the fishery. 

Advertisement

The state of Alaska, the Alaska Trollers Association and a coalition of environmental, tribal and other groups are all seeking to keep the hold in place, as is the National Marine Fisheries Service, the lead defendant.

As legal matters proceed, the federal government is rewriting the fisheries rules that were the subject of the lawsuit, and a new version of the rules is expected by November.

Attorney Thekla Hansen-Young, representing the National Marine Fisheries in court on Thursday, said that “it is undisputed that whales are not going to go extinct in the next four months. … On the other side, if the stay were to be lifted, that would irreparably harm Southeast Alaska communities because there would be considerable uncertainty about how they could continue to fish.”

Judges Milan Smith, Mark Bennett and Anthony Johnson appeared sympathetic to that line of thought and skeptical of the idea that they should lift the hold before the new rules are released.

Speaking to attorney Brian Knutsen of the Wild Fish Conservancy, Bennett said documents submitted to the court indicate “a lot of uncertainty” about whether whales will be helped by a halt to fishing.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, “closing some of the fisheries is absolutely going to cause harm to inhabitants of Alaska and their various subsistence and cultural practices,” he said.

“I find it very difficult to come out on your side, given the uncertainty about the numbers, but convince me why I should be less troubled,” Bennett told Knutsen.

Knutsen responded that there’s also “a significant amount of speculation with respect to the economic impacts,” suggesting that Alaskans might switch to fishing different kinds of fish if barred from catching kings.

Knutsen said the Conservancy doesn’t believe — based on prior experience with other federal issues — that NMFS will complete the new rules by November.

“We think, if there may be delays, that the benefit of the doubt should be given to the (whale) species and not to the hopes … the gambling that NOAA will get legal and new documents out,” he said.

Advertisement

In response to those concerns, the judges asked Hansen-Young if she could assure them that the November timeline will hold.

She said that it could commit, “barring unforeseen circumstances.”

After that comment, one of the judges asked whether Hansen-Young would approve of an order that halts fishing if the federal government fails to meet that November timeline.

She initially said she “wouldn’t agree to such a broad grant of relief to plaintiffs,” but when asked whether she would approve of the 9th Circuit issuing more limited instructions in case of a missed deadline, she said that the government “would not object, so long as any instruction to the district court would be post-December 1.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

After a dry June sparked wildfire concerns, Alaska has had a very rainy July

Published

on

After a dry June sparked wildfire concerns, Alaska has had a very rainy July



A duck swims in the rain on Anchorage’s Westchester Lagoon on July 16, 2024. (Leigh Walden/Alaska Public Media)

It’s been rainy in Alaska for much of July so far, with Southcentral set to see cloudy skies through the week.

That comes on the heels of a drier than usual June, which sparked concerns as wildfires burned across the Interior. 

As part of our Ask a Climatologist segment, National Weather Service climate researcher Brian Brettschneider says the rain is lessening those wildfire concerns, and though temperatures may seem comparably cooler, it’s still a warmer-than-average summer.

Advertisement

Listen: 

This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity. 

Brian Brettschneider: Obviously, rain is a great antidote for wildfire concerns. And it’s been, at least in Southcentral, it was fairly dry for the month of June, and actually most of the state it was dry for the month of June. And we were getting more concerned about the conditions that might be susceptible to starting fires. But this rain has certainly, quite literally put a damper on that.

Wesley Early: And speaking of wildfires, there were a bunch that were burning in the Interior. You mentioned that a big chunk of the state has seen rain. Is the Interior part of that big chunk?

BB: Yes. So if you look statewide, the first half of July, we basically had an entire July’s worth of rainfall, so far, on average statewide. You know, places like Nome, it’s five times as much rain so far that they should have had for the first half of July. And pretty much every single station is well above normal, with just a couple of exceptions. And so the fires that were burning, I don’t think there’s any fire that was burning that hasn’t gotten significant rain. I’m not sure if they’re all out or not, but the rain has definitely been a blessing for fire. And also, you know, July is basically the month of the year where we get the most lightning strikes by a wide margin. It’s July, and then it’s kind of June to a lesser degree, August to an even lesser degree. And with all this, these wetting rains, and they’ve been a kind of steady rains, not convective, not thunderstorms, not nearly as much. And that’s also good for fires. And now we’re really only a few weeks away from the end of the busy time of the lightning season. So there’s not going to be too many more opportunities for new fires to start, hopefully.

Advertisement

WE: We’re coming to the end of what’s considered, sort of, the peak of wildfire season, peak of lightning season. What is the rest of the summer looking like?

BB: Well, the Climate Prediction Center, they do monthly outlooks, and the next outlook, which is going to be released on Thursday, will show that the southwest part of the state is most likely to be a little bit below normal temperatures. And then the north and northeastern part of the state may be a little bit warmer than normal and about half the state in the near-normal category. A very familiar climate outlook pattern that we’ve seen a number of times over the last few months, and the August one looks to continue that trend also with above normal chances of being wetter than normal. And keep in mind, July and August are the two wettest months of the year in the mainland, so not Southeast, but in the mainland, those are the two wettest months of the year. And so even near-normal rainfall during those months is a good thing. It’s a good amount of rain and we potentially could be on the high end of that.

WE: And this seems to be the second year in a row where the Lower 48 has had baking temperatures. I’ve seen so many places that don’t normally have above 100 degrees having above 100 degrees. Alaska is having a… I don’t want to say lackluster, but a less severe summer. It seems like an odd trend that as the Lower 48 bakes, Alaska has a comparatively cooler summer. Is that normal?

BB: Not really. There’s a little bit more correlation in the winter where there can often be kind of a flip between what Alaska experiences and what the Lower 48 does. It doesn’t really work out so much in the summer. So June statewide it was a top 10 warmest June. It was also a top 10 driest June. And so we need to be careful now that we’re in a kind of a cool wet pattern to think, “Oh, this has been a cool, wet summer.” It really hasn’t been. In fact, for the first half of the summer, statewide, we’re kind of exactly normal. The southwest part of the state is cooler than normal, the eastern part of the state is warmer than normal. But on balance, we’re right at the 1991 to 2020 normal, which is warmer than previous decades. So historically, this is still probably a warmest third of all summers. And, you know, as far as rainfall again, it was a very dry June. We’re definitely making up for that so far in July and the forecast looks for that to continue.


Advertisement
a portrait of a man outside





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Judge suspends Alaska oil sale over beluga whales

Published

on

Judge suspends Alaska oil sale over beluga whales


A federal judge has suspended an oil sale off the coast of Alaska, saying the Interior Department failed to consider the cumulative effects on endangered beluga whales.

Judge Sharon Gleason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska ordered the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management in her Tuesday ruling to do a supplemental analysis on how the 2022 lease sale of roughly 1 million acres may affect the whales. The whale’s population in Alaska’s Cook Inlet numbers fewer than 300 due to historic overfishing.

Gleason also found that BOEM violated the National Environmental Policy Act by not providing sufficient alternatives in its environmental review. The judge said she chose not to vacate the sale, Lease Sale 258, because it was mandated to be held by December 2022 by Congress in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).

The “Court finds that vacatur would be contrary to the directive of Congress,” the judge wrote.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending