Sports
Brailsford's story, part one: The rise of Mr Marginal Gains and the road to Manchester United
If you work in the sports industry but have not been invited to one of Jimmy Worrall’s events, it’s a message: you haven’t made it yet.
One of life’s great networkers, Worrall is the founder of Leaders In Sport, a conferencing and publishing business based in London but with a global outlook.
Sir Dave Brailsford, the man tasked with the job of making Manchester United a feared and revered team once more, has been invited to lots of Worrall’s events. Sometimes, he is the event.
About a decade ago, Worrall started an offshoot of his Leaders mega-gatherings. He called them P8, a play on the G8 summits in international politics, with the P standing for “performance”.
The format is simple. Worrall books space in a hotel for a day or two and invites a group of big names to hammer out whatever job-related problem they want to discuss — no media, no sponsors. Invitees have included Carlo Ancelotti, baseball’s Billy Beane, Gareth Southgate, Arsene Wenger and Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff. Brailsford has been to every one.
“It’s like an MBA (Master’s degree) with bells on,” Worrall tells The Athletic. “And when Dave speaks, they all listen. His contributions are just better than the others.
“We did a tour of a few different U.S. teams in the autumn of 2022 and I remember taking him to the (NFL’s) Philadelphia Eagles. (Eagles general manager — a job roughly equivalent to sporting director/director of football) Howie Roseman suggested we pop down to say ‘Hi’ to the coaching staff. So, we went down to where (head coach) Nick Sirianni and his guys were.
“I wondered if Sirianni would have the first clue who Dave was, this Tour de France guy. But when Howie introduced Dave, Nick leapt up from behind his desk and shook Dave’s hand. Pointing to a load of motivational messages on the wall, he said, ‘You see all these mottos? They’re our marginal gains. I’ve been studying you for years’.
“I’ve witnessed things like that all over the world of sport. Dave is the best high-performance thinker in the world.”
That’s a big claim and some might suggest Worrall, now a “strategic advisor” to the European Club Association, Deloitte and INEOS, is a bit biased when it comes to his friend’s abilities. But he is not alone.
The Football Association asked Brailsford to join an advisory panel when it was trying to climb out of the crater left by England’s performances, and early exit, at the 2016 European Championship in France. And in 2022, the England and Wales Cricket Board wanted to pick his brains for its next five-year plan.
These were formal examples of sports tapping into Brailsford’s expertise but he has been doing this on a more informal basis for 20 years.
“I’ve known Sir Dave for years, working across different sports, and he is, without doubt, the best in the world at creating a high-performance culture and turning that into winning,” said Newcastle United director of football Dan Ashworth after he had invited Brailsford to speak to that club’s players and staff before the 2022-23 season.
With Brailsford now keen to bring Ashworth to Manchester United, that quote looks like a textbook case of foreshadowing but at the time, it was just another example of one sports expert paying homage to the “Tour de France guy”.
But what has he done that could give him any insight into what it takes to win in the NFL, international cricket or club football?
There is no answer to that question, but Brailsford will turn 60 this week, and while nobody could have predicted even 15 months ago that he would become this powerful at perhaps the biggest football team on the planet, it makes sense when you lay it all out.
That does not mean it will work, of course, but people used to say the same thing about British cyclists winning the top races…
Brailsford’s father, John, was an orphan from Sheffield who started off as an apprentice in the Yorkshire city’s steel industry and became a master blacksmith but followed his heart to work as a mountain guide in France, via stops as a teacher in Derbyshire, where Brailsford was born on February 29, 1964, and north Wales, where he grew up.
A good amateur cyclist, John was head of outdoor education at a school in the Welsh town of Bangor and spent his weekends climbing in the nearby Snowdonia mountains. Family holidays involved more cycling and climbing in the French Alps. He also invented climbing equipment, including an ice axe that is still used by mountaineers today, and wrote several guidebooks.
Adversity, self-reliance, technical skill, hard work, passion, leadership… hmmm, nobody likes amateur psychiatry but one wonders what lessons the future Sir Dave may have learned at home.
Brailsford left his Welsh-language school at 16 and became an apprentice draughtsman with the local highways agency. But three years later, to his mother’s horror but John’s quiet approval, he announced he was moving to France to become a professional cyclist.
Over the next four years, riding as a sponsored amateur for a team based in Saint-Etienne, he learned he was not quite good enough to make it as a pro but he became fluent in French and an avid reader of books about coaching, physiology and psychology.
Armed with this knowledge, he returned to the UK and did a sports science degree in Chester and then an MBA in Sheffield. His first real job was running a perfume business in Paris, before doing a similar job in Worcester, in the West Midlands.
Scents to cycling is not an obvious path but Brailsford had not stopped being interested in a career in the sport. So, when he set up his own independent consultancy, in his early thirties, it made sense that one of his clients was Planet X, a Yorkshire-based cycling retailer.
And while he was edging closer to the job that would make his name, that job was edging closer to him, too.
The 1996 Summer Olympics were a nadir in the history of British involvement at the Games. The team returned from Atlanta with only 15 medals and just one gold. That meant finishing 36th in the medal table, below Belgium, Kazakhstan and North Korea.
The remedy was adding the pursuit of medals to the list of good causes that the recently launched National Lottery should fund and a new quango, UK Sport, was set up to allocate the money and make sure it was well spent.
The era of big budgets, medal targets and performance directors had begun… it just needed people who could run it all.
Largely by default, Peter Keen was that person at British Cycling. A schoolboy champion, Keen had become the national track cycling coach by the age of 25 and was Chris Boardman’s coach when he won the individual pursuit title at the 1992 Games in Barcelona — Britain’s first cycling gold for 72 years.
A superb coach with an academic’s brain, Keen was also honest enough to know he needed help. So he hired Brailsford, first to get hold of the better equipment the British team could suddenly afford, and then to do whatever else was required now Keen had told everyone the target was Olympic domination.
Long story short? Keen was right.
By the time he took an overarching elite-performance role at UK Sport in 2003, Brailsford was Keen’s natural successor at British Cycling and the raw materials were in place to turn its home at the Manchester Velodrome into Team GB’s medal factory. Two Olympic golds in 2004 were followed by eight in both 2008 (France were next with two cycling golds) and 2012 (no other nation won more than one), with plenty of silvers and bronzes and World Championships titles, too.
Millions of words have been written and spoken about how Brailsford and company (because it was a team effort) did it but the short version is what NFL coach Sirianni referred to when he pointed to the writing on the walls at the Philadelphia Eagles’ training facility: marginal gains.
Based on the Japanese principle of ‘kaizen’, which loosely translates as constant improvement, Brailsford’s big idea was that if athletes and their teams upgrade all the little things they do by one per cent, the overall gain will be game-changing.
It has become a cliche now — and Brailsford himself got bored of talking about it years ago — but it is hard to exaggerate how persuasive and pervasive this idea was. Business leaders, educationalists, politicians and other sports leapt on the bandwagon and Brailsford was the guru de jour.
That was especially the case for a golden/yellow period between 2011 and 2016, when British cyclists seemed to win a different race every week across all of the sport’s different disciplines.
By this point, Brailsford had already decided to take what had worked so well in track cycling to the ultra-competitive world of road cycling by launching Team Sky in 2010. Never afraid of a target, he said he wanted to win the Tour de France, with a British rider, within five years.
He ticked that box within three years, when the now Sir Bradley Wiggins won cycling’s greatest race. That victory was the first of seven Tour wins in eight years, shared between four riders, three of them Brits.
That team, which was bought and renamed by Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s petrochemicals giant INEOS in 2019, has also won three editions of the Giro d’Italia and two Vueltas a Espana, the two other “grand tours” on the calendar, as well as dozens of week-long races, one-day classics, time trials and national and world championships.
I was lucky enough to have a roadside/trackside view of many of these triumphs as a cycling reporter for the BBC and, like every other reporter on that beat, I could fill notebooks with examples of what came to be lumped together as “marginal gains”.
Some of them became famous (and widely copied) pretty fast; some were not really new at all, Brailsford just rebranded them; some were clearly nonsense (although nonsense can be quite effective in sport if the right people believe it).
The link was that they were all answers to the fundamental question he would set himself. How do we win this race?
The easy answer is: You get to the finish line quickest. But how do you actually do that? Or, just as important, what stops you from doing it?
You need the best kit, right? So, Brailsford brought in designers from motorsport to create the most aerodynamic bikes, helmets and shoes, and he would hold the best stuff back until the big races so his competitors couldn’t copy it. Team GB got so good at this that some teams would be mentally defeated just by the sight of the Brits’ new kit at an Olympics, whether it was actually special or not.
You must prepare properly. So, he hired bright, hungry, workaholic coaches and support staff to make sure the riders were well coached, fed and looked after. If other teams did a winter training camp for a week somewhere hot, Team Sky would book an entire hotel on the Spanish island of Mallorca for December and January.
And he really valued coaching. Whereas other teams would spend all their budget on riders, he would save some for the team behind the team, because he believed a £900,000 rider with a £100,000 coach would beat a £1million rider.
Once a season started, other teams would not bother with training so much. The orthodox view was you raced to stay fit. Brailsford and his staff realised the racing could be easier than the training, so the riders would “detrain” as the season went on, or the races would not prepare them for the specific challenge ahead.
So, Team Sky broke up the calendar, inserting in-season training blocks. And if the secret to winning the Tour de France was how fast you climb above 2,000 metres, why not spend a big chunk of time only doing that? So, Team Sky went to Mount Teide, a volcano on the Spanish island of Tenerife with one of the highest roads in Europe and a spartan hotel at the top.
To get around France on a bike, you need to eat lots without stressing your stomach, so Brailsford hired great nutritionists who got the riders eating rice cakes on their bikes and drinking vitamin-rich blends of vegetables for breakfast. He bought a mobile kitchen and brought his own chefs to the Tour, so the team did not have to eat whatever the local hotel chef came up with. After all, it has to be tasty or they won’t eat it.
You have to stay healthy, so he got a surgeon to teach the team how to wash their hands properly and had the entire gang fist-bumping and using hand sanitiser gel long before anywhere had heard of Covid-19.
An article he read about the Royal Ballet’s tour taught him the importance of sleep, so he got the riders to bring their own pillows with them to races and had washing machines fitted on the team bus (they later had an entire van of washing machines, to avoid the risk of illness spreading throughout the team) so they had their own clean sheets every night.
In 2015, he turned up at the first race of the season in a motorhome, so he did not have to put up with the sometimes sketchy hotel rooms a race organiser would provide. He actually wanted his riders to stay in motorhomes, too, but that was a marginal gain too far for cycling’s bosses, who thought it would give the big-budget teams an advantage and not do much for the sport’s environmental footprint.
He made it clear that everyone was working for a common goal — to win — and everyone had a contribution to make. The mechanics had to be the best at the race, so Team Sky would have fewer mechanical problems than their rivals, or their bike changes would be slicker. If it was cold or wet, the support staff had to get the riders warm and dry while their rivals were still shivering. The press officers had to be the best at getting Wiggins, Chris Froome or whoever was winning through the post-race protocols and back at the hotel as quickly as possible.
Over a three-week bike race, with all other things being equal, the team who eat and sleep the best, have the fewest crashes and punctures, and don’t lose anyone to a cold or tummy bug, win. That is what marginal gains meant in practice. But what was also very clear, as I followed the team about France and elsewhere, was that it was about people.
Brailsford had simply put the best team together, and they were not all obvious hires. Some were, but his best recruit was Tim Kerrison, a sports scientist from Australia who had previously worked with rowers and swimmers and knew nothing about cycling. Kerrison used to remark that his naivety about the sport was a strength, as he asked lots of questions about why cyclists did things the way they did them and then showed them a better way.
Kerrison became head coach and he got them training harder, earlier in the season, and smarter.
Data played a big part but it was applied to fairly basic ideas about what a rider needed to do to win. The team have not won a Grand Tour since Kerrison left at the end of the 2021 season.
Of course, none of the above has much to do with football, right?
There is no disputing that, beyond pointing out that people wondered what it all had to do with winning the Tour de France until Brailsford did it.
So, what lessons can we draw from this that might explain what Brailsford will bring to Manchester United?
“Dave’s personality is perfectly matched to the qualities you need to thrive in elite sport, or any high-performance environment for that matter,” says Peter Keen, the man who hired him at British Cycling.
“He is never ‘off’ — complete immersion. And when you are dealing with other obsessive, driven people, that’s powerful. You need them to feel secure. You need their trust. Dave earns that because he is as committed as they are.
“He is also fearless. Most people, if they see colleagues having an argument in the office, will pretend not to see it or just turn around because they don’t want to get involved. I’m not saying Dave likes a fight but he is not afraid of conflict. He will walk towards the argument and intervene, and 99 per cent of the time, he will make the situation better.
“I think he is intrigued by tension and there is a lot of that in elite sport — it’s relentless and it can be uncomfortable. He is OK with that.
“Dave is very good at picking the right people for the right role. He realised early on that his real skill was finding talented people who shared his hunger and work rate, but were perhaps best out of the limelight. Again, that is very powerful.
“But he is not at all sentimental. If you’re not performing anymore, you’ve got to go. That can seem quite clinical and uncaring but you cannot have passengers in elite sport. Dave has never had any problem with the difficult conversation.”
Brailsford calls this approach “compassionate ruthlessness” and he talked about it for the first time in Heroes, Villains and Velodromes, the 2008 book about Sir Chris Hoy’s rise to Olympic stardom by the late journalist Richard Moore. Like so many books about British cyclists of this era, Brailsford puts in a best-supporting actor performance.
“It means,” Brailsford explained to Moore, “telling people the truth all the time about where they’re at, and making very tough decisions about whether riders continue on the programme, about staff continuing or not…”
Does this make you think of a certain underperforming football giant, too?
Sir Michael Barber is an educationist who ran the public policy unit Britain’s then-Prime Minister Tony Blair set up to make sure his government was doing what it promised it would do. Barber described himself as a “deliverologist” and has advised governments in more than 60 countries on how to get things done. He is a good example of the kind of person who likes Brailsford, and vice versa.
“He brings a way of thinking about elite performance that is relevant to every sport,” Barber tells The Athletic.
“At first, it was a lot of stuff about technology and science, but he’s equally good at the more human side of things, the man-management stuff.
“Gareth Southgate was very interested in Dave’s advice on how you keep everyone in a World Cup squad motivated, including those who aren’t playing. Team Sky had almost 30 riders but only nine, and then it was eight, of them could ride the Tour.
“His real skill was making sure everyone in the team felt like they were contributing to the goal of winning the race. Gareth lapped it up and took detailed notes.
“A lot of very good sportsmen and women talk about doing their best, but with Brailsford, it is more than that. I remember talking to him after one of the Tour victories. It was in the lobby of the hotel the morning after and I congratulated him. He proceeded to tell me about the four things they got wrong that could have cost them the win.
“He is also very interested in learning from other sports and walks of life. When he ran the sub-two-hour marathon project, he didn’t know anything about running but he asked the same questions about the demands of the event that he asked before the Tour. And then he asked how best to prepare for that: Where do people lose speed? How many support runners do we need? What happens when there is an adverse camber on the road?”
This is a reference to one of the things Brailsford has done since he stepped back from his hands-on role with the cycling team and took on his current job as INEOS’s director of sport, which is basically a role he designed himself and then pitched to Sir Jim Ratcliffe in 2019.
Speaking to the T2 Hubcast podcast last year, Brailsford said he was in charge of something called “INEOS X… teams times teams”, which he described as an attempt to recreate the highly cooperative and multi-disciplinary world of Olympic sport in a professional teams environment.
What this means in practice is that he oversees all of Ratcliffe’s sports investments and tries to get them to share best practices, so they all win.
Practical examples of this would be moving the designers working on the America’s Cup sailing team Ratcliffe owns, the Sir Ben Ainslie-skippered INEOS Britannia, into the Brackley base of Mercedes-AMG Petronas, the Formula One outfit of which Ratcliffe owns a third, or turning French top-flight football club Nice’s training ground into a high-performance centre that the company’s cyclists and sailors can also use.
Another would be the INEOS 1:59 Challenge that Barber referred to, which saw Kenyan marathon great Eliud Kipchoge make history by breaking the two-hour mark for running 26.2 miles in 2019. Ratcliffe who loves a challenge, too, paid for the lot, and Brailsford, despite admitting that he knows “less about running than I know about football… and I don’t know much about football”, planned it for him.
Using the same “what are the demands of the event” checklist that he applied to winning Olympic medals and Grand Tours, Brailsford used his sailing team’s weather expertise to find the perfect location — a park in the Austrian city of Vienna, his cycling team’s aerodynamics experts to come up with a new formation for Kipchoge’s stellar cast of pace runners to use and Ratcliffe’s wallet to flatten out any bumps in the road; literally, in terms of a new roundabout in the park.
More recently, however, Brailsford has been on a football crash course. It is almost like he knew there was a big job on the horizon.
We have already written extensively about his work at Nice, so we will not dwell too long on it here, beyond noting that he threw himself at it with the customary gusto and it appears to have worked. They are third in Ligue 1, a point behind the team in second place, and into the quarter-finals of the Coupe de France.
“Dave wouldn’t pretend to be a football expert,” says Leaders In Sport’s Jimmy Worrall. “He knows he can’t match guys like Dan Ashworth or (Manchester City director of football) Txiki Begiristain for football knowledge, but he knows how to win.
“He was thrown in at the deep end at Nice. Of course, he was going to make mistakes but it was obvious to me that he would learn from those mistakes. He was working from seven in the morning until midnight, sleeping at the training ground in his motorhome.”
When Brailsford was asked about his football qualifications on that T2 podcast, he put it like this: “When I watch cycling, I’ll be watching in colour and you’ll be watching in black and white. But in football, I’m watching in black and white. I’ll get better, I’m working on it.”
Michael Barber agrees.
“Dave is passionate about football,” he says. “He loves it.”
While Keen chips in with an even better anecdote.
“We were close for a while and we had complementary skills,” explains Keen. “He was good at things I couldn’t do and vice-versa, and it worked really well. We didn’t socialise much but I vividly remember one occasion when Dave had managed to get some tickets for a Manchester United game. That would have been about 2003.
“Now, I’m not suggesting he has been playing the long game all this time but I do know that he has always loved football and Manchester United.”
I mentioned earlier that 2016 was the end of a period when it felt like Brailsford might actually achieve the new goal he set himself three years before when he said he wanted to make Team Sky “the most admired sports team in the world”, because that was when shadows started to be cast on his achievements and he ceased to be everyone’s favourite “man with a plan”.
In truth, the shadows had been there before, but allegations of doping within the British Olympic team and at Team Sky hit the mainstream in 2016 with the leak of Wiggins’ medical records. Suddenly, there appeared to be another explanation for all that winning.
I am not going to get into that here, 4,000 words into an article about what Brailsford can bring to Manchester United (or any other elite sports team), because that story deserves a few thousand words of its own in the coming days. What is important to note at this point is that he started a move away from the limelight in 2016 that he has only recently begun to reverse.
Some of that has to do with two serious health scares (cancer treatment in 2019, then heart surgery in 2021) and some of it is because Team INEOS, now known as INEOS Grenadiers after Ratcliffe’s London pub/off-road vehicle, stopped winning the Tour de France.
It happens. Sport is cyclical and some believe the team lost their edge because Brailsford backed away, bruised by the public reaction to the claims of cheating that he and his supporters have always fiercely denied. Without his presence at every race, standards slipped, details were missed, the intensity waned.
But Brailsford has not lost his edge. And he is now walking the walk at United. As Keen put it, that’s powerful.
Before the strains in their once-close relationship started to surface, Wiggins provided one of the best explanations of what Brailsford stands for, and what he won’t stand for, in his 2009 autobiography In Pursuit Of Glory.
Towards the end of the book, Wiggins describes a “strange poster in Dave B’s office in Manchester”. It is a huge picture of Chris Hoy getting his gold medal at the 2004 Olympics in Athens, taken from behind the podium — “not Chris’ best side by any means”, as Wiggins puts it.
Sir Clive Woodward, England’s 2003 Rugby Union World Cup-winning coach was visiting the velodrome, as they all did back then, and he asked Brailsford why he had chosen that picture, from that angle, to put on the wall.
“That is to remind people why we are here,” answered Brailsford. “We are all behind that bloke — and any rider in a GB kit who goes onto the track. We are here totally to serve and to make sure they have everything they want.
“Any of the backroom staff who can’t accept that are in the wrong place and the wrong job and need to remove themselves immediately. Or I will remove them.”
(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)
Sports
The State of Punditry – part 2: How the world analyses football – and the U.S. lead the way
Football coverage is a divisive subject.
Some think the standard of punditry is great, others will tell you it needs some work and some will deride it as awful. The analysis of the analysis never ends.
This week, The Athletic is looking more closely at the state of the industry, starting with yesterday’s piece assessing what is demanded of pundits in the United Kingdom in 2024 and how people consume their work.
Today, we broaden the discussion to see how UK coverage stacks up against the rest of the world, including the proudest of all football nations Germany, Brazil and Spain, together with those pesky upstarts in the U.S..
In Europe, the landscape of punditry can be wildly different. Travel to Italy, Spain or Turkey, switch on a television and scan through the channels and you’ll almost certainly be able to find some football coverage, be it via a football talk show, replays of matches, or on the news.
This is the case in the UK, too, via Sky Sports’ network of channels, but we’re talking free-to-air here in countries where people are arguably far more obsessed with football than your average UK football diehard.
It borders on fanaticism in a place like Turkey and the at-times frantic coverage reflects that. One grim incident recently showcased how seriously football is taken, when pundit Serhat Akin was shot in the foot when leaving a TV studio.
The former Fenerbahce player had been covering the club’s match against Belgian side Union Saint-Gilloise from an Istanbul studio, after which he was approached and shot by a masked man.
Akin posted a picture of his bloodied foot on Instagram with the caption: “They shot my foot, our last word is Fenerbahce.”
Over in Germany things are a bit calmer.
In many ways the coverage is very similar to in the UK, only probably a bit better. Standard Bundesliga behaviour.
Why? Well, depending on your disposition, they don’t quite have as much forced melodrama that you tend to find with the Premier League.
The punditry industry is not quite as accessible for ex-players, so the notion of former pros that you’d get on, say, a certain national radio station in the UK where certain people will make certain comments to attract attention doesn’t really exist.
Presenters, again, unlike in the UK with Gary Lineker, Alex Scott, or, until recently, Jermaine Jenas, are media professionals rather than players. Pundits include Per Mertesacker and Christoph Kramer, the 2014 World Cup winner who has been an analyst for many years already despite being only 33 years old and still not officially retired (he left Borussia Mönchengladbach in the summer).
They have a tactics corner on Sky via Dutchman Erik Meijer, the one-time Liverpool striker who spent much of his career in Germany. In a recent interview with The Athletic, Meijer described his reaction to being asked to appear on German television: “The first question I had was, ‘There are 80 million Germans in this country so why do they need to employ a Dutchman? But they wanted a different voice — someone who would say that Bayern Munich were c**p when they were.”
Julia Simic, who used to play for the women’s national team, is also a regular, while pundits who cover the Premier League include former goalkeeper Rene Adler and ex-Croatia international and Fulham and West Ham striker Mladen Petric.
While Germans do like other sports, such as basketball, handball and tennis, football is the main draw and the coverage can be dense and fanatical, although it tends to be quite considered and mindful of weighty issues. The rise of vloggers and influencers we have seen in the UK hasn’t yet caught on.
Probably the most high profile figure is Wolff Fuss, inflection king extraordinaire. Search for him on TikTok and you’ll find 20 million matches. Fuss has the stage to himself because, in another difference to the UK, co-commentators are quite uncommon in Germany.
If Fuss is the main man, then Lothar Matthaus is the loudest. Not necessarily in volume, but in the decibel level of his opinions (and his outfits… Matthaus caught the eye at this summer’s European Championship with some striking gilets).
Matthaus could probably be compared to Gary Neville or Jamie Carragher in that he gives forthright views on “his” club, which in this case would be Bayern Munich. Neville and Carragher constantly attract the attention of Manchester United and Liverpool managers with their views but Matthaus — and his partner-in-crime, Dietmar Hamann — tend to take it a bit further.
In the past year alone, Matthaus has called for Thomas Tuchel to be sacked, questioned the signing of Eric Dier, claimed Jadon Sancho’s influence at Borussia Dortmund had been exaggerated by the media and said he “felt sorry” for Cristiano Ronaldo whose “ego trips” had “damaged the team and himself”.
Last November, Tuchel referenced Matthaus and Hamann in a press conference after a 4-0 victory over Borussia Dortmund, saying: “Can I quote Lothar and Didi? For a team with no further development and a bad relationship between coach and players, that was alright today, I’d say. I’m sure the experts will tell you the rest themselves.” Nice.
Matthaus is probably still tame compared to Rafael van der Vaart, who, since retiring, has very much earned a reputation for making unfiltered and inflammatory comments in his role as a pundit in the Netherlands.
You may recall Van der Vaart had a pop at England’s Declan Rice after the Euro 2024 final on the coverage of Dutch broadcaster NOS, saying: “£100million for Declan Rice, what does he do? He comes to collect a ball only to pass it back to John Stones. He is useless. If you are truly worth £100m then you should be able to play a ball forward.”
This was very much in character for Van der Vaart, whose appreciation for the England team seems to be somewhat lacking given he also decried the whole side as “s***”, also on NOS, after they defeated the Netherlands 2-1 in the semi-finals.
Over in Spain, you may be most familiar with Spanish football TV punditry from clips of El Chiringuito de Jugones, a late-night debate show in which a cast of big personalities voice their opinions — usually quite loudly and with little sense of impartiality.
🔥 “RAMOS, TE QUIERO. ERES MI CAPITÁN” 🔥
⚪️‼️”¡¡FIRMA y QUÉDATE en el REAL MADRID!!”‼️⚪️
🤍💜 El discurso de @As_TomasRoncero que convencerá a @SergioRamos. #ElChiringuitoDeMega pic.twitter.com/SVdRd0HPcS
— El Chiringuito TV (@elchiringuitotv) May 9, 2021
In recent years the programme has gained notoriety for interviewing Real Madrid president Florentino Perez after the attempted launch of the European Super League, using the phrase “tic tac” to announce incoming transfer news (imitating the ticking of a clock) and showing three minutes of former Madrid midfielder Guti looking sad after his old side’s 4-0 Champions League defeat by Manchester City last year.
You will find a more sophisticated level of discussion on TV channel Movistar Plus and streaming platform DAZN. The former features former Madrid and Argentina player turned pundit Jorge Valdano while presenter Miguel Quintana and former Equatorial Guinea international Alberto Edjogo-Owono, who spent his career in the Spanish lower leagues, are two respected voices on DAZN.
But the way fandom works in Spain — in particular with the big two clubs, Barcelona and Madrid — means those pundits are often labelled the enemy of one or other team, despite trying to be impartial.
In Spain, there is also a deeper layer of scrutiny towards refereeing and why decisions do or do not happen (possibly linked to the above). There is no equivalent of Match of the Day, perhaps because there is not much interest in analysing games like Osasuna versus Getafe from a tactical perspective. And the tactical insight mainly comes from social media rather than mass media.
As for other prominent pundits, Guti has made a name for himself on DAZN, while Gaizka Mendieta and Juanfran Torres are also regulars on television.
Often more in-depth analysis can be found on late-night radio shows such as El Larguero on Cadena SER or Cadena COPE’s El Partidazo — both of which go on until the early hours and continue to attract huge audiences, as The Athletic’s Laia Cervello Herrero explored earlier this year. Even then, debates can get heated given the nature of football in Spain.
You might think the tone would be fairly outrageous in a football-mad country like Brazil, but while passions undoubtedly run extremely high and some coverage can be melodramatic, there is also room for reasoned debate.
The biggest difference in Brazil is the volume of the commentators, who are the stars of the show.
“The commentator really goes for it,” Natalie Gedra, a football reporter for Sky Sports in the UK who previously worked for ESPN and Globo in Brazil, tells The Athletic. “Brazilians cannot understand countries who don’t scream ‘GOOOOOOAAAAAAL!’ There’s also a tune that comes with it, either the club’s anthem or a song that’s related to the national team.
“Visually it’s different too — for example, you will have a gigantic ball going back and forth on the screen between transitions of replays. I remember watching World Cups growing up and they had a little mascot who would show up on the screen and dance around.”
Having ex-referees as pundits, for example, has been a well-established practice in Brazil for at least a decade, formerly in the commentary box but now more as studio analysts. Oh, and the studios are always at TV HQ, not on site at stadiums.
Talking of the commentary box, it’s typically filled with three people – a commentator, i.e. the star, a journalist and a former player.
“They have more ex-players now, but a lot of journalists are co-commentators or pundits on both pre and post-match shows,” Gedra adds. “Everyone knows the commentator; they’re massive stars.”
Reflecting how their best players tend to head to Europe, Brazil’s most famous ex-players aren’t really part of the TV coverage over there, other than for World Cups. Ronaldo worked on the 2014 World Cup and, most famously, Pele was a commentator for the 1994 World Cup.
“There are some ex-players, like, for example (Walter) Casagrande, who played for Corinthians. He was the most prominent for many years,” Gedra says. “He was a bit of a pioneer, he had a big profile and didn’t back down from making big statements, but he was also very articulate.
“The main Brazilian football names don’t become pundits in Brazil, but Pele in 1994 is by far the most famous example. There is a picture of him celebrating in the commentary booth with commentator Galvao Bueno which is one of the most iconic images in the history of Brazilian television.
Meu amigo Édson se foi!!
Que tristeza! Mas Pelé, não!!
Pelé é eterno!! Rei Pelé!!
Primeiro e único!! pic.twitter.com/AA56oWRdlZ— Galvão Bueno (@galvaobueno) December 29, 2022
“Galvao Bueno is probably the biggest name in the history of Brazilian TV, he’s absolutely huge and the voice of many of the biggest sporting moments, like all the World Cups. Yes, people love or hate him but everybody knows who he is.”
Commentators in the UK don’t have anywhere near as big a profile. No wonder Guy Mowbray has started doing Gladiators.
Another difference is in the make-up of the post-match chat. Gedra has observed that Brazil’s coverage is less data-orientated than in the UK, although the tone depends on the channel. Globo, the free-to-air channel, have largely monopolised coverage but they are now under threat from newer players such as Sport TV, ESPN and TNT Sports. YouTube channels are also growing.
“I worked for ESPN and I think they got the tone just right, very analytical and not too spectacular or passionate,” Gedra says.
Unspectacular is definitely not a word you would use to describe the stylings of Alexi Lalas, one of the most prominent broadcasters in the U.S., whose brash persona brings a love-it-or-hate-it quality.
He works as an analyst for Fox Sports, has a podcast called Alexi Lalas’ State of the Union and doesn’t care if people like him or not. But his bold, direct and outspoken opinions have made him an influential figure in the U.S. and beyond.
Lalas is another who doesn’t seem to especially like English players, saying during the Euros that Gareth Southgate’s team were “insufferable as they are talented”.
“But I’m in the entertainment business,” Lalas told The Athletic earlier this year. “I am a performer. When you say that, sometimes people cringe. By no means am I saying that I can’t be authentic and genuine. But I recognise the way I say something is as important as what I say.
“When I go on TV, I put on a costume and when that red light goes on, I don’t want people changing the channel.”
Lalas’ audacious approach is a bit of a leap from the English-style NBC coverage that rose to prominence a few years ago. A number of ex-Premier League players headed Stateside and made names for themselves, such as Robbie Earle and Robbie Mustoe — while having decent careers in England, neither was a household name when playing for Wimbledon and Middlesbrough respectively.
GO DEEPER
Access all areas at NBC: Three Premier League games, a Winnebago and tactical sushi
The pair, who have their own podcast called The 2 Robbies, gave NBC’s coverage a familiar feel alongside commentator Arlo White and pundit Lee Dixon, while former Stoke City defender Danny Higginbotham is another face of the channel having moved Stateside. “What we’ve tried to do from the start is talk in a normal way about football,” Earle told The Guardian in 2017. An underrated concept.
Fox Sports also employ recognisable names from UK TV coverage including commentator (sorry, ‘play-by-play announcer’) Ian Darke, former Newcastle defender Warren Barton and ex-Sky Sports reporter Geoff Shreeves. Fox also use Mark Clattenburg as a refereeing analyst.
Undoubtedly the most renowned U.S. soccer coverage, though, is on CBS Sports via its hugely popular Golazo Champions League show, complete with the instantly recognisable line-up of Kate Abdo, Thierry Henry, Micah Richards and Jamie Carragher, whose on-screen chemistry make them a social media staple on every matchday.
Pete Radovich, the coordinating producer of the UEFA Champions League coverage on CBS Sports, told The Athletic in September on how he came to realise that the network’s Champions League Today studio now owns the global conversation on major nights of European football.
“Thierry Henry, in no uncertain terms, says he gets asked more about CBS now than Arsenal,” he said. “That to me is wild.”
The show’s razor-sharp use of social media and its mix of humour, analysis and engaging post-match interviews with managers and players is a winning formula, while most importantly the quartet’s camaraderie feels natural, warm and unforced.
Americans showing the world how to make excellent football soccer coverage? It’s a brave new world.
(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)
Sports
Former NCAA swimmer Riley Gaines calls out ‘deranged’ co-hosts of ‘The View’ over Capitol Hill bathroom ban
Former University of Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines blasted the co-hosts of “The View” on Wednesday, calling them “deranged” and “out of touch” after they spoke out in defense of Delaware Rep.-elect Sarah McBride over a resolution that would ban transgender women from using women’s restrooms at the U.S. Capitol.
Gaines, a 12-time NCAA All-American swimmer who has publicly spoken out against trans inclusion in women’s and girls sports and advocated for protecting women’s spaces, posted a message on X calling out the group for speaking out on an issue that does not directly impact them.
“I wonder if the deranged, out-of-touch women on The View would be comfortable letting Mr. McBride change in a locker room inches away from their own daughters,” she wrote in a post on X which accompanied a clip of the show.
“It never matters until it affects you personally.”
Gaines competed against former UPenn swimmer Lia Thomas, a transgender athlete, at the NCAA championships in 2022, where she said the NCAA had opted to give Thomas the fifth-place trophy for the “photo op” despite them tying in the women’s 200 freestyle.
Thomas would go on to win a national title in the women’s 500 freestyle.
Gaines was responding to a segment of Tuesday’s episode of “The View” where the co-hosts reacted to a resolution by Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., to ban transgender women from using women’s restrooms at the U.S. Capitol in response to McBride, the first openly transgender federal lawmaker set to join Congress in January.
RILEY GAINES REPEATEDLY TEARS INTO AOC FOR TAKING PRONOUNS OUT OF X BIO AFTER ADVOCATING FOR TRANS ATHLETES
“I don’t understand how this is [Mace’s] welcome to someone who is coming to make a difference in the country,” Whoopi Goldberg said.
“It’s not a welcome, it’s flipping her the middle finger. Because she is the one person in the House that this will affect,” Sara Haines responded, adding, “And this woman that came and sat at our table is one of the most decent, amazing politicians I’ve ever seen. Her messaging resounded across the boards.”
Alyssa Farah Griffin chimed in, calling the attempt to ban McBride “gross.”
“It is a new member of Congress, who ran as a centrist democrat, talked about issues – pocketbook issues. She said at our table ‘I am not a spokesperson for my community. I’m running to deliver for Delaware.’ And Nancy Mace is trying to goad her into a fight she did not sign up to be part of. She’s trying to pigeonhole her into ‘You have to be this culture warrior, who makes this your whole identity’ purely because Nancy Mace doesn’t like how she chooses to exist.”
Gaines said in a separate post on X Wednesday that she would be “happy” to join “The View” for a conversation after disagreeing with Goldberg’s numbers regarding trans athletes competing in public schools.
Fox News’ Liz Elkind contributed to this report.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Sports
Freddie Freeman grand slam ball to be auctioned. Could bring 'life-changing money' for Venice family
The past few weeks have been a whirlwind for Zachary Ruderman.
He’s the 10-year-old Dodgers fan who ended up with one of the most significant baseballs in team history — the one his favorite player, first baseman Freddie Freeman, hit for a walk-off grand slam during the 10th inning in Game 1 of the 2024 World Series against the New York Yankees.
Since then, Zachary has seemingly become one of the most famous people living in Venice.
“It’s a lot more attention than my son has ever had,” his father, Nico Ruderman, said. “He’s spoken to so many media outlets, so many interviews. People recognize him. I mean, literally everywhere we go people stop him and want to take pictures with him. He’s really actually been loving it. It’s been a fun experience for him.”
That experience is entering a new phase. On Wednesday, SCP Auctions announced the ball will be up for bid from Dec. 4-14. Coming just weeks after the Dodgers won their eighth World Series championship — with Freeman hitting four home runs and winning MVP honors, all on a badly sprained ankle — SCP founder and president David Kohler said his company thinks “the sky’s the limit” for what the auction could bring.
“We think this is gonna bring seven figures,” Kohler said. “We think it’s one of the most historic baseballs ever, with the moment of this World Series, the first walk-off grand slam, the whole story of Freddie Freeman, the Dodgers, Game 1, extra innings. Just everything about it. I mean, it’s one of the most historic moments in sports and we feel that people are going to appreciate that.”
Last month, Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani’s 50th home run ball was sold by Goldin Auctions for a record $4.4 million. Could the Freeman ball be worth even more than that?
“It could be. You never know,” Kohler said. “We’re gonna find out. Certainly the Ohtani ball was very, very significant and Ohtani is beloved, but this is more of the history of the game of baseball and just the moment — seeing that happen was just incredible.”
Zachary, along with his father and mother Anne, were part of that moment. After Freeman blasted his game-winning shot into the right-field pavilion, the ball rolled next to Zachary’s feet. The fifth-grader batted it over to his father, who pounced on it, stood up and handed it back to his son.
“They’re just amazing memories,” Zachary said Thursday, looking back on that night. “Like after we got it, no one was mad. No one was trying to take it from us. Everyone was just super happy.”
His father added: “We just feel so lucky and honored to be a small part of such a huge moment in Dodger history.”
The experience was so special that at first the family had no intention of parting with the ball.
“That night when we caught it we were like, ‘We’re gonna keep this forever,’” Ruderman said. “The problem is, if we keep it, we’re not gonna keep it in our house. I don’t want to pay for the insurance for it, so it would just be locked up in some safety deposit box. Nobody would ever see it.
“Maybe [the auction] brings life-changing money and pays for education for our son, and also allows somebody with the resources to actually display it and show it to the world. We’re really hoping that whoever buys it agrees to display it at Dodger Stadium for some time so everybody can see it. That’s really our wish.”
Even with all the incredible experiences he’s had because of the ball — including his favorite, speaking in front of Los Angeles City Council at City Hall and receiving a certificate of congratulations from Councilmember Traci Park earlier this month — Zachary said he’s “really excited” about the auction.
“It’s probably going to be a pretty fun experience,” Zachary said.
“We’ve had our fun with the ball,” his father added. “At this point he cares more about the memories, the pictures. He loves reading all the articles and watching all the news stories about it. That’s what’s fun for him, not the item itself.”
-
News1 week ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business5 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Politics4 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Science2 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Technology3 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI