Sports
NBA trade deadline: Should your team buy, sell or stand pat as Feb. 6 looms?
The NBA trade deadline is right around the corner, and front-office executives across the league are working the phones to scan the market and figure out the best paths forward for their respective teams.
The Athletic NBA staff decided to offer an assist. For all 30 teams, we’ve selected a short-term route — buy, sell or stand pat — they should take as the clock ticks to Feb. 6. Some choices may surprise you. Others might not.
GO DEEPER
NBA Trade Board 2.0: Jimmy Butler, Zach LaVine and more big names on market
Atlantic Division
Boston Celtics
Stand pat: After their struggles over the last month, the Celtics should obviously sell everything and start over. (OK, fine, I didn’t mean that.) If Boston does anything, it should be a minor move to improve the wing depth near the end of the bench. The Celtics don’t need much. Their frontcourt is good enough that Xavier Tillman can’t even get a chance. Their perimeter talent is good enough that Sam Hauser has lost minutes lately. They could use one more 6-foot-6 or 6-foot-7 option that Joe Mazzulla would trust, but those are hard to find, and it’s not a desperate need anyway. — Jay King
Brooklyn Nets
Sell: The Nets have already declared themselves ripe for the picking this season, trading Dennis Schröder and Dorian Finney-Smith before the new year. Cam Johnson is one of the most coveted players on the market, a versatile wing who could squeeze into the starting lineup of just about any contender. The Nets have stockpiled second-rounders, which can be useful as trade chips as they start to build back up after the upcoming draft. Johnson should bring back a first-rounder at the very least. The question is whether the Nets keep the fire sale going beyond that if they can’t get more firsts for their other players. Because the draft lottery odds are flat for the four worst teams, they don’t have to race all the way to the bottom and could keep some of their young guys like Cam Thomas to see how they develop. — Jared Weiss
GO DEEPER
Why Nets’ Cam Johnson is one of the most coveted players as NBA trade deadline nears
New York Knicks
Buy: At this point, with how much the Knicks have committed to their starting lineup, the team has to continue to build toward being a title contender. New York isn’t one yet, and part of that is because of its struggling bench. The team could desperately use some wing depth. The question, though, is how does New York get it? Mitchell Robinson is the only non-starting player who makes more than $10 million, and it’s still unclear when he will play his first game of the season after undergoing foot surgery in May. With New York not too far away from the second apron, it’ll have to get creative in how it makes additions … if it does at all. — James L. Edwards III
Philadelphia 76ers
Sell: The Sixers are in a conundrum because they put together a roster all-in on winning now but has been so injured that making the playoffs is at risk. They probably have a better feel for whether Joel Embiid and Paul George could be healthy for the postseason, but this team has been so bad that adding another role player isn’t going to make much of a difference to the Sixers’ upside. Their best outcome could be to end up in the top six of the draft and not have to send their pick to the Oklahoma City Thunder. The Sixers have a few role players who could bring in some decent draft pick value, so they should consider trading Guerschon Yabusele, who will command more than they can offer in free agency this summer. — Jared Weiss
Toronto Raptors
Sell: The Raptors have no shot at the playoffs and an exceptionally easy schedule down the stretch. They have to find creative ways to lose some games. They can do that through their own, errr, roster manipulation, but if they can get some light draft compensation without taking on too much future money for the likes of Bruce Brown, Chris Boucher, Davion Mitchell and Kelly Olynyk, that would be nice, too. And if someone bowls them over for Jakob Poeltl? Well, it’s worth considering, although that seems unlikely. — Eric Koreen
Central Division
Chicago Bulls
Sell: At some point, the Bulls must admit defeat. Their continued attempts at retooling have only landed them in the messy middle for the past four seasons — with just one playoff appearance and one playoff win as a result. Extensions for Zach LaVine, Nikola Vučević and Patrick Williams in consecutive summers all look like mistakes. None have moved the needle or truly impacted winning. Now the Bulls are at risk of losing this year’s first-round pick to the San Antonio Spurs as compensation for the DeMar DeRozan trade if the selection falls out of the top 10. To prevent that worst-case scenario from becoming a reality, the Bulls should sell for whatever they can before the deadline and rebuild. — Darnell Mayberry
GO DEEPER
Bulls in a familiar place of mediocrity as they reach the NBA halfway point
Cleveland Cavaliers
Buy: These exercises have become dangerous for me; I nearly had to sell my house in Cleveland after the last one. I think, but who can say, Cavs fans will agree with me here. If they can make an upgrade on the wing, they should. I recently reported the team’s interest in Cam Johnson. Not sure if the assets are there for Cleveland to pull off such a move, but bigger guards and wings have given the Cavs problems because of a combo of the relative lack of size and physicality on the part of Donovan Mitchell and Darius Garland (when going against bigger opponents) and the inconsistency the team gets out of the small forward position. Mitchell and Garland are great, but against bigger backcourts, they’d be greater with a little more help from a tall, athletic wing who can shoot. Whether or not the Cavs can make that happen is another matter, again, because of the assets available to them and competition on the market. — Joe Vardon
Detroit Pistons
Stand pat: I’ve gone back and forth, but I’ve settled on this: Detroit has an average age of just over 24, has been hampered by injuries and needs time for this group to blossom. The biggest area of concern is the lack of a secondary ballhandler and playmaker outside of Cade Cunningham. Without Jaden Ivey, the offense has the tendency to become stagnant when Cunningham is on the sideline. That said, I’m willing to bet on Cunningham continuing to ascend and young players such as Ausar Thompson and Ron Holland II taking advantage of increased opportunity. If Detroit were to be buyers, it could jeopardize the chemistry of a team oozing with camaraderie and possibly stunt the growth of first- and second-year players. — Hunter Patterson
Cade Cunningham and the Pistons are one of the NBA’s biggest surprises. (Lon Horwedel / Imagn Images)
Indiana Pacers
Stand pat: Myles Turner is on an expiring contract and could surely help a contender off the bench. But the Pacers have surged recently and are playing better at both ends, and coming off last season’s deep playoff run, there is no reason not to allow the team as currently constructed to take another swing. Given the strength of the teams ahead of them, I’m not sure this is the year to spend the assets they have, but I don’t see this club as a seller, either. If Tyrese Haliburton has a healthy, steady second half, the Pacers could be a tough out. I love Andrew Nembhard and Bennedict Mathurin together, and Pascal Siakam has been good. Keep it going. — Joe Vardon
Milwaukee Bucks
Buy: After a rough start, the Bucks have stabilized and worked themselves back into the top four in the Eastern Conference. On the season, they are just outside the top 10 in offensive efficiency and inside the top 10 in defensive efficiency. With one of the best players on the planet in Giannis Antetokounmpo and an All-Star-level point guard in Damian Lillard, they have the NBA’s top scoring duo. It is perfectly reasonable for them to try to add more to their roster to try to make a deeper playoff run. — Eric Nehm
Southeast Division
Atlanta Hawks
Stand pat: The Hawks spent a year finding out the trade value of their weightiest contracts, and except for the departed Dejounte Murray, the answer was “not much.” Between that and owing this year’s first-round pick to San Antonio, they might as well plow forward and deal with the futures of players like Clint Capela and De’Andre Hunter this summer. At the same time, the Hawks aren’t exactly in win-now mode with a young, mildly overachieving team that’s just over .500. Maybe they trade a second for a backup point guard, but it’s not time to push in their remaining chips. — John Hollinger
Charlotte Hornets
Sell: The Hornets’ choice is abundantly clear. They are in Year 1 of a rebuild under new basketball operations head Jeff Peterson. They have slowly accumulated draft picks for the future as they try to not only strengthen their asset base but find new ways of acquiring talent. They won’t contend for a playoff spot this year, and may not next year either, even in a league in which two-thirds of the teams make the postseason. Charlotte has a few veterans who might be able to help other teams, such as Miles Bridges, Grant Williams and Tre Mann. The Hornets also could work their way into trades to create room for maneuvering for other teams, which would come with a likely payoff of a draft pick or young player. — Mike Vorkunov
Miami Heat
Sell: Technically, if you’re the team shopping a player as accomplished as Jimmy Butler ahead of the trade deadline, that probably makes you a seller. But as we know, the Heat are never looking to take a step back. This franchise always has an eye toward making the playoffs, and although all signs point to the Heat moving on from Butler sooner rather than later, they won’t be looking to rebuild anytime soon. Will the return in a Butler deal be enough to put this team back into contention for the Eastern Conference crown? Probably not. But this will be a great opportunity for the Heat to assemble a few assets for the future. Rebuilding is considered a bad word in Miami. Perhaps a better way to put it is that Butler moving on will allow the Heat to restructure the foundation of the roster by prioritizing Tyler Herro and Bam Adebayo. — Will Guillory
GO DEEPER
How did Jimmy Butler, Pat Riley and Miami reach this point?
Orlando Magic
Buy: The Magic have slumped lately, but even with the recent return of star Paolo Banchero, they remain inundated with injuries, including to defensive standouts Jalen Suggs and Goga Bitadze. Franz Wagner, Orlando’s second star, on Thursday played his first game since Dec. 6. A larger problem remains with their 3-point shooting, an area where the Magic need significant help. A top-level 3-and-D guy would be ideal. In other words, Orlando needs exactly the characteristics so much of the league needs. With Moe Wagner out for the season, a decent backup big would help, too. — Josh Robbins
Washington Wizards
Sell: There’s a caveat here. Yes, because the Wizards are early in their rebuild, they would benefit from trading for young players with upside and future draft picks, particularly future first-round picks. But at the same time, the team shouldn’t “sell” low on its current veterans merely for the sake of making a deal. For instance, Kyle Kuzma, who’s having an uncharacteristically unproductive season by his standards, may need time to resuscitate his trade value. It’s also critical for Washington to retain veterans who play the right way and are leaders by example. — Josh Robbins
Northwest Division
Denver Nuggets
Buy: Denver has become … let’s call it frugal … since winning the 2023 championship. We’ve seen several key players find their way out of town for nothing in return. While I wouldn’t expect any big deals, Denver should try to add another quality rotation guy. Nikola Jokić continues to do some special stuff, and this front office and ownership should not take it for granted. Get him the help he deserves. — Zach Harper
Will Denver look to add reinforcements around three-time MVP Nikola Jokić? (Bart Young / NBAE via Getty Images)
Minnesota Timberwolves
Stand pat: I can hear Wolves fans screaming at me right now, but hang with me. The Wolves do have needs, but not a lot means to address them. They could use a rim-protecting backup big and another shooter. The problem is they are a second-apron team, which severely restricts their ability to make trades. They also don’t have a ton of ammunition to make offers, so the likelihood of landing an impact player is low. Yes, the Julius Randle fit has been awkward, but I think there are bigger problems the Wolves have to solve. The biggest issue they have right now is Rudy Gobert and Mike Conley have not played nearly as well as they did last year. Gobert doesn’t have much of a trade market, and Conley is still valuable as a mentor to Rob Dillingham. This team is in every game it plays. I don’t see a trade out there that makes the Wolves markedly better or a sell move that drastically improves their position going forward without them incentivizing a team to help them. It may not be popular, but it may be what makes the most sense. — Jon Krawczynski
Oklahoma City Thunder
Stand pat: The Thunder remain the subject of rumors involving just about anyone. Such will always be reality for a team that owns the most draft picks in the league. But that doesn’t mean they have to use them now. Oklahoma City has built this thing from the bottom — and in a matter of only a few years. Sure, the Thunder have flaws, though not many. They still rank near the bottom in defensive rebounding. Deep in the playoffs, they could potentially benefit from an extra facilitator. But they are also the runaway best team in the West without their second-most important player, Chet Holmgren, who has been hurt for most of the year and is expected back before the playoffs. Playing Holmgren with Isaiah Hartenstein will clean up the rebounding issues without taking away space from the offense, and Holmgren will give them another high-scoring option. If the Thunder don’t make any major edits to the roster, think of Holmgren as their big-time deadline acquisition. Just bringing him back could be enough to win a title. — Fred Katz
Portland Trail Blazers
Sell (sell, sell): The Blazers are not winning games as currently constructed, so they might as well take away all impediments to figuring out their future by trading the likes of Jerami Grant, Robert Williams, Anfernee Simons and — if there is any team gullible enough to believe he can be a winning piece — Deandre Ayton. The only certainties on this Blazers roster are that Deni Avdija and Toumani Camara are worthy building blocks, and that Shaedon Sharpe has shown enough promise to keep. As for Scoot Henderson, Donovan Clingan, Kris Murray and Rayan Rupert? It’s time to clear the way for more playing time to see just how promising — or bleak — the cupboards are … and gain some draft capital in the process. Sure, trading away the veterans will set up the Blazers for more losses, but it’s not like they are winning with them. — Jason Quick
Utah Jazz
Buy … and sell: The Jazz should be in both markets. They should try to send out more veteran options like Jordan Clarkson, John Collins and Collin Sexton for future assets or further flexibility. At the same time, they need to be in the market to acquire players other teams need to jettison to avoid the tax. You pick up draft capital in the process. — Zach Harper
Pacific Division
Golden State Warriors
(Soft) buy: The Warriors, despite employing the greatest shooter in history, have been one of the five worst NBA offenses over the last two months. They have made it clear they don’t plan to “mortgage the future” at the trade deadline because they don’t see a reasonably priced path to a legit co-star for Stephen Curry and don’t believe enough in this current team that a single move will leap them into contention. But you can get something done at the trade deadline with expiring contracts (of which the Warriors have a few) and a sprinkle of draft capital: Second-rounders, maybe a heavily protected first. Nikola Vučević is a popular name because he’s a stretch center who’d open up the floor with his shooting and unlock lineups in a congested Warriors’ frontcourt. That’s the type of move worth making, if Chicago’s price is reasonable. — Anthony Slater
GO DEEPER
Who are the Warriors? Trade deadline begs for some Zach LaVine-level boldness
LA Clippers
Buy: This is more on the buy-stand pat spectrum. The Clippers have some clear long-term objectives, such as keeping the powder dry for the 2026 and 2027 free-agent classes. That is when James Harden’s (player option exercised) and Kawhi Leonard’s contracts expire. But this is the maiden voyage of Intuit Dome, and Steve Ballmer is not a tank owner. This organization wants a winning record and to host a playoff game. There are contracts that need to be dealt with by next month, and the Clippers survived without Leonard to stay relevant in the West. They’re in position to optimize the 2025 roster. — Law Murray
Los Angeles Lakers
Buy: The Lakers may only have 18 months remaining of LeBron James and Anthony Davis. If they’re not going to go for it at the deadline, what exactly are they doing? As it stands, the Lakers are not good enough to truly contend for a championship but also not well-equipped enough with draft picks and young players for the post-James era. They need to pick a lane, and unless they’re willing to trade James and/or Davis and tear it all down, buying and taking one final swing at contention is the most sensible approach. Standing pat or taking a small swing, which is certainly possible, would be a mistake. — Jovan Buha
Phoenix Suns
Sell: In the mortgage business, Mat Ishbia believes in identifying problems quickly and fixing them quickly. This approach with the Suns should lead him to one conclusion — sell. Phoenix has gotten progressively worse over the past three seasons. They have changed coaches. They have overhauled the bench (and added Bradley Beal). They have changed lineups (and demoted Bradley Beal). Nothing has worked. This season, the Suns have lacked the togetherness to beat a good team and the fire to put away a bad one. On many nights, they just look old. Acquiring Jimmy Butler — if a deal can be constructed — would help, but it won’t make Phoenix a championship contender. — Doug Haller
Bradley Beal’s name has been a constant one on the trade market, but he has a no-trade clause. (Christian Petersen / Getty Images)
Sacramento Kings
Buy: They’re committed, at this point, to keeping the win-now pedal down on this Domantas Sabonis-De’Aaron Fox era. It’s why the Kings gave up a valuable first-round pick swap to San Antonio this summer to complete the DeMar DeRozan deal. Everything looked shakier a few weeks back when they were 13-19, and it looked increasingly likely Fox might nudge his way out of town. That still remains possible in the semi-near future, but winning cures plenty in sports. The Kings have leaped back over .500 after a hot streak under interim coach Doug Christie and have maintained internal motivation to add to this core, not subtract. Cam Johnson is a known target. They’ve been discussing him with Brooklyn since the summer. — Anthony Slater
Southwest Division
Dallas Mavericks
Stand pat: The Mavericks were 19-10 with the No. 4-ranked offense and the No. 11-ranked defense before they faced the Minnesota Timberwolves on Christmas. They were dealt some bad luck when Luka Dončić exited that game with a left calf injury. Dallas should see what it has when it’s healthy and then re-assess this summer. The Mavericks looked like one of the NBA’s elite teams before their best player getting hurt. — Christian Clark
Houston Rockets
Buy (or finance): The Rockets brass continue to maintain a cautious, patient stance as it relates to roster construction, but I respectfully disagree. Even if there isn’t a clear blockbuster move to make Houston “buy” at this juncture, the franchise should definitely take a financing approach — smaller moves around the margins that can pay dividends come postseason time. A once-stout rebounding unit has seen its numbers plummet to around league average since losing Jabari Smith Jr. to injury, and the Rockets’ shooting woes won’t just dissipate overnight. This season has been filled with feel-good vibes, but we’re in an age of parity that simply hasn’t been around in quite some time. If there’s a trade that makes the Rockets better, even if it’s by 5 percent, they should do it. It may be the difference between a conference finals run and a first-round exit. — Kelly Iko
Memphis Grizzlies
Buy: The Grizzlies have a reasonably good chance at making the second conference finals in team history even if they stand pat. Their odds of true contention increase, however, if they can add size and shooting at the forward spots that would alleviate the scheming the Grizzlies will likely face in the postseason, especially if its a player on their timeline (i.e. not Jimmy Butler). We already know the Grizzlies will willingly offer Luke Kennard and John Konchar as a salary match, and Memphis has access to all its future first-round picks. If the right player is available, it’s time to go all-in. — John Hollinger
New Orleans Pelicans
Sell: Based on the Pelicans’ record, the answer to this question should be obvious. When things have gone as poorly as they have this season, it’s probably the right time to cash in on a few assets and start looking at the future. The tough part for New Orleans is finding the right move that can bring in the value the Pelicans are looking for. Brandon Ingram has practically been on the trading block since last summer. He’s more likely than anyone else on the roster to get moved before the deadline, but who else? Is CJ McCollum playing so well that he’s removed himself from trade speculation? Is it too early to look at Zion Williamson deals? This team will be active ahead of the trade deadline, but it probably isn’t looking to make the big, forward-thinking moves some may be expecting. — Will Guillory
GO DEEPER
Zion Williamson’s first five years in the NBA were full of highs, lows and drama. What’s next?
San Antonio Spurs
Buy: Devin Vassell is starting to shake off some rust after returning from injury and looks more like himself as of late (four straight 20-point performances entering Thursday’s game in Paris), but until the Spurs figure out their center depth behind Victor Wembanyama, they’ll continue to struggle. Given where they are in their rebuilding process, Nikola Vučević probably doesn’t make a ton of sense, but in a vacuum, he brings the perfect blend of scoring, floor spacing and rebounding to jolt a second unit — and even play alongside Wembanyama at times. Between Zach Collins, Tre Jones and Charles Bassey (the latter two of whom are expiring contracts), San Antonio has avenues to wheel and deal should it choose. — Kelly Iko
Sign up to get The Bounce, the essential NBA newsletter from Zach Harper and The Athletic staff, delivered free to your inbox.
(Illustration: Will Tullos / The Athletic; top photos: Mark Blinch, Issac Baldizon, Luke Hales / Getty Images)
Sports
Florida AG launches civil rights investigation into MLB’s warning to Christian pitchers over Pride Night caps
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
The attorneys general from Missouri and Florida have reacted strongly to the controversy stirred when Major League Baseball warned three San Francisco Giants players about inscribing a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps, and that reaction includes MLB being served with a subpoena that signals the launch of an official investigation.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier launched his investigation on Friday by serving MLB with a subpoena to investigate whether it is violating the civil rights of players based on their religious beliefs.
The general purpose and scope of Florida’s investigation “extend(s) to possible civil rights and deceptive and unfair trade practices violations in matters of employment concerning the business practices, policies, and procedures of Major League Baseball,” per the subpoena obtained by Fox News Digital.
In a letter from Uthmeier to MLB Commissioner Robert Manfred, the AG warns that “a pattern or practice of selectively enforcing its rules to benefit favored secular beliefs over disfavored religious beliefs would not only potentially violate Florida civil rights law, but it would also violate the League’s own policies.
MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL FACES BACKLASH FOR ITS STANCE ON CHRISTIANS WRITING BIBLE VERSES ON PRIDE CAPS
“And a practice of claiming not to discriminate based on religion while discriminating based on religion could further amount to an unfair or deceptive trade practice in violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier speaks at a news conference in Orlando on July 15, 2025, where he said U.S. Masters Swimming should not allow transgender athletes to compete against women swimmers or face legal action. Advocates Cassidy Carlisle and Lainey Armistead also attended. (Rich Pope/Orlando Sentinel/Tribune News Service)
Uthmeier is particularly troubled by the fact MLB said its warning had nothing to do with the players’ religious beliefs but rather was strictly because of a violation of the league’s uniform code.
It should be noted MLB said in a follow-up statement to its initial warning to the players that it was merely enforcing its uniform codes and the warning had nothing to do with Giants pitchers Landen Roupp, JT Brubaker and Ryan Walker writing a Bible verse on the team’s Pride Night Cap most of the other players wore.
MLB ACCUSED OF ‘DOUBLE STANDARD’ AFTER CALLING OUT PLAYERS’ BIBLE MESSAGES DESPITE BACKING BLM IN 2020
Uthmeier noted that doesn’t ring true and presented in his letter a handful of examples where MLB has been absolutely fine with players adding to their uniform.
“In 2019, for example, a Cincinnati Reds player wrote on his cap in tribute to a nearby mass shooting,” Uthmeier wrote to Manfred. “And in 2020, MLB evidently added new, sweeping exceptions to its uniform rules by allowing players to ‘support social justice and diversity and inclusion.’ These policy changes included permitting players to add Black Lives Matter patches to their sleeves.
“MLB therefore appears to applaud — even change its rules for — the ideological beliefs it prefers, but targets players who express religious views the League doesn’t like.”
Commissioner of Major League Baseball Robert D. Manfred Jr. speaks at the 2024 MLB Draft presented by Nike at Cowtown Coliseum in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 14, 2024. (Daniel Shirey/MLB Photos via Getty Images)
The Florida subpoena, issued under the Florida Civil Rights Act, demands action from MLB on July 23, 2026, at 9 a.m.. At that time, MLB must deliver to the AG’s office documents including:
- All documents concerning how MLB characterized or classified the June 2026 cap writing, including, for example, whether MLB treated it as religious expression, political messaging, protest, or a violation unrelated to its content.
- All documents concerning what prompted MLB’s review of and warning regarding the June 2026 cap writing, including any complaint, media inquiry, internal escalation, or third-party communication received before the warning issued, and the timing of each relative to the warning.
- All documents concerning the actual June 2026 warnings issued by the MLB to any club.
- All documents, including drafts and internal deliberations, concerning MLB’s decision to issue and publicly announce the June 2026 warnings, and any analysis of whether doing so adhered to the Code or with MLB’s treatment of comparable non-religious expression.
San Francisco Giants pitcher Landen Roupp wrote “Genesis 9:12-16” on his Pride-Night themed hat. (Thearon W. Henderson/Getty Images)
Uthmeier is thus joining Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway, who recently wrote a letter to Manfred asking the commissioner to confirm that no player who has chosen to refrain from “wearing Pride Month paraphernalia or included Bible verses on Pride Month hats” will not be disciplined in any way.
Hanaway’s letter states that if Manfred fails to answer by June 25 or does not confirm that no discipline will be levied, she too will open an investigation of MLB.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
The two attorneys general have authority over their individual states. But it affects four MLB teams.
Florida is home to two MLB teams — the Tampa Bay Rays and Miami Marlins — while Missouri is home to the St. Louis Cardinals and Kansas City Royals.
FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO
Sports
Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim
Amid the first days of grief after Alex Vesia and his wife lost their newborn daughter last fall, Vesia noticed something as he watched the World Series on television. He paused the broadcast, then checked the video, then texted another player to make sure.
51.
Dodgers teammates wore his number on their caps. So did players from the Toronto Blue Jays.
“It was awesome,” Vesia said. “It was a very heartwarming moment.”
Moving.
Touching.
And, under baseball’s rules, illegal.
Who knew, really, until this week? Three pitchers from the San Francisco Giants wrote the name of a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps and, amid an uproar, Major League Baseball said it had warned the players that “writing of any kind, with any message” on any playing apparel is not permitted. The issue, the league said in a statement, was not what they wrote on their caps but simply that they wrote on them at all.
Said MLB in the statement: “We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members.”
To its credit, the league did not enforce the rule when Vesia’s number started appearing on caps in the World Series. But, if you’re going to draw a line on enforcement, where should you draw it?
In San Francisco, the actions of the Giants’ pitchers were widely condemned.
“They were in for a rude awakening with the response, and it wasn’t just from the gay community,” Giants broadcaster and former pitcher Mike Krukow told KNBR, the team’s flagship radio station. “It was from the Northern California community that supports the gay community.”
In response to media inquiries, and as first reported by Outsports, MLB confirmed it had warned the three players. I asked the league whether warnings had been issued in two other instances in which players had written on their caps, including Clayton Kershaw last year writing the same Bible verse on his Pride Night cap that the Giants’ pitchers wrote this year. MLB declined to comment.
“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen told me, “and now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me.”
Treinen said league officials had told him the rule is strictly enforced.
“I straight up asked Clayton last year, ‘Did they call you when you put that on your hat?’” Treinen said. “He said, ‘No.’”
The Pride caps feature team logos decorated in the colors of the rainbow, a symbol long associated with the gay community. In the Bible verse cited by the pitchers (Genesis 9:12-16), the rainbow represents “the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures.”
That the league would warn players against writing a Bible verse on their caps ignited a wave of conservative outrage, from Vice President JD Vance to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.
Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley fired off a letter to MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, alleging apparent discrimination “against baseball players who profess their Christian faith” and threatening the league’s antitrust exemption. Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon said on national television that players might be able to file a claim for employment discrimination.
That is complete nonsense. This is what you want: When employees raise an issue to their employer, the employer listens and addresses their concerns.
In 2023, the year after five Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear rainbow logos for Pride Night, Manfred said the league would no longer compel players to do so.
“We have told teams, in terms of actual uniforms, hats, bases that we don’t think putting logos on them is a good idea just because of the desire to protect players: not putting them in a position of doing something that may make them uncomfortable because of their personal views,” Manfred said then.
Teammates congratulate Freddie Freeman after his walk-off home run gave the Dodgers a 1-0 win on June 5, when the Dodgers held their annual Pride Night. Blake Treinen, the winning pitcher that night, elected to wear his regular Dodgers cap instead of the Pride version.
(Katelyn Mulcahy / Getty Images)
Manfred said the Pride Night celebrations could go on, however a team wished to stage them — or not, in the case of the Texas Rangers, the only one of the 30 MLB teams that declines to hold a Pride Night. And the league still sells Pride gear on its website for all teams, including the Rangers.
In the cases of the Giants and Dodgers, MLB grandfathered each team’s long-running use of a rainbow logo on the cap, with this accommodation to players: If you don’t feel comfortable wearing the Pride cap, just wear your regular cap.
That is what Treinen and outfielder Alex Call did when the Dodgers celebrated Pride Night. That is also what a fourth Giants pitcher did.
“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen said. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”
To Treinen, the decision over whether to wear a Pride cap is not about passing judgment on anyone else but about what he sees as the push “to force something on people that you know that is controversial to their faith — and, in fact, straight up against their faith.”
He expressed his support for the Giants pitchers.
“Kudos to those men over there who are standing strong in their faith,” he said. “It’s a sad thing to corner someone and try to make them feel bad about their convictions.”
I respect Treinen for explaining his viewpoint. To me, wearing a Pride cap for one night does not diminish your faith at all. It might sharpen your convictions. More important, it signals a welcome to everyone in the community that buys the tickets and broadcast subscriptions that help pay your salary.
“I think a few people made it about themselves and not about the community,” San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie told the Bay Area Reporter.
We always proclaim the life lessons of sports. One of them: Sometimes you have to put the team’s interests ahead of your own.
Sports
2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round.
El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.
This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002.
With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026.
Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000.
Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.
This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.
Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination
Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)
Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).
Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:
1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD
What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.
-
South-Carolina2 minutes agoSickle Cell Day gathers advocates at South Carolina State House
-
South Dakota9 minutes agoCommunities across South Dakota celebrate America 250 with fireworks, parades, and exhibits
-
Tennessee12 minutes agoShooting Hunger event aims to prevent childhood hunger in West Tennessee
-
Texas17 minutes agoNew screwworm portal aims to protect Texas livestock, wildlife and rural economy
-
Utah24 minutes agoUtah Athletics making Huntsman Center seating changes – KSL Sports
-
Vermont27 minutes agoNew owners of Vermont Packinghouse plan for local growth – The Vermont Journal & The Shopper
-
Virginia32 minutes agoPredicting Virginia Tech’s 2026 Statistical Leaders
-
Washington39 minutes agoWashington Nationals vs. Tampa Bay Rays prediction, pick for Friday 6/19/26