Everyone in Washington, it seemed, heard the news almost simultaneously, alerted by beeps and buzzes on their phones soon after President Biden posted his statement on X that he was abandoning his reelection bid. Even though many expected might he step aside, the sudden Sunday afternoon announcement jolted the capital like an earthquake, reshaping the political landscape and the November election in an instant.
Washington, D.C
How deeply political D.C. reacted when Biden dropped out of presidential race
In the District, where politics has always been king, Biden’s decision reverberated across the city’s coffee shops and bars, street corners and playgrounds, and outside of the Capitol and the White House.
Biden was especially popular in D.C., winning 92 percent of the District’s 2020 general election vote. In the 24 hours following his post, as the reality sunk in that his more than 50-year political career was ending, everyone, it seemed, had thoughts.
Felix Brown, 21, was at Blue Bottle Coffee in Georgetown on Sunday when he noticed the people sitting a few feet away murmuring excitedly. He overheard some of their conversation and turned to the strangers to ask, “Is it true? Did Biden drop out?”
As word spread rapidly around the coffee shop, Brown, a Democrat, said customers began to smile at one another. “I could feel the buzz around me,” he said.
Sheamari Whitaker, 21, a summer intern for a Senate committee, said on Monday that when she first heard the news, she thought it wasn’t real. Biden has been president or vice president for more than half of her life.
“I was not surprised, but a little surprised,” Whitaker said, echoing a response many others gave about learning of the president’s decision. “We’re so deep into the election process so we really weren’t sure how this was going to go.”
As a consensus opinion has emerged that Vice President Harris will likely be the Democratic nominee for president, Whitaker, a rising senior at Howard University, Harris’s alma mater, said she’s excited but also a little wary.
“I’m nervous because of how things went with Hillary Clinton. Not only is Kamala a woman, she’s a Black woman,” Whitaker said. “I’m very concerned about her safety.”
Dorothy Devore, 81, was on her way to work Monday morning as a cashier at a Senate cafeteria, a job she’s held for more than 30 years. The District resident has seen her share of political surprises over the years, but Biden’s decision still came as a shock. She’s fond of the president, she said, but worried about him recently. “Every time I see him on TV he just didn’t look right,” she said.
Walking on Pennsylvania Avenue a few blocks from the Library of Congress shortly after the news broke Sunday, Robert Argento, 35, said he was glad Biden made the decision to drop out.
“It was ‘will they or won’t they?’ for such a long time,” Argento said. “It was a relief that we could move on from this very stressful conversation.”
This being Washington, more than a few people declined to comment on the president’s decision.
“Because of my job, I probably can’t talk about that,” was one version of an answer given by numerous people asked for their opinion about Biden leaving the race. Young Hill staffers were especially eager to avoid the wrath of their bosses by uttering anything without permission.
Biden was at his Rehoboth Beach, Del. home recovering from covid when he made his announcement, but more than a hundred people gathered outside the White House early Sunday evening. Some were tourists whose trips coincided with the news. But dozens, including former Biden officials and staffers congregated at Lafayette Square for a spontaneous rally to honor his accomplishments.
Anne Filipic, who had various roles in the Obama and Biden administrations, said she wanted to show her “gratitude and appreciation” to Biden.
The 42-year-old arrived about 7 p.m. from her Mount Pleasant home with her husband and three kids. A sign on their stroller said: “My future is brighter because of you!” and “Great president, true patriot!”
Filipic, the CEO of Share Our Strength, a D.C. nonprofit fighting hunger and poverty, was eager to “rally behind Vice President Harris” and wanted her kids to be part of the moment, she said.
Former Obama staffers Kyle Lierman, 37, and Amanda Brown-Lierman, 38, had been on vacation three hours away in Deep Creek, Md., and immediately jumped in a car with their three kids to head to D.C. when they heard.
“I’m proud of him,” said Lierman. “I think a lot of us were waiting for him to make this decision and waiting to take his lead.”
Not everyone outside the White House cheered for the president. Independent Michael Wille, 37, a catering sales manager for a sandwich shop in D.C., had a homemade sign reading, “Bye, Joe!” He’d come out as soon as he heard the news.
Wille said he isn’t supporting Trump and said he’d only come out to tell people not to believe anything politicians say. He said he’d like Biden to resign and for a third-party candidate to run, but with Harris likely in the race, he said, “I think it’s great for Trump. He’ll probably win.”
Elsewhere in D.C., the news left some people feeling uncertain.
“Things are so chaotic,” said Grace Koh, 51, as she walked her dog Coco past Eastern Market late Sunday afternoon. “I think that’s the way we all feel about politics right now, right? These are not easy times.”
Koh said she isn’t sure who she’ll vote for in November but said she felt sad for Biden. “I’ve thought about how he’s feeling and how difficult it must have been to make that decision.”
Out for a walk in his Capitol Hill neighborhood Sunday afternoon, Bill Nash, 81, a registered independent, said he too felt empathy for the president. “He is an honorable, dedicated public servant and for him to face the consequences we all face of getting old is very difficult. And it’s sad,” said Nash.
Marquise Lewis, 29, stepped out for a smoke break from his job as a chef at a restaurant on Pennsylvania Avenue SE. He learned of Biden’s decision in the kitchen during a busy afternoon so he was just starting to think about the consequences.
“If you’re physically incapable, I’d say focus on your health. Winning the election and then having health issues isn’t going to help anyone,” he said.
Lewis said he wasn’t the biggest fan of Biden or Trump but he’s willing to give Harris a chance to make her case. Traditional politics isn’t winning him over.
“We just need new blood,” he said. “Someone not D or R, just someone doing the best for the American people.”
Gebre Hiwot, 61, of D.C., said Biden made the right decision to leave the race. “What he did for the country was great,” he said. “Now it is time for him to step aside.”
An immigrant from Ethiopia who has lived in Washington for 36 years and owns a convenience store, Hiwot said it was time to give Harris an opportunity. “Personally I don’t like her but she’s a much better person to run than Biden,” he said. “And anyone is better than Trump.”
Outside of Eastern Market on Capitol Hill late Sunday afternoon, Malaika Tull, 11, said she and her mother had just been talking about Biden’s announcement and what it meant. Not only for Biden, but for his vice president. Malaika, a rising sixth grader, isn’t sure if Harris will be elected but she’s holding out hope.
“As a Black girl, I think it’s inspiring to know that a Black female could be the next president of the United States,” she said. And she has another reason she’s rooting for Harris: Malaika’s middle name is Kamala.
Washington, D.C
The Trump administration is suing the District of Columbia over its gun laws – WTOP News
The Trump administration is suing the local government of Washington, D.C., over its gun laws, alleging that restrictions on certain semiautomatic weapons run afoul of Second Amendment rights
The Trump administration is suing the local government of Washington, D.C., over its gun laws, alleging that restrictions on certain semiautomatic weapons run afoul of Second Amendment rights.
The U.S. Department of Justice filed its lawsuit Monday in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, naming Washington’s Metropolitan Police Department and outgoing Chief of Police Pamela Smith as defendants and setting up another potentially seismic clash on how broadly the courts interpret individual gun possession rights.
“The United States of America brings this lawsuit to protect the rights that have been guaranteed for 234 years and which the Supreme Court has explicitly reaffirmed several times over the last two decades,” the Justice Department states.
It’s the second such lawsuit the administration has filed this month: The Justice Department also is suing the U.S. Virgin Islands, alleging the U.S. territory is obstructing and systematically denying American citizens the right to possess and carry guns.
It’s also the latest clash between the District of Columbia and the federal government, which launched an ongoing law enforcement intervention into the nation’s capital over the summer, which was meant to fight crime. The district’s attorney general is challenging the deployment of the National Guard to the city as part of the intervention in court.
In Washington, Metropolitan Police Department spokesman Sean Hickman said the agency does not comment on pending litigation.
The Justice Department asserts that the District is imposing unconstitutional bans on AR-15s and other semiautomatic weapons the administration says are legal to posses under the Supreme Court’s 2008 Heller precedent, which also originated from a dispute over weapons restrictions in the nation’s capital.
In that seminal case, the court ruled that private citizens have an individual right to own and operate weapons “in common use today,” regardless of whether they are part of what Second Amendment text refers to as a “well regulated militia.”
“There seems to us no doubt, on the basis of both text and history, that the Second Amendment conferred an individual right to keep and bear arms,” the majority reasoned. The justices added a caveat: “Of course, the right was not unlimited, just as the First Amendment’s right of free speech was not.”
The Justice Department argues that the District has gone too far in trying to limit weapons possession under that caveat. Administration lawyers emphasize the Heller reference to weapons “in common use today,” saying it applies to firearms that District of Columbia residents cannot now register. Those restrictions in turn subject residents to criminal penalties for unregistered firearms, the administration asserts.
“Specifically, the District denies law-abiding citizens the ability to register a wide variety of commonly used semi-automatic firearms, such as the Colt AR-15 series rifles, which is among the most popular of firearms in America, and a variety of other semi-automatic rifles and pistols that are in common use,” Justice Department lawyers write.
“D.C’s current semi-automatic firearms prohibition that bans many commonly used pistols, rifles or shotguns is based on little more than cosmetics, appearance, or the ability to attach accessories,” the suit continues, “and fails to take into account whether the prohibited weapon is ‘in common use today’ or that law-abiding citizens may use these weapons for lawful purposes protected by the Second Amendment.”
The Justice Department does not include any individual plaintiffs from Washington, D.C., alleging any violations of their constitutional rights. That’s different from the Heller case, which is named for Dick Heller, a Washingtonian who filed a civil lawsuit challenging the city’s handgun ban in 2003.
The administration argues in the suit that it has jurisdiction to challenge current District laws under the sweeping federal crime law of 1994.
Copyright
© 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, written or redistributed.
Washington, D.C
Virginia Lawmakers Raise Safety Concerns Over Aircraft Safety After Fatal D.C. Crash
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WAVY) — On Dec. 10, U.S. Reps. Don Beyer, Suhas Subramanyam, James Walkinshaw, Bobby Scott, Jennifer McClellan and Eugene Vindman, members of Virginia’s congressional delegation, issued a statement regarding Section 373 of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2026.
The section addresses manned rotary-wing aircraft safety in the wake of the Jan. 29, 2025, midair collision at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport that killed 67 people.
The lawmakers said they share concerns raised by the Families of Flight 5342 and the National Transportation Safety Board over Section 373 of the National Defense Authorization Act, citing safety risks in the airspace around Reagan National Airport following January’s fatal collision.
Congress said the provision allows waivers for training flights that could further congest already crowded airspace.
Congress stated, “This provision falls short of NTSB’s preliminary safety recommendations and omits changes that are essential to improve visibility, safety and communications between military and civilian aircraft in D.C. airspace. Further action is needed to prevent a repetition of the mistakes that led to this incident. We will continue working as quickly as possible with our colleagues and transportation officials to get this right before any waivers are issued and to ensure air safety in the region.”
Washington, D.C
Week Ahead in Washington: December 21
WASHINGTON (Gray DC) – With Congress in recess and President Donald Trump spending the holidays in Florida, attention has turned to the Epstein files and unresolved healthcare legislation.
The trove of documents partly released Friday has prompted some members of Congress to question whether the Department of Justice followed the law requiring their release, as many files were heavily redacted.
California Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna said Friday night he and Kentucky Republican Rep. Thomas Massie were considering drafting articles of impeachment against Attorney General Pam Bondi for not complying with the law the two authored earlier this year.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” some photos were held back at the request of victim advocacy groups as the DOJ looks at whether they need redactions to protect the victims.
With Congress gone, there remains no solution on healthcare. Enhanced Affordable Care Act tax credits are set to expire at the end of 2025.
Despite enough lawmakers signing onto a discharge petition forcing a vote to extend the subsidies, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) sent the House home without holding a vote.
Johnson said the full House will vote on the bill when Congress returns to Washington in early January, after the subsidies have lapsed.
Federal workers will get some extra time off this week. Trump signed an executive order closing federal agencies and offices on both Dec. 24 and 26, in addition to Christmas Day.
Copyright 2025 Gray DC. All rights reserved.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Iowa1 week agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Maine7 days agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico6 days agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms