Connect with us

Alaska

$44B Alaska LNG project and oil and gas exploration company take early step toward a gas deal

Published

on

B Alaska LNG project and oil and gas exploration company take early step toward a gas deal


Alaska’s gas line agency and an oil and gas company with North Slope prospects have taken a step toward a deal that could one day provide gas for the $44 billion Alaska LNG project.

A subsidiary of Pantheon Resources signed a gas sales precedent agreement with 8 Star Alaska, a subsidiary of the Alaska Gasline Development Corp., the company and the state agency said on Tuesday.

The agreement is primarily focused on providing gas for an initial phase of the gas line export project, the statement said.

That initial phase, estimated to cost about $11 billion, is designed to provide North Slope gas to address a looming shortage of the Cook Inlet natural gas that has long provided heat and electricity in Anchorage and other areas of the state.

Advertisement

Frank Richards, AGDC president said in the statement that the agreement “solidifies the commercial foundation” for the initial phase.

It “provides enough pipeline-ready natural gas, at beneficial consumer rates, to resolve Southcentral Alaska’s looming energy shortage as soon as 2029,” he said.

The agreement contains key commercial terms for a binding gas sales agreement that will be negotiated. The terms include Pantheon supplying up to 500 million cubic feet per day of gas, the statement says.

But large uncertainties exist with the plan.

Pantheon Resources, based in London, does not currently produce the natural gas that would be needed for the project. It is working to develop the Ahpun prospect and a nearby project on Alaska’s North Slope.

Advertisement

It has not yet made a final investment decision that would be needed before the company would develop the Ahpun field for oil and gas production.

The Alaska LNG project has been unable to secure investments from potential private partners to support project costs. The initial project phase also needs private funding. The agency has signed other preliminary gas deals with major oil and gas producers in the past, but the project has continued to struggle.

The state-led Alaska LNG project calls for an 800-mile pipeline carrying natural gas from the North Slope so it can be liquefied in Southcentral Alaska and exported to Asian markets in oceangoing tankers.

The gas line agency this year pitched the new pipeline-first approach to lawmakers, in part to help move the full project forward. That would initially build a pipeline, and later construct other aspects of the project to support the gas exports.

The Alaska LNG project has been in the works for about a decade.

Advertisement

In April, top board members with the gas line agency asked the Legislature to provide another year of funding to keep the project alive.

If the gas line agency cannot secure funding for the entire project or the initial pipeline phase, then staff have been instructed to shut the project down by the end of this year, they said in a letter.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.

The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.

The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.

According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.

Advertisement

This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake

Published

on

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake


An engine and firefighters from the Division of Forestry & Fire Protection’s Mat-Su Area are responding to a fire near Flat Lake.

A caller reported a fire on an island in Flat Lake, with 2 foot flame lengths and structures near by.

The engine crew responding will be shuttled by boat to the fire. The fire is currently reported as .1 acre, creeping and smoldering.

Advertisement

Additional updates will be shared as they become available.

‹ Pioneer Peak Hotshots, Gannett Glacier Crew Join Fight Against 2 Fires Near Ruby

Categories: Active Wildland Fire

Tags: #FireYear2026 #2026AKFIRESEASON, 2026 Alaska Fire Season



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s $10,000 question: Leave or stay?

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s ,000 question: Leave or stay?


A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.

Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?

It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.

Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.

Advertisement

A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.

Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.

Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.

That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.

Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.

Advertisement

This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.

Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”

• • •

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending