Connect with us

Sports

F1 season predictions: Our picks for 2025’s champions, surprises and top moments

Published

on

F1 season predictions: Our picks for 2025’s champions, surprises and top moments

It’s hard to believe it’s only been 95 days since the last Formula One grand prix, but here we are again, with the 2025 F1 season upon us, the Australian Grand Prix set to kick off the action this weekend and with a (hopefully) remarkable season of close racing ahead. (Catch the schedule here.) After a whirlwind of team launches, Lewis Hamilton dominating headlines at Ferrari and three days of preseason testing, it’s time to go racing at the Albert Park Grand Prix Circuit in Melbourne.

Our F1 team are ready to share their predictions for the season ahead. We have our sights set on who might emerge as the championship frontrunner, which teams will make dramatic strides, who could surprise us with breakout performances, and whether the established powerhouses will continue to dominate or face new challengers.

Dive into our analysis and share your own predictions in the comments before the lights go out on Saturday at midnight ET (Sunday 4 a.m. GMT). But first, here are ours.


Constructors’ podium

Luke Smith: McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull — I think it’s going to be super close through this season, but it’ll shake out as the same top three as last year. McLaren has the early advantage going into the season, which could help it move into a decent lead. The combination of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri offers race-winning pace and, unlike the other three front-running teams going into 2025, stability between seasons. If it can maintain its development path from the past couple of years, McLaren will be very hard to beat this year.

Madeline Coleman: McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull. As Red Bull team principal Christian Horner said during preseason testing, the grid is converging in the final year of the regulations and we do anticipate the grid to be competitive. McLaren and Ferrari have the most potent driver lineups, but the Woking-based crew is expected to have the quicker car from the get-go.

Advertisement

Pat Iversen: McLaren, Ferrari, Red Bull. This century has seen a few incredible driver combinations in terms of ability and achievement. There’s a good chance we include either Norris and Piastri or Hamilton and Leclerc in that conversation someday. It’s a close call, but I’ll go with McLaren by a nose. The papaya seems to be in full stride, from factory to cockpit, and I think it will take a bit for all the pieces to come together at Maranello.

Michael Bailey: Ferrari, McLaren, Red Bull. What is the start of a season if not the place to dream? “You’d be surprised at how quick they’re going to be this weekend,” Lando Norris said about Ferrari ahead of the Australian Grand Prix. McLaren broke its 26-year drought to win last year’s constructors’ championship. It’s been 17 years since Ferrari last took that crown. With Hamilton now alongside Charles Leclerc, why not?

Drivers’ podium

LS: Lando Norris, Max Verstappen, Oscar Piastri. After crossing the line in Abu Dhabi to clinch McLaren the constructors’ title, Norris said on the radio that 2025 was “gonna be my year, too,” and I see him making good on that promise. He’s learned the hard lessons of fighting Verstappen from last year, had the edge on Piastri over a single lap, and can now put everything together to mount a serious title charge from the start of the season.

MC: Norris, Leclerc, Verstappen. It’ll come down to how the teams develop their respective cars and which drivers make the least mistakes. Norris knows how he needs to fight in the championship battle and McLaren seemed to have the edge during preseason testing.

PI: Verstappen, Norris, Leclerc. He’s the most talented driver in the world and I don’t think it’s close. He’s won four titles in a row. He won with a subpar (by Red Bull’s recent standards) car last season. Until he doesn’t win the championship, I’ll keep betting on Verstappen. (He’s also been just cagey enough about Red Bull’s actual pace that I’m suspicious they’ve hoodwinked us all.)

Advertisement

MB: Hamilton, Norris, Verstappen. Yes, I’m still dreaming. I’m not even sure if this is mathematically possible given my constructors’ title prediction, but I’m all in on some romantic 2021 redemption for Hamilton and do feel Norris’ winning experience of 2024 will take him to the brink.

Best of the rest?

LS: Alpine. The fashion in which Alpine turned its season around through the end of last year, highlighted by the double podium in Brazil, should breed plenty of confidence going into this year. The regulation change in 2026 may be the focus and head honcho Flavio Briatore may only care about contending for a title in the coming years, but I think Alpine can keep its upswing going. Pierre Gasly can fully morph into the team leader role this year alongside Jack Doohan. With Aston Martin stumbling last year and there being little in testing to suggest it has righted itself, I’m saying Alpine can land fifth in the standings.

MC: The fight for P5 will be close and I would even go as far as to say that Williams could throw its hat into the fight with the experienced duo of Carlos Sainz and Alex Albon. However, Alpine’s performance improved in the latter portion of last season. Although there’s the caveat of preseason testing being smoke and mirrors, Gasly put some competitive laps on the timesheets. The one big caveat is that Doohan will be adjusting during his rookie season, but with so few points positions up for grabs, Alpine could be a consistent contender.

PI: Can I be honest? I don’t love this pick. Aston Martin’s fall-off from the highs of early 2023 has been stark. But I think its floor is higher than Alpine’s to start the season. In a year when many of these teams will save money on development to focus on 2026, maybe Aston Martin has just enough built-in consistency to rise above the rest again.

MB: How much realism have I got in me here? I really do feel like Alpine has the advantage and Gasly is one of the most underrated drivers on the grid. But I’m going to give into my gut again. I’d love it to be Williams (everything else I’ve written here means I probably should say that, too). Sainz, Albon, and an iconic marque heading in the right direction at last.

Advertisement

Surprise pole

LS: I’m playing a bit fast and loose with the definition of ‘surprise’ given Mercedes should be contending toward the front this year, but if no one tells me otherwise, the 18-year-old Kimi Antonelli is my pick, making him F1’s youngest-ever pole-sitter in the process. Scarily, Antonelli has three seasons to try to achieve that feat! Sebastian Vettel was 21 when he scored his first pole, setting the current record.

MC: As Luke noted, the constructor alone isn’t necessarily surprising, but Antonelli is 18 years old (he recently got his driver’s license) and a rookie. Securing pole position is still a big feat considering the caliber of drivers competing against him and the strength of the closest constructors.


Our staff expects a big rookie season from Kimi Antonelli (Sipa USA)

PI: Liam Lawson. A surprise because you’d think a Red Bull pole would belong to Verstappen, but no! I will take no further questions about this incredibly safe pick.

MB: Gasly nailing a pole position for Alpine in drying conditions somewhere. It will happen.

Surprise podium

LS: This feels very much like closing my eyes and putting my finger on a name from the grid, but I’m going to say Esteban Ocon. He’s proved his ability to seize the moment in recent years, be it last year in Brazil or with his famous win in Hungary. Haas still doesn’t have a podium finish to its name in F1. A crazy race somewhere featuring rain and a red flag will play into Ocon’s favor. Perfect fodder for a “Drive to Survive” redemption arc if ever I saw one.

Advertisement

MC: Sainz. Listen, we said surprise, right? The last time a Williams driver stood on the podium was in 2021 when George Russell finished second at Spa. Sainz has the skill; he showed this at Ferrari. The thing we don’t know is where the car stacks given how preseason testing comes with the usual caveat despite his big day two run.

PI: Antonelli. He’ll have at least two by the end of the season.

MB: I see Madeline’s bid and I’ll go further. I think Albon getting his Williams in a top three, for what would be a third career F1 podium, would be an even greater achievement — and potentially driven by his increased in-team competition from Sainz.

Most improved team

LS: Mercedes. Harsh given it won four races last year? Maybe a little. But I think Mercedes will finally right the wrongs of recent years with its car design and enjoy a consistent season of performance instead of a handful of peaks. It’s a bit too late for this rule set and I don’t think it’ll be enough to give thought to a first championship since 2021, but I think the post-Hamilton era will start positively.


Can Carlos Sainz help turn Williams around? (Sipa USA)

 

Advertisement

MC: Williams. The team was hamstrung last season by the sheer number of wrecks and starting the year with an overweight car. This year’s car, though, was on time and on the weight limit, and during preseason testing, it seemed there was reason for cautious optimism around the team. Williams finished ninth last season, but the duo of Sainz and Albon is its strongest driver lineup in recent years. Combine that with a stronger car, the Grove-based crew could just be in the midfield fight consistently.

PI: Williams. There’s nowhere to go but up for Williams, who finished ninth last season — especially with two solid veteran drivers who (should) keep the car on the track more often.

MB: I would love to change it up, but I also think Williams has a lot to offer this year — from an impressive drivers’ lineup to the potential leap forward in the FW47. Finishing ninth in 2024 leaves a lot to improve this year, too.

Most improved driver

LS: Verstappen’s teammate. Liam Lawson knows he is stepping into the toughest seat in F1 this year, going toe-to-toe with Verstappen. He’s seen how that seat chewed up and spat out Sergio Pérez, Gasly and Albon in the past six years, but I’ve got a good feeling about Lawson. His confidence can go a long way and I think he has broad enough shoulders to be able to deal with the inevitable pressures. Going into the year, his goal should not be to beat Verstappen, but simply to get as close as possible to his level of performance. I think the call to drop Pérez and promote Lawson will age well.

MC: Hamilton. Yes, the seven-time world champion. The final few years of his time at Mercedes drastically contrasted the championship seasons and Hamilton failed to match Russell head-to-head, sometimes due to setup experiments and other times just not clicking with the car. Mercedes simply lacked consistency in the car’s performance, which left questions about what the 40-year-old is capable of.

Advertisement

PI: Gasly. At 29, the Frenchman is now the unquestioned top driver at Alpine and coming off a strong end to the 2024 season. He says the team is in a good place after a few years of turmoil and that’s enough to give me confidence in a driver who I think is a little underrated. I don’t think expecting him to finish better than 10th in the standings this season is a leap.

MB: I should also say Hamilton, as I’ve gone all romantic over his eighth title chances. And that would definitely win this little gong, too. But another shout for Albon here, who picked up just 12 points in a coasting 2024. Up against Sainz and in a much more competitive car (hopefully), Albon could make huge strides forward.

Best young driver

LS: Antonelli. I’m really excited to see what Antonelli can do this year. Getting a quick car as a debutant is a privilege bestowed upon so few drivers and Mercedes has long seen the Italian as being a key part of its future. Yes, there’ll be mistakes as in any rookie season, but I do think Antonelli will stand out from the rookie class of 2025.

MC: Ollie Bearman. He scored points in two of the three grands prix he raced in last season — once in a Ferrari and once in a Haas. He did make several mistakes during the Brazil GP, where he finished P12 out of the 15 drivers who finished the race. However, I feel he will become a steady point-scorer for Haas if they have a competitive car again.

The total number of points at the season’s end isn’t why I made this selection, considering he’ll be in the midfield. But because he’s with Haas, he will be fighting directly with a majority of other rookies. The growth potential is there and consistency in his performance and adaptability are key.

Advertisement

PI: Antonelli. I mean, I did just say he’d grab two podiums, didn’t I? I am keeping an eye on Gabriel Bortoleto. He won the F3 and F2 titles in back-to-back years (just like Russell, Leclerc and Piastri). That counts for something.

MB: For ‘best,’ I want to read ‘most fun.’ Isack Hadjar is going to be emotional, lively, and he might just outstrip a Racing Bulls teammate in Yuki Tsunoda who could feel a little lost following his winter Red Bull snub. There were just two-tenths between the pair in terms of their quickest testing laps in Bahrain and I’m looking forward to seeing how Hadjar fares from here.

Imagine a moment we’ll remember from this season

LS: The first contact between Norris and Piastri. I know McLaren is confident it can manage the situation and the lessons from last year and ‘papaya rules’ will of course be helpful. But when you have two young, hungry drivers both vying for wins, it’s inevitable something will happen at some point. I don’t see it being explosive between the two of them, but I do see a moment when an incident makes McLaren get firmer with its team orders between them. Cue the dramatic “Drive to Survive” music!

MC: Lewis Hamilton’s first win as a Ferrari driver. Two legendary brands are teaming up and the first year of the partnership is coming during a highly anticipated competitive season. Not to mention, the tifosi are such a passionate fanbase. The hype around Hamilton and Ferrari has been building since the news broke in February 2024. The crowd will go wild as he stands atop the podium, an emotional moment that’ll go down in history.

PI: The questions and angst around Hamilton as Leclerc starts out-performing him by mid-season.

Advertisement

MB: It’s hard to predict this without starting to imagine a hypothetical scenario, but it’s going to involve Verstappen and another driver getting wildly upset with his driving, it will epitomise the end of the Dutchman’s title-winning streak, and maybe it will impact where his career heads next.

Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Clive Rose/Getty Images, WILLIAM WEST/AFP via Getty Images

Sports

How is college football trying to rein in ‘wild West’ of transfers? Make players pay to leave

Published

on

How is college football trying to rein in ‘wild West’ of transfers? Make players pay to leave

For four years, college coaches and administrators have lamented the “wild, wild West” nature of the transfer portal, with athletes hopping from school to school in search of more money, more playing time or a better fit. Now, some universities are invoking a new threat to keep their players: Leave, and you’ll owe us money.

Programs are chasing that kind of leverage under the assumption that they will soon be in a position to directly sign athletes to NIL deals without having to depend on outside collectives or individual donors to make arrangements. They would gain that ability with the landmark House v. NCAA settlement, which would permit schools to share as much as $20.5 million in revenue with their athletes in the next school year if the settlement is approved by a federal judge in California. A hearing is scheduled for April 7.

Many schools during the recent winter portal cycle used that anticipated revenue to make school-funded NIL deals that would go into effect only if the House settlement is approved. The Athletic reviewed redacted copies or was briefed on the terms of several Power 4 schools’ proposed or finalized contracts, which were shared on the condition of anonymity due to the private nature of the contracts.

While there is no such thing as a standardized NIL contract, all contained language intended to deter the player from entering the portal.

“You’re seeing some stuff similar to coaching contracts with the buyout language in there,” said agent Joe Hernandez of Just Win Management Group. “Which is something that you wouldn’t really see in an NFL player-team contract.”

Advertisement

One Big 12 school required the athlete to pay a buyout equal to 50 percent of his remaining compensation if he transferred before the end of the deal’s term. An ACC school required the athlete to pay back 100 percent of his earnings if he transferred before Jan. 31, 2026.

One Big Ten player’s contract, based on a suggested template the conference sent to all of its members, requires the athlete to pay liquidated damages in the event he transfers. Another defers two-thirds of the athlete’s payments for the coming season until the end of January — after the winter portal window closes.

“They can’t stop players from moving from school to school,” said NIL attorney Mit Winter. “But the buyout clause is an attempt to limit that by making the player have to pay back money to the school if they want to get out of that contract.”

Shane Burnham, a former FBS defensive line coach who is now director of football for Ascension Sports Consulting, said he recently reviewed the contract of a player who signed with an ACC school in January. The deal included a clause where the player would have to forfeit 50 percent of the money he’d received if he entered the portal in April.

“It’s predatory what these schools are doing,” Burnham said.

Advertisement

Industry sources say the practice did not become prevalent until the most recent transfer portal cycle, when programs’ general managers began negotiating NIL contracts directly. In the past, schools were more mindful of maintaining separation between the school and an outside collective, but that’s gone by the wayside with the advent of revenue sharing.

“There’s just so much money,” said Walker Jones, executive director of The Grove Collective, which supports Ole Miss. “It got to the point where collectives and schools felt they had to be protected.”

It remains to be seen whether that protection is realistic.

Wisconsin set the tone for this new era in January when it refused to enter cornerback Xavier Lucas’ name into the transfer portal after Lucas had signed a two-year NIL deal. Lucas still left the program and enrolled at Miami, which Wisconsin subsequently accused of tampering with Lucas.

“A request to enter the transfer portal after entering into such an agreement is inconsistent with the representations and mutual understanding of the agreement and explains the reason for not processing a transfer portal request under these circumstances,” Wisconsin said in a statement, which also hinted at potential legal action. “Under the terms of the agreement between Xavier and Wisconsin Athletics, it remains in effect and enforceable.”

Advertisement

The schools are asserting that these contracts are licensing agreements that don’t make the athletes employees, echoing a red line for the NCAA and universities. They also say that the payments are not for athletes to attend the university or to play for it, even as they try to disincentivize players from leaving.

Several figures interviewed for this story speculated or assumed that schools that sign transfers, rather than the players themselves, would be expected to pick up the tab for a buyout.

“It’s basically a carbon copy of what happens with coaches,” said Winter. “They all have employment contracts that say, ‘You can’t coach anywhere else, but if you want to break the contract, here’s what you have to pay.’ And it’s almost always the new school that pays the buyout.”

In interviews with several athletic directors, football general managers and lawyers, all sounded skeptical that the buyout provisions concerning transferring could actually be enforced.

“Our preference wouldn’t be to be the first school to have to take a kid to court to chase down your $25,000 or $50,000,” said an ACC football administrator. “But … the student-athlete would be aware that, ‘Hey, I signed this contract and if I go in the portal, there’s a chance I might owe this money back.’”

Advertisement

“Theoretically, this kid isn’t getting paid to play still,” said a Big 12 general manager whose program did not include a buyout, “so when push comes to shove, if it gets litigated, you’re not going to win that. Now, I see the advantage of potentially using it as a scare tactic to keep players. They don’t know better. But the second any agent gets involved, they’ll just bypass it.”

“The first team that sues a kid — I’d like to see their next recruiting class,” said a second Big 12 GM.

Three agents told The Athletic they’ve insisted the buyouts be removed or reduced from their clients’ deals. However, many players do not have agents and may be unaware that this is a possibility.

Winter said schools need to be careful not to insist on such a high buyout that it might be deemed a penalty, which a court would not enforce, rather than a reasonable estimate of damages.

Meanwhile, it’s believed that most schools’ NIL contracts this cycle were only one-year deals. (Star quarterbacks may be a notable exception.) If there are buyout clauses, the remaining payments owed might be minimal. Multi-year contracts would make the buyouts more prohibitive and, in theory, decrease roster attrition. But as tempting as it may sound to lock down players, in reality, schools may want their own roster flexibility.

Advertisement

“If there’s a buyout, it’s usually both ways,” said the first Big 12 GM. “So it would limit our freedom to just cut the kid if he doesn’t turn out to be good.”

Which would be especially pronounced at a school with a coaching change. A new football hire will invariably want to bring in “his guys,” but may be stuck with some well-paid underperformers who know they won’t make more elsewhere.

After four years of seemingly never-ending chaos and relentless legal challenges, NCAA president Charlie Baker and others have been hoping the House settlement will bring much-needed stability to the NIL space. Collectives are not likely to disappear — if anything, they may help programs spend more than $20.5 million — but the Power 4 conferences have enlisted Deloitte to serve as a clearinghouse for all deals above $600.

As it pertains to transfers, though, any sense of order does not feel imminent.

“I’m not sure my expectation is that the current revenue sharing contracts will change the (transfer) flow,” said Nebraska AD Troy Dannen. “It hasn’t shown to be that way yet.”

Advertisement

— The Athletic’s Jesse Temple contributed to this report.

(Illustration: Demetrius Robinson / The Athletic; Photos: Alex Slitz / Getty Images, AP Photo / Michael Conroy)

Continue Reading

Sports

WNBA great Candace Parker highlights late Tennessee coach Pat Summitt's 'truly important' legacy

Published

on

WNBA great Candace Parker highlights late Tennessee coach Pat Summitt's 'truly important' legacy

Before she won a couple of WNBA MVP trophies, Candace Parker rose to national basketball prominence at the University of Tennessee. Parker was a member of two national championship-winning teams, earning NCAA Tournament Most Outstanding Player honors along the way. 

Parker was guided by coach Pat Summitt during her standout tenure with the Volunteers. Parker, an “NBA on TNT” analyst, took a moment to share how she continues to carry the lessons the late coach instilled in her years ago.

“I would say eye contact is really, really, really important. And she was the first person that made me really truly look at her when she would talk,” Parker responded to co-host Adam Lefkoe’s request to share some memorable advice from Summitt during a “Storytime” segment.

University of Tennessee athletic director Dave Hart (left), former player Candace Parker (right), head coach emeritus Pat Summitt (left center) and head coach Holly Warlick (right center) during the retirement ceremony of Parker’s jersey before a game against the LSU Tigers at Thompson-Boling Arena. (Randy Sartin/USA Today Sports)

Advertisement

“And so now, when I’m at home, and I’m parenting my son, my son says, ‘Look at me. Look at me.’ Like all the time, because I didn’t realize I say that all the time. She had this crystal blue stare that she could get you to want to run through walls. And so being able to carry out her legacy is truly important,” a tearful Parker added.

2025 NCAA TOURNAMENT PROJECTIONS: UNC AMONG LAST FOUR IN; OHIO STATE DROPS OUT

Summitt died in 2016 of complications from early-onset Alzheimer’s disease.

Candace Parker hugs Pat Summitt

Tournament MVP Candace Parker of the Tennessee Lady Volunteers hugs head coach Pat Summitt as they celebrate their 59-46 victory against the Rutgers Scarlet Knights to win the 2007 national championship at Quicken Loans Arena April 3, 2007, in Cleveland.  (Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)

Lefkoe thanked Parker and then recalled another story the three-time WNBA champion once told.

“We all wish to have a relationship with somebody the way you did with Pat,” said Lefkoe. “I’ll never forget you telling me the story of how you came into college. You were hurt, and she would just make you sit there. And you guys would talk. I think it is a blessing. I want you to say thank you for sharing these stories with us because we don’t have these relationships like you did. We love you. And to Pat and Pat’s entire family, we love you as well.”

Advertisement
Pat Summitt

Tennessee Lady Volunteers head coach Pat Summitt smiles during a halftime ceremony at a 2012 NCAA Final Four game between the Baylor Bears and the Stanford Cardinal at the Pepsi Center. (Ron Chenoy/USA Today Sports)

Parker also serves on the Pat Summitt Foundation’s Board of Directors. The foundation seeks to make advances in Alzheimer’s research.

Summitt is widely regarded as one of the greatest coaches in college basketball history. She won eight national titles during her storied tenure at Tennessee.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

With LeBron James looking on, Sierra Canyon captures Division I state title

Published

on

With LeBron James looking on, Sierra Canyon captures Division I state title

LeBron James’ entrance at Golden 1 Center on Friday night produced a crowd reaction similar to a rock star walking on stage for a concert. Fans began to rise from their seats and shout. Anyone with a camera tried to capture the scene of James, his wife and young daughter walking to their courtside seats to watch son Bryce play for Sierra Canyon against Stockton Lincoln in the state Division I championship game.

James, sidelined because of a groin injury, had another son, Bronny, with the Lakers in Denver, with both games going on simultaneously. It was a fitting ending to James’ six-year run as a Sierra Canyon parent trying to balance his responsibilities as one of the world’s most famous athletes with being the father of two teenage basketball players.

James’ presence helped bring out one of the largest crowds (8,396) for a Friday night state final in years, and Sierra Canyon rallied in the fourth quarter behind Maximo Adams to pull out a 58-53 victory.

Sierra Canyon (27-7) fell behind by four points at halftime after making just one of 13 shots from three-point range. The Trailblazers finally took charge in the fourth quarter when Adams made a three with 1:52 left for a 51-50 lead. The Trailblazers had been three for 23 on three-pointers until that clutch shot.

“My coaches tell me to keep shooting, so why not let it fly,” Adams said.

Advertisement

Then came a Bryce Cofield basket, a three-point play by Adams, plus two more free throws from Adams.

Gavin Hightower finished with 15 points, Adams 14 points, Cofield 11 and Stephen Kankole 10. Donez Lindsey and Anthony Moore each scored 18 points for Lincoln, which felt the officiating favored the Trailblazers, who made 20 of 30 free throws.

“It wasn’t a great flow tonight,” Sierra Canyon coach Andre Chevalier said. “There were a lot of whistles blown.”

Sierra Canyon has been prominent in the Open Division, but Chevalier will take the Division I title.

“This was hard as heck,” he said. “We’re going to hang this banner like it’s the world championship.”

Advertisement

Afterward, Lincoln’s Moore was helped up off the floor when LeBron James gave him a hand.

“That was crazy,” Moore said. “I’ll remember that.”

Chevalier said it was “the best coaching job of my career” after overcoming the loss of players who left, the disruption of the L.A. fires and an early loss to Santa Barbara.

Bryce James finished with three points and the first CIF state title in the family.

Division III

San Gabriel Academy 52, King’s Academy 51: Mahamadou Diop, San Gabriel Academy’s 6-foot-11 sophomore center from Mali, is someone fans in Southern California will need to watch in the coming years. He’s that good.

Advertisement

“My dream is to go to NBA,” the 17-year-old said.

He had 10 points, seven rebounds and four blocked shots in the first half of the state championship game. Three of his baskets came on dunks. He didn’t score in the third quarter when his team’s lead was cut from 13 points at halftime to four. That’s when he rose up to get his team rolling, and San Gabriel held on for its first state title.

Diop finished with 20 points, making 10 of 16 shots, 13 rebounds and seven blocks.

With San Gabriel leading by nine in the final minute, the Eagles started committing turnovers and fouling. King’s Academy closed to within 50-49 with 11.3 seconds left before Xavier Wang made two free throws for a three-point lead.

“I lost about five years in my life in the last 15 seconds,” San Gabriel coach Daniel Piepoli said.

Advertisement

After San Gabriel’s 25th turnover led to a layup just before the buzzer, the Eagles were able to to run out the clock and celebrate their first championship.

Diop, who doesn’t speak much English, said he likes blocking shots more than dunking.

“He gets better every single day. You can see he can tear the rim down,” Piepoli said.

As Diop improves his shooting touch from outside, his value will only increase.

Division V

San Francisco International 71, Diamond Ranch 52: Conor Maguire scored 32 points to help International come back from a six-point halftime deficit to win the title. Devin Turner scored 16 points and Michael Salazar had 14 points for Diamond Ranch (23-15), the Southern California champion.

Advertisement

The Panthers were outscored 16-0 during one drought. In the first half Salazar made seven of 10 shots and scored all 14 of his points as Diamond Ranch led 30-24. He got into foul trouble, then fouled out. It was a tough way to potentially end his basketball career.

“I’ve been hooping my whole life,” Salazar said. “It’s hard. I hope I don’t have to give up basketball yet.”

Diamond Ranch coach Kevin Ryan said, “These guys went into every morning practice trying to get better every day. Basketball is a game of runs and they swung at us and hit us hard.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending