Connect with us

Sports

Inside CBS’s Champions League coverage: ‘Thierry Henry gets asked about it more than Arsenal’

Published

on

Inside CBS’s Champions League coverage: ‘Thierry Henry gets asked about it more than Arsenal’

Pete Radovich, the coordinating producer of the UEFA Champions League coverage on CBS Sports, is reflecting on how he came to realise that the network’s Champions League Today studio now owns the global conversation on major nights of European football.

“Thierry Henry, in no uncertain terms, says he gets asked more about CBS now than Arsenal,” Radovich grins. “He will tell you that straight up. That to me is wild.

“This summer, I was in a taxi in Croatia. The driver asked me where I’m from. I told him New York. He’s like, ‘Oh, you’re into sports?’. I said yes and he said ‘My favourite sports show is in the U.S.’. A taxi driver in f****** Croatia! He’s saying ‘I don’t know if you’ve ever seen it; Thierry Henry, Kate Abdo, Micah Richards. It’s hilarious. I love that show. Have you ever seen it?’. And you just sit there and you’re like, ‘How in God’s name…?’.

“Four years ago, if you told me people outside of America would know our show, that is truly bigger than we could have ever dreamt. That’s the fun part. The hard part is staying relevant and getting better.”

The growth is reflected in numbers as well as anecdotes. CBS say their Champions League coverage garnered more than 3.5 billion video views across social media last season, the majority of which were from their Champions League Today studio show. It is anchored by Kate Abdo, the multilingual, 43-year-old British presenter, and merges insight and camaraderie with a panel comprised of the former Arsenal and Barcelona legend Henry, a Liverpool icon and Champions League winner in Jamie Carragher and ex-Manchester City defender Micah Richards, who is a Premier League winner.

Advertisement

This season represents the start of a six-year contract for Paramount Global, the owner of the CBS network, to broadcast UEFA club tournaments across the CBS network and its Paramount+ streaming service in the United States. It is one of the largest broadcast contracts in the sport, worth $1.5billion (£1.15bn) across six years. Paramount beat competition from Amazon to keep the UEFA competitions, including the Europa League and Conference League. David Berson, the president and CEO of CBS Sports, says the property is now considered one of the network’s “marquee assets”. He says: “We’re known for the NFL, Super Bowls, NBA Final Fours and the Masters and so on. The fact that we now put our soccer portfolio with the UEFA Champions League in that same discussion, that’s thrilling for us. It’s different. It’s exciting. It’s growing. It’s young-skewing (the average age of soccer viewers on Paramount+ is 37). It’s moved into that upper echelon of properties that help define who we are.”


Abdo, Henry, Richards and Carragher in the studio (CBS Sports/Paramount+)

It has certainly aided the growth of Paramount+. The Champions League was a “top five” driver of subscriptions throughout the 2023-24 season and it has been that way since the service launched in March 2021. CBS first broadcast the Champions League in 2020, when Turner Sports opted out of their UEFA contract after Paramount secured an initial three-year deal with UEFA beginning in the 2021-22 season. It allowed CBS to pick up the broadcast even earlier. The most recent contract will take CBS and UEFA through to 2030, representing a decade-long commitment and a period in which it is eminently possible that some UEFA club games may make their way across the Atlantic to the U.S. UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin has previously said it is a possibility, while PSG president Nasser Al-Khelaifi, the chair of the European Clubs’ Association, is a major advocate.

“I do think it’s real,” Berson says. “The powers that be recognise, by doing so, it can help further grow the game long-term. I think eventually you’re going to see more of this. They’re doing a lot of friendlies now. It’s intentional. I went to the Manchester City vs AC Milan game at the Yankee Stadium this summer and the crowd was incredible. The lines outside to get in. People wearing the uniforms, the jerseys. It’s truly remarkable; kids everywhere. They have to figure out how it works in the context of the actual schedule, but I would not be surprised because of the potential to get more fans in this country even more engaged in the product.”

Is it feasible within the current rights cycle? “Maybe — it is more their issue to figure out. We’d obviously welcome it. We’re not expecting it. It would be additive and something that can help showcase the sport to this country even more.”

As for another idea UEFA rather like — gaining access to some weekends for Champions League games — Berson says: “It would be desirable for us.”

Advertisement

He adds: “UEFA has more challenges to do that, but it’s appealing. We’re quite busy on weekends; there’s positives to that because the potential audience is typically bigger because people aren’t working. But you also start facing a lot more competition (from other sports). It’s pretty fun now with the excitement that it generates at a time of day when no one else is focused on sports, but some exposure on weekends could be of help as you move forward.”

Along with the Champions League, CBS has also recently secured rights to the EFL, while it has renewed deals for the NWSL and Serie A. It is becoming a destination for football fans in the U.S. and it is tempting to wonder whether CBS may have its eyes on even more premium content, such as the World Cup or the Premier League, when the next set of rights comes around.

“We’d love to have more,” Berson says. “It’s challenging because when you have the Champions League and all the UEFA products, the majority of the real fans of the sport are part of your service already. So how much incremental value will you get by adding some of the others? It doesn’t mean we won’t. The World Cup is tremendous. It’s different in that it is every four years versus 10 and a half months of every year, like the Champions League.

“I give props to NBC for the great job that they do with the EPL — they took a swing at this several years ago and proved their potential. Of course, we’d like to be the only destination, but when all media companies are committed to growing the sport, we all wind up benefiting. Frankly, it’s not that dissimilar from the tremendous success that we all have with the NFL. It’s not realistic that any one network could carry it all. We don’t have space or money for that. When we all get behind it, a rising tide lifts all boats. So you could make a similar point here on soccer.”

There will never be anything more powerful than the game itself when it comes to driving interest, but the studio show has made waves and headlines. Radovich, a Croatian-American whose cousin, Dragan Radovich, played for the Washington Diplomats alongside Johan Cruyff in 1980, is a lifelong football fan. He is a former producer on Inside The NFL. “It was the longest-running show on cable television. Full stop. Not just sports, any show. And when I started working on that show, we had some fun because we were on tape, so you can take risks. It really conditioned me to push the envelope. Going live, obviously it’s a different animal. But you develop an understanding of what could work and when the alarms go off to tell you, ‘Hey, dial back here’. Inside The NBA is another inspiration. Kudos to them; they have their talent but also to the production for taking risks, sometimes crossing a line and having to deal with that.”

Advertisement

The CBS team during a broadcast (CBS Sports/Paramount+)

At its best, the Champions League studio show is playful, daring and funny, but also interspersed with sharp tactical analysis and powerful interventions, notably when Henry and Richards led a conversation about racism in European football in 2023 after abuse endured by Romelu Lukaku. The casting was intentional. Radovich wanted characters new to American television, which was true of Henry, Richards and Carragher.

“In the coaching world, a manager gets fired here and then suddenly they appear there. It’s just rotating and the wheel never changes. What I didn’t want for us to do was just bring in faces that have been on other networks over the years. It would have felt like every other show. Kate was the one exception and she was the first hire. I felt like she’d not cut through yet. Then it came down to Zoom calls — the story with Jamie Carragher was whether an American audience would understand him.

“And within the first two minutes of the conversation, I had to say, ‘Listen, I’m going to cut to it. Can you dial back the Scouse? Because that’s the concern here. Because if it’s a problem, then really we shouldn’t waste our time here’. Jamie said, ‘Of course, that’s not a problem — I’ve done television for Danish TV where English is a second language and I’m forced to dial it back’. So those are the kind of conversations that we were having. We wanted to feel new. We wanted to feel like something that people had not seen before. And then they had to be willing to have fun at their own expense.”

But there have also been moments of controversy. Last season, after Arsenal’s victory over Porto in the round of 16, Carragher appeared to question, in jest, Abdo’s loyalty to her now husband Malik Scott live on air. On social media, the matter rapidly “snowballed”, as Radovich puts it. Yet on the next broadcast, Abdo handled the matter to great acclaim.

She said: “This group has been together for three and a half years. I grew up with a brother and I feel like I have gained three more here. Let me introduce you to the group again; Thierry Henry; the golden child, can do no wrong, always says the right thing, sets the example to the rest of us. He is the big brother we all look up to. Then there is the middle child; Jamie Carragher, a chip on his shoulder, capable of saying anything for attention. Does he go too far sometimes? Absolutely. Does he apologise? Yes, he does. But all of us have that one annoying family member that we still love. Then there’s little bro; loud but loveable, Micah Richards, easy to pick on, impossible not to love.”

Advertisement

Abdo’s response immediately extinguished the flames. What did Radovich make of it all? “The first thing to say is everyone was surprised at the reaction that night; myself, Kate and Jamie included, because it was just banter gone wrong amongst friends, between a brother and sister. That night, when it started to snowball, we had discussions. It wasn’t alarms or questioning if we were going to be able to repair this. He misspoke. He felt bad. Kate wasn’t crazy about it, but none of it was like, ‘This could be the end’.

“The biggest reaction was surprise at how much play it got. So, there was never a moment in all of that time where I was like, ‘Wow, I don’t know if we can bounce back from this’. Not even for a split second because I knew internally we were all cool. It’s not for me to speak for Kate, but I can only speak to the conversations I had with Kate. She conveyed to me that she wasn’t crazy about the comment, but at the same time, we can get over this.”


Henry and Richards speaking to City’s players (Michael Regan/Getty Images)

Is all publicity good publicity for a studio show? “Well, you don’t want them talking about you like that. That’s never a good thing. Even the recovery, if you want to call it that, I don’t look at it as a good thing because that only happens with the bad. So you never want it to go bad. But you understand (the risk) when you play this game.

“Using a football analogy, you want to be aggressive in your game planning as a manager. That means if you want to press, press, press, you can get caught, right? We’re going to always press. And that’s how we’re going to score our goals and get our wins. But yes, on occasion you’re going to get countered or something’s going to go wrong. And you dust yourself off and get back at it. I can’t give the talent enough credit. They’re the ones who have to be able to be vulnerable on camera in front of millions of people on television and social media. It is not easy to put yourself out there like that. It only works because they’re willing to do that. But again, willing to do that with friends. They have to have that chemistry. They have to have that love for one another.

“We were on a group chat a couple of hours before the gold medal game for the Olympics in Paris (where Henry’s France Under-23 team lost 5-3 against Spain). And we’re exchanging texts with Thierry, saying ‘Good luck, we love you, we’re rooting for you’. And Thierry is responding. That’s special. That’s a family. It’s not just show up to work, punch the clock and go home and forget each other. There are legitimate friendships here.”

Advertisement

One of Radovich’s objectives is to bring American supporters closer to the European game. That means sometimes taking the show on the road, from the studio in London, and doing big matches on location. Last season, for Dortmund’s semi-final against Paris Saint-Germain in Germany, Carragher travelled to the game and once again captured the headlines. A few drinks with Dortmund fans escalated and he ended up watching the game in the famous “Yellow Wall”. By full time, he appeared rather merry as he filled the studio in on his day and then secured an interview with Jadon Sancho, on loan from Manchester United at the time. Carragher put his arm around him while asking questions to the English winger. Radovich calls it another moment of “pushing the limits”.

“We started our coverage during Covid,” he says. “There were a lot of restrictions. You have the greatest European club competition in the coolest cities, the coolest countries. You can go anywhere, but you can’t. It was like: ‘Here is this cake in front of you, but you can’t eat it’. So the minute we were told you could eat it, we went in head first, not even using our hands.

“The broadcasters that had it before us, whether it was a budget thing or whatever, there was virtually zero presence on site. Everything was done in a sterile studio back in America. ‘And here’s the game’. Our studio is in Europe, our talent is in Europe, and the games are in Europe. That visceral feeling of being pitchside at AC Milan vs Inter Milan for a Champions League semi-final — if had we been in London, you wouldn’t have Maldini coming over or Lukaku coming over. This is a financial investment for sure, but we feel that we’re getting so much in return.

“To UEFA’s credit, they see what’s happening in America. They understand what the audience wants. We’re probably a thorn in their side at times, but they also see the results and think, OK, that was painful at the time, but maybe there’s something here. So Jamie and Dortmund. That was an interesting day, but the result is that it’s now looked back on very fondly. At the time it was a little bit of a headache for everyone, but now when we look back, it’s like, ‘Was that so bad?’”


Carragher watched Dortmund in the Champions League with their fans (ANP via Getty Images)

This season brings more games for CBS, as UEFA introduces the Swiss model for the Champions League group phase, meaning there will be eight rounds of fixtures. “There’s more jeopardy for longer,” Radovich says. “This is an absolute improvement. The debate is whether more matches are good or bad. That’s a completely different conversation. But from a television and a drama standpoint, from building an arc and keeping an audience longer, 100 per cent this is going to be better.”

Advertisement

For CBS, it will almost certainly mean more subscribers. Last season was their most-streamed Champions League campaign on Paramount+, with double-digit year-over-year growth in households and streaming minutes. The final between Real Madrid and Borussia Dortmund was the third-most watched final on record in U.S. English-language television, averaging 2.3 million viewers. It was also the most-viewed final to not feature an English club. Their Golazo network had its most-streamed day of 2024.

Why do Americans like it so much? Radovich believes he has the answer.

“Americans believe that we have the best movies, the best television shows, the best musicians, the best Broadway shows. Anything related to entertainment, we already have the best of the best. So if you’re going to give me entertainment, if it’s not the best, I’m not interested. It’s that simple. We saw that a long time ago, back in the days of the New York Cosmos. The one time that the domestic league did work here was when, in theory, the best players, the Peles of the world, were playing here; George Best and Johan Cruyff.

“I know it’s oversimplified, but when you live here and when it comes to entertainment, basically you are spoiled. These are the best basketball players in the world? Yep. Best hockey players? Yep. Best baseball players? Yep. Best NFL players? Yep. Are these the best soccer players in the world (in MLS)? Um, not really. So, OK, what else have we got? The Champions League is the best of the best. Best clubs? Yep. Best players? Yep. Cool. I’ll give this a try. It’s that simple.”

(Top photo: CBS Sports/Paramount+ and Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement

Sports

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Published

on

Commentary: Why MLB’s Pride Night cap condemnation isn’t the anti-Christian crackdown conservatives claim

Amid the first days of grief after Alex Vesia and his wife lost their newborn daughter last fall, Vesia noticed something as he watched the World Series on television. He paused the broadcast, then checked the video, then texted another player to make sure.

51.

Dodgers teammates wore his number on their caps. So did players from the Toronto Blue Jays.

“It was awesome,” Vesia said. “It was a very heartwarming moment.”

Moving.

Advertisement

Touching.

And, under baseball’s rules, illegal.

Who knew, really, until this week? Three pitchers from the San Francisco Giants wrote the name of a Bible verse on their Pride Night caps and, amid an uproar, Major League Baseball said it had warned the players that “writing of any kind, with any message” on any playing apparel is not permitted. The issue, the league said in a statement, was not what they wrote on their caps but simply that they wrote on them at all.

Said MLB in the statement: “We have given the same warning numerous times in the past to players for messages such as ‘Dad’, ‘Happy Mother’s Day, I Love Mom’ and names of family members.”

To its credit, the league did not enforce the rule when Vesia’s number started appearing on caps in the World Series. But, if you’re going to draw a line on enforcement, where should you draw it?

Advertisement

In San Francisco, the actions of the Giants’ pitchers were widely condemned.

“They were in for a rude awakening with the response, and it wasn’t just from the gay community,” Giants broadcaster and former pitcher Mike Krukow told KNBR, the team’s flagship radio station. “It was from the Northern California community that supports the gay community.”

In response to media inquiries, and as first reported by Outsports, MLB confirmed it had warned the three players. I asked the league whether warnings had been issued in two other instances in which players had written on their caps, including Clayton Kershaw last year writing the same Bible verse on his Pride Night cap that the Giants’ pitchers wrote this year. MLB declined to comment.

“I got chastised by the league when I put Charlie [Kirk]’s name on my hat last year, because a man was murdered in cold blood,” Dodgers pitcher Blake Treinen told me, “and now these gentlemen who are relievers in San Francisco are getting chastised by the league for putting a Bible verse on their hat. It’s crazy to me.”

Treinen said league officials had told him the rule is strictly enforced.

Advertisement

“I straight up asked Clayton last year, ‘Did they call you when you put that on your hat?’” Treinen said. “He said, ‘No.’”

The Pride caps feature team logos decorated in the colors of the rainbow, a symbol long associated with the gay community. In the Bible verse cited by the pitchers (Genesis 9:12-16), the rainbow represents “the everlasting covenant between God and all living creatures.”

That the league would warn players against writing a Bible verse on their caps ignited a wave of conservative outrage, from Vice President JD Vance to Texas Gov. Greg Abbott.

Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley fired off a letter to MLB commissioner Rob Manfred, alleging apparent discrimination “against baseball players who profess their Christian faith” and threatening the league’s antitrust exemption. Assistant U.S. Atty. Gen. Harmeet Dhillon said on national television that players might be able to file a claim for employment discrimination.

That is complete nonsense. This is what you want: When employees raise an issue to their employer, the employer listens and addresses their concerns.

Advertisement

In 2023, the year after five Tampa Bay Rays players declined to wear rainbow logos for Pride Night, Manfred said the league would no longer compel players to do so.

“We have told teams, in terms of actual uniforms, hats, bases that we don’t think putting logos on them is a good idea just because of the desire to protect players: not putting them in a position of doing something that may make them uncomfortable because of their personal views,” Manfred said then.

Teammates congratulate Freddie Freeman after his walk-off home run gave the Dodgers a 1-0 win on June 5, when the Dodgers held their annual Pride Night. Blake Treinen, the winning pitcher that night, elected to wear his regular Dodgers cap instead of the Pride version.

(Katelyn Mulcahy / Getty Images)

Advertisement

Manfred said the Pride Night celebrations could go on, however a team wished to stage them — or not, in the case of the Texas Rangers, the only one of the 30 MLB teams that declines to hold a Pride Night. And the league still sells Pride gear on its website for all teams, including the Rangers.

In the cases of the Giants and Dodgers, MLB grandfathered each team’s long-running use of a rainbow logo on the cap, with this accommodation to players: If you don’t feel comfortable wearing the Pride cap, just wear your regular cap.

That is what Treinen and outfielder Alex Call did when the Dodgers celebrated Pride Night. That is also what a fourth Giants pitcher did.

“My job is to abide by the rules,” Treinen said. “Ultimately, the only rule we have is to wear our team-issued uniform. So that’s what I chose to do.”

To Treinen, the decision over whether to wear a Pride cap is not about passing judgment on anyone else but about what he sees as the push “to force something on people that you know that is controversial to their faith — and, in fact, straight up against their faith.”

Advertisement

He expressed his support for the Giants pitchers.

“Kudos to those men over there who are standing strong in their faith,” he said. “It’s a sad thing to corner someone and try to make them feel bad about their convictions.”

I respect Treinen for explaining his viewpoint. To me, wearing a Pride cap for one night does not diminish your faith at all. It might sharpen your convictions. More important, it signals a welcome to everyone in the community that buys the tickets and broadcast subscriptions that help pay your salary.

“I think a few people made it about themselves and not about the community,” San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie told the Bay Area Reporter.

We always proclaim the life lessons of sports. One of them: Sometimes you have to put the team’s interests ahead of your own.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

Published

on

2026 World Cup Odds: How Far Can Mexico Go After Winning Group A?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

After its massive 1-0 win over South Korea on Thursday night, Mexico has won Group A and officially clinched a spot in the knockout round. 

El Tri will play its Round of 32 game in Mexico City, and will face the third-place finisher in either Group C/E/F/H/I.

This is the fourth time that Mexico has topped the group stage of a World Cup, with the other three coming in 1986, 1994 and 2002. 

With the win, Mexico remains unbeaten in World Cup group games at home, going a combined 6-2-0 (W-D-L), with two wins and a draw in 1970 and 1986, and now two wins in 2026. 

Advertisement

Before the tournament began, Mexico was listed at +6500 to win the World Cup. Now, after winning its first two games of the tournament, Mexico has surged up the oddsboard to +5000. 

Can Mexico build off its first two matches and make a deep run in this tournament? Let’s check out the updated odds for El Tri as of June 19.

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

Team Mexico — Stage of Elimination

Last 32: +125 (bet $10 to win $22.50 total)
Last 16: +135 (bet $10 to win $23.50 total)
Quarterfinals: +600 (bet $10 to win $70 total)
Semifinals: +1600 (bet $10 to win $170 total)
Runner-up: +3000 (bet $10 to win $310 total)
Outright winner: +5000 (bet $10 to win $510 total)

Advertisement

Mexico is currently +5000 to win the 2026 FIFA World Cup after winning Group A (Getty Images).

Mexico’s Past World Cup Results:

1930: Group stage
1934: Did not qualify
1938: Withdrew
1950: Group stage
1954: Group stage
1958: Group stage
1962: Group stage
1966: Group stage
1970: Quarterfinals
1974: Did not qualify
1978: Group stage
1982: Did not qualify
1986: Quarterfinals
1990: Banned
1994: Round of 16
1998: Round of 16
2002: Round of 16
2006: Round of 16
2010: Round of 16
2014: Round of 16
2018: Round of 16
2022: Group stage
2026: TBD

What to know: Mexico has made a habit of being in the running, but never really being in the running. Make sense? Consider this: El Tri made it out of the group stage in seven consecutive World Cups (1994-2018), but never made it past the Round of 16 in any of those years. In 2022, Mexico failed to make it out of the group stage, and it will look to get back to its winning ways in 2026 after a great start to the tournament. With its win Thursday night, Mexico has now advanced to the knockout stage in eight of the last nine World Cups. It is important to note, however, that Mexico has never made it past the quarterfinals at a FIFA men’s World Cup.

Continue Reading

Sports

Goalkeeper Raúl Rangel’s elite play and South Korea’s mistake help Mexico advance

Published

on

Goalkeeper Raúl Rangel’s elite play and South Korea’s mistake help Mexico advance

Three and a half years after its biggest failure on the World Cup stage in half a century, the Mexican national team needed only two games to advance to the knockout round of this year’s tournament as winner of Group A.

Mexico’s defense held off a spirited final push by South Korea, earning a 1-0 win on Thursday night at Guadalajara Stadium in front of a fiery announced sellout crowd of 45,522.

“It was a very tough game,” Mexico coach Javier Aguirre said.

Goalkeeper Kim Seung-gyu made a mistake in the 50th minute, failing to stop what appeared to be a simple cross and bobbling the ball. That allowed Mexico’s Luis Romo to easily tap the ball into the net and claim a 1-0 lead.

“In the end, a mistake was going to tip the scales,” Aguirre said.

Advertisement

Mexico goalkeeper Raúl Rangel blocks a shot from South Korea’s Son Heung-min during their World Cup match at Guadalajara Stadium on Thursday.

(Natacha Pisarenko / Ap Photo/natacha Pisarenko)

“You always want to be there; I felt it, and I got the chance,” said Romo, who started the game after starting the opener on the bench — a strategic change by the Mexican coach that paid off.

South Korea put pressure on the Mexican team throughout the game. Late in the scoreless first half, Jae-sung Lee came close to giving South Korea the lead. Aguirre hoped his team would shake off nerves following the emotional opener at Azteca Stadium and show more bite in its second game against South Korea, but his team didn’t have much power behind its attack during the game’s first 45 minutes.

Advertisement

The crowd in Guadalajara grew frustrated and began booing the Mexican national team’s performance at the end of the first half.

Mexico, however, won back their cheers when it capitalized on South Korea’s costly mistake and converted it into a goal.

Obed Vargas replaced Romo in the 71st minute and was close to scoring a spectacular goal if not for Seung-gyu’s save.

El Tri earned a win without any other goals thanks, in part, to a great night by goalkeeper Raúl Rangel, who stopped a header by Cho Gue-sung in the 87th minute. Captain Edson Álvarez helped turn away South Korea’s attack late, holding up relatively well despite having left ankle surgery during the past year.

“It was just a reflex,” said Rangel, whose club team Chivas plays at at Guadalajara Stadium. “I was very focused and stepped up when the team needed me, and I’m happy about that.”

Advertisement

LAFC star and South Korea captain Son Heung-min fired one shot over Mexico’s goalkeeper in the first half, but Álvarez cleared it off the line before the referee ruled Son was offsides.

South Korea finished controlling possession 58% of the time, but it only earned two shots on target.

“It wasn’t a good game because they didn’t let us do much,” Aguirre said.

Mexico was coming off a comfortable 2-0 victory over South Africa, while the South Koreans had defeated the Czech Republic 2-1, marking their first World Cup opening-match win since 2010.

During the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, Mexico was eliminated in the group stage for the first time since 1978, breaking a streak of seven consecutive appearances in the knockout rounds. However, playing on home soil, the team’s goal is to emulate El Tri’s achievements in 1970 and 1986, when they reached the quarterfinals — the country’s best World Cup finish.

Advertisement

Due to the new 48-team format, Mexico would need to win two knockout-round matches and reach a sixth game to realize its goals.

“We’re taking it one step at a time; first, there’s the third game,” Romo said.

Mexico's Luis Romo celebrates with his teammates after scoring during a match against South Korea at Guadalajara Stadium

Mexico’s Luis Romo celebrates with his teammates after scoring during a match against South Korea at Guadalajara Stadium on Thursday.

(Natacha Pisarenko / Associated Press)

After the win over South Korea, Mexico will close out group play against Czechia at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City on Wednesday. El Tri will get to play the first two games of the knockout round — should it win the first one — at Azteca Stadium, a venue where it has never lost a World Cup game.

Advertisement

South Korea has four points and will be favored when it plays South Africa Wednesday in Monterrey. If South Korea wins the match, it would be the Group A runner-up and advance to play the Group B runner-up on June 28 at SoFi Stadium.

“We want all nine points,” Vargas said of Mexico’s goal entering its next game against Czechia.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending