Connect with us

Technology

Google settles with engineers who said they were fired for trying to organize

Published

on

Google has settled with six engineers over claims the corporate squashed staff’ efforts to arrange, as first reported by Motherboard. The specifics of the settlement stay below a non-disclosure settlement, however 4 of the employees who had been allegedly fired out of retaliation for his or her labor activism in 2019 is not going to be reinstated, whereas one nonetheless stays employed by the tech large.

4 staff, Rebecca Rivers, Laurence Berland, Paul Duke, and Sophie Waldman, filed labor expenses towards Google in 2019 after the corporate stated they had been fired as a result of they violated its knowledge safety insurance policies. Previous to their termination, they rallied towards a few of Google’s ethically questionable decisions, together with its work with the Customs and Border Safety (CBP), regardless of the company’s therapy of immigrants and enforcement of household separation insurance policies. Berland reached a settlement with Google final yr.

One other worker, Kathryn Spiers, was fired shortly after for creating inside pop-ups, saying, “Googlers have the suitable to take part in protected concerted actions.” The pop-up would seem when staff considered Google’s inside worker pointers or visited the web site of IRI Consultants, an anti-union agency that Google employed. Google says Spiers was fired for not getting correct approval for the code she used to create the notification.

In 2020, the Nationwide Labor Relations Board (NLRB) filed a criticism towards Google, claiming the corporate illegally spied on Berland and Spiers earlier than firing them, and stated that Google “arguably violated” labor legal guidelines by firing Waldman, Rivers, and Duke. The NLRB took the tech large to trial final yr, and over the course of the two-year-long authorized battle, the NLRB uncovered one thing referred to as Venture Vivian, Google’s secret union-busting initiative. In January, the courtroom ordered Google at hand over extra inside paperwork that the corporate tried to hide by claiming attorney-client privilege.

“It took over 2 years of preventing. Over 2 years of dwelling in a near-constant hell. However, it’s lastly over,” Rivers said in a tweet. “Combating for staff’ rights is tough, it hurts, however seeing the affect that we now have helped make within the Labor Organizing motion is value it.”

Final November, Waldman, Rivers, and Duke filed a separate lawsuit towards Google, stating they had been contractually obligated to comply with the corporate’s well-known “don’t be evil” coverage, which is why they protested towards Google’s contract with the CBP. This lawsuit was dropped as a part of the settlement, in line with The New York Instances.

“I’m very happy with what my purchasers achieved: they fought aggressively — and efficiently — in exposing Google’s plan which was orchestrated on the highest degree of inside administration to quell union organizing and cease its staff from talking out about issues that had been simultaneous of labor place and international concern,” Laurie Burgess, the lawyer representing the workers stated in an announcement to The Verge. “I’m assured that my shopper’s success right here — successfully bringing Google to its knees — will encourage different Googlers and for that matter staff in different industries to choose up the baton and proceed the efforts to carry companies accountable for his or her actions.”

Advertisement

Google didn’t instantly reply to The Verge’s request for remark.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Two students find security bug that could let millions do laundry for free

Published

on

Two students find security bug that could let millions do laundry for free

A security lapse could let millions of college students do free laundry, thanks to one company. That’s because of a vulnerability that two University of California, Santa Cruz students found in internet-connected washing machines in commercial use in several countries, according to TechCrunch.

The two students, Alexander Sherbrooke and Iakov Taranenko, apparently exploited an API for the machines’ app to do things like remotely command them to work without payment and update a laundry account to show it had millions of dollars in it. The company that owns the machines, CSC ServiceWorks, claims to have more than a million laundry and vending machines in service at colleges, multi-housing communities, laundromats, and more in the US, Canada, and Europe.

CSC never responded when Sherbrooke and Taranenko reported the vulnerability via emails and a phone call in January, TechCrunch writes. Despite that, the students told the outlet that the company “quietly wiped out” their false millions after they contacted it.

The lack of response led them to tell others about their findings. That includes that the company has a published list of commands, which the two told TechCrunch enables connecting to all of CSC’s network-connected laundry machines. CSC ServiceWorks didn’t immediately respond to The Verge’s request for comment.

CSC’s vulnerability is a good reminder that the security situation with the internet of things still isn’t sorted out. For the exploit the students found, maybe CSC shoulders the risk, but in other cases, lax cybersecurity practices have made it possible for hackers or company contractors to view strangers’ security camera footage or gain access to smart plugs.

Advertisement

Often, security researchers find these security holes and report them before they can be exploited in the wild. But that’s not helpful if the company responsible for them doesn’t respond.

Continue Reading

Technology

The Mac Pro and Studio won’t get the M4 nod until mid-2025

Published

on

The Mac Pro and Studio won’t get the M4 nod until mid-2025

Throughout 2024, though, all of Apple’s laptops (except the MacBook Air) will move to the M4 chip that the company just gave the iPad Pro, Gurman writes. Amusingly, this herky-jerky chip upgrade cycle means that the iPad Pro is currently the single-core performance champ of Apple’s lineup — and it will continue to be for about another year, when compared to the Mac Studio and Mac Pro.

This is a silly comparison, of course — The current crop of Mac Studios and Mac Pros are incredible computers that hold more RAM, have more ports, and won’t throttle as quickly as the iPad Pro, even with that heat-conducting Apple logo. They also don’t have an operating system that stands squarely in the way of pushing their hardware. And high-end Mac users should be used to waiting a while between revisions. Still, I’m sure more than a few people will appreciate the upgrade when it comes.

Continue Reading

Technology

Boston Dynamics' creepy robotic canine dances in sparkly blue costume

Published

on

Boston Dynamics' creepy robotic canine dances in sparkly blue costume

As the world celebrated #InternationalDanceDay, a unique duo took the stage, or rather, the screen, to showcase a different kind of choreography. 

Spot, the quadruped robot developed by Boston Dynamics, found a new friend in Sparkles, a dazzlingly dressed counterpart designed to explore the fusion of robotics, art and entertainment.

Sparkles and spot canine robots dance (Boston Dynamics)

A cartoon come to life

At first glance, the video in question seems like a whimsical animation straight out of a children’s show. Yet, this is no fiction. The footage is a testament to how far robotics has come, featuring Spot adorned in a blue, sparkly, albeit slightly creepy costume, performing a dance routine that could rival any animated character.

robot dogs 2

Sparkles and spot canine robots dance  (Boston Dynamics)

GET SECURITY ALERTS, EXPERT TIPS – SIGN UP FOR KURT’S NEWSLETTER – THE CYBERGUY REPORT HERE

Advertisement

Meet Sparkles

“Spot is meeting another strange dog and making friends through the power of dance. Meet Sparkles!” Boston Dynamics announced. The video features two Spots — one in the recognizable black and yellow, and the other, Sparkles, in the blue, sparkly dog costume — engaging in a robotic dance-off that culminates in a mechanical kiss.

ASK ANY TECH QUESTION, AND GET KURT’S FREE CYBERGUY REPORT NEWSLETTER HERE

robot dogs 3

Sparkles and spot canine robots kiss  (Boston Dynamics)

This display of robotic affection and agility has sparked conversations about the potential applications of such technology in entertainment venues like theme parks, where robots could add a layer of realism to character interactions.

Social media’s mixed moves

The reception on social media was as varied as the dance moves displayed. Some viewers were enchanted, praising the mobility and innovation, while others expressed discomfort, humorously suggesting that the cute facade could well be the stuff of nightmares.

Advertisement

CLICK TO GET KURT’S FREE NEWSLETTER, THE CYBERGUY REPORT

ROBOT dogs 4

Sparkles and spot canine robots dance (Boston Dynamics)

HUMANOID ROBOTS ARE NOW DOING THE WORK OF HUMANS IN A SPANX WAREHOUSE 

Kurt’s key takeaways

After watching Spot and Sparkles bust a move together, it’s pretty wild to think about where robotics is heading. It’s like we’re watching a live-action cartoon, isn’t it? These robots are not just showing off some fancy footwork; they’re opening our eyes to a whole new world of possibilities. Whether they’re making us smile or giving us the heebie-jeebies, they’re proof that creativity knows no limits.

How do you feel about robots displaying human-like behaviors such as dancing and kissing? Does it concern you for the future of human-robot interactions? Let us know by writing us at Cyberguy.com/Contact

Advertisement

For more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading to Cyberguy.com/Newsletter

Ask Kurt a question or let us know what stories you’d like us to cover

Follow Kurt on Facebook, YouTube and Instagram

Answers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:

Copyright 2024 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending