Connect with us

Washington, D.C

After immigration arrest near DC school, how an educator and officer found common ground

Published

on

After immigration arrest near DC school, how an educator and officer found common ground


More complaints were filed against D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department in 2025 than ever before, the News4 I-Team has learned. Weekly complaints increased after federal officers and agents surged into the city in August, often working side by side with D.C. police officers.

The head of a charter school in D.C. filed a complaint after federal immigration authorities and D.C. officers questioned two young men outside her school, in view of students. A comment by one D.C. officer was especially damaging. Months later, the educator and officer met in a mediation session and found some common ground.

As D.C.’s Bilingual Public Charter School in Fort Totten was dismissing students on Sept. 25, a caravan of federal authorities and D.C. police arrived and questioned two men who were not connected to the school.

“I went out there right away. This is my school, and I’m going to protect it, and I’m going to make sure all the kids are safe,” school CEO Daniela Anello told News4.

Advertisement

Cellphone video shows the encounter as the two men in handcuffs sat on a curb.

“If you do not get on the sidewalk, you’ll be arrested for failure to obey a traffic officer,” one D.C. officer warns people gathering.

“Can you tell us what they’re being arrested for?” a woman asks.

“It’s none of your business,” a D.C. officer replies.

It was an incident – among many reported by News4 last year – in which federal immigration authorities took someone into custody alongside D.C. police.

Advertisement

“Do you see who’s watching you? These are children that you’re doing this in front of!” a woman yells.

At one point, a D.C. officer made this comment: “If you have such a problem with us, don’t call 911 next time.”

Anello thought he went too far and his message clashed with what she teaches her students.

“That was very puzzling to me, because we’ve taught our kids over and over: If there’s something harmful, dangerous or scary, you call 911 and the police will come and help you. So that was very upsetting,” she said.

The stop eventually ended when the men were taken into custody.

Advertisement

‘Students cried, asking their parents if they too would be taken away’

The encounter led to several complaints against D.C. police. Concerned about what her students and staff had witnessed, Anello filed a complaint. She also wrote Mayor Muriel Bowser but said she never heard back. News4 reached out to Bowser’s office too.

She did hear from then-Chief of Police Pamela Smith after speaking out at public meetings and testifying before the D.C. Council.

“Students cried, asking their parents if they too would be taken away,” Anello said at a round table.

She filed her complaint with D.C.’s Office of Police Complaints (OPC), an independent agency that investigates complaints against officers in the District. It was one of 1,065 complaints received last year, according to the agency. While complaints are not always found to be misconduct, this is the most complaints the office has received in a year.

“I was complaining about how the police responded in a moment of high stress outside of the school community when kids and staff and community members are watching,” Anello said.

Advertisement

Rebuilding community trust in police

In an interview with the I-Team, OPC Director Marke Cross said he wasn’t surprised 2025 was a record year for complaints.

“We expected there would be a lot more complaints about stops and searches and frisks and things like that,” he said.

Cross said he can’t be sure why there was an increase in complaints; that analysis is ongoing. But he said it points to a level of trust in police that may need to be rebuilt.

“The topic of community trust in the police department in D.C. has a long history,” he said.

News4 asked if 2025 was a particularly hard year for community trust.

Advertisement

“Um, yes. Yes, it has been,” he replied.

A News4 analysis of OPC data shows a 17% increase in weekly complaints after the federal surge began in August. That included allegations on intimidation, property mishandling, and officer language and conduct.

Alicia Yass, who now works for the ACLU, previously served as OPC’s deputy director.

“I think they should be trying to do better. I mean, all of us should always be trying to do better at our jobs. This is not just the police, but the police are being given evidence of what they could be doing better,” she said.

Cross said investigators review and investigate every complaint – reviewing witness statements, body-worn camera video and police reports. After that, only a very small percentage of complaints are upheld. Anello’s was among those.

News4 asked her how much trust-building she thought D.C. police need to do.

Advertisement

“Oh, a lot,” she replied.

School leader describes her mediation session with officer who snapped at crowd

Months after Anello filed her complaint with OPC, she was offered mediation with the officer who snapped at the crowd that day, telling them not to call 911 if they had a problem with police. Their two-hour session was confidential, according to the agency’s rules, but she shared how it felt for her.

“I can say that I received the apology that I was seeking,” she said.

News4 asked, how did that feel?

“Amazing,” she said. “To feel that there was the connection between what I would have wanted to have happened and the police officer’s realization of, ‘Yes, I could have done this better.’ That connected us.”

Advertisement

While OPC can’t take direct disciplinary action against officers, it can make recommendations to D.C. police. There is no automatic mention of the OPC process in an officer’s police personnel file.

But at a time when police and community relations need rebuilding, Anello still believes there’s value in the process and said she hopes her complaint and the hundreds of others this year will change police behavior.

“We had a moment of, ‘You care, I care. We’re both professionals. We’re both trying to keep our communities safe. We’re just going about it in slightly different ways with different roles,’” she said.

OPC’s director said the agency plans to make recommendations to MPD soon based on last year’s complaints, including on the impact of the federal surge.

Interim Chief of Police Jeffery Carroll declined to talk with News4 on camera. We also asked for an interview with the officer who Anello met with; he declined.

Advertisement

An MPD spokesperson said the department hasn’t been briefed about the rise in complaints but plans to provide a more detailed strategy for community outreach in the coming months.

The department said in a statement: “There is nothing more important to MPD than maintaining the trust of DC residents, and we appreciate our community’s partnership and support of our efforts to drive significant reductions in crime over the last two years.

MPD leadership is committed to listening to community concerns, and that’s why our leaders regularly attend Advisory Neighborhood Commission meetings, why MPD has a Citizens Advisory Council, and why we regularly host community walks in all seven police districts. We understand the need to enhance outreach districtwide to ensure we are maintaining trust.”

A Maryland lawmaker is proposing a bill that would authorize the Maryland attorney general and state police to gather identifying digital data about agents who are the subject of misconduct complaints. News4’s Mauricio Casillas reports.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington, D.C

Sherry Abedi has been appointed as General Manager at LINE DC

Published

on

Sherry Abedi  has been appointed as General Manager at LINE DC


The LINE DC is delighted to announce the appointment of Sherry Abedi as its new General Manager. In her new role she will oversee all aspects of the hotel, including operations, people and culture, sales and marketing, and guest experience strategy. Abedi will lead day-to-day hotel operations while driving programming, business development, and initiatives that strengthen the property’s connection to Washington D.C.’s cultural and creative communities.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

‘We did not have the votes:’ DC Council does not take up expanded summer curfew

Published

on

‘We did not have the votes:’ DC Council does not take up expanded summer curfew


Tuesday was the last day the D.C. Council could vote to enact an expanded curfew in time for summer.

7News learned it never even made it on the agenda for a discussion and went to council members to find out why.

For the next two months, it’ll be up to the mayor to declare a curfew until the permanent version kicks in. There is already a city curfew. The curfew that has been up for debate for more than a year is the expanded version of the curfew. The expanded version allows the Metropolitan Police Department to create zones where teens 17 and under cannot gather in groups of nine or more.

RELATED | DC curfews pushed large groups into local neighborhoods, some residents say

Advertisement

Mayor Muriel Bowser currently has her own curfew order in place, which ends Saturday. The mayor can continue issuing an order. Councilmembers against the expanded curfew said that’s why it doesn’t need to come from the council.

In a video posted two weeks ago, D.C Council public safety chair Brooke Pinto said she wanted her councilmembers to vote to fill the gap today. 7News asked her why she never presented it to the council.

“Unfortunately, in working with my colleagues over the last several weeks, we did not have the votes,” said Pinto. “We have to have enough votes to pass the law and make sure that we didn’t have a gap.”

Bowser, in a letter to council Tuesday, said councilmembers Trayon White, Robert White, Zachary Parker, Brianne Nadeau and Janese Lewis-George are “blocking the will of the public and majority of council.”

7News spoke to three of the members she called out about the mayor’s pushback.

Advertisement

“I reject the rhetoric and the political games that are being played, and I’m wanting for us to get to the bottom of how do we stop the teen takeovers and the delinquent behavior we’ve been seeing,” Parker said.

“I stand by my belief that a curfew policy is a failed policy, kind of smoke and mirrors, and what we really needed is investments in our young people, so I’m pretty firm on that,” Nadeau said.

“We have to choose our tools and the time we use those tools. I’ve supported the curfew in the past, but I think with the current surge of more federal troops that have been impending, we’re putting our youth in even more danger by extending that work. I know the executive has put in an emergency executive order that will fill the gap. I hope that comes alongside extended hours, I’ve funded at DPR, extended weekends, and opening more safe spaces for youth here in the city. And that’s the solution that we do agree on,” Lewis-George said.

The mayor has not confirmed if she’ll issue another order, but it is on the table.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Memorial to honor journalists like Don Bolles, killed in pursuit of truth

Published

on

Memorial to honor journalists like Don Bolles, killed in pursuit of truth


play

  • A memorial honoring journalists who died in the line of duty will be built on the National Mall in Washington, DC.
  • The memorial was inspired by the 2018 Capital Gazette shooting and will honor journalists like The Arizona Republic’s Don Bolles, who was killed in 1976.
  • While the national memorial moves forward, a similar effort to create a memorial for Bolles at the Arizona Capitol has repeatedly stalled.

A memorial designed to pay tribute to journalists who have died in pursuit of a story — including Arizona Republic reporter Don Bolles, who had a bomb explode under his car 50 years ago — will soon have a home on the National Mall in Washington, DC.

The Fallen Journalists Memorial, set to open in June 2028, won’t include individual names of journalists. A rule says that unless Congress makes an exception, a memorial wall can only include a group whose last member died more more than a quarter century prior.

Advertisement

And the number of journalists who die in pursuit of truth continues to grow every year.

The foundation creating the memorial has featured journalists on its website. Included in the first round of those showcased is Bolles.

Bolles was a reporter with The Arizona Republic who investigated the mafia, land fraud and political corruption. He was killed in June 1976 by a bomb planted under his Datsun at a midtown Phoenix hotel, an incident that shocked the nation and shook the journalism community.

Barbara Cochran, president of the Fallen Journalists Memorial Foundation, said the aim was to remind people of the work done by journalists like Bolles.

“They go as eyewitnesses. They document,” she said. “They dig deep and come up with information that people don’t have time to do on their own.”

Advertisement

Bolles’ legacy was not just forged by his death, Cochran said, but the work his death inspired.  

Scores of reporters from around the country descended on Phoenix to continue investigating political corruption as Bolles had.

That collective action sent a message.

“Even if you kill the journalist, you won’t kill the story,” Cochran said. “Don Bolles was really the symbol of that.”

Advertisement

The memorial will honor journalists who, like Bolles, were targeted for their reporting, Cochran said. It would also honor those who died in pursuit of a story.

That’s the story of at least five more Arizona journalists.

In 1985, Republic reporter Charles Thornton was killed in Afghanistan, which at the time was invaded by the Soviet Union. Thornton was a health reporter and took the trip to cover a clinic set up by Americans looking to save the lives of people injured in the war by bombs and chemical weapons.

Thornton knew the risks of traveling to a war zone. But said he thought it was worth it to bring the story of the injuries suffered by the Afghan rebels to Republic readers.

Advertisement

In 2007, two news helicopters collided while covering a police chase in midtown Phoenix. The helicopters, one from Channel 3, KTVK-TV, and one from Channel 15, KNXV-TV, each carried a cameraman and a pilot. All four men died when the helicopters crashed onto Steele Indian School Park.

Bolles will be the only Arizona reporter among the first to be honored as part of the new National Mall memorial project.

The physical memorial in Washington will be made up of glass rectangles.

On one end of the plaza, they will be laid in an abstract design. The glass rectangles could serve as benches on the plaza.

Advertisement

As visitors walk to the other end, the glass rectangles begin stacking. Visitors will then enter a circle formed by more glass rectangles.

On the ground in the center of the circle will be the words of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

play

Reporter writes ‘the book I wanted to read’ on slain journalist Don Bolles

Axios reporter Jeremy Duda discusses “Murder in the Fourth State,” a book on the murder of The Arizona Republic’s Don Bolles, who died after a car bombing in 1976.

Arizona effort to create a Don Bolles memorial stalls at state Capitol

The DC memorial was introduced in Congress in 2019. It passed both the House and Senate unanimously in 2020 and was signed into law in December 2020 by President Donald Trump.

Advertisement

In contrast, a push to create a memorial for Bolles on the grounds of the state Capitol was proposed at the Arizona Legislature each of the past few years. But every attempt has stalled.

The bill passed the Arizona House unanimously this year. It was bottled up in the state Senate, as has happened since it was first introduced in 2023.

The Bolles memorial bill was assigned to the Senate Government Committee, chaired by state Sen. Jake Hoffman, R-Queen Creek. He did not give the bill a hearing, just as he had declined to do in the previous two sessions.

Hoffman, who has done contract work for the conservative groups Turning Point USA and Turning Point Action, has had an antagonistic relationship with the mainstream press and The Republic.

Advertisement

Rep. Selina Bliss, R-Prescott, the sponsor of the measure, said she is not sure exactly why Hoffman hasn’t given the bill a hearing. She expected it would easily pass if it made it to the state Senate floor.

“I can’t get into the minds of others,” she said, “why they choose to hear or don’t hear a bill.”

Bliss said she recognized the passion that Bolles had for journalism.

“It’s like a line of duty death, if you will,” she said. “People are killed in action doing what they do.”

Advertisement

Bliss said she was a teenager in Prescott at the time of the Bolles bombing. She remembers the experience as searing.

“It shook everyone so dramatically,” she said.

Bliss said she might expand the bill next session to include all fallen Arizona journalists, in hopes of getting it out of the logjam in the Senate.

Tim Eigo, president of the Arizona chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists, has testified at the Arizona Legislature in support of the bill to allow a Bolles memorial.

Eigo said it was unfortunate that the bill was caught up in the swirl of current political feelings about journalism.

Advertisement

“I think people can get confused about whether dogged coverage is also advocacy. It’s not,” he said. “Some people get confused by that. So, they hesitate to honor a remarkable journalist like Don Bolles because there are other journalists they don’t like.”

Commemorating reporters who were targeted specifically because of their work like Bolles sends a signal, Eigo said.

“When we are honoring their accomplishments and commitment,” he said, “we are also defeating those who feel they can commit crimes against the press with impunity. … We are speaking truth to that cynical power.”

Shooting that killed journalists in Maryland inspired push for memorial

The idea for the DC memorial came after the June 2018 mass shooting at the Capital Gazette newsroom in Annapolis, Maryland. Five people were killed in the incident, four of them journalists.

Advertisement

The convicted gunman had filed a defamation suit against the newspaper after it reported on his legal troubles. He reportedly sent letters threatening to attack the newspaper’s journalists before he stormed the newsroom with a shotgun.

Retired U.S. Congressman David Dreier sat on the board of Tribune Publishing, the corporate owner of the sister newspapers, The Capital and the Maryland Gazette. Dreier, a Republican from California, worried that by 2019 the memory of the shooting was already fading.

He wanted a public memorial on the National Mall. The idea gained urgency, Cochran said, when the Newseum announced in 2019 that it was closing. That museum had an exhibition honoring slain journalists. Its centerpiece was the blown-out car from the 1976 Bolles bombing.

“There is nothing in Washington that talks about the sacrifices of journalists or that talks about the First Amendment, which is such a unique contribution to freedom and free expression for people everywhere,” Cochran said.

The location cited for it is a triangular plot of land about three blocks from the U.S. Capitol. The site, about a quarter-acre, was formed by the intersection of Independence Avenue and Maryland Avenue, which runs on a diagonal to the U.S. Capitol.

Advertisement

“The site has a clear view of the Capitol Dome,” Cochran said. “It’s a connection to journalism and a symbol of democracy. It reinforces the idea that journalism is a pilar of democracy.”

The memorial will not carry the names of any of the fallen journalists.

Cochran said a federal regulation governing memorials on the National Mall has a rule about those being honored in a group needing to have been deceased for more than 25 years.

“This is a memorial for which there would never be an end time,” she said.

Advertisement

Threats to press freedom are on the rise across the globe

The anniversary of Bolles’ death and the memorial underway come as journalists around the world face increased threats.

Reporters Without Borders, a global nonprofit advocating for independent journalism, has tracked press freedom around the world since 2002. The organization scores countries based on how free journalists are to report, evaluating the legal, political, economic and cultural constraints. It also looks at journalists’ safety working in the countries.

The organization’s 2026 World Press Freedom Index returned the lowest average score among all countries in 25 years.

The United States ranked as the 64th freest country in the world, dropping seven places from its ranking in 2025. The organization cited Trump’s continued attacks on journalists who cover him, as well as his administration’s pressure on networks and news outlets as part of the ranking.

Trump has made attacking the press and sowing distrust in traditional news media a hallmark of his agenda since his first run for higher office in 2015. He has threatened to ease libel laws to make it easier to sue news outlets.

Advertisement

Trump himself sued the CBS and ABC networks based on their journalists’ work. The networks settled despite legal experts saying the cases were weak.

U.S. presidents have long had an antogonistic relationship with the press.

George Washington, the first president of the United States, referred to journalists as “infamous scribblers.” Vice President Spiro Agnew called the press “nattering naybobs of negativism.” President Barack Obama used the Espionage Act to plug what he perceived were leaks from his administration to the press, according to the Cato Institute.

The Freedom of the Press Foundation, a nonprofit news advocacy group, has tracked more than 2,500 anti-press incidents in the United States since 2017, with nearly 1,400 assaults making up the majority. The tracker records non-physically violent threats, too, such as subpoenas and legal interventions, or chilling statements.

The Committee to Protect Journalists has recorded 17 journalists and reporters killed in the United States since 1992.

Advertisement

In Arizona, 28 anti-press incidents were recorded since 2017, including arresting reporters and denying them access to government events.

The Arizona incidents over the past decade include an interview subject who pushed and shoved an Arizona Republic reporter before stealing her cell phone during the interview, the detention by Phoenix police of a Wall Street Journal reporter who was talking to customers outside a bank, and the detention of an Arizona Republic photographer who was covering protests outside the state Capitol in 2024.

Taylor Seely is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at The Arizona Republic / azcentral.com. Do you have a story about the government infringing on your First Amendment rights? Reach her at tseely@arizonarepublic.com or by phone at 480-476-6116.

Reach Richard Ruelas at richard.ruelas@arizonarepublic.com or at 602-444-8473.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending