Earlier this year, a relatively unknown startup from Finland made a startling announcement: It had finally solved solid-state batteries.
Technology
Boeing Starliner’s crew flight test delayed due to a valve problem
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25436042/2151613500.jpg?ssl=1 "Boeing Starliner’s crew flight test delayed due to a valve problem")
NASA will attempt to send a pair of astronauts to space aboard Boeing’s Starliner aircraft for the first time soon, but not today. As the the astronauts settled into place, officials scrubbed Monday night’s planned launch attempt at around 8:30PM ET, due to “a faulty oxygen relief valve observation” on the ULA Atlas V rocket’s Centaur second stage. Another launch window is available on Tuesday night, but it’s unclear whether they will be able to reset that quickly.
The launch was scheduled to take place at 10:34PM ET from the Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, with a livestream available on NASA’s YouTube channel.
The United Launch Alliance’s Atlas V rocket will propel the Starliner aircraft to space, where it will stay at the ISS for one week. While on board, flight commander Butch Wilmore and pilot Suni Williams will test the Starliner’s capabilities, including launching, docking, and its eventual return to Earth.
Boeing built the Starliner as part of its $4.2 billion contract with NASA, which encourages the development of new spacecraft from private companies through the agency’s Commercial Crew Program.
If all goes well during this flight, NASA will certify Starliner, allowing it to ferry NASA astronauts between Earth and the ISS. This could make the Starliner a new rival for SpaceX, which has been carrying NASA astronauts to space since 2020.
Update May 6th: Added details about scrubbed Monday night launch attempt.
Continue Reading
Technology
The Netherlands is the first European country to approve Tesla’s supervised Full Self-Driving
Dutch regulators, the RDW, announced that after over a year and a half of testing, it has officially approved Tesla’s Full-Self Driving (FSD) Supervised. This makes the Netherlands the first European country to authorize the use of FSD on its roads. This could open the door to wider adoption throughout the EU. Tesla’s European headquarters is located in Amsterdam, so it’s only fitting that the country is the first to embrace the company’s FSD.
In a statement announcing the approval, the RDW said that, “Using driver assistance systems correctly makes a positive contribution to road safety because the driver is supported in their driving tasks; it is a supplement to the driver. Through continuous strict monitoring of the driver in the vehicle, the system is safer than other driver assistance systems.”
The update implementing FSD Supervised (version 2026.3.6) has started rolling out to a limited number of users. Drivers will need to watch a tutorial and take a quiz before self-driving can be enabled, which reminds people that FSD Supervised “does not make your vehicle autonomous. Do not become complacent.”
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The first time I tried to remove my personal information from people search sites, it was back online after a few weeks. If the same thing happened to you, you might have decided it’s just not worth the effort. This is likely by design.
Data brokers profit from your information, so they’re incentivized to make the process as difficult as possible. Sen. Maggie Hassan even called out a few data brokers recently for hiding their opt-out pages altogether. But you don’t have to let them keep your data, as long as you know what to do.
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
SPRING CLEAN YOUR DIGITAL FOOTPRINT: WHY RETIREES ARE SCAM TARGETS
A quick search of your name can reveal just how many sites are sharing your personal information without you realizing it. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
How to remove your personal info
The way I see it, there are two ways you can do this:
- Manually removing your information
- Using an automated data removal service
I recommend the second option. It saves a lot of time and does a more thorough job than most people will manage on their own. But if you still prefer to go about it yourself, I’ll share a step-by-step guide to help you do it as painlessly and thoroughly as possible.
Step 1: map your exposures
This step is important for when your information inevitably reappears after some time. Before you start removing anything, compile a list of places where your personal information appears or is likely to be held. Or you can compile the list yourself. The sites will likely include:
People search sites
These are the easiest to find because they’re designed to be public.
- Search: “your full name” + city, “your phone number”, “your email”
- Check beyond page 1, as many listings appear deeper in the results
- Repeat searches with: Maiden names or name variations and old locations
Private data broker databases (harder to see, but widely used)
These don’t usually show up in search results because they sell data to businesses, not individuals. You can try to infer their presence based on how your data is used, but it’s no easy feat.
This is one of the reasons I recommend using a data removal service. They narrow down which brokers are most likely to have your information based on things like your location and other markers.
But if you want to try for yourself, look for signals like:
- Getting calls or emails from companies you’ve never interacted with
- Highly specific outreach (e.g., your job title, income range, or recent move)
- Pre-filled forms with your personal details
Where your data likely came from:
- Warranty registrations
- Loyalty programs and retail purchases
- Financial, insurance, or real estate inquiries
- App usage and location data
If you’ve shared your data with a company, there’s a strong chance it’s been resold or shared with brokers behind the scenes.
Marketing and lead generation lists
These are often built for targeted advertising and outreach, and your data can circulate across many of them at once.
How to spot them:
Sudden spikes in spam after:
Signing up for a service
Entering a giveaway or quiz
Downloading a resource (e.g., ebook, discount code)
- Signing up for a service
- Entering a giveaway or quiz
- Downloading a resource (e.g., ebook, discount code)
- Emails that feel “personalized” but come from unfamiliar brands
- Messages referencing a specific interest, purchase, or life event
Where to check:
- Your email inbox (search for patterns in senders)
- SMS history for unknown marketing messages
- Unsubscribe pages (they often reveal the company or list owner)
Important: Unsubscribing usually stops messages. It doesn’t remove your data from the underlying list.
Public profile aggregators (not quite the same as people-search sites)
These sites compile information from across the web but aren’t always designed specifically for “people lookup.”
Examples include:
- Old forum profiles or community pages
- Professional directories and membership listings
- Scraped social media profiles
- Event attendee lists or speaker bios
How to find them:
Search your name in quotes + keywords like:
“profile”, “bio”, “member”, “directory”
- “profile”, “bio”, “member”, “directory”
- Search usernames you’ve used in the past
- Use image search to find reused profile photos
These are often overlooked but can still expose valuable details like your location, employer, or social links.
5 MYTHS ABOUT IDENTITY THEFT THAT PUT YOUR DATA AT RISK
Data broker listings often include sensitive details like your address, phone number and relatives, making removal a critical first step. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Step 2: Remove your data
Now that you’ve mapped where your data is exposed (or likely to be), it’s time to start removing it. Instead of jumping randomly between sites, work through your list in order of visibility and risk:
- People search sites (highest visibility)
- Public profile aggregators
- Marketing and lead-gen lists
- Private data brokers (least visible, but still important)
Remove your data from people-search sites
These should be your first priority because they make your personal information easy for anyone to find.
Typical process:
- Find your listing using the link you saved earlier
- Locate the “opt-out” or “remove my info” page (usually in the footer)
- Submit your profile URL
- Verify your request (via email or CAPTCHA)
What to expect:
- Time per site: ~5-20 minutes
- Removal timeframe: a few days to a couple of weeks
Tip: Save confirmation emails or screenshots. You may need them if your data reappears.
Remove your data from public profile aggregators
These can be less standardized, since they’re often scraped or republished pages.
Typical process:
- Look for a “Contact,” “Support,” or “Privacy” page
- Request removal directly (or delete your account, if possible)
- If no response, identify the site owner via WHOIS or hosting info
Alternative option:
- If the page won’t be removed, you can request de-indexing through Google, but this only hides it from search results, not the site itself
These take more effort, but they’re worth addressing because they often contain contextual details (job, interests, affiliations.)
Remove your data from marketing and lead-generation lists
This is less about a single listing and more about stopping ongoing data use.
Typical process:
- Use the “unsubscribe” link in emails or reply STOP to SMS messages
- Look for a “delete my data” or privacy request option
- Submit a formal request if available (often under GDPR/CCPA rights)
Important:
- Unsubscribing stops messages
- It does not always delete your data
If the company has a privacy page, look specifically for:
- “Right to deletion”
- “Do not sell my information”
Remove your data from private data broker databases
These are the least visible and often the most frustrating to deal with manually.
Typical process:
- Find the company’s privacy or legal page
- Submit a data access or deletion request
- Verify your identity (this may require ID documents)
What makes this harder:
- You often don’t know which brokers have your data
- Some require detailed verification
- Responses can take weeks
This is where most people hit a wall and where ongoing monitoring or automation becomes useful.
Keep track as you go
As you work through your list, track:
- Sites you’ve submitted requests to
- Dates of submission
- Confirmation emails or case IDs
This makes it much easier to:
- Follow up if needed
- Re-check later when your data reappears
1 BILLION IDENTITY RECORDS EXPOSED IN ID VERIFICATION DATA LEAK
Even after you remove your information, it can reappear, which is why ongoing monitoring or automated removal matters. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
The best way to deal with resurfacing data
My recommendation is to use a personal data removal service. These services handle the entire removal process for you, so there’s no need to search for your own data online or return to data broker sites to repeat opt-out requests. Everything is managed in the background.
They also tend to do a more thorough job than most people can manage on their own.
Many data removal services can request deletions from a wide range of websites, including some that are not easy to find on your own. They also scan for new exposures, alert you if your information shows up again and allow you to submit additional removal requests when needed. In some cases, these requests are handled by privacy specialists.
Most services also include a 30-day money-back guarantee, so you can try it risk-free and see how much of your information is exposed online.
YOU COULD BE SHARING YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER WHEN YOU DON’T NEED TO
Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com.
Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web: Cyberguy.com.
Kurt’s key takeaways
Removing your personal information from the internet is not a one-and-done task. It takes persistence, a bit of strategy and the right tools. The frustrating part is that your data can come back even after you remove it, but that does not mean the effort is wasted. Every step you take reduces your exposure and makes it harder for your information to spread. If you want the most control, doing it manually gives you a clear view of where your data lives. However, if you want consistency without the ongoing time commitment, a data removal service can take that burden off your plate and keep working in the background. Either way, the key is to stay proactive. Your data has value, and once you start treating it that way, you will approach your privacy very differently.
Have you ever removed your personal info online only to see it show up again later, and what did you do next? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Not only that, but Donut Lab, a spinoff of Verge Motorcycles, said that its solid-state battery — long considered the “Holy Grail of batteries” for their high-density, durable, fast-charging abilities — would go into production later this year.
Battery experts were understandably skeptical. After all, solid-state batteries are one of those technologies, along with artificial general intelligence and the hyperloop, that seem perpetually two years away. And while most legitimate efforts in this field — whether academic or commercial — have some level of published research or recognizable names attached, Donut Lab seemed to have emerged out of nowhere, with no known researchers or prior presence in the field. This lack of traceability immediately raised concerns about the startup’s credibility.
“I can’t say they didn’t do it,” said Eric Wachsman, the director of the Maryland Energy Innovation Institute and an expert on solid-state batteries and solid oxide fuel cells. “All I can say is they haven’t demonstrated that they have.”
The skepticism seems warranted, especially when you consider how many other people have been chasing the solid-state dream. Were we really to believe this obscure startup had beaten Toyota, Stellantis, and the entire nation of China to the punch? The odds were against it.
Donut Lab seemed to anticipate the doubt, launching a website last February called idonutbelieve.com that would serve as a platform to publish independent tests verifying that, in fact, its solid-state battery was real, and spectacular. Over the course of several weeks, the startup posted third-party results from state-owned VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland that it said proved its battery was what it said it was: a fast-charging, high-energy-density solid-state battery that wasn’t actually a supercapacitor in disguise.
“The resistance won’t disappear when we present the proof,” Donut Lab CEO and cofounder Marko Lehtimäki said in a video. “It will just intensify because this new technology is a threat to the established players in the industry.”
But Donut Lab is still hiding the ball on some key information. At CES in January, the startup said its solid-state battery has an energy density of 400Wh per kilogram—roughly twice that of typical lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries in production. Not only that, but it could charge to full in five minutes, had a practically unlimited lifespan of 100,000 charging cycles, was unaffected by heat and cold (negative 30 degrees Celsius and 100C), and contains no rare earth elements, precious metals, or flammable liquid electrolytes.
Much of that remains unsubstantiated. Even after posting five independent test reports from VTT, the startup has yet to demonstrate three of the most important metrics: chemistry, density, and cycle-life claims.
The stakes are incredibly high. Imagine an electric vehicle that can travel 700–800 miles on a single charge, and that wasn’t at risk of bursting into flames because the flammable electrolytes had been replaced with a solid material.
In lithium-ion batteries, the motion of the liquid electrolytes generates heat, and in certain situations, this can slip into a “thermal runaway” effect that results in a fire. By comparison, solid-state batteries would make it safer to quickly draw power from (or add it back to) the battery, meaning you could theoretically charge an EV faster. It also could mean, structurally, less room has to be devoted to temperature control, which could allow companies to squeeze more battery cells into the same size pack.
After reviewing the tests of the Donut battery, Wachsman said there are still significant concerns. During the extreme heat tests, for example, the pouch surrounding Donut’s battery lost its vacuum seal. Gas generation inside batteries — caused by processes like electrolyte decomposition or oxygen release — can lead to swelling and rupture of the battery pouch. But without knowing the exact chemistry of the cell, it’s difficult to say how significant it is that Donut’s battery had this failure.
Setting aside the Donut battery for a moment, solid-state batteries have struggled to graduate from the laboratory to the assembly line because of well-documented problems. These batteries are often plagued by the formation of metallic cracks called dendrites that cause them to short circuit. Think of them like cracks that form on a sidewalk when a tree root grows underneath.
Dendrites have been a thorn in the side of battery developers since the 1970s. One reason lithium-ion batteries have become ubiquitous while other approaches have stalled is that their commonly used graphite anodes are less susceptible to dendrite formation.
But new discoveries could help engineers finally overcome these hurdles. A research team from MIT recently published a study in Nature that found that chemical reactions caused by high electrical currents that weaken the electrolyte also make it more susceptible to dendrite growth. That’s why developing stronger electrolytes alone hasn’t solved the decades-old dendrite problem. And it could point to the importance of developing more chemically stable materials to finally fulfill the promise of solid-state batteries.
Progress is already being made — where else? — in China. Last month, CATL, which controls nearly 40 percent of the global battery market, filed a patent application for solid-state batteries with a reported 500Wh energy density. According to CarNewsChina, the battery maker has already been planning small-scale production in 2027. But automotive-grade cells won’t be ready likely until the end of the decade.
Other Chinese companies are rushing ahead. Automaker FAW said recently that its “liquid-solid-state” lithium-rich manganese cell with 500Wh/kg was ready for vehicle integration.
China is already laying the groundwork for mass production by the end of the decade, by which point it hopes the technology will be mature. And why wouldn’t it? This is a country that has taken EVs and battery development seriously for years, allowing it to corner the market on much of the world’s supply.
Different companies are taking different approaches. For example, Honda is committed to sulfur-based electrolytes despite emerging alternatives. Last October, Toyota announced “the world’s first practical use of all-solid-state batteries in BEVs” by 2027 or 2028. And Mercedes, using a prototype battery from startup Factorial, was able to get an electric EQS sedan a real-world range of 749 miles.
“The companies probably have a ways to go,” said Alevtina Smirnova, director of the NSF Industry-University Cooperative Research Center for Solid-State Electric Power Storage. “Because there is no comparison to what is happening now in China to what is happening here in the US.”
For its part, Donut Lab is unperturbed by the skepticism around its claims. On April 1st, Lehtimäki posted a new video addressing some of the controversy surrounding its solid-state batteries. He also revealed that Donut Lab had created a second, more production-ready version of its battery that would start shipping to customers later this year.
There was a crucial admission: The widely discussed “100,000 cycles” figure was a design target, he said, not an experimentally verified result. Actual testing has been conducted over shorter cycles, with projections extrapolated based on known variables such as charge rate, temperature, and usage conditions.
He then pivoted to a more near-term project: Donut Lab’s latest merch drop, including a “tin-foil”-covered bucket hat.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Technology4 minutes ago
The Netherlands is the first European country to approve Tesla’s supervised Full Self-Driving
World10 minutes ago
Malnourished boy found locked in father’s van for more than a year unable to walk, hadn’t showered since 2024
Politics16 minutes ago
Trump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
Health22 minutes ago
Americans wait overnight for access to free healthcare as costs soar ‘out of reach’
Sports28 minutes ago
Caitlin Clark’s Fever make several key offseason signings in championship pursuit
Florida1 year ago
Florida High School Football Rankings: Top 25 teams – Oct. 21
Oregon2 years ago
How old is Bo Nix? What to know about Oregon quarterback ahead of 2024 NFL Draft
Connecticut2 years ago
Cleary's 21 help Le Moyne down Central Connecticut State 69-64 in OT
Virginia2 years ago
99th annual Pony Swim held in Virginia
Indiana2 years ago
Indiana Members Credit Union announced as new anchor tenant at Bottleworks District
Politics16 minutes ago
Trump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
World1 hour ago
Pope Leo urges world leaders to reject war and negotiate peace
News2 hours ago
Manhattan DA’s office to investigate Swalwell sexual assault allegation
Videos6 hours ago
NASA’s Artemis II mission in 20 minutes
Politics12 hours ago
Trump adversary running for Senate borrows his filibuster playbook
-
Atlanta, GA7 days ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Movie Reviews1 week agoVaazha 2 first half review: Hashir anchors a lively, chaos-filled teen tale
-
Georgia4 days agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Pennsylvania5 days agoParents charged after toddler injured by wolf at Pennsylvania zoo
-
Arkansas1 day agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Milwaukee, WI5 days agoPotawatomi Casino Hotel evacuated after fire breaks out in rooftop HVAC system
-
Entertainment1 week agoInside Ye’s first comeback show at SoFi Stadium
-
Indianapolis, IN1 week agoFighting Illini begin Final Four preparations in Indianapolis