Alaska
Alaska agency boosting gas line asks skeptical Legislature to consider investing up to $800M
JUNEAU — The state agency advocating for a $44 billion gas line in Alaska is asking the Legislature to consider investing up to $800 million in the long-sought but faltering megaproject.
There has been renewed interest in building an 800-mile gas pipeline from the North Slope since President Donald Trump announced his strong support for the project. Several Asian nations have shown an interest in investing in the pipeline and buying gas from Alaska, but no concrete deals have yet been signed.
Gov. Mike Dunleavy and Alaska’s three-member, all-Republican congressional delegation have been bullish on the Alaska LNG project. Some lawmakers have been equally optimistic, but multiple legislators said they remain skeptical that the pipeline will be built, particularly on the fast timeline touted by the project’s new private developer.
Frank Richards, president of Alaska Gasline Development Corp., told legislators this week about the upsides of the project. It has been fully permitted and is eligible for $28 billion in federal loan guarantees, he said.
Delegates from South Korea and Thailand are set to come to Alaska soon to study the project, AGDC officials said this week. Additionally, the Trump administration is urging leaders of several Asian nations to commit to the pipeline with representatives set to attend a June summit in Alaska, The New York Times reported.
[South Korea and other Asian countries plan visits to the state as they eye Alaska LNG project]
The renewed interest in the pipeline comes after AGDC — the state agency leading the project — announced in January that Glenfarne had signed on to become its lead developer.
The terms of AGDC’s deal with Glenfarne, a New York-based company, remain confidential. But AGDC told lawmakers this week that Glenfarne agreed to take a 75% stake in exchange for bringing the project to a final investment decision — a pivotal step in completing a megaproject.
Richards said Wednesday that Glenfarne had recently “suspended” calls for an Alaska development agency to provide $50 million as an insurance policy for remaining engineering and design work. Instead, Richards said Glenfarne would be willing to use private capital to complete that work, which is estimated to cost $150 million.
‘It is in our future’
In recent months, some lawmakers have been buoyed by the prospects for the project.
Anchorage GOP Rep. Chuck Kopp penned an opinion piece in the Daily News encouraging Alaskans to “shake the cynicism off.” Fellow Anchorage Republican Rep. Mia Costello introduced a legislative resolution that urges support for “the rapid advancement” of the pipeline.
“We really will be having a gas line. It is in our future,” Costello said at a Tuesday media conference.
Still, multiple lawmakers said while they support the pipeline, they have lingering doubts and questions. Some legislators have been skeptical about the project’s costs and timelines; others have questioned why Glenfarne, a relatively new player in the oil and gas sector, was chosen as the lead developer.
Richards said other offers were discussed, but Glenfarne got the tick of approval from AGDC’s board and investment bank Goldman Sachs.
Some lawmakers have bristled at what they say is the Legislature’s limited oversight of the project.
In 2014, the Legislature approved Senate Bill 138, which granted AGDC broad authority to develop the pipeline.
Republican former House Speaker Mike Chenault, a current AGDC board member, said the agency’s independence was by design. He said that gives AGDC the ability to make decisions in a timely matter.
“I believe that if the Legislature gets involved, that this project will go away,” he said.
With Southcentral Alaska facing a looming shortfall of natural gas from Cook Inlet, the pipeline has been touted as a way to secure gas supply for Alaska in the long term. But the project is also being discussed as a way to fill state coffers.
Officials at AGDC said the state’s current stake in the project could potentially raise hundreds of millions of dollars per year in new revenue, but that is still set to be negotiated with Glenfarne and any other potential investors.
There is an opportunity for Alaska to invest substantially more in the project to collect more revenue for the state, Richards said.
“The big question for the state of Alaska going forward is really going to be around that equity financing,” he said Wednesday to a joint legislative committee.
The project has recently been split into phases. The first phase would see an 807-mile gas pipeline built from the North Slope to Nikiski. The second phase would see plants built to treat gas and prepare it for export.
Richards told lawmakers that the state, Alaska Native corporations, Alaska businesses and individual Alaskans could invest up to 25% in those subprojects. For the pipeline, that would cost roughly $800 million. For the pipeline and two plants, the cost would be over $3.5 billion, AGDC board members said earlier in the month.
The Legislature is currently grappling with strained revenue and a dire fiscal outlook, making it unlikely that it could fund the 25% stake in the pipeline, lawmakers said.
Anchorage Republican Sen. Cathy Giessel said that she had heard little interest from lawmakers for the state to put “money into this project.” Giessel, chair of the Senate Resources Committee, said “$800 million, of course, is an absurd amount.”
Timing, tailwinds and wariness
Project timelines have also been greeted with skepticism by veteran legislators.
Richards told lawmakers this week that a final investment decision could be reached by the end of the year. A pipeline could be constructed and delivering gas for Alaskans by 2030 or 2031, he said.
During a joint legislative committee hearing, House Speaker Bryce Edgmon said that there seemed to be “missing key ingredients” in answers to legislators’ questions from AGDC. Edgmon, a Dillingham independent, suggested that the 2031 timeline seemed “more aspirational than it is reality.”
The costs of the project have also come under scrutiny. The full gas line project was estimated in 2023 to cost $44 billion, AGDC board members said. The pipeline itself was expected then to cost just under $11 billion.
Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, said that the trans-Alaska pipeline was completed in 1977 at a cost of $8 billion. He said that the gas pipeline is expected to cost 37% more than TAPS, but that inflation has increased prices more than five-fold over the past 48 years.
Fields asked how that cost estimate for the gas pipeline could be “plausible.”
Warren Christian, an AGDC board member, said the project’s costs were carefully calculated by ExxonMobil.
An updated cost estimate is expected after engineering and design work is completed, AGDC officials said.
While pipeline discussions continue, concrete plans have been advancing to import gas for Southcentral Alaska. Gas line boosters said the project could be a viable long-term fix for the state’s energy needs.
Veteran legislators say they’ve heard that before.
Anchorage Democratic Sen. Bill Wielechowski said there seemed to be some positive “tailwinds” behind the project, citing interest from the Trump administration and in Asia. But Wielechowski estimated this was the eighth version of the pipeline he’s heard pitched during his 18-year tenure in the Legislature.
“I’m a bit wary at this point, just based on promises we’ve heard in the past,” he said. “New administrations, new people come in and it sounds great, and then, for whatever reason, it just doesn’t work.”
As an example, he pointed to TransCanada. In 2008, the Legislature approved paying up to $500 million for the Calgary-based company to help with pre-construction costs. Seven years later, the Legislature appropriated $64 million to buy out TransCanada’s stake in the project.
Wielechowski said the state should consider investing in the pipeline to raise more state revenue for Alaska. But echoing many in the Capitol, he remained somewhat doubtful the project would come to fruition.
“I want it to happen. I share the sentiment that I think many Alaskans share — I’ll believe it when I see it,” he said.
Alaska
University of Alaska names U.S. Army commander as new UAF chancellor
Officials with the University of Alaska have tapped the commander of the U.S. Army 11th Airborne Division’s Arctic Aviation Command as the new permanent chancellor of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Col. Russell “Russ” Vander Lugt was selected from four finalists after an eight-month search process. He will be the top executive of Alaska’s leading research institution, which describes itself as “America’s Arctic university.” He will replace interim chancellor, and former U.S. Ambassador to the Arctic, Mike Sfraga, who succeeded former chancellor Dan White who announced his retirement in May of last year.
Vander Lugt is a senior U.S. Army officer, an Arctic scholar and UAF alumni, with over two decades of executive leadership experience, according to a university announcement on May 27. He has served as commander of the 11th Airborne Division’s Arctic Aviation Command at Fort Wainwright in Fairbanks since Aug. 2024.
“I’m humbled to be selected to lead the University of Alaska Fairbanks during this pivotal time,” Vander Lugt said in a statement with the announcement.
“I look forward to leading through trust, transparency, and teamwork as we see Alaska and the Arctic transformed through education, research, and public service. I’m committed to building on the strong foundation Chancellors Sfraga and White have established, and working closely with university leadership and governance to support and advance UAF’s mission,” he said.
Vander Lugt will step into the permanent chancellor role on Sept. 8. Sfraga’s last day was Friday, and university officials have selected Larry Hinzman, director of the UA Arctic Leadership Initiative, to serve as interim chancellor through the summer.
Vander Lugt has had a long career with the U.S. Army in various roles in Alaska, where he is stationed in Fairbanks, and across the U.S. His resume lists deployments to Europe and the Middle East.
He served in executive leadership roles that include the Alaskan Command, a division of the U.S. Northern Command, the 601st Aviation Support Battalion, and the 1st Stryker Brigade Combat team. He also taught history and military leadership as an assistant professor at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point and was a professor of military science and department chair at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Prescott, Arizona.
He holds a master’s degree and doctoral degree in Arctic and Northern Studies, which he completed in 2022 at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Vander Lugt’s hire is the latest in major leadership changes in the University of Alaska system — former UA President Pat Pitney retired last month and former university attorney Matt Cooper was named as her successor. Cooper will begin as university president in early August, and Michelle Rizk, vice president of university relations and chief strategy, planning and budget officer, is serving as interim president. Cheryl Siemers was appointed permanent chancellor of the University of Alaska Anchorage in March, after serving as interim chancellor since the retirement of former chancellor Sean Parnell last year.
Vander Lugt’s base salary will be $309,000, according to the university’s announcement.
The University of Alaska Fairbanks serves roughly 7,500 students. It employs more than 800 faculty and nearly 2,000 staff across urban and rural campuses in Fairbanks, Kotzebue, Nome, Bethel and Dillingham.
Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.
Alaska
Dutch Harbor Remembrance Day 2026 – Mike Dunleavy
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1942, six months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, World War II arrived in Alaska when Dutch Harbor on Amaknak Island was bombed by Japanese – the first aerial attack by an enemy on the continental United States; and
WHEREAS, the Japanese pilots expected little resistance; but because of an intercepted message three weeks earlier, the installation was on high alert, and Navy and Marine personnel were prepared with anti-aircraft defenses; and
WHEREAS, encountering unexpected resistance at Dutch Harbor, installation, Japanese forces shifted their focus to the Margaret Bay Naval Barracks, where the attack claimed the lives of 25 servicemen; and
WHEREAS, following the initial attack on Dutch Harbor, Japanese forces launched additional assaults on Dutch Harbor, Adak, Kiska, and Attu, resulting in the Aleut people being evacuated and held in internment camps in Southeast Alaska for three years, through which many did not survive; and
WHEREAS, the brave soldiers of the United States Armed Forces and allied Canadian Forces fought valiantly for more than a year to reclaim the remaining Aleutian Islands. The battle of Attu stands as one of the most costly American assaults in the Pacific, with hundreds of servicemen making the ultimate sacrifice to liberate Alaska; and
WHEREAS, on the 84th anniversary of the bombing of Dutch Harbor, we remember and honor all who were affected by the attack, paying tribute both to the military personnel who served and died to defend our Nation and to the Aleut people who died while imprisoned.
NOW THEREFORE, I, Mike Dunleavy, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, do hereby proclaim June 3, 2026, as:
Dutch Harbor Remembrance Day
in Alaska and encourage all Alaskans to join with the people of Dutch Harbor, Unalaska, and the Aleutian Islands to honor all who were lost in Alaska during World War II, and I order the Alaska State Flag to be flown at half-staff in remembrance of those who perished.
Dated: June 3, 2026
Alaska
Photos show Alaska National Guard plane damaged in Iran war theater
A plane belonging to the Alaska National Guard appears to have been damaged during operations connected to Operation Epic Fury as part of American military efforts against Iran, according to online reports. Defense officials have so far declined to confirm whether Alaska National Guard personnel or equipment are taking part in the campaign.
Last week, defense industry news outlet The War Zone published photos of a KC-135 Stratotanker transiting through a British airbase. In the pictures, made by photographer Andrew McKelvey, the rear bottom of the fuselage and wing stabilizers are “peppered with temporary shrapnel damage repairs‚“ according to The War Zone’s article. The plane also appears to be missing its refueling boom, the proboscis extending from under the tail to pump off fuel to other aircraft.
In the photographs, the Stratotanker’s tail number is visible, identifying the refueling plane as belonging to the Alaska Air National Guard’s 168th Wing, based at Eielson Air Force Base outside of Fairbanks. The wing’s mission includes aerial refueling. That’s the tactic of large planes unloading vast quantities of fuel to aircraft, ranging from fighter jets to rescue helicopters, in midair.
Pictures from a different photographer published last week by another blog, The Aviationist, show the same plane. The tail includes the letters “AK” painted above a white polar bear.
In addition to the photographs, the reporting from The War Zone is based on publicly available flight data and social media posts scraped from a variety of sources.
According to information from Flight Radar 24, the Stratotanker left Eielson on March 5, just days after the U.S. and Israeli militaries began bombing Iranian targets on Feb. 28. Through March, according to public flight records, the plane was based at Ben Gurion Airport southeast of Tel Aviv, where, according to The War Zone, dozens of American refueling aircraft were staged as part of Operation Epic Fury.
There are no public flight records connected to the Stratotanker through April and most of May, until it appeared to fly through England on the way to the United States at the end of last month.
It is not clear how many Alaska Air National Guard planes, personnel or units are currently deployed in connection to the war effort against Iran.
A spokesperson for the Alaska National Guard referred all questions about Operation Epic Fury to the U.S. Central Command.
A spokesperson for CENTCOM, headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida, declined to answer questions on the record or provide any specific information about Alaska National Guard units deployed as part of ongoing military operations, citing the need to protect service members and operational security.
The Alaska National Guard has posted no informational releases or pictures connected to an overseas deployment during the last few months.
Much of Operation Epic Fury has been waged by military aircraft, and aerial refueling is critical to keeping planes supplied during long flights. A May 12 report from the Congressional Research Service composed of public damage reports to U.S. military aircraft noted that among the 42 records of damage or losses were seven KC-135 Stratotankers, though the findings were published before photos emerged of the Alaska-based plane. The report noted that the Defense Department “has not published a comprehensive assessment of combat losses” from Operation Epic Fury.
The tail number is associated with a Stratotanker manufactured in 1964, the year before Boeing ceased making them. All of the nearly 400 KC-135s currently in operation within the American military date back to that era of the Cold War.
The aircraft has the word “Tetlin” painted on the top of its tail. The name is an homage to the Interior Alaska village, one of several selected to honor longstanding bonds between military aviators and Alaska Native communities, according to photographs of a dedication ceremony posted by the Alaska National Guard last summer.
The 168th Wing currently has 12 Stratotankers attached to the unit. That number bumped up in April after a long campaign by Alaska Republican U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan to allocate more tankers to the state’s portfolio given its vast geography and high number of advanced fighter jets.
-
Crypto14 seconds agoRobert Kiyosaki Asks How Government Taking 40% of Your Money Still Ends up Trillions in Debt
-
Finance5 minutes agoHouston budget amendment would give financial assistance to help those impacted by a trash fee
-
Fitness12 minutes agoHow Jeremy Clarkson Reset His Health and Fitness at 66 – Walking, Pilates and Trying ‘Not to Die’
-
Movie Reviews20 minutes ago
Movie Review: Paul Rudd and Nick Jonas hit the right notes in ‘Power Ballad’
-
World25 minutes ago
Trump Says Iran Has Agreed to Not Have a Nuclear Weapon
-
News35 minutes agoHow Each House Member Voted on the Iran War Powers Resolution
-
Lifestyle1 hour agoFirings at CBS’ ’60 Minutes’ reflect the fight for media control in the age of Trump
-
Technology1 hour agoMicrosoft Is Pulling the Plug on Publisher This Fall. These 8 Alternatives Prove You Don't Need It
