Connect with us

Virginia

Virginia signs NIL law allowing universities to directly negotiate with players – Yellowhammer News

Published

on

Virginia signs NIL law allowing universities to directly negotiate with players – Yellowhammer News


Thursday morning, Virginia governor Glenn Youngkin signed into law legislation permitting Virginia’s universities to directly sign student-athletes to Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals, a development that could spell massive changes across college athletics.

The NCAA currently prohibits schools from directly paying players, meaning most NIL money is raised and distributed through third-party organizations called collectives. For example, many of the University of Alabama’s NIL resources are distributed through Yea Alabama, which is not directly affiliated with UA.

Virginia’s new law, going into effect on July 1, contradicts the NCAA’s rule. The bill will make it illegal for the NCAA to punish schools for “violat[ing] [the NCAA’s] rules or regulations concerning name, image, or likeness.” Schools in Virginia will still not be able to pay players based on their on-field performance, but will be able to use athletic department resources to compensate athletes for appearing in campaigns and promotions.

The law won’t yet render collectives obsolete — there are too many moving parts and not enough open communication for that to be realistic, said University of Virginia Athletic Director Carla Williams — but it will bring collectives and athletic departments closer to unified entities.

Advertisement

In December, NCAA president Charlie Baker proposed that all schools have the ability to pay athletes via NIL deals, but “the schools who actually make the rules have thus far balked at bringing the athlete marketplace inside the athletic department’s control,” according to ESPN’s Dan Murphy.

Virginia’s new legislation may force the issue. If powerful members of D1 athletics don’t expedite their process and bring Baker’s proposal to a vote, the commonwealth’s schools could enjoy a significant recruiting advantage.

The bill is the latest in a series of state-level legislation across the country usurping the NCAA. Prominent NIL attorney Mit Winter, a former basketball player at William & Mary, told a Charlottesville newspaper that “he doesn’t think the NCAA has a whole lot of legal recourse” and pointed out the NCAA’s recent losing streak in court against lawsuits from the attorney generals of Virginia and Tennessee.

Youngkin emphasized his desire to see NIL governed by “colleges and universities,” not by parties like the NCAA.

Advertisement

“This bill takes a most important step that we in fact are first going to make sure that our institutions of higher education, our colleges and universities, are at the forefront with policies and procedures that they can review and approve, that they in fact can help manage this,” said the governor. “This is going to be a program that’s going to be managed by Virginia’s universities and colleges and not by outside institutions or associations.”

Nick Saban, U.S. Senators want to regulate NIL before it’s too late

The bill also explicitly stated that Virginia student-athletes will still not be considered employees.

Several figures representing Virginia’s D1 universities attended the bill’s signing, all of whom lobbied for NIL legislation.

“We are thankful to the state legislature and Governor Youngkin for their proactive work in the NIL space,” said Virginia Tech athletic director Whit Babcock. “We take care of our student-athletes and recognize the value they bring to ensure the longstanding success of our athletic programs.”

Advertisement

UVA’s Williams thanked legislators “for ensuring student-athletes in Virginia have every opportunity to take full advantage of NIL.”

“Ultimately, and most importantly, we have an opportunity to fully support our student-athletes and coaches in NIL activities,” she added.

Charles Vaughan is a contributing writer for Yellowhammer News.

Don’t miss out!  Subscribe today to have Alabama’s leading headlines delivered to your inbox.

Advertisement





Source link

Virginia

Virginia Supreme Court to hear redistricting oral arguments next week

Published

on

Virginia Supreme Court to hear redistricting oral arguments next week


The Virginia Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday, April 27, in a legal challenge connected to redistricting in the state.

A Tazewell County Circuit Court judge blocked the certification of votes from Tuesday’s congressional map referendum. Roughly 51 percent of voters voted “yes” to redraw the state’s congressional maps.

The Tazewell County judge ruled that the referendum was illegal.

Attorney General Jay Jones filed an appeal on Thursday, warning the decision would invalidate the votes of millions of Virginians and could pose problems ahead of the Aug. 4 primary.

Advertisement

Oral arguments are set for 9 a.m. Monday and an audio livestream will be available on the Virginia Supreme Court’s website.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Democrat Beyer blasts GOP plan to counter Virginia redistricting by eliminating his seat

Published

on

Democrat Beyer blasts GOP plan to counter Virginia redistricting by eliminating his seat


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A Republican lawmaker is proposing to return Arlington and Alexandria to Washington, D.C., a move aimed at countering Democrats’ newly strengthened grip on Virginia’s congressional map following this week’s redistricting vote.

The “Make D.C. Square Again Act” from Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga., comes after voters approved Virginia’s new Democratic-backed map positioning the party to expand its congressional seat advantage by linking blue Northern Virginia suburbs with more rural districts — a shift Republicans warn could dilute GOP strength statewide.

Rep. Donald Beyer, D-Va., on Thursday lambasted McCormick’s plan to finish what lawmakers in the 1860s started and return the heavily Democratic district to the District.

Advertisement

“Rich McCormick’s bill is an embarrassing legislative tantrum,” Beyer told Fox News Digital.

SOROS-LINKED DARK MONEY NETWORK FUELS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING PUSH BACKED BY NATIONAL DEMOCRATS

Rep. Donald Beyer Jr., D-Va., attends a protest in Washington. (Tom Williams/Getty Images)

“It is also unconstitutional, and a stupid waste of time. Republicans upset about the passage of Virginia’s redistricting referendum should stop whining, as they have no one to blame but themselves.”

McCormick’s bill called the 1846 retrocession “unconstitutional” and restore the District of Columbia’s original 100-square-mile boundary.

Advertisement

He lamented the redistricting vote and noted that Sen. Benjamin Wade, R-Ohio, originally sparked the retrocession movement with legislation in 1866. An 1836 effort by Sen. William Preston, a Whig from South Carolina, to cede the entirety of Washington, D.C., to Maryland also failed.

Alexandria County — now Arlington County and the city of Alexandria — retroceded from the District of Columbia to Virginia amid alleged economic inequities with then-Georgetown County, D.C., political mismanagement and tensions over Alexandria’s then-booming slave trade, as the North, including Washington, D.C., opposed the practice.

All that remains of Washington, D.C., on the Virginia side of the Potomac River is Columbia Island, also known as Lady Bird Johnson Island, which remains with the District of Columbia due to an arcane law regarding the river’s high-water mark.

Presidents Abraham Lincoln and William Taft also voiced support for Wade’s mission, but de-retrocession routinely died in the Senate in the several times it was tried.

NEWSOM TURNS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING VICTORY INTO WARNING SHOT FOR TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Advertisement

A Virginia welcome sign is posted in the grass near the intersection of Lee Highway, Key Bridge, and the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Rosslyn, Arlington County, Va. (Universal Images Group/Getty Images)

“Restore to the District of Columbia the portion of its territory taken away by the retrocession,” Taft demanded in his 1912 State of the Union.

McCormick argued that “absent the vote of DC bureaucrats,” the other 90% of Virginia’s geographic voice would remain intact with a “substantial Republican majority.”

He said 250,000 votes in Arlington and Alexandria — which Beyer’s district comprises along with parts of southern Fairfax — should rightly belong to Washington, D.C.

Beyer said that Virginia’s voice opposing President Donald Trump was rightly heard in Tuesday’s election and that Republicans like McCormick are trying to instead “permanently deprive hundreds of thousands of my constituents of their right to vote in federal elections.”

Advertisement

“Their contempt for voters is breathtaking,” Beyer said.

Beyer added that Americans want Congress to focus on economic issues and halting Trump’s Iran War but are instead faced with Republicans “humiliating themselves” to curry the president’s favor.

“Voters will remember,” he said.

In a response to Fox News Digital, McCormick shared a meme of a Google Map with Beyer’s portrait bordered by the District of Columbia.

“On the bright side, you can run for mayor now, Don Beyer.”

Advertisement

Former assistant U.S. Attorney and Heritage Foundation fellow Zack Smith noted to Fox News Digital that Taft later became Chief Justice of the U.S. and had legally analyzed retrocession to be “problematic”

“This questionable action should not be used as justification for radically transforming the boundaries and the status of the District of Columbia by simple legislation,” Smith wrote in a recent law review article.

Smith argued that Maryland’s consent should have been efforted in order to create Arlington and Alexandria, citing colonial law regarding Maryland having land carved from itself for the District – and not for the eventual formation of a piece of another state.

“Since Maryland donated the land for the purpose of creating the seat of the federal government, Maryland must consent to its use for another purpose,” Smith wrote.

JEFFRIES DEFENDS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING AS ‘TEMPORARY MEASURE’ TO STOP TRUMP FROM TRYING TO ‘RIG’ MIDTERMS

Advertisement

An old map of Washington, D.C., when it included “Alexandria County” is on display at the D.C. City Museum. (Chris Maddaloni/Getty Images)

In a statement on the bill, McCormick argued that the Constitution is indeed on his side.

He said the Enclave Clause puts D.C.’s boundaries in Congress’ hands and gives no authority to retrocede territory back to the states.

“The Make DC Square Act restores the District of Columbia as the Founders envisioned it,” he said.

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger rebuked the idea of giving Arlington and Alexandria back:

Advertisement

“Inflation is skyrocketing, gas is close to $4, and Virginia families are feeling squeezed by high prices because of the reckless policies coming out of Washington. Republicans in Congress should be focused on contending with the high costs and economic chaos created by President Trump,” the spokesperson said.

Not all Virginia lawmakers agreed with Beyer, including Del. Wren Williams of Patrick County in the southern part of the commonwealth.

Williams, who is also an attorney, told Fox News Digital he “fully supports this act.”

“If we’re going to claim we support the constitution while our federal capital remains split over separate jurisdictions, how are we any better than those who allow millions of illegal aliens to flow across our borders as enemies to our nation?” he asked.

“We need to resolve the inconsistency. We gave that land to the district, and there are no takebacks.”

Advertisement

GOP-LED COUNTIES PUSH BACK AGAINST DEMOCRAT’S REDISTRICTING CHARGE, TESTING VIRGINIA’S CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS

The Arlington, Virginia, skyline is seen from the sky on a hazy afternoon. (iStock/Getty Images)

Williams said returning Arlington and Alexandria to Washington would begin a necessary “healing process” in Virginia to correct a longstanding divide, which other Republicans have lamented has left southside Virginia without a full voice in Richmond.

The Washington-based government-transparency group The Oversight Project has also focused at times on the Arlington boundary dispute.

Mike Howell, an attorney and the organization’s president, told Fox News Digital that “aggressive actions” need to be undertaken to return the District of Columbia to its proper confines.

Advertisement

He called for returning “D.C. back in its proper constitutional place and to return order and dignity to the Nation’s capital.”

“The Oversight Project has been pushing this issue on many fronts, particularly as it relates to President Trump’s authority to take control of the area and an out of control D.C. bar.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Howell said his group is making headway in court and offered encouragement that McCormick’s bill would open the door to more action.

Given the heavily Democratic tilt of Beyer’s district, removing Arlington and Alexandria from Virginia would significantly alter the state’s political balance, potentially reshaping the state’s political balance after years of Democratic gains.

Advertisement

Democrats’ newly approved map relies heavily on Northern Virginia’s dense, reliably blue suburbs to anchor multiple districts, alongside other urban centers such as Richmond, Norfolk and Charlottesville — a structure that could be disrupted if those populations were no longer part of the state.

Such a shift could also ripple into state politics, where control of the legislature remains closely divided, though any downstream impact would depend on court challenges, implementation hurdles and whether the proposal gains traction in Congress.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

A proposal to merge Alexandria, Arlington back into DC sheds light on past retrocession

Published

on

A proposal to merge Alexandria, Arlington back into DC sheds light on past retrocession


A Georgia congressman’s viral proposal to add Arlington and Alexandria back into Washington, D.C., is called the “Make D.C. Square Again Act,” which has a history lesson buried inside it.

Rep. Rick Allen McCormick posted the idea on X this week, arguing the two Virginia jurisdictions were “always meant” to be part of the nation’s capital. His proposal comes as Virginia fights a federal court order blocking certification of results from a special election tied to its ongoing congressional redistricting battle.

“What we want to do is make D.C. square again,” McCormick wrote. “We repeal that unconstitutional law, give back Virginia exactly what it should have, give D.C. what it should have, and get this thing right.”

There is currently no indication the proposal has any support in Congress or from leaders in D.C. or Virginia. But the history behind it is complicated.

Advertisement

1835 map showing Alexandria as part of original District of Columbia. (Library of Congress)

When Congress established a permanent home for the federal government through the Residence Act of 1790, Virginia and Maryland each surrendered territory to create it. The 100-square-mile District was made up of 69 square miles from Maryland and 31 square miles from Virginia, including what’s now known as Arlington and Alexandria.

When those areas were absorbed into the new District, its residents lost their Virginia state citizenship and, after 1802, could no longer vote in congressional or presidential elections.

Almost from the moment of its passage in 1801, Virginia was looking for a way to get its territory back. But it was economics, specifically the economics of slavery and the domestic slave trade, that ultimately made it happen.

Beginning in the 1820s, Alexandria became a major port of the domestic slave trade, with a series of slave trading companies operating out of a slave pen at 1315 Duke Street. Enslaved people from the Upper South, where tobacco farming was in decline, were bought and sold in Alexandria before being shipped to cotton plantations further south.

Advertisement

DMV 250 | DC marks 178th anniversary of The Pearl, the largest enslaved escape attempt in US history

Interior view of a slave pen at 1315 Duke Street in Alexandria, Virginia between 1861 and 1869. (Library of Congress)

Interior view of a slave pen at 1315 Duke Street in Alexandria, Virginia between 1861 and 1869. (Library of Congress)

Abolitionists had been vigorously lobbying Congress to end slavery and the slave trade in the District. In response, Alexandrians who profited from slaveholding wanted the town returned to Virginia’s jurisdiction, fearing abolitionists would succeed in banning the practice within the District.

A series of bills to return the “town and county of Alexandria” portion of D.C. to Virginia were proposed in Congress beginning in 1804. Both abolitionists and pro-slavery advocates at various times supported the effort, though for opposing reasons.

A key turning point came in 1844, when Congress ended its self-imposed ban on debating anti-slavery petitions. This was a sign that abolitionist political power was growing, and that the worst-case scenario for Virginia slaveholders was becoming more plausible.

Advertisement
Undated engraved portraits of President James Polk believed to be created 1775-1849. (Library of Congress){br}{br}{br}
Undated engraved portraits of President James Polk believed to be created 1775-1849. (Library of Congress)

By 1846, white civic leaders were actively lobbying for Alexandria and Arlington’s return to Virginia. Congress passed a retrocession act, and President James K. Polk signed it into law in July 1846. Virginia formally accepted those areas back under its jurisdiction in March 1847.

The decision had immediate consequences for Alexandria’s Black community. African American residents soon experienced the negative impacts of retrocession, including the closure of schools and other gathering sites they had previously been permitted to use while living under the District’s laws.

SEE ALSO | Virginia could adopt its 5th electoral map in 2 census cycles: how we got here

McCormick’s bill undoes the retrocession act passed by Congress. He has framed it as a solution to Virginia’s ongoing redistricting disputes, arguing the congressional map chaos could have been avoided under his proposal.

In a statement, Democratic Congressman Don Beyer, who represents the affected areas in Northern Virginia, called McCormick’s bill “an embarrassing legislative tantrum” and “unconstitutional.”

Advertisement

Wednesday, a federal judge blocked Virginia from certifying results from a redistricting-related special election, ruling both the referendum and the underlying bill unconstitutional. Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones confirmed his office will appeal.

No co-sponsors have emerged for McCormick’s proposal. It would also face enormous legal, political, and practical hurdles, including questions about whether Congress can unilaterally alter state boundaries and what it would mean for the about 250,000, largely Democrat, residents of Alexandria and Arlington who currently hold Virginia citizenship.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending