Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Trump Transition Team Considering a Public Safety Czar for D.C.

Published

on

Trump Transition Team Considering a Public Safety Czar for D.C.


President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is considering a possible takeover of public safety in D.C., potentially installing—with congressional approval—some type of federally appointed czar over law enforcement in the nation’s capital, according to two sources.

The sources emphasized no firm decisions have been made. “A lot of things are being considered,” said one involved source familiar with the presidential transition team’s discussions at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach. 

Two separate sources suggested that a U.S. deputy attorney general or similar official could possibly be appointed to directly oversee the District’s police force, fire and emergency services, the 911 call center, and possibly even juvenile justice work that is now done by the locally elected Attorney General Brian Schwalb. D.C. Republican Party chair Patrick Mara previously speculated about the potential for federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department.

Such a takeover of public safety would be a more targeted action than what happened in the late 1990s, when Congress created the federal Financial Control Board to run the entire District government, which at the time was nearly bankrupt.

Advertisement

Several District officials and business leaders are discouraging any public discussion of what Trump might do, fearing it might “poke the bear” and make matters worse with the incoming president. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s office did not respond to requests for comment on this story.

The potential intrusion into local governing could come even though Bowser and the D.C. Council are making a determined public effort in the halls of Congress and elsewhere to highlight sharp drops in violent crime this year compared to recent years. 

At a year-end briefing on crime in early December, Bowser revealed she had personally spoken with transition officials. “Yes, I’ve talked to them about public safety … and I specifically talked about … how we have been very focused on driving down crime,” she said.

The D.C. Council also recently has pulled back from several of its more progressive crime policies—toughening pretrial detention and expanding DNA testing of suspects charged with crimes, and creating aggressive policing in targeted “drug free zones,” which officials have credited with reduced crime in hot spots around the District.

The Council also has eased restrictions on police officers’ ability to physically detain suspects while maintaining a ban on “chokeholds” in place since 1982. Ward 2 Councilmember Brooke Pinto, who chairs the Council’s public safety committee, wrote in her year-end report that “the District is ending the year with the lowest amount of violent crime we have seen in over 20 years. The ongoing work to keep DC residents and visitors safe continues.”

Advertisement

And the Council recently voted to expel Ward 8 Councilmember Trayon White, who is facing criminal bribery charges in federal court. Ahead of the vote, councilmembers spoke publicly about the importance of upholding the body’s ethics. Some members also privately worry that their failure to take strong action would invite interference from Congress during this heightened moment for the city. White was re-elected in November and is set to be sworn in Jan. 2. The Council is expected to take a final vote to expel him in February.

At minimum, Trump is expected to nominate a new and more aggressive U.S. Attorney for the District to replace Matthew Graves, who was chosen by President Joe Biden in 2021. Graves has served three years as the District’s chief prosecutor amid criticism that his prosecutions haven’t matched the level of crime in the District.

Short of a full takeover of public safety, Trump’s transition team is considering revising or rescinding some of the District’s most progressive criminal justice laws. The Republican-controlled Congress could direct Bowser and the Council to hire more police and public safety workers.

The Metropolitan Police Department has about 600 fewer officers than in previous years. Bowser has pressed the 13-member Council to do more to help bring the force to about 4,000 officers. But a recent audit by D.C. Auditor Kathy Patterson concluded better deployment of the current force and hiring more civilian staff would be more effective than hiring more sworn officers. 

The still-private transition discussions belie the hopes of some local leaders that Trump would be too busy with national and international issues to focus on local D.C. “He’s going to do something,” the source familiar with Mar-a-Lago discussions says about the District. Trump has made criticism of crime in the District a constant theme for many years, irrespective of whether crime rates are up or down.

Advertisement

At a July rally at his Doral golf club in Florida, Trump declared: “We will take over the horribly run capital of our nation in Washington, D.C. and clean it up, renovate it, and rebuild our capital city so that it is no longer a nightmare of murder and crime, but rather it will become the most beautiful capital anywhere in the world.”

In August at a campaign stop in York, Pennsylvania, Trump vowed to make the District “safe” again. “You want to be able to go there and you want to be able to enjoy it, and you don’t want to be mugged or shot or killed in our capital, which has become very unsafe,” Trump said. “It’s horribly run, graffiti stained, and we’re going to fix it very quickly and beautifully.”

District officials gamely dispute Trump’s filth and crime-ridden declarations. And they note that he generally has trashed urban areas from New York to San Francisco with their more liberal and Black and brown populations. But only in the nation’s capital does federal law give Trump and Congress the upper hand to interfere with or override District laws and operations.

The District’s limited Home Rule Act, passed by Congress in 1973, includes a provision that allows any president to take over the District’s police department for 48 hours by declaring an emergency, and longer if Congress approves.

Local officials say they believe that the next Congress, with Republicans in control of both chambers, would likely support Trump if he made such a move. Trump also is empowered to call out the District’s National Guard to patrol streets even though the policing powers of the Guard are limited. 

Advertisement

The Constitution empowered Congress to establish a federal capital district where it would “exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever.” Even lawyers for the District recognize the broad power of that provision as long as Congress’ actions do not violate human rights or other federal laws. “We have no real cards to play,” says one District official.

Walter Smith, a respected local lawyer and a former D.C. deputy attorney general who supports statehood for the District, contended in the Washington Post in November that the Constitution’s “exclusive legislation” provision does not mean Congress has wholesale power to simply “take over” the government. Others dispute that view and note the continuing enmity with which some members of Congress attack the District. 

In July, Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah introduced a bill that would abolish the District’s entire Home Rule government. Lee pointedly named the bill the “Bringing Oversight to Washington and Safety to Every Resident Act,” or the “BOWSER Act.” 

Some District officials have pointed out that Bowser has developed a good working relationship with Republican Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, who as chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability oversees the District. Comer has praised Bowser’s focus on public safety and other issues and was a key player in the District’s recent win in Congress to get control of the federal RFK Stadium land—a positive sign for the District. 

But given the drumbeat of Trump’s outrage over crime, local leaders privately say it’s still more likely that the Trump transition will take action against local D.C. rather than decide to do nothing.

Advertisement

Tom Sherwood is a contributing writer for City Paper and the resident political analyst for WAMU’s Politics Hour with Kojo Nnamdi.






Source link

Advertisement

Washington, D.C

DC celebrates boost in college grant program for students – WTOP News

Published

on

DC celebrates boost in college grant program for students – WTOP News


The expanded funding aims to make college more affordable for thousands of D.C. students, continuing a program that has already helped nearly 40,000 graduates pursue degrees nationwide.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser went back to school on Thursday. She headed to the gym at Coolidge High School in Northwest to make an announcement that could make college more affordable for eligible D.C. high school students.

Standing at the podium in front of a vibrant mural in the gymnasium, Bowser told the students, “A few weeks ago we got some good news from the United States Congress!”

“Even they can get it right sometimes!” she added.

Advertisement

The news from Capitol Hill was that funding for the 25-year-old D.C. Tuition Assistance Grant program, or DCTAG, has been increased, something Bowser said she’s been working toward for 10 years.

Starting in the 2026-27 academic year, the maximum annual award for students who apply and qualify for the grants will go from $10,000 a year to as much as $15,000, and the overall cap increases from $50,000 to $75,000.

“These are real dollars guys, a real $15,000!” Bowser told the students. “This year alone, 4,500 students were approved for DCTAG, and that’s the highest number that we’ve had in the last five years.”

Since DCTAG was established, Bowser said nearly 40,000 D.C. high school students were serviced through the program, attaining degrees at more than 400 colleges across the country.

Among those who benefited from the DCTAG program was Arturo Evans, a local business owner who grew up in Ward 7 and graduated from D.C.’s Cesar Chavez Public Charter School.

Advertisement

Speaking to the Coolidge students, Evans explained that as a high school student, he didn’t know if his dreams would ever come true.

“Do your homework, go to class, be on time, listen to your teachers,” he said. “Do not let your current situation determine who you can be tomorrow.”

Evans said without the grant money available in the DCTAG program his college prospects would have been “very limited.”

“I probably would have stayed local, probably would have had to go to a community college,” he said.

But he told WTOP, since he applied for and received grant money through the program, “TAG was able to pave the way for me to go ahead and achieve my dreams and go to my dream school,” at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Advertisement

While he was at UNLV, Evans said his mother’s illness meant he had to return to the District to help care for her. But thanks to help from his DCTAG adviser, he was able to complete his degree before becoming the CEO of his own D.C.-based business.

Among the Coolidge students attending the event was senior Victoria Evans (no relation to the speaker Arturo Evans), who also was in the DCTAG program and serves as the Command Sergeant Major of the Coolidge Junior Army ROTC.

Victoria Evans said she hopes to study medicine, and explained, “I found out about DCTAG through my school counselors and my college and career coordinators.”

Asked about the application process, she said, “It’s not hard at all. I would definitely say go and get the money they’re providing.”

D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton pushed to establish the funding when she introduced the D.C. College Access Act, which passed Congress in 1999. It was designed to address the fact that, since D.C. doesn’t have a state university system, D.C. students had limited access to in-state tuition at public colleges and universities.

Advertisement

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Six months into federal surge, questions persist over MPD’s level of involvement

Published

on

Six months into federal surge, questions persist over MPD’s level of involvement


More than six months into the federal law enforcement surge in the District, questions remain about how the Metropolitan Police Department’s level of involvement in joint operations and what information the department tracks to ensure accountability.

Councilmember Brooke Pinto (D – Ward 2), chairwoman of the Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, held an oversight hearing of three public safety agencies on Wednesday, including MPD.

The bulk of the 10.5-hour meeting focused on testimony from concerned residents and Interim Chief Jeffery Carroll about the police department.

“Interim Chief Carroll’s testimony provided a clearer sense of how the federal surge of officers is managed overall; however, many questions still remain regarding the ongoing investigations into the three federal agency involved shootings and how and where deployment decisions are being made and which agencies are handling arrests,” Pinto said in a statement to 7News.

Advertisement

At the same time, more residents are raising alarms about federal agencies responding to 911 calls. Carroll said it is not new for agencies such as the U.S. Park Police and the U.S. Secret Service to respond to those calls, but residents are concerned that other agencies are reportedly starting to show up as well.

SEE ALSO | DC Council committee holds oversight hearing on MPD

“When we say law enforcement in DC in 2026, who are we talking about, who’s there, what are they doing, what limits and regulations and oversight are they beholden to, and what recourse do residents have?” Bethany Young, director of policy at DC Justice Lab, told 7News.

“If you call 911, MPD is showing up,” Carroll testified Wednesday. “Can other agencies hear those calls that have those radio channels? Absolutely, they can. But MPD is being dispatched a call and MPD is responding.”

“You see now the uneasiness of some people calling for help,” Councilmember Christina Henderson (I – At-Large), responded to Carroll. “No, I definitely understand,” Carroll replied. “I’m not saying it’s a situation that we want to be in or where we want to be, but I want to make sure that we’re transparent and clear on what the state is right now. That’s what the state is.”

Advertisement

Requests for comment were sent to the D.C. U.S. Attorney’s Office and the mayor’s office about Carroll’s testimony. The mayor did not make herself available for questions at a public event on Thursday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC Courts create new pathway for people without lawyers to get legal help – WTOP News

Published

on

DC Courts create new pathway for people without lawyers to get legal help – WTOP News


Nonlawyers who receive training will now be able to help with civil matters in D.C., as part of a new order issued by D.C. Courts that expands access to legal assistance.

This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

DC Courts create new pathway for people without lawyers to get legal help

Nonlawyers who receive training will now be able to help with civil matters in D.C., as part of a new order issued by D.C. Courts earlier this month that expands access to legal assistance for people without an attorney.

Advertisement

The rule, scheduled to take effect in April, creates a framework for Community Justice Workers, or nonlawyers who are supervised and trained to offer limited legal assistance through a partnership with legal services organizations.

The step comes after a yearslong assessment into the possible role for nonlawyers in offering certain types of legal help to D.C. residents.

As of 2017, 97% of plaintiffs in paternity and child support cases, and in small estate matters, represent themselves in D.C. Superior Court, according to a 2025 report from the District of Columbia Courts Civil Legal Regulatory Reform Task Force.

“We are facing an extraordinary need,” said Nancy Drane, executive director of D.C.’s Access to Justice Commission. “There are thousands of District residents who are not getting the legal help they need.”

The Community Justice Worker model could be compared to seeing a nurse practitioner in a doctor’s office. Ariel Levinson-Waldman, director of nonprofit Tzedek D.C., said someone who goes through a supervised program would be able to provide help, “just like your nurse practitioner does.”

Advertisement

Tzedek D.C. offers pro bono legal help and financial counseling. But, Levinson-Waldman said, there are thousands of people who are eligible for their services and the work of similar providers, and only a select few are available to help.

“Many of the court’s high-volume dockets are cases where the individual D.C. resident is not getting any help,” he said. “This effort, we saw that as a way to change that, to bring more people into opportunities for access to justice, to bring more resources to the problem.”

Whether it be divorce, custody cases, small claims or child support cases, the stakes are high.

Without an attorney or someone who can help in some way, cases often go “less well than it would have. It impacts their family, their future, their finances, sometimes access to the custody of their children,” Levinson-Waldman said.

In some instances, Drane said people experiencing issues such as eviction or family conflict navigate cases without help from a lawyer because legal help is expensive. Free legal service groups have limited capacities and budgets.

Advertisement

Under the Community Justice Worker model, organizations could either train their own staffs to help or partner with community nonprofits.

“What this would mean, practically, is that we will have more helpers in the community who are trained and authorized to provide certain types of legal help,” Drane said. “The real beauty of Community Justice Workers is that they receive what I would call ‘bite-sized training for bite-sized tasks.’”

Karen Dale, market president and CEO of AmeriHealth Caritas District of Columbia, said people “need assistance, they need support. Having someone by your side to help you navigate with a level of specificity, get you to the right resources in a timely way, should be able to help less lives and families and communities get derailed.”

The approach, Levinson-Waldman said, will provide a formal way for “public spirited” volunteers to help their neighbors.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

Advertisement

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending