Connect with us

Technology

What platforms know — but don’t tell us — about the war on Ukraine

Published

on

What platforms know — but don’t tell us — about the war on Ukraine

Brandon Silverman is aware of extra about how tales unfold on Fb than nearly anybody. As co-founder and CEO of CrowdTangle, he helped to construct programs that immediately understood which tales had been going viral: useful information for publishers at a time when Fb and different social networks accounted for an enormous portion of their visitors. It was so useful, in truth, that in 2016 Fb purchased the corporate, saying it could assist the establishments of journalism establish tales of curiosity to assist their very own protection plans.

However a humorous factor occurred alongside the best way to CrowdTangle turning into simply one other instrument in a writer’s analytics toolkit. Fb’s worth to publishers declined after the corporate determined to de-emphasize information posts in 2018, making CrowdTangle’s authentic perform much less very important. However on the identical time, within the wake of the 2016 US presidential election, Fb itself was of large curiosity to researchers, lawmakers, and journalists in search of to grasp the platform. CrowdTangle provided a novel, real-time window into what was spreading on the positioning, and observers have relied upon it ever since.

As Kevin Roose has documented at The New York Instances, this has been a persistent supply of frustration for Fb, which discovered {that a} instrument it had as soon as purchased to courtroom publishers was now used primarily as a cudgel with which to beat its homeowners. Final 12 months, the corporate broke up the CrowdTangle staff in what it has described, unconvincingly, as a “reorganization.” The instrument stays energetic, however seems to be getting little funding from its father or mother firm. In October, Silverman left the corporate.

Since then, he has been working to additional what had turn into his mission at CrowdTangle exterior Fb’s partitions: working with a bipartisan group of senators on laws that will legally require Fb proprietor Meta and different platform corporations to publicly disclose the sort of data you’ll be able to nonetheless discover on CrowdTangle, together with way more.

I’ve been making an attempt to persuade Silverman to speak to me for months. He’s essential of his previous employer, however solely ever constructively, and he’s cautious to notice each when Fb is best than its friends and the place your entire {industry} has failed us.

Advertisement

However with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and the many questions on the position of social networks that it has posed — Silverman agreed to an electronic mail Q&A.

What I appreciated about our dialog is how Silverman focuses relentlessly on options: the interview beneath is a sort of handbook for the way platforms (or their regulators) may assist us perceive them each by making new varieties of information obtainable, and by making current information a lot simpler to parse.

It’s a dialog that reveals how a lot remains to be attainable right here, and the way low a lot of that fruit hangs to the bottom.

Our dialog has been edited for readability and size.

Advertisement

Casey Newton: What position is social media taking part in in how information in regards to the warfare is being understood to this point?

Brandon Silverman: This is without doubt one of the single most outstanding examples of a serious occasion in world historical past unfolding earlier than our eyes on social media. And in plenty of methods, platforms are stepping as much as the problem.

However we’re additionally seeing precisely how necessary it’s to have platforms working alongside the remainder of civil society to answer moments like this.

As an example, we’re seeing the open-source intelligence neighborhood, in addition to visible forensics groups at information shops, do unbelievable work utilizing social media information to assist confirm posts from on the bottom in Ukraine. We’re additionally seeing journalists and researchers do their greatest to uncover misinformation and disinformation on social media. They’re commonly discovering examples which were seen by thousands and thousands of individuals, together with repurposed online game footage pretending to be actual, coordinated Russian disinformation amongst TikTok influencers, and faux fact-checks on social media that make their method onto tv.

That work has been essential to what we all know in regards to the disaster, and it highlights precisely why it’s so necessary that social media corporations make it simpler for civil society to have the ability to see what’s occurring on their platforms.

Advertisement

Proper now, the established order isn’t adequate.

To date, the dialogue about misinformation within the Russia-Ukraine warfare principally facilities on anecdotes about movies that bought plenty of views. What sort of information can be extra useful right here, and do platforms even have it?

The quick reply is completely. Platforms have plenty of privacy-safe information they might make obtainable. However possibly extra importantly, they might additionally take information that’s already obtainable and easily make it simpler to entry.

As an example, one information level that’s already public however extremely arduous to make use of is round “labels”. A label is when a platform provides their very own data to a chunk of content material — whether or not a chunk of content material has been fact-checked, if the supply of the content material is a state-controlled media outlet, and many others. And so they’re turning into an more and more well-liked method for platforms to assist form the move of data throughout main crises like this.

Nonetheless, even if the labels are public and don’t comprise any privacy-sensitive materials, proper now there aren’t any programmatic methods for researchers or journalists or human rights activists to have the ability to kind by means of and examine all these labels. So, if a newsroom or a researcher needs to kind by means of all of the fact-checked articles on a specific platform and see what the largest myths in regards to the warfare had been on any given day, they’ll’t. In the event that they need to see what narratives all of the state-controlled media shops had been pushing, they’ll’t do this both.

Advertisement

It was one thing we tried to get added to CrowdTangle, however couldn’t get it over the end line. I feel it’s a easy piece of information that needs to be extra accessible for any platform that makes use of them.

That makes plenty of sense to me. What else may platforms do right here?

A giant a part of all this kind of work isn’t all the time about making extra information obtainable —it’s oftentimes about making current information extra helpful.

Can a journalist or a researcher shortly and simply see which accounts have gotten probably the most engagement across the Ukrainian scenario? Can anybody shortly and simply see who the primary particular person to make use of the phrase “Ghost of Kyiv” was? Can anybody shortly and simply see the historical past of all of the state-controlled media shops which were banned and what they had been saying about Ukraine within the lead-up to the warfare?

All of that information is technically publicly obtainable, but it surely’s extremely arduous to entry and manage.

Advertisement

That’s why an enormous a part of efficient transparency is just about making information simple to make use of. It’s additionally an enormous piece of what we had been all the time making an attempt to do at CrowdTangle.

How would you charge the varied platforms’ efficiency on these things to this point?

Nicely, not all platforms are equal.

We’ve seen some platforms turn into actually essential public boards for discussing the warfare, however they’re making nearly no effort to assist civil society in making sense of what’s occurring. I’m speaking particularly about TikTok and Telegram, and to a lesser extent YouTube as nicely.

There are researchers who’re making an attempt to observe these boards, however they should get extremely artistic and scrappy about the way to do it. For all of the criticism Fb will get, together with plenty of very reasonable criticism, it does nonetheless make CrowdTangle obtainable (no less than for the second). It additionally has an Advert Library and an extremely strong community of fact-checkers that they’ve funded, educated and actively assist.

Advertisement

However TikTok, Telegram and YouTube are all method behind even these efforts. I hope this second is a wake-up name for tactics during which they’ll do higher.

One blind spot we’ve is that no matter platforms take away content material, researchers can’t examine it. How would we profit from, say, platforms letting teachers examine a Russian disinformation marketing campaign that bought faraway from Twitter or Fb or YouTube or TikTok?

I feel unlocking the potential of impartial analysis on eliminated content material accomplishes no less than three actually necessary issues. First, it helps construct a way more strong and highly effective neighborhood of researchers that may examine and perceive the phenomenon, and assist your entire {industry} make progress on it. (The choice is leaving it fully as much as the platforms to determine by themselves). Second, it helps maintain the platforms accountable for whether or not they made the fitting selections — and a few of these selections are very consequential. Third, it could assist be a deterrent for unhealthy actors as nicely.

The only largest blind spot in insurance policies round eliminated content material is that there aren’t any industry-wide norms or regulatory necessities for archiving or discovering methods to share it with choose researchers after it’s eliminated. And within the locations the place platforms have voluntarily chosen to do a few of this, it’s not practically as complete or strong appropriately.

The truth is that plenty of the eliminated content material is completely deleted and gone eternally.

Advertisement

We all know that plenty of content material is being faraway from platforms round Ukraine. We all know that YouTube has eliminated a whole bunch of channels and hundreds of movies, and that each Twitter and Meta have introduced networks of accounts they’ve every eliminated. And that’s to say nothing of all of the content material that’s being mechanically eliminated for graphic violence, which may characterize necessary proof of warfare crimes.

I feel not having a greater resolution to that whole downside is a large missed alternative, and one we’ll all in the end remorse not having solved sooner.

I feel platforms ought to launch all this information and extra. However I can even think about them taking a look at Fb’s expertise with CrowdTangle and say hmm, it looks like the first impact of releasing this information is that everybody makes enjoyable of you. Platforms ought to have thicker skins, in fact. However in case you had been to make this case internally to YouTube or TikTok — what’s in it for them?

Nicely, first, I’d pause a bit in your first level. They’re going to get product of enjoyable regardless — and in some methods, I truly assume that’s wholesome. These platforms are enormously highly effective, and they need to be getting scrutinized. On the whole, historical past hasn’t been significantly variety to corporations that resolve they need to disguise information from the surface world.

I additionally need to level out that there’s plenty of laws being drafted world wide to easily require extra of this — together with the Platform Accountability and Transparency Act within the U.S. Senate and Article 31 and the Code of Follow within the Digital Companies Act in Europe. Not all the laws goes to turn into legislation, however a few of it should. And so your query is a crucial one, but it surely’s additionally not the one one which issues anymore.

Advertisement

That being mentioned, given every little thing that occurred to our staff during the last 12 months, your query is one I’ve considered lots.

There have been occasions over the previous few years the place I attempted to argue that transparency is without doubt one of the few methods for platforms to construct legitimacy and belief with exterior stakeholders. Or that transparency is a helpful type of accountability that may act as a helpful counterweight to different competing incentives inside huge corporations, particularly round progress. Or that the reply to irritating evaluation isn’t much less evaluation, it’s extra evaluation.

I additionally noticed first-hand how arduous it’s to be goal about these points from the within. There have been completely factors the place it felt like executives weren’t all the time being goal about among the criticism they had been getting, or at worst didn’t have an actual understanding of among the gaps within the programs. And that’s not an indictment of anybody specifically, I feel that’s only a actuality of being human and dealing on one thing this difficult and emotional and with this a lot scrutiny. It’s arduous not to get defensive. However I feel that’s another excuse why you could construct out extra programs that contain the exterior neighborhood, merely as a test on our personal pure biases.

Ultimately, although, I feel the true cause you do it since you assume it’s only a duty you’ve given what you’ve constructed.

However what’s the sensible impact of sharing information like this? How does it assist?

Advertisement

I can join you to human rights activists in locations like Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Ethiopia who would inform you that once you give them instruments like CrowdTangle, it may be instrumental in serving to stop real-world violence and defending the integrity of elections. This 12 months’s Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Maria Ressa, and her staff at Rappler have used CrowdTangle for years to try to stem the tide of disinformation and hate speech within the Philippines.

That work doesn’t all the time generate headlines, but it surely issues.

So how can we advance the reason for platforms sharing extra information with us?

As a substitute of leaving it up platforms to do fully by themselves, and with a single algorithm for your entire planet, the following evolution in fascinated by managing massive platforms safely needs to be about empowering extra of civil society, from journalists to researchers to nonprofits to fact-checkers to human rights organizations, with the chance to assist.

And that’s to not defer duty from the platforms round any of this. But it surely’s additionally recognizing that they’ll’t do it alone — and pushing them, or just legislating, methods during which they should collaborate extra and open up extra.

Advertisement

Each platform ought to have instruments like CrowdTangle to make it simple to look and monitor necessary natural content material in actual time. But it surely must also be far more highly effective, and we must always maintain Meta accountable in the event that they attempt to shut it down. It signifies that each platform ought to have Advert Libraries — but in addition the present Advert Libraries needs to be method higher.

It means we needs to be encouraging the {industry} to each do their very own analysis and share it extra commonly, together with calling out platforms that aren’t doing any analysis in any respect. It means we must always create extra methods for researchers to check privacy-sensitive information units inside clear rooms to allow them to do extra quantitative social science.

That signifies that each platform ought to have fact-checking applications just like Meta’s. However Meta’s must also be a lot greater, far more strong, and embrace extra consultants from round civil society. It means we must always continue to learn from Twitter’s Birdwatch — and if it really works, use it as a possible mannequin for the remainder of the {industry}.

We needs to be constructing out extra options that allow civil society to assist be part of managing the general public areas we’ve all discovered ourselves in. We should always lean on the concept that thriving public areas solely prosper when everybody feels some sense of possession and duty for them.

We should always act like we actually imagine an open web is best than a closed one.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Analogue’s 4K N64 has been delayed again, but only by a month

Published

on

Analogue’s 4K N64 has been delayed again, but only by a month

The Analogue 3D has been hit with another delay, but should still be launching this summer. In an update on its preorder website, Analogue explained that it’s modern take on the Nintendo 64 “is now shipping in late August 2025,” after previously aiming for July. The company said in a separate statement that the decision was made due to the ever-changing situation around US tariffs.

“Following last week’s sudden tariff changes, Analogue 3D will now begin shipping next month,” the company explained in a post on X. “We’re absorbing the costs — your preorder price stays the same. No additional charges. Late August, the wait ends: reviews go live with everything we’ve been saving for this moment.”

Like its previous hardware, the $249.99 Analogue 3D is a modern console designed to play old games, in this case N64 cartridges. The new console can upscale classic games to 4K and includes multiple display modes to mimic the look and feel of a CRT display, and the company says that it supports 100 percent of N64 cartridges. It was originally planned for a launch in 2024, but has been hit with multiple delays since it was initially announced.

Continue Reading

Technology

Lowering your electric bill could be floating in the ocean

Published

on

Lowering your electric bill could be floating in the ocean

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

What if the answer to cleaner energy was right out on the waves? A new green energy system is set to change how we capture clean power, and it all starts with the ocean. French startup Seaturns has designed technology that taps into the natural motion of the sea. Their water pendulum turbines are built to last, require little maintenance, and turn rolling waves into electricity. Unlike other renewable options, ocean waves offer a steady, often predictable source of power.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM/NEWSLETTER.

Water pendulum turbine. (Seaturns)

How renewable wave energy works using a water pendulum system

Here’s how the water pendulum wave converter works. These large, yellow, floating cylinders pitch back and forth with each passing wave. Inside, the motion causes a column of water to swing like a pendulum, compressing air between two chambers and driving a turbine that generates electricity. This constant back-and-forth movement happens entirely within the hull, protecting components from corrosive saltwater and turbulent seas.

Advertisement

Unlike older wave converters that rely on exposed mechanical parts, Seaturns’ design is simple, reliable, and self-contained. Backed by organizations such as Bpifrance, Horizon Europe, and marine research institute Ifremer, the project has drawn support from across France’s public and private sectors.

Water pendulum turbines.

Water pendulum turbines. (Seaturns)

Renewable wave energy turbine passes open-sea testing

Seaturns recently completed 18 months of successful offshore testing using a prototype built near Brest, France. Built at quarter-scale, the test demonstrated the system’s durability and energy efficiency under harsh marine conditions. This confirms the power-producing concept as a promising alternative to traditional energy technologies.

Historically, ocean power projects have struggled due to their complexity, cost, and vulnerability to damage. Seaturns’ design addresses these weaknesses head-on. A water pendulum is driven by the horizontal motion of wave surges, allowing it to function efficiently even in shallower waters where wave height is limited. This enables performance in shallower depths, bringing the system closer to shore. Its compact size, modular construction, and simplified deployment process make it attractive for coastal cities, offshore industries, and island communities alike.

And unlike wind or solar power, which can fluctuate with weather and daylight, wave converters can generate energy more consistently, though typically at lower output levels, even when skies are cloudy or winds are still.

Water pendulum turbine.

Water pendulum turbine. (Seaturns)

Low-maintenance renewable wave energy designed to last

Wave energy offers enormous untapped potential. According to some estimates, global oceans could theoretically produce more than 2 terawatts of renewable electricity using wave technology. That’s enough to power a significant portion of national grids, potentially up to a third of the United States’ energy demand, if fully harnessed, though real-world output would depend on many local and technical factors. Harnessing even part of Alaska’s extensive coastline could significantly reduce fossil fuel reliance in remote communities.

Advertisement

Recent academic studies have highlighted the promise of pendulum-based wave energy converters. Their ability to deliver direct mechanical-to-electrical conversion, combined with structural simplicity, makes them a viable path forward for clean ocean power.

Speaking of power, want to reduce your energy bills while staying cool? Check out these smart ways to beat the heat at Cyberguy.com/KeepCool.

Also, explore the latest innovations in smart thermostat technology for your home Cyberguy.com/SmartThermostats. 

Kurt’s key takeaways

Some people point out that wave energy still has its hurdles, like dealing with inconsistent wave patterns and currently lower power output compared to wind or solar farms. Even so, the Seaturns system could be a real breakthrough. Its tough design, simple upkeep, and environmental benefits make it a strong contender for future energy grids. As we keep searching for reliable and sustainable power, wave energy is starting to stand out. Now, the big question is whether creative ideas like water pendulums can help make wave power a key player in the global shift to clean energy. 

Learn how to save on electricity at home at Cyberguy.com/SaveonPower.

Advertisement

Would you support the installation of wave energy systems like the Seaturns turbines near your local beach? Tell us why or why not. Let us know by writing us at Cyberguy.com/Contact

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM/NEWSLETTER.

Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Technology

Superman is a box office hit, but the hard part comes next

Published

on

Superman is a box office hit, but the hard part comes next

Over the weekend, DC Studios’ new Superman feature became this year’s third-biggest box-office debut in the US. The movie’s success is a sign that theatergoers might actually not be quite as tired of superheroes as people tend to think, and that’s particularly notable for Warner Bros., given the studio’s plan to build a new cinematic universe of DC Comics adaptations for the big screen. But making interconnected film franchises work is easier said than done. And even though Superman is putting up numbers, DC might have a much harder time doing the same with its next couple of cape movies.

Though it fell short of A Minecraft Movie’s and Lilo & Stitch’s domestic opening weekends, Superman raked in $125 million stateside and another $95 million internationally, making it WB’s strongest superhero debut since Matt Reeves’ The Batman in 2022. You can see those numbers reflected in the sheer amount of Superman hype (some of which has been weird and gross) that has overtaken social media since the movie first premiered. Because of Superman’s success, DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn is reportedly thinking about a couple of spinoff series revolving around Edi Gathegi‘s Mister Terrific and Skyler Gisondo‘s Jimmy Olsen. But before any of that comes to fruition, the studio first has to sell the public on its next two big tentpole features due out next year: Craig Gillespie’s Supergirl and James Watkins’ Clayface.

Following the disaster that became known as the DCEU, WB was in desperate need of a fresh start and a vision for how it could use DC characters in ways that audiences would actually like. That need led to the creation of DC Studios with Gunn and co-CEO Peter Safran guiding the whole endeavor. Though Gunn had worked on previous DC projects, his DC Studios’ appointment felt like a power move on WB’s part that spoke to its desire to push back against Marvel’s box-office dominance. And while it seemed a little odd that Gunn wanted to launch his new DC Universe with an animated Creature Commandos streaming series for (HBO) Max, it was easy to understand the logic behind his plan to make a new Superman the franchise’s centerpiece.

Superman has always been a pillar of the DC Comics brand and embodied much of what makes the company’s characters compelling across different mediums. In a universe full of gods, alien monsters, and supervillains, Superman represents hope and humanity at its best. He’s a near-indestructible powerhouse, but he’s also just a dork from Kansas who loves his family and believes in the importance of journalism. He’s got a bunch of superfriends, but he also has major beef with deranged billionaires who can’t wrap their minds around the concept of immigrants being people who make valuable contributions to society.

Those basic beats have defined Superman stories ever since the character first appeared back in 1938. And part of what makes Gunn’s new film so excellent is the way it weaves all of those ideas together into a colorful, optimistic joyride that feels nothing like WB’s other recent takes on the Man of Steel.

Advertisement

Some of Superman’s success can also be attributed to the basic fact that he’s a character whose lore most people are familiar with — something the movie acknowledges by glossing over Clark Kent’s tragic backstory and dropping you right into his life as an established superhero. But the same can’t exactly be said for Superman’s cousin, Kara / Supergirl, and B-tier Batman villain Clayface.

Thanks to CBS’s Supergirl and HBO Max’s Harley Quinn animated series, Kara and Clayface have had pretty big presences on the small screen in recent years. But the characters have always had somewhat lower profiles compared to DC’s other heroes and villains. Viewed through one lens, DC Studios following Superman up with Supergirl and Clayface reads as a calculated move to avoid following in the examples of the MCU and DCEU, which were both fleshed out with a series of features focused on the kinds of A-list characters you see on lunchboxes and bookbags. But the upcoming features also feel, at least on paper, informed by the way that studios like Marvel and Disney have gotten into the habit of expanding their genre franchises with ill-conceived spinoffs.

That’s kind of the general vibe you get from the full slate of DC Studio’s projects that are currently in development, which includes a stop-motion movie about two of Batman’s Robins, a True Detective-style Green Lantern show for HBO Max, and a feature about Bane and Deathstroke. A sequel to The Batman — which predates the DCU and exists in its own continuity — is also due out in 2027. And at some point down the line, the studio intends to introduce a new Bruce Wayne who will presumably link up with Superman and Wonder Woman (whose reboot is also in the pipeline) to form some sort of Justice League.

A man with a black face mask shaped like the letter T. The man is also a black, red, and white motorcycle jacket with matching pants and standing in front of a pherical space ship.

DC Studios

Most of DC Studios’ far-off films and series feel like the kinds of projects you would expect a studio to lead with — ones with instantly recognizable characters whose stories are well known enough to get audiences curious and excited about how they could be done differently. Milly Alcock’s Supergirl, who gets a brief and fantastic Superman cameo, seems a bit better suited to keep the franchise’s current momentum going. But given that we’re so early in this DCU’s existence, a body horror like Clayface, about an actor who becomes a murderous mud monster, feels like a tougher sell (even if Mike Flanagan is writing the script).

It’s easy to imagine Supergirl and Clayface revealing that what audiences have grown weary of isn’t comics-inspired narratives, but sprawling, interconnected franchises more concerned with growth than being made up of good movies. That energy is what dragged the MCU into its flop era and made most of Disney Plus’ Star Wars series slogs to get through, and DC Studios clearly doesn’t want to wind up in a similar position. Turning Clark’s cousin and a lesser-known DC villain into box-office juggernauts might be an even bigger challenge — but Superman at least shows that Gunn and Safran know where to start. And if the studio plays its cards right, this really might be the start of a new golden age for DC.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending