Connect with us

Virginia

Virginia contractor accused of taking money for work never done

Published

on

Virginia contractor accused of taking money for work never done


A Fairfax County, Virginia, contractor faces criminal charges for allegedly taking money from clients but never doing any work.

Dr. Stephanie Waggel, whose allegations are not part of the criminal charges, said she hired Scott Tripp of Capital Pro Services to remodel her Ashburn psychiatric practice. But he didn’t do a minute of construction work on a $100,000 project even after she sent the first two checks for $30,000, she said.

“There was picking of floors and picking of colors and getting really excited about things, but the employees told me that every time they would order something for the project, he would cancel it and keep the money,” Waggel said.

She said she and her father ended up doing the remodel themselves.

Advertisement

“I learned a lot from YouTube about how to use power tools,” she said.

A homeowner in Falls Church said they paid Tripp almost $30,000 to demolish and build a new garage. It was torn down, and some concrete was poured in a fashion they said was not up to code. Then no one ever returned.

And a Vienna family has hired a new contractor to build an addition to their home. They said they paid Capital Pro Services $53,000, but a search warrant affidavit filed in court by a detective says neither Tripp nor his company ever filed for a permit or did any work.

When the family demanded its money back, “Tripp advised he wired the refund … however the wire transfer number … proved to be fictitious,” investigators wrote in court documents.

The Falls Church and Vienna cases — along with one other — are the basis for six criminal charges filed against Tripp in late January, alleging contractor fraud and operating without a license.

Advertisement

Waggel’s case is being investigated in Loudoun County.

The Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation shows no contractor license for Scott Tripp nor Capital Pro Services. The license listed on the company website is for another construction and roofing company.

At Capitol Pro Services’ Chantilly office, News4 found letters spilling from the mailbox and the office locked up with UPS delivery notices stuck to the door. A neighboring tenant said he hasn’t seen anyone there since January.

Several of Tripp’s former employees said they’re owed money for paychecks never sent. One shared a video of the inside of the office when it was open last year. Construction there was never completed.

“I really thought I was building a business,” said Tarita Plomata, who said she was hired by Capitol Pro Services’ office director in March 2024.

Advertisement

She said she became frustrated when she’d start working on a project only to have Tripp put a halt to it.

“Wherever the money went, we don’t know,” Plomata said. “‘Cause we would have projects that he would have everything ready for. I would go ahead and do research, do whatever he told me to do.”

Ethan Topper said Tripp hired him as a salesman in August.

“He told me it is really easy to make $100K in your first year,” Topper said.

He said he already had some experience in construction but wanted to learn more.

Advertisement

“Our training consisted of watching YouTube videos on how to sell,” Topper said. “I was like, this isn’t really the training that I was looking for.”

He said he quit after only three months.

“I kind of started to think that this company was more of a joke than a reality,” Topper said.

He said he’s still owed his last paycheck and commissions.

A judgment in U.S. District Court shows Tripp previously led a company called Pritt Investment Partners LLC. Four former employees sued in 2022 after claiming the company failed to pay them for months of work. The court ordered Tripp to pay $235,000 out of a total $2.35 million judgment.

Advertisement

In 2020 and 2021, Tripp hired ASPIS Protection Services — a private security company — but stopped paying his bill, according to Fairfax County Circuit Court records. A judge ordered him to pay almost $324,000 plus attorney’s fees.

Waggel said she went to Tripp’s office three times to demand her money back.

“He was kind of in shock,” she said. “He turned all red. And so I said, ‘You said you’d give me my money.’ I mean, I have it in writing. He emailed me, ‘I will return your money.’ I’m here to get it. He said, ‘I don’t have a checkbook.’”

She said she’s never received her money back. She said she’s hopeful the pending criminal case will help bring a stop to Tripp’s business practices.

“I don’t really care one way or the other about jail, he just needs to stop the cycle of opening a new business and not paying people and not doing clients’ work, and then shutting it down, and starting the cycle over and over,” Waggel said.

Advertisement

News4 went to Tripp’s home in Marshall. He answered his doorbell camera, saying, “I have nothing to say about an active case.”

Tripp has not named an attorney to defend him in the upcoming criminal case. He’s been ordered to give the court a name next week. His preliminary hearing is set for May 6.



Source link

Virginia

Five charged after Virginia Beach Police conduct human trafficking operation

Published

on

Five charged after Virginia Beach Police conduct human trafficking operation


VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) — Five people were charged after Virginia Beach Police conducted a two-day human trafficking and vice operation on July 3, according to the Virginia Beach Police Department.

The department’s Special Investigations Bureau conducted the operation, which was aimed at identifiying human trafficking victims, reducing the demand for commercial sex and targeting individuals seeking to exploit or recruit children for prostitution.

Detectives used many investigative techniques to proactively identify individuals involved in criminal activity related to prostitution, human trafficking and offenses against children. The operation was conducted in Virginia Beach, involving personnel from all of the bureau’s squads.

As a result of the operation, five people were identified and charged with offenses ranging from solicitation of prostitution to sex trafficking and crimes involving minors. Two vehicles and U.S. currency were seized during the operation. Other people were connected to victim services through Samaritan House.

Advertisement

The operation led to the following people being charged:

  • Shane Carter, 28, of Norfolk, was charged with solicitation of prostitution.
  • Robert Harris, 64, of Virginia Beach, was charged with solicitation of prostitution and assault and battery.
  • Larry Pittman, 53, of Portsmouth, was charged with sex trafficking and use of electronic devices to facilitaate certain offenses involving minors.
  • Kenric Frazier, 46, of Portsmouth, was charged with sex trafficking, use of electronic devices to facilitate certain offenses involving minors and solicitation of child pornography.
  • Cameron Lewis, 24, of Norfolk, was charged with solicitation of prostitution.

Investigators also developed leads about people who are suspected of trafficking and exploiting others for commercial sex. Those are now active and ongoing investigations. There may be more charges and arrests pending further investigation and consultation with the Virginia Beach Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office.

If you’re a human trafficking victim or know someone who is, you can report it to the National Human Trafficking Hotline at 1-888-373-7888.

Continue to check WAVY.com for updates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Dragas responds to accusations of having unfair advantage in quest to buy VB National

Published

on

Dragas responds to accusations of having unfair advantage in quest to buy VB National


VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (WAVY) — Helen Dragas, CEO of Dragas Companies, said she does not feel her company had an “unfair advantage” in pursing a deal to buy Virginia Beach National Golf Club.

Rather, Dragas said her team took the initiative to put forward the “the “best competitive proposal we could.”

Next month, Virginia Beach City Council could vote to sell the 270-acre 18-hole course to Dragas, who along with Texas-based Century Golf, would redesign and refurbish the course. Dragas would then build nearly 660 housing units on the southern end of the property, and build a new childcare center.

Dragas’ proposal, titled “Princess Anne Landing,” was one of nine total groups who responded to the city’s request for proposals regarding of the future of the course.

Advertisement

Still, many on both social media and in public comments have accused the longtime housing developer of having the upper hand, given that she had the city sign a non-disclosure agreement in 2024, more than a year before the city’s intentions of possibly selling the course became public.

As part of an interview Tuesday with 10 On Your Side, Dragas was asked about those accusations and other questions. Responses are edited for style and brevity purposes.

REPORTER: You’ve heard some of the criticisms … sitting through the public hearings. … How do you take it when people say that you got an unfair advantage?

DRAGAS: I say that we invested thousands of hours of hard work and due diligence watching public hearings, media council meetings, digging into those engineering studies that I referenced before that showed the deficiencies, … understanding the comprehensive plan, the Historic Overlay District, the ITA situation, all that. There’s a lot of complexity there and we invested a lot of time and energy to develop the best competitive proposal we could. We never knew we would see it, and we still don’t know if we’ll see a single cent of that investment back. And that’s competition and that’s initiative, and we live in a country that’s always rewarded initiative. And we took it. And while others might have been spending their time on other projects or other endeavors, this is what we were doing. So we didn’t receive any nonpublic information. We just did our homework and I think we tried to solve a lot of problems in one proposal: housing, homeownership, childcare, golf course, you know, redesign and refresh and reinvestment and a future tax stream for the course. So we think we come up with something that provides benefit, not just at offers, but to a lot of other constituents in the city as well. We’re really proud of it.

REPORTER: You were telling me that … long before even the auditors report, you had your eye on that that parcel and thought it would be good for houses. Correct?

Advertisement

DRAGAS: Well, we always knew that there was that section that … could handle some housing, yes. And others did as well. There were other rentals. There was another unsolicited proposal or two. And then I think about half of the respondents to the proposal included housing.

Under the terms that have been negotiated between City Council and economic development staff for months in closed session, Dragas would purchase the roughly 270 acre course for $17.9 million from the city. The city will, in turn, give the $17.9 million back to Dragas, along with $1.8 million from the Virginia Beach Development Authority, to go towards an estimated $38 million golf course redevelopment.

On top of the nearly $20 million the city would give the development team for the golf course work, the city could contribute up to nearly $8 million in public infrastructure along Tournament Drive and Princess Anne Road, to include turn lanes, streetscape improvements, utility relocations, and a sewer extension.

REPORTER: Why does it need to be a public-private partnership?

DRAGAS: So right now the city has millions of dollars in deferred renovation — $7.7 million in identified stormwater deficiencies and remaining clubhouse and facilities repair. That doesn’t cover anything about renovating a 30-year-old course. And … everything needs a renovation, refurbishment at some point in its life, physical life. And so, this course needs that. There’s also public infrastructure that serves the entire area right there. So there’s some Virginia Beach Development Authority parcels that sit there and the first tee … as you probably know, is that land is going to be dedicated to the First Tee. There’s sanitary sanitary sewer infrastructure that serves all those parcels that was originally connected to be temporary, and that was almost 30 years ago. So the city has, I think, some deferred public infrastructure costs as well. What our proposal does is take the city off the hook for future maintenance liabilities. They’re actually going to come out of pocket less than they would if they just did the stormwater and the clubhouse repairs that were made, and in exchange, the city will have a $3.4 million a year tax revenue stream, a completely refreshed and refreshed renovated golf course, a badly needed child care facility and then, of course, the homes, homeownership opportunities for over 600 families.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Three Things We Hope to Learn About Virginia Tech At ACC Media Days

Published

on

Three Things We Hope to Learn About Virginia Tech At ACC Media Days


Virginia Tech football head coach James Franklin and three players — defensive tackle Kemari Copeland, safety Tyson Flowers and running back Marcellous Hawkins — will be present Thursday at the 2026 ACC Kickoff at the Hilton Charlotte Uptown (Charlotte, N.C.). Here are three things I think Hokies fans should hope to learn about the Hokies at media days, centered around which players will be taking questions.

Advertisement

No. 1: How has it been incorporating new athletic director Brian White?

White was named the university’s new athletic director and vice president in June; he previously served in the same roles at Florida Atlantic University. Under the helm of White, the men’s basketball team, coached by Dusty May — he later won a NCAA title with Michigan, and he’s now the head coach of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks — made it to the Final Four in the 2022-23 season. While White’s chops lie more in hoops, his influence on football could also arrive via the chips that he’s surrounded with around the Hokie Club. Virginia Tech has made an effort in finding replacements for its university president (Tim Sands) and athletic director (Whit Babcock), and it’s also procured a record $75 million investment, the majority of which is directed towards the athletic department. How that process of integrating White, who specializes in finances, is going is one of the more intriguing notes to cover.

No. 2: Is there anyone on the secondary that jumps out to either Franklin or Flowers?

The secondary remains one of the more fascinating position groups on Virginia Tech’s roster entering the 2026 season. While Flowers is the established veteran and unquestioned leader of the unit, there are plenty of snaps available around him following offseason departures. Media days won’t provide a depth chart, but they can offer insight into which younger defensive backs have separated themselves during summer workouts.

It will be interesting to hear if there’s a specific player who has caught his attention. Cornerback Joshua Clarke could be one to watch given that he projects into the two-deep after a torn ACL cost him the 2025 campaign. Whether it’s Clarke, an experienced transfer acclimating to Blacksburg like Troy transfer Jaquez White or a younger corner beginning to emerge, those types of comments often provide an early indication of how the coaching staff and players view the rotation before preseason camp begins.

Advertisement

The same goes for Franklin. Coaches are naturally careful with personnel discussions in July, but even subtle praise can be revealing.

No. 3: How does the running back/defensive line depth shape up?

Virginia Tech operated slightly short-handed at running back for the duration of fall camp, missing true freshman Messiah Mickens throughout. Hawkins was hobbled, and though he went through several individual workouts, he did not play in the spring game. How he’s doing is one of the points to note, and while it doesn’t appear to be a serious injury at first glance, clarity is always helpful.

As for the defensive tackle room, Emmett Laws is currently out with an undisclosed injury that defensive coordinator Brent Pry did not go into more detail on. Any update on his availability would be encouraging, particularly for a defensive front that is counting on developing quality depth behind its projected starters. Kemari Copeland and Elhadj Fall appear to be the likely starters at tackle, but beyond Aycen Stevens being at one of the edge spots, who starts at the other is yet to be determined.

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending