Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Airlines Pilots Push Forward With Strike Authorization

Published

on

Alaska Airlines Pilots Push Forward With Strike Authorization


The Air Line Pilots Affiliation (ALPA), the union representing the various pilots at Alaska Airways, has mentioned that over 95% of the airline’s pilots have voted to authorize a authorized strike if perceived as crucial.

What’s been taking place

Whereas the pilots of Alaska Airways aren’t on strike but, they’re undoubtedly reaching the tip of the road for persistence. ALPA has sought a brand new contract negotiation for 3,100 represented pilots for nearly three years, with an finish aim for a brand new market-based employment contract. The pandemic has made issues barely worse because it took a variety of bargaining energy away from the pilots.

Advertisement
SIMPLEFLYING VIDEO OF THE DAY

As the worldwide aviation business has been selecting itself again up, Alaska Airways has suffered an issue that has effects on many carriers worldwide – pilot shortages. Regardless of ALPA warning the airline late final yr that it was missing an sufficient variety of pilots, the airline was nonetheless unable to correctly put together for the present shortfalls, resulting in flight cancellations.

Sadly for the airline, the pilot scarcity downside won’t be solved with no new pilot contract. Present pilots proceed to depart the airline in document numbers for higher piloting alternatives elsewhere. Thus, the Alaska Airways pilots and ALPA have been pushing the airline for higher contracts, one that’s decently on par with airline rivals. Pilots needed Alaska Airways administration to handle work guidelines, scheduling flexibility meaningfully, and profession safety, as emphasised by the union:


“For years, we’ve got been working towards a market-based contract with cheap options that deal with work guidelines, scheduling flexibility, and career-security points that pilots at different corporations take pleasure in, not a strike.”

Nonetheless, progress on the bargaining desk hasn’t been as far alongside because the pilots and the union had hoped. In April, the leaders of ALPA voted unanimously to conduct a strike-authorization poll among the many pilots. On Could twenty fifth, that balloting completed with the pilots sending a clear-cut message. Among the many greater than 3,100 pilots in Alaska Airways, roughly 96% had forged votes, and 99% of these pilots voted in favor of the strike. This quantities to over 95% of all Alaska Airways pilots who voted to authorize a strike.

Alaska Airways has acknowledged that operational difficulties are usually not as a result of actions of its pilots however as a substitute an unlucky results of its staffing and coaching missteps. Photograph: Vincenzo Tempo – Easy Flying

Advertisement

What occurs now?

Whereas the strike authorization additionally does not imply the Alaska Airways pilots can now stroll off the job, the overwhelming vote is the most recent transfer of the pilots and ALPA in bringing a hopefully peaceable finish to this ongoing labor dispute. Beneath the Railway Labor Act, each the airline’s administration and the union are coming into mediation talks beneath the Nationwide Mediation Board with the federal authorities concerned, the place issues ought to now be settling amicably, as highlighted by the union:


“For 3 years, Alaska pilots have been resolved of their dedication to succeed in a brand new settlement and immediately, we spoke with one unified voice, similar to we did with our latest informational picketing occasion. Now’s the time for administration to reply and interact constructively on the bargaining desk.”

Nonetheless, if talks nonetheless don’t attain an amicable finish beneath the Nationwide Mediation Board, the Board must launch Alaska Airways and the union from mediation. The discharge could be adopted by a mandated 30-day cooling-off interval earlier than the pilots can legally go on strike. Which means that if a strike have been to finally occur, it could be throughout the peak summer season journey interval.

And will the strike happen, it could be the primary pilot strike from a US service in additional than a decade, because the final one occurred again in 2010 when the Spirit Airways pilots went on a brief strike.

Advertisement

The strike authorization additionally implies that Alaska Airways administration may hypothetically select to lock its pilots out. Photograph: Denver Worldwide Airport

The placing line

Whereas it’s comprehensible that contract negotiations usually take fairly a while, three years is fairly lengthy. Strikes are usually not one of the simplest ways to resolve issues, and a attainable strike throughout the peak summer season journey season would undoubtedly be chaotic for passengers. Contemplating Alaska Airways’ poor operational efficiency in latest weeks, the strike authorization and present mediation course of may very well be a useful wake-up name for each events to work in the direction of an amicable finish to this labor dispute.

Advertisement


GettyImages-684876588 Southampton Airport

Southampton Airport Enlargement Case Thrown Out Of Courtroom

Learn Subsequent


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska’s Mac Swanson taken in 7th round of NHL Draft by Pittsburgh Penguins

Published

on

Alaska’s Mac Swanson taken in 7th round of NHL Draft by Pittsburgh Penguins


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Anchorage-born skater Mac Swanson was drafted by the Pittsburgh Penguins in the 7th round, 207th overall, in the 2024 NHL Draft, Saturday, after a dominant season in junior hockey where he was named USHL’s Player of the Year.

The 18-year old will play at the University of North Dakota this fall after reporting to Penguins’ development camp next week.

Swanson was named by USA Hockey as the best player in Junior Hockey after a season in which he led the Fargo Force to the Clark Cup Championship, where he was named playoff MVP.

During the season, he led all USHL skaters with 51 assists and third in total points with 77 in 55 games played which led to an avalanche of accolades that included USHL Player of the Year, Forward of the Year and a first team All-USHL selection.

Advertisement

His father, Brian Swanson, was selected in the 1994 NHL Draft by the San Jose Sharks and played for the ECHL’s Alaska Aces.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Wildfire prompts evacuations near Denali National Park entrance along Parks Highway

Published

on

Wildfire prompts evacuations near Denali National Park entrance along Parks Highway


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – A wildfire that has quickly grown to about 300 acres is threatening the entrance to Denali National Park on the Parks Highway and has forced the evacuation of several hundred people.

The blaze — named the Riley Fire — began burning shortly after noon on Sunday and by 5:30 p.m. was reported at around 350 acres in size.

The fire was first spotted near mile 239 of the Parks Highway, across the Nenana River from the town of Denali, a heavily-populated spot in the summer when tourists visit, and about a mile north of the entrance to the park.

No structures are immediately threatened by the blaze, officials said.

Advertisement
A wildfire that has quickly grown to about 300 acres is threatening the entrance to Denali National Park on the Parks Highway.(Courtesy Denali Borough/via Bureau of Land Management)

Denali National Park spokesperson Paul Ollig said that the blaze is within about a quarter of a mile from people and structures.

“The area where the fire is currently burning is up above the Nenana River in close proximity to the Horseshoe Lake Trail area,” Ollig said. “It is generally dense black spruce forest, and is right up against Mount Healy, so it does have some steep terrain that climbs pretty quickly in that area, once you’re across once you’re west of the railroad tracks.”

Ollig estimated that around 200 people are currently being affected by evacuation notices in the area, including 100 to 150 park employees and another 75 to 100 residents.

Other areas of the park near the fire are in “ready” mode to evacuate, Ollig said, meaning they must be ready to evacuate if the order is given. That includes campers in the Riley Creek Campground, which Ollig said is closest to the blaze.

The Bureau of Land Management’s Fire Service team said 12 smokejumpers responded to the fire via plane and another 10 were driving to the area to help suppress it.

Advertisement

Ollig said that tour and transit bus service has been stopped going westbound. Day-use visitors west of the park entrance are being shuttled back eastward, and “public front-country” facilities and nearby trails have been closed, including the Denali Visitor Center.

The Riley Fire burns near the Denali National Park entrance on June 30, 2024.
The Riley Fire burns near the Denali National Park entrance on June 30, 2024.(Courtesy National Park Service)

BLM said in addition to the smokejumpers, four water-scooping planes were on scene to help douse the flames, with two water scoopers and a retardant air tanker on the way.

The fire was reportedly burning an area predominantly thick with black spruce trees near the Alaska Railroad.

The Park Service said that agencies working to contain the fire include the Alaska Division of Forestry & Fire Protection, Tri-Valley Volunteer Fire Department, and the McKinley Village Volunteer Fire Department.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska issues regulations for carbon offsets program

Published

on

State of Alaska issues regulations for carbon offsets program


JUNEAU — The Dunleavy administration has finalized regulations to start selling carbon offset credits on state land.

The Legislature approved Senate Bill 48 in May last year to allow the state to establish a carbon offset program. New state regulations are set to go into effect July 19. In Haines, a yearlong public process has started to amend the state forest management plan to allow for carbon offsets.

Trevor Fulton, the state’s carbon offset program manager, said it would likely take another 18 months to two years for the state to start selling carbon credits.

Advertisement

“We’re still relatively early in that process,” he said at a public meeting in Haines in May.

That process has already been more than a year in the making.

During his annual address to the Legislature last January, Gov. Mike Dunleavy unveiled plans to monetize carbon in Alaska. SB 48 created a framework to establish carbon offsets on state land. The other Dunleavy bill, approved by legislators in May, allows the state to establish a regulatory framework for storage of carbon dioxide deep underground.

Dunleavy said last year that a carbon management system could generate billions of dollars per year in new state revenue. But at first, revenue expectations from carbon credits are much more modest.

The state is looking at three areas to start selling carbon offsets: Haines State Forest, Tanana Valley State Forest and state forested land in the Matanuska-Susitna region. All three pilot projects are expected to be around 75,000 acres to 100,000 acres each. Anew, an outside consultant, estimated in 2022 that the state could bring in $8 million per year from the three areas, in the first decade.

Advertisement

“We hope to see that grow as projects develop across the landscape, and as we tap further into Alaska’s potential for carbon offsetting,” Fulton said.

By law, 80% of revenue generated from carbon credits would go to the state’s general fund, which could be appropriated for any purpose. The other 20% would be directed to the state’s renewable energy grant fund for clean energy projects.

Carbon offsets in Alaska could see the state receive compensation for protecting forests, kelp farms or even selling millions of acres of beetle-killed wood for biochar, a carbon-rich material that has applications in agriculture.

[Environmentalists urge US to plan ‘phasedown’ of trans-Alaska pipeline amid climate concerns]

In an interview, Fulton said the state is looking to participate in carbon offsets in two ways: By developing its own offset program, and then by establishing a leasing program for carbon management projects to third parties. Fulton said state law likely prevents leasing management of Alaska’s timber resources. That means third-party leasing would likely be limited to projects such as biochar and kelp farms, he said.

Advertisement

Alaska is set to participate in the $2 billion global voluntary carbon market, which allows corporations such as airlines to purchase carbon credits to offset their emissions. The much larger $800 billion compliance market that California participates in with its cap-and-trade program mandates that corporations reduce their emissions to certain levels, including with carbon offsets.

Each carbon offset equates to one metric ton of carbon avoided or removed from the atmosphere. Fulton said that would be the equivalent of the amount of carbon produced by an average round-trip drive from Anchorage to Seattle.

Climate vs. logging

The revenue implications of carbon credits are uncertain for Alaska — and so are the environmental benefits. A growing number of studies have questioned how emission reductions from offsets are measured and whether they are effective at all.

In response to concerns about the unregulated voluntary carbon market, the Biden administration in May released a set of principles to define high-integrity carbon offsets that have a measurable impact in reducing emissions.

Legislative debates about monetizing carbon storage in Alaska have focused more on the potential for revenue and industry investment than environmental benefits. But proving those environmental benefits could be key.

Advertisement

[Previously: Alaska’s carbon storage bill, once a revenue measure, is now seen as boon for oil and coal]

Dominick DellaSala, chief scientist with Wild Heritage, a California-based forest conservation group, said the state would need to show how its offset program would reduce emissions and have that verified. Using the example of logging, DellaSala said the state could pledge not to log old-growth trees and instead use them as a carbon sink.

“That difference between what they would have released from logging versus what they are protecting is the carbon offset,” he said.

The Alaska Department of Natural Resources said the state would show the environmental benefits from its offsets program with improved “forest management projects” to increase “carbon stocks year-over-year.” A spokesperson said those projects could include planting trees and thinning tree stands to reduce crowding — among other practices.

Sealaska Corp., a Southeast Alaska Native corporation, agreed several years ago to participate in California’s cap-and-trade program and protect thousands of acres of old-growth forest for 100 years. The deal was worth a reported $100 million between 2015 and 2020.

Advertisement

DellaSala said that “legitimate” carbon offsets in Southeast Alaska would come from protecting old growth forests for decades. He said the state’s regulations and other forest management practices appear “vague,” and run the risk of “greenwashing.”

In May, state officials held a public meeting to start discussions about allowing carbon offsets in Haines State Forest. The 260,000-acre forest managed by the state has some of “highest per-acre carbon levels” studied by Anew.

Jessica Plachta, executive director of Lynn Canal Conservation, welcomed the state’s interest in carbon offsets. She said that much of the timber in the area is of low value due to timber defects. Carbon offsets would be a significant improvement in forest management practices from large, old-growth timber sales, she said.

“These forests support superlative salmon-spawning and rearing habitats, host the world’s largest gathering of bald eagles, and underpin local subsistence and the commercial fishing and tourism industries, which are the bedrock of the local economy,” she said by email.

SB 48 says that state forests used for a carbon offset program “must remain open to the public” for hunting, fishing and other recreation opportunities. The Dunleavy administration has also said that carbon offsets can coexist with resource extraction industries such as logging.

Advertisement

But there could be a balancing act. The trees with the greatest potential to capture carbon emissions are typically the most attractive to the timber industry.

State forester Greg Palmieri said in May that the five-year schedule of timber sales in Haines would be paused as the forest management plan is discussed. Once that process is completed, state officials should have a better idea how to apply carbon offsets in Haines.

“Every acre of the forest that’s available for timber sales is going to be available for carbon offset programs, Palmieri said, adding that “the intention is to create the highest value for the state in the resources that they own on these lands that we manage.”

State officials say they’ve heard some concerns from the timber industry, but they stressed several factors to help allay fears. State forests being considered for carbon offsets are below their allowable cut, which refers to the amount of wood that can be sustainably harvested; there are no specific projects being actively considered; and public engagement would be robust as the offsets programs are developed, they said.

“Enrollment in an improved forest management project doesn’t take timber harvest off the table, it just takes the most aggressive timber harvest scenario off the table,” a spokesperson for the Department of Natural Resources said.

Advertisement

Bryce Dahlstrom, president of the Alaska Forest Association, said the timber industry’s trade group would have no comment about carbon offsetting until state projects are ready to be presented.

For Southeast Conference, a regional economic development organization, there is interest in the potential benefits of carbon offsets. Robert Venables, Southeast Conference’s executive director, said he is looking to develop a mariculture program to see how much carbon can be sequestered in kelp and seaweed.

One challenge for the state, and other actors, is to marry up the science with the potential economic benefits of carbon offsets, he said.

“I think there is a lot of potential, both on the mariculture side as well as in the forests,” he said. “That will take a new approach on both fronts.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending