Connect with us

Southeast

Virginia couple married for 30 years claim they’ve never argued

Published

on

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

With greater than 30 years of marriage underneath their belt, one Virginia couple — Hannah Keeley, a grasp life coach, and her husband, Blair Keeley, a advertising and marketing skilled — declare they’ve by no means had a single argument. 

In addition they say they’ve by no means even raised their voices at one another, together with whereas parenting their seven youngsters, who’re all now grown.

If these relationship claims elevate a couple of eyebrows — and a number of the consultants Fox Information Digital consulted say a state of affairs like this sounds very “uncommon” and “not often achievable” (maintain studying!) — the couple additionally share intriguing insights concerning the strengths of their partnership and sensible takeaways others may glean from their experiences.

“Relationships are a ability, not a present,” the couple stated in a joint assertion to Fox Information Digital. 

Advertisement

Hannah and Blair Keeley share their relationship secrets and techniques with Fox Information Digital and provide loads of recommendation for others of their footwear.
(Hannah and Blair Keeley)

“We determined from the start that our marriage was vital sufficient to develop the talents of communication,” the Keeleys stated. “Our dad and mom each have long-standing wholesome relationships, [so] we realized what to do, and what to not do, by observing them.”

Whereas the couple admit they’ve gotten upset with one another occasionally throughout their three-decade relationship, they view “anger as miscommunication” — so, as a substitute of feeding any emotions of anger, the pair select to “combat on the identical facet,” slightly than be in opposition to at least one one other, they stated.

“There isn’t a profitable or dropping in an argument,” the Keeleys informed Fox Information Digital. 

Hannah and Blair Keeley (center) got married in 1991 and are the parents of seven adult children (shown above). The couple shared unique conflict-free relationship philosophies with Fox News Digital.

Hannah and Blair Keeley (middle) obtained married in 1991 and are the dad and mom of seven grownup youngsters (proven above). The couple shared distinctive conflict-free relationship philosophies with Fox Information Digital.
(Desiray Osier/Nowell Photograph)

“An argument is there to show one thing. Should you resort to preventing, you’ve each misplaced,” they stated. 

Advertisement

Listed here are 7 total suggestions the couple shared in feedback to Fox Information Digital.

Tip No. 1: Share emotions and expectations

Arguing and yelling are behaviors much like a baby throwing a tantrum, the Keeleys imagine. “You yell and scream on the best goal obtainable — your partner,” the couple stated. “A wedding shouldn’t be an association of ardour, however a partnership of energy.”

That is why, they stated, they select to speak with one another earlier than anger even has an opportunity to take root.  

They share their emotions, expectations and the interior narratives they might or might not have created throughout the occasions they’ve gotten mad at one another.

Tip No. 2: ‘Problem one another to develop’ 

Hannah and Blair Keeley additionally flip to their religion after they face challenges, they stated. This consists of consulting the Bible, together with a verse from Deuteronomy 32:30, which says that “one man will chase a thousand and two put ten thousand to flight.”

Advertisement

“That is the precept of multiplicity,” the Keeleys stated. 

MINNESOTA COUPLE LOSES MORE THAN 200 POUNDS COMBINED: ‘IT’S ENERGIZING’

“If a wedding is a relationship between two people who find themselves attempting to repair and ‘full’ each other, it’s often a strained and weakened partnership,” they informed Fox Information Digital. 

“Nevertheless, if a wedding is a relationship between two full individuals who problem one another to develop, that could be a highly effective and peaceable partnership. If somebody makes you content, that’s harmful. In the event that they make you happier, that’s lovely.”

Advertisement

Different ideas they are saying they’ve realized with the assistance of their religion embody accepting private duty and practising a “cooperative partnership, not a hierarchical relationship.” 

CANADIAN POLITICIAN’S TWEET ABOUT WIFE SHOVELING SNOW AFTER 12-HOUR HOSPITAL SHIFT TAKES UNEXPECTED TURN

A cooperative partnership encourages “collaboration and mutual honor,” they imagine.

Tip No. 3: Learn the physique language

For {couples} who desire a extra harmonious relationship, the Keeleys advocate listening with out interruption and studying the opposite individual’s physique language.

“Have a look at how the individual is holding their physique and sustaining their gaze,” they informed Fox Information Digital.

Advertisement

“Closed in posture, [people] really feel attacked. Huge actions, they really feel unimportant. Downward gaze, they really feel embarrassed or ashamed. Upward gaze, they really feel confused.”

“Search for the ache or worry that the phrases might not be capable of categorical,” they went on.

Tip No. 4: By no means go to mattress offended (however not for the explanations you assume)

Hannah and Blair Keeley insist it’s vital for {couples} to not go to mattress offended. That is as a result of nighttime is when people usually encode their cognitive experiences from earlier within the day.

“If a pair can resolve all of their points with calm communication, then that might be the perfect, if not often achievable, situation,” stated one knowledgeable. 

Within the couple’s personal phrases: “Anger towards your partner can simply flip right into a perception for those who don’t handle the thought previous to bedtime. How can we do that?” 

Advertisement

They continued, “All the time affirm the love you’ve got for that individual, even when there isn’t a decision. The last word battle decision is making the aware resolution to like.”

Tip No. 5: Keep away from the phrase ‘ought to’ 

Romantic companions have to keep away from the phrase “ought to,” the Keeleys additionally stated, in the event that they wish to have a profitable relationship. 

“Holding the thought that your partner ‘ought to’ be completely different is arguing with actuality,” Hannah and Blair Keeley wrote. 

“Should you try this, you’ll lose 100% of the time. Perceive the best show of affection is permitting freedom to exist with out expectations.”

Tip No. 6: Talk, talk, talk!

The Keeleys first met in 1986 throughout their first yr of school at Furman College in Greenville, S.C. However sparks didn’t fly till they obtained to know one another three-and-a-half years later.

Advertisement

That is when Blair Keeley discovered Hannah’s misplaced sketchbook — and requested if they might catch up earlier than they graduated.

After commencement, Blair went to Saudi Arabia to work with a information company for Desert Protect, whereas Hannah began graduate faculty in Columbia, S.C. The couple wrote letters to one another all that summer season.

They finally reunited and obtained married on Dec. 21, 1991. 

At present they reside close to Richmond, Virginia; their seven children’ names are Kelsey, Katie, Kyler, Karis, Korben, Klara and Kenna. The Keeleys imagine that no less than a few of their success as a married couple will be attributed to the time and dedication they gave one another early on.

Tip No. 7: Do not sabotage one thing good

“Folks don’t must imagine we’ve by no means fought. It doesn’t hassle us a bit,” the Keeleys additionally informed Fox Information Digital. 

Advertisement

“These closest to us, those who reside underneath our roof and see us 24/7, definitely imagine it, and that’s all that issues to us — that we’re making an impression on those that love us probably the most and know us one of the best.”

When requested for different ideas about those that may query their strife-free relationship, the couple thought of that society might need conditioned folks to imagine fights are an unavoidable facet of relationships at this time.

“The objective of a wholesome relationship shouldn’t be to keep away from preventing, however to disagree in a method that permits for issues to be solved.”

— Psychotherapist Dr. Daryl Appleton to Fox Information Digital

“If we imagine we are able to’t keep away from one thing, we’ll sabotage our personal private efforts to attain any proof that’s in opposition to that perception,” the Keeleys stated. 

“Possibly the easiest factor you are able to do on your marriage is imagine that concord in that partnership shouldn’t be solely potential, however straightforward to attain.”

Advertisement

The consultants weigh in 

A number of relationship consultants and psychological well being professionals informed Fox Information Digital that fight-free relationships are unusual, however not not possible to attain.

“Within the relationship gamut, by no means having a single argument would fall on the extra ‘uncommon’ facet,” stated psychotherapist Dr. Daryl Appleton, who practices in New York Metropolis and New England. 

“For apparent causes, this may be actually wholesome as a result of we see two folks nonetheless in love after 30 years with little to no turmoil. On the opposite facet, we all know that by no means having a disagreement or passionate variations will be unhealthy as a result of it begs the query: Can the whole lot in life truly be agreed on?”

Psychotherapist Dr. Daryl Appleton told Fox News Digital that not all arguments are bad; but there's a right and wrong way for couples to argue.

Psychotherapist Dr. Daryl Appleton informed Fox Information Digital that not all arguments are dangerous; however there is a proper and unsuitable method for {couples} to argue.
(iStock)

Appleton believes {couples} can have wholesome and respectful arguments after they actively pay attention, share duty in problem-solving, make actionable follow-through steps and use “I statements,” equivalent to, “’This made me really feel X’ or ‘I perceived the occasions as Y.’”

Unhealthy arguing practices that Appleton stated {couples} ought to keep away from embody name-calling, violence, private assaults, bringing unrelated elements right into a present combat, stonewalling, not taking accountability and holding a grudge.

Advertisement

3 SIGNS THAT A MARRIAGE WON’T LAST, ACCORDING TO WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHERS

Appleton stated, “The objective of a wholesome relationship shouldn’t be to keep away from preventing, however as a substitute be capable of disagree in a method that permits for issues to truly be solved and for our companions and ourselves to really feel seen and heard.”

New Jersey-based non-public follow therapist Frank Thewes of Path Ahead Remedy LLC informed Fox Information Digital that {couples} ought to keep away from yelling, gaslighting and utilizing insults when and if an argument comes up. 

As an alternative, they need to have calm, constructive and emotion-centered debates with the intention to focus on matters healthily with out escalation.

Advertisement
Private practice therapist Frank Thewes said couples should discuss their disagreements in a calm, constructive and emotion-centered manner.

Personal follow therapist Frank Thewes stated {couples} ought to focus on their disagreements in a relaxed, constructive and emotion-centered method.
(iStock)

“{Couples} who declare to by no means argue are both so well-matched that they by no means have a disagreement or open battle — or they each generally tend to withdraw from battle and keep away from open battle and displaying uncomfortable feelings,” Thewes stated. 

“Each companions could possibly be so self-regulating that they deal with the whole lot with calm and empathy, however this is able to be an anomaly slightly than the norm.”

Thewes continued, “This isn’t essentially unhealthy, until it’s manufactured or as a result of every companion having a worry of emotional battle and due to this fact avoiding it and by no means coping with points.”

Advertisement

He completed, “If a pair can resolve all of their points with calm communication, then that might be the perfect, if not often achievable, situation.”

Learn the total article from Here

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southeast

Epstein grand jury records released, describe trafficker's network for 'grooming' underage girls

Published

on

Graphic content warning

Jeffrey Epstein, the sex-trafficking financier who died in federal custody while awaiting trial, had a network of groomed girls in Palm Beach, Florida, recruiting victims for him as far back as 2005, according to newly unsealed grand jury transcripts from a child trafficking case that he largely escaped with a slap on the wrist nearly 20 years ago.

The 176-page document contains new details about Epstein’s crimes, including specifics about cash payouts to teens who recruited one another for Epstein’s misdeeds, firsthand accounts from child sex-assault victims, and allegations of rape.

Palm Beach police initially opened the case after a fight between girls at a local high school, according to the transcript. One, just 16, had been accused of prostitution by a classmate, and a school official later found $300 in her purse, which originally came from Epstein, according to the documents. 

She testified that she had been instructed to concoct a fake life story and pretend to be 18 to get $200 to give Epstein a massage before the first time she met him. Then she revealed she was asked to strip down to her underwear and had a graphic sexual encounter with him.

Advertisement

FLORIDA GOV RON DESANTIS SIGNS LAW WITH BIG POTENTIAL IMPACT ON EPSTEIN CASE

Jeffrey Epstein pictured in Cambridge, Massachusetts on Sept. 8, 2004. (Rick Friedman/Rick Friedman Photography/Corbis via Getty Images)

In a court order authorizing the release of the documents, Circuit Judge Luis Delgado warned that the contents were disturbing.

“It is widely accepted that Epstein is a notorious and serial pedophile,” the order reads. “The testimony taken by the Grand Jury concerns activity ranging from grossly unacceptable to rape – all of the conduct at issue is sexually deviant, disgusting, and criminal.   The details in the record will be outrageous to decent people.”

Joseph Abruzzo, who serves as Palm Beach County’s court clerk and comptroller, announced the release of the documents shortly before 3 p.m. on Monday, hours after a new Florida law took effect legalizing the release of grand jury materials in certain cases. Grand jury proceedings are typically kept secret.

Advertisement

The transcript shows that prosecutors asked the victims if they were aware that they may have committed the crime of prostitution and did not describe Epstein as a “pedophile” in questioning before the grand jury. 

EPSTEIN CELLMATE, AN EX-COP, CONVICTED OF KILLING 4 PEOPLE

Prince Andrew Virginia Roberts

Photo from 2001 that was included in court files shows Prince Andrew with his arm around the waist of 17-year-old Virginia Giuffre who says Jeffrey Epstein paid her to have sex with the prince. Andrew has denied the charges. In the background is Epstein’s girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell. (Florida Southern District Court) (U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

An investigator on the witness stand, however, referenced a March 14, 2005, phone call from a victim’s mother who was concerned about “sexual activity” involving her step-daughter.

“What had occurred was that [redacted] had gotten into a fight at [redacted] School,” the doc explains. “And subsequently, after the fight, they discovered $300 in her purse.”

“When questioning the $300, she had told ’em that she had received it from a man in Palm Beach.”

Advertisement

The girl explained to a detective that she was taken to a house to massage “a wealthy man in Palm Beach,” – and the documents identified the man as Epstein.

PSYCHIATRIST HENRY JARECKI BLASTS EXPLOSIVE CLAIMS IN JEFFREY EPSTEIN ACCUSER’S NEW SEX TRAFFICKING LAWSUIT

A partially-redacted evidence photo shows various girls smiling for a picture on Jeffrey Epstein's Little St. James Island

A partially-redacted evidence photo shows various girls smiling for a picture on Jeffrey Epstein’s Little St. James Island in 2006. The documents pertaining to a 2017 civil lawsuit from Epstein-accuser Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell have been made public by a federal judge. (SDNY)

On page 102 of the document, a search of Jeffrey Epstein’s home found that a dildo was found in a bedroom. In earlier testimony, one of his underage accusers said he had offered her an extra $100 – on top of $200 for a massage – if she’d let him use a similar toy on her.

The documents also reveal one of Epstein’s victims being interviewed about the money she was given for acts she performed.

“And I was like, I got $300,” the girl said. “And I was like, kind – I was excited. $300.”

Advertisement

One victim disclosed that she was 17 years old when she had sex with Epstein. The encounter took place on the day before her 18th birthday. Another said she was in her early teens when the financier used a sex toy on her and masturbated.

Mug shot of Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein mugshot, 2019. (Kypros/Getty Images)

“And for my birthday he gave me, like, a couple [of] bras and panties,” the victim said. She was also asked to stay in the room while Epstein had sex with Nadia Marcinko.

When asked if she wanted to have sexual intercourse with him, the victim answered no but said that it was “stupid of [her] to put myself in that situation.” A juror also asked the question, “Did he take away from your person, your being, your spirit?”

“Yes,” she replied. The witness also told jurors that she Epstein was well aware of her age at the time, but did not want to testify against Epstein.

“I would like to put it behind me for the most part,” she said. “I was successful until about two days ago.”

Advertisement

Jury proceedings also revealed that a witness saw Epstein sexually assault a stripper.

“When Jeffrey entered [redacted], did she ask him to stop at all?”

A close-up of Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey Epstein in Cambridge, MA on 9/8/04. Epstein is connected with several prominent people including politicians, actors and academics. Epstein was convicted of having sex with an underaged woman. (Rick Friedman/Rick Friedman Photography/Corbis via Getty Images)

“She screaming no,” the witness replied. The witness also added that he later apologized and offered her a thousand dollars in return.

The documents also mention former President Bill Clinton, who knew Epstein. It was in relation to a girl mentioning the former president on her blog, according to the investigator on the witness stand.

Advertisement

“There is a notion on one of her blogs, that she says she would like to meet Bill Clinton this week, because – and this is in quotes now – ‘Someone could be so famous for sucking his d–k; that’s how famous I could be.’” 

She did not accuse the former president of wrongdoing or indicate that she’d actually met him.

Recalled to the stand, Palm Beach Detective Joe Recarey testified that investigators found evidence that one of Epstein’s “assistants,” as his groomers were known, recruited a 23-year-old woman for Epstein, but he turned her away.

“He told her, the younger, the better,” he testified. “She brought a 23-year-old to massage him, and he told her that she was too old and he wanted someone younger.”

Epstein received a lenient punishment of just 13 months for the 2005 child sex case. As a result, a group of accusers in February announced a lawsuit against the FBI, alleging it failed to properly investigate him at the time, allowing him to continue harming children and young women for years.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Southeast

Kentucky Gov Beshear responds to rumors that he’ll run for president: 'It's flattering'

Published

on

Kentucky Democrat Gov. Andy Beshear told reporters Monday that even though President Biden’s recent debate performance was “rough,” he has no intention of sliding into presidential contention unless Biden bows out of the race.

Reporters asked Beshear what he thought about Biden’s performance in last week’s debate and whether he should remain in the race.

“Well, the debate performance was rough. It was a very bad night for the president,” the Kentucky governor said. “But he is still the candidate. Only he can make decisions about his future candidacy, so as long as he continues to be in the race, that’s important.”

The question came just days after the first presidential debate between Biden and former President Trump, which left many Democrats shocked and concerned about the current president’s performance. Biden’s rambling answers and raspy voice raised concerns about his age, mental state and whether he is fit to serve another four years.

Advertisement

TOP HOUSE DEM ADMITS BIDEN DEBATE WAS A ‘SETBACK,’ CALLS FOR COMEBACK AFTER ‘UNDERWHELMING PERFORMANCE’

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear was asked about his thoughts on President Biden’s debate performance and whether he would consider sliding in to run for the top spot on the ticket in November. (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley/File)

Following the debate, multiple Democrat figures and media outlets called for the current president to step out of the race and allow another Democrat to take the party’s spot at the top of the ticket.

When asked if he would slide into the slot if Biden were to bow out of the race, Beshear reiterated that only the president can determine his future as a candidate.

“He is the candidate, and as long as he is, I’m supporting him,” Beshear said.

Advertisement

BIDEN DEBATE DEBACLE: 10 EYE-OPENING MEDIA RESPONSES, FROM MSNBC PANIC TO ‘THE VIEW’ CALLING FOR REPLACEMENT

Three shots of Biden during the debate

Voters have expressed concerns over Biden’s age and capability to serve a second term after the debate. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images | Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

But he also told reporters that he was flattered when people mention his name as someone being considered to lead the party as a presidential candidate.

“I think it’s a reflection of all the good things going on in Kentucky. As compared to the rest of the country, the temperature’s been turned down here,” Beshear said.

He explained that state Democrats and Republicans are excited about the jobs the state has created as well as the record-low unemployment and decreases in overdose deaths, among other things.

BIDEN REPORTEDLY HUMILIATED BY DEBATE PERFORMANCE, LACKS CONFIDENCE: ‘IT’S A MESS’

Advertisement
Democrat Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear speaking at an event

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear (AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley/File)

Beshear said he thinks the rest of the country is turning to the things being done in Kentucky, and he talked about how a Democrat governor and a Republican general assembly can get good results.

“I think the answer to that is everything is not partisan, and people are tired of the clashes, day in and day out,” he said. “So, when they look at what we have done in Kentucky, they see a better future that’s beyond some of the back-and-forth that we see on the federal level.”

Biden has not bowed out of the race, though he was reportedly humiliated by his debate performance and “devoid of confidence,” according to an NBC News report that cited a person familiar with the president’s mood.

“It’s a mess,” the source reportedly told NBC News.

The outlet reported that several prominent Democrats expressed concern in private over Biden’s chances of beating Trump in November after his debate performance. However, they remain steadfast in their support for Biden in public.

Advertisement

During a speech at a New Jersey fundraiser on Saturday, the president acknowledged he didn’t have a “great night.”

“Research during the debate shows us converting more undecided voters than Trump did, in large part because of his conduct on Jan. 6,” he said. “People remember the bad things during his presidency.”

Biden’s campaign said it has raised $27 million since his debate performance.

Fox News Digital’s Hanna Panreck contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Southeast

Biden is destroying girls’ sports and we are going to stop him

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Title IX has long recognized biological differences between the two sexes, but the Biden administration insists that sex is effectively the same as “gender identity.” The implications of this redefinition aren’t just theoretical. 
 
We are both part of a lawsuit in which a federal district court in Kentucky recently stood up for the privacy and safety of women and girls, halting the Biden administration’s attempt to rewrite Title IX through a new rule that would have allowed men who identify as females into women’s locker rooms, restrooms, and showers. 
 
One of us is Patrick Morrisey, the attorney general of West Virginia. I count it a privilege to represent my state’s interest in protecting women’s safety and privacy. 

Advertisement

CECÉ TELFER, TRANSGENDER ATHLETE WHO WON NCAA TITLE, VOWS TO ‘TAKE ALL THE RECORDS’ IN INDOOR COMPETITIONS
 
The other one of us is Adaleia Cross, a 15-year-old female athlete represented by Alliance Defending Freedom who has competed in a variety of track-and-field events — including discus, pole vault, and shot put — since middle school.  

President Joe Biden gutted the true meaning of Title IX regulations. The result harms female athletes and forces them to compete with biological males. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

I was recently forced to compete against a male athlete identifying as a girl. Predictably, the male student beat me many times and bumped me from a conference championship I had worked all season to qualify for. 
 
Simply put, with a biological male competing alongside me, I began losing opportunities to compete because of the male student outperforming me. Until April 2023, I was in the top three on my team for discus, and I was usually in the top three or four for shot put as well. 
 
And when off the field, as I shared in my affidavit filed in court, other female teammates and I were forced to share locker rooms and restrooms with a male student. But women and girls should never be forced to face a boy when we change or shower in a restroom or locker room.  

In addition, we can all agree that no one should experience sexual harassment in these places. We must protect women and private spaces and ensure women are not put in uncomfortable situations, as I was. 

My affidavit contains a simple request, true to the heart of Title IX: “I want girls to have an opportunity to compete on a level and safe playing field, and I know that will never happen if boys are allowed to compete on girls’ sports teams. It seems that people have forgotten the whole point of making girls’ sports separate. It was impossible for girls to compete in boys’ sports safely and competitively. Letting biological males into women’s sports defeats the whole purpose of even having them in the first place. We simply cannot compete with men.” 
 
West Virginia state officials rightfully recognize biological reality. Our legislature passed the Save Women’s Sports Act to buttress Title IX’s protections and defend women’s sports. Yet the Biden administration’s new rule would override even that law. 
 
In the face of this not-so-slight-of-hand erasure of women’s rights, we (West Virginia and Adaleia) sued the Biden administration in May. Joining us was a coalition of states — Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana and Virginia — and Christian Educators Association International, also represented by ADF. 
 
Title IX is simple: It demands that girls and women get their fair share of opportunities in education, and its regulations make clear that this can be accomplished in school athletic programs by having “separate teams for members of each sex.”  

Advertisement

And because of the enduring physical differences between men and women and importance of privacy, Title IX has always allowed the sex-specific spaces — like bathrooms and locker rooms — that are ubiquitous across the nation. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION 
 
The administration’s notion to include “gender identity” in its definition of sex deprives girls of the opportunity to continue to get a fair shake. The rule forces states like West Virginia to accept radical gender ideology in their schools. And this administration has done so in blatant defiance of Congress’ repeated refusal to extend Title IX’s protections to anything other than sex. 
 
The sweeping Title IX mandate by the Biden administration would upend schools’ long-lawful practices protecting student privacy, unfairly undermine women’s academic and athletic achievements and related advancements in society, and punish states for following their laws. Federal bureaucrats have no right to rewrite the statutes Congress passes, let alone fundamentally change what it means to be a man or a woman. 
 
Allowing such a mandate would be a shame because the impact of Title IX on women’s sports has been profound. Before the law, just one in 27 young women played sports. Today, that figure is 10 in 25. 

West Virginia state officials rightfully recognize biological reality. Our legislature passed the Save Women’s Sports Act to buttress Title IX’s protections and defend women’s sports. Yet the Biden administration’s new rule would override even that law. 

In the guise of confronting “gender identity discrimination,” the administration’s Department of Education is, simply put, attempting to abolish sex-based distinctions in educational activities and programs. 


 
In the end, Title IX is about basic fairness. We must honor and defend this law to guarantee future generations of girls and women benefit from its many protections. Rest assured we will fight these radical changes to Title IX with every available tool in our arsenal. 
 
Women deserve nothing less. 

Advertisement

Adaleia Cross is a 15-year-old student in West Virginia. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PATRICK MORRISEY

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ADALEIA CROSS

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending