Virginia
Should legislators tweak Virginia’s 2006 voter roll law for more clarity? • Virginia Mercury
Virginia officials have asked the United States Supreme Court to block a lower court’s ruling that roughly 1,600 people purged from voter rolls by Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s executive order must be reinstated. Two lawsuits allege that Youngkin’s order violated federal law by removing voters from rolls too close to Election Day, a claim the governor refutes by pointing to a 2006 state law as the basis of his action.
Virginia asks Supreme Court to block order to reinstate 1600 people stripped from voter rolls
The situation has raised questions on whether state lawmakers should consider amending that law for additional clarity and to avoid future legal disputes over how Virginia confirms voter registration shortly before elections.
The 2006 law
Youngkin has said repeatedly that his executive order was built on a 2006 state law for voter roll cleanups, which directs the Department of Motor Vehicles to send data to the State Board of Elections of people who failed to indicate U.S. citizenship in paperwork. There’s a process of notification and then purging of voters who fail to prove their citizenship, and in previous years, the process was done on a monthly basis. Youngkin’s order directed DMV and Elections Department officials to perform it daily.
The lawsuits the state and Youngkin face say Youngkin’s order ran afoul of the National Voter Registration Act, which institutes a “quiet period” on such actions 90 days before an election. Several state lawmakers have signaled they agree with that allegation, including House Speaker Don Scott, D-Portsmouth, who previously told The Mercury “The reason that we have this 90-day rule is that we don’t want citizens to be accidentally removed.”
Privileges and Elections Committee chair Sen. Aaron Rouse, D-Virginia Beach, called Youngkin’s order “reckless” and alleged that it’s being used to “fire up the (Republican) base.”
“When you actually look at the issue of the matter, it’s the 90-day quiet period,” Rouse said.
The courts will decide the matter concerning the legal challenges, John Aughenbaugh, a political science professor at Virginia Commonwealth University, said.
But he added that the Youngkin administration “brought this on themselves” by issuing the order so close to the 90-day federal threshold.
However, Aughenbaugh said, “I can understand why the Youngkin admin told Fox News ‘we didn’t think we were doing anything wrong,’” in citing the 2006 law.
That measure was carried by former republican state Sen. Ken Cucinelli and signed by former Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine. At that time, Republican President George Bush’s Department of Justice had issued a memo that it didn’t object to the law.
In the time since, no one has challenged it, until the two suits against Youngkin.
An argument in Attorney General Jason Miyares’ Supreme Court filing notes confusion on when the federal 90-day law should overpower the 2006 state law.
“The current confusion surrounding the NVRA makes the rules anything but clear,” Miyares’ petition reads. “States are unaware of when, or whether, they can remove noncitizens from the voter rolls. They need to know with certainty whether they can remove noncitizens at any point, only outside of the Quiet Period, or never.”
On Tuesday, the Republican National Committee and Republican Party of Virginia also filed a brief in support of the state’s SCOTUS request.
Virginia GOP calls on U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate Youngkin’s voter purge order
Rouse said there hasn’t yet been talk between himself and other members of the Privileges and Elections Committee about tweaking the 2006 law to spell out the 90-day threshold of the NVRA.
“We haven’t had those conversations,” he said.
As to resolving any confusion, Sen. Bill Stanley, R-Franklin County, said that the state legislature broadly is always looking at ways past laws might need to be amended.
“This might be one of those times,” he said. “The question then becomes ‘is there a bipartisan solution?”
It might also come down to the question of how to prevent governors from overstepping or skirting federal law, as well as how to prevent presidential administrations from wading into state law, Aughenbaugh suspects.
The debacle playing out on the national stage might prompt Virginia legislators to ask, “Did the Youngkin administration too broadly interpret the law? Do we want to rein-in gubernatorial administrations in the future?” Aughenbaugh posited. “Meanwhile, how do you revise the law so that future presidential administrations don’t single out a state for lawsuits two weeks before Election Day?”
Rouse said there’s valid reasons for those types of deliberations.
“It’s more of a bigger picture with Governor Youngkin in terms of inciting fear and undermining our elections,” Rouse said of conversations he’s having with his fellow lawmakers. “We understand that this administration has been known to make mistakes.”
Rouse pointed to how the administration pulled out of ERIC, a multi-state data-sharing coalition meant to maintain voter roll accuracy — and how he vetoed legislation prompting Virginia’s return to it this year, along with other voting-related bills. The administration also mistakenly canceled over 3,000 people’s registrations last year, Rouse said.
Can same-day voter registration and provisional ballots fix it?
Regardless of whether eligible voters were caught up in the recent purge or runs into other election-access issues, registrars have said that use of same-day registration and provisional ballots are an option that would allow them to vote on Election Day. Provisional ballots require follow-up after voting to verify a person’s address, citizenship status or other factors.
It’s an argument Republican national and state leadership is making as a reason Youngkin’s order and the subsequent voter purges should stand.
“Even if a person entitled to vote were erroneously removed from the voter rolls and unable to respond to the Commonwealth’s outreach, they may still take advantage of same-day registration and cast a ballot,” the state’s request to the Supreme Court stated. “No legal voters could or would be disenfranchised.”
Aughenbaugh doubts the nation’s highest court will grant Virginia’s request so close to the elections and suspects people who have been purged may not have to resort to provisional ballots this year.
“I don’t think there are enough (Supreme Court) justices that have the appetite to wade into that dispute less than a week before elections,” he said.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Virginia
Final Bowl Projections For Virginia Heading Into Selection Sunday
Virginia was hoping that today would be the day where they found out where they would be heading for the College Football Playoff, but after being upset last night by Duke, the Cavaliers are not going to be going to CFP. They should get one of the ACC’s better bowl games, but considering the stakes of yesterday’s game, today might feel a little disappointing.
For Virginia and the rest of the ACC teams, it could be chaotic in terms of where they end up this postseason.
There is a chance the ACC gets zero, one, or two teams in the playoff. After the results of yesterday, will Miami get in as an at-large? Will Duke get in over James Madison as the last conference champion in the field? Is there a world in which they both get in? Not only that, but what about Notre Dame? The Fighting Irish are eligible for ACC bowl spots, and if they are left out in favor of Miami and Alabama, that would also complicate the picture.
Given all of that, here are the final bowl projections for UVA heading into selection Sunday.
Projections
Athlon Sports
Athlon Sports is projecting for Virginia to play in the Pop Tarts Bowl and face Big 12 runner up BYU. In their projection, neither Miami or Duke get into the CFP.
The Athletic
Scott Dochterman at The Athletic has Virginia going to San Diego to play in the Holiday Bowl against Arizona. The Wildcats went 9-3 in a big bounce back year and have a potent offense.
CBS Sports
Brad Crawford at CBS Sports also has Virginia going to the Pop Tarts Bowl to face BYU.
ESPN
The two analysts at ESPN are split on where Virginia is going to be playing this postseason. Kyle Bonagura projects that UVA is going to the Pop-Tarts Bowl to face TCU, while Mark Schlabach is projecting Virginia to go to the Duke’s Mayo Bowl to face Georgia Tech. That would be a unique scenario and an intriguing matchup.
Final Word
The playoff field is going to determine everything. If either Miami or Duke gets in, or neither of them does, it is going to make for a chaotic bowl picture. Lots of destinations are seemingly on the table for Virginia. The Duke’s Mayo Bowl, the Gator Bowl, the Pop Tarts Bowl, the Holiday Bowl, the Sun Bowl, and even the Pinstripe Bowl could be possibilities for the Yellow Cavaliers. It seems impossible to project right now, and that will be the case right up until the announcement. Another thing to watch is if the SEC can’t fill up their bowl slots, and then look to some ACC teams.
More Virginia Football News:
Virginia
Virginia vs Duke live updates: ACC Championship game score, highlights
College football Power Four title picks and top Group of Five contender
Before the Snap looks at who’s poised to win the Power Four leagues and which Group of Five program could emerge as the top contender.
A Power Four conference champion will be determined tonight — though depending on the result, the winner of the game may not come with a College Football Playoff berth.
The 2025 ACC football season will wrap up on Saturday, Dec. 6 with the league’s championship game between No. 16 Virginia (No. 17 CFP) and Duke taking place at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Watch the ACC championship game on Fubo (free trial)
The Cavaliers have been one of the best stories in college football this season, with a 10-2 record after going just 11-23 in their previous three seasons under coach Tony Elliott. It’s Virginia’s first 10-win season since 1989. One of those victories came against its Saturday opponent: a 34-17 win against the Blue Devils on Nov. 15.
Duke is in the ACC championship game despite finishing just 7-5 in the regular season. A 6-2 record in conference play, however, sent it to Charlotte after a convoluted series of tiebreakers notably left out No. 13 Miami (No. 12 CFP).
If the Blue Devils manage to get a different result in the second matchup between the teams, it’s quite possible that the ACC will get left out of the 12-team playoff, which gives berths to the five highest-ranked conference champions. Duke wasn’t ranked in the latest top 25 from the playoff selection committee, putting it behind No. 25 James Madison, the Sun Belt champion.
USA TODAY is bringing you live updates, scores and highlights from the game. Follow along:
This section will be updated throughout the game.
TEAM
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
FINAL
Duke
7
7
0
—
—
Virginia
0
7
3
—
—
This section will be updated closer to kickoff.
The Cavaliers get all the way down to the Blue Devils’ 2-yard line on their opening drive of the second half, but Duke’s defense stands tall from there, dropping Virginia for a 5-yard loss and then forcing Chandler Morris into an incompletion.
Still, the Cavaliers cap off a 17-play drive with a 24-yard field goal from Will Bettridge to get within four, 14-10, with 7:19 remaining in the third quarter.
Duke holds a 14-7 lead over Virginia at halftime. The Blue Devils have a 170-115 advantage in total yards, with the Cavaliers running only 23 plays and Duke leading the time of possession battle 20:29-9:31.
Virginia is set to receive the opening kickoff of the second half.
Duke goes three-and-out and punts away to Virginia, which will take over at its 30-yard line with 1:43 left.
For the first time tonight, we have a punt. A Chandler Morris pass on third-and-9 from the Virginia 48-yard line falls incomplete and the Cavaliers opt to punt. The ball bounces into the end zone for a touchback, giving Duke the ball at its own 20 with 2:55 remaining in the first half.
Duke has another lengthy touchdown drive, this one going 75 plays in 13 plays in 8:02. It’s punctuated by a 16-yard Nate Sheppard touchdown run to give the Blue Devils a 14-7 lead with 6:14 left in the first half.
Duke yet again comes up with big plays with it needed them, converting on two fourth downs on the drive, one of which came on a fake punt from its own 33-yard line. It’s the Blue Devils’ third-consecutive game with a special teams fake for a first down.
Darian Mensah’s interception proves to be costly, turning what could have been a 14-point lead into a tie ballgame.
On a first-and-10 from the Duke 11-yard line, Chandler Morris dumps it off to running back J’Mari Taylor, who cuts and plows through the Blue Devils’ defense for a touchdown, tying the game after the extra point with 14:16 left in the first half.
Virginia has a second-and-1 at the Duke 14-yard line once the second quarter begins.
Shortly after Duke benefits from a momentum swing, the Blue Devils give the ball right back. On a second-and-14 from the Duke 24-yard line, two plays after Virginia’s missed field goal, Darian Mensah throws an interception right to Cavaliers safety Corey Costner, who returns it to the Duke 23-yard line with 47 seconds left in the quarter.
The Cavaliers have a nice response to Duke’s opening touchdown drive, getting as far as the Blue Devils’ 20-yard line. From there, though, they’re dropped for a 2-yard loss on a rushing attempt, Chandler Morris is brought down for a sack on third down and Will Bettridge misses a 45-yard field goal wide left.
Duke will take over at its own 28 with about two minutes left in the first quarter.
After days of jokes about how it made the conference championship game, Duke showed on its first drive that it just might belong on this stage. The Blue Devils go 75 yards in 15 plays and 9:38, capped off by a 12-yard touchdown pass from Darian Mensah to Jeremiah Hasley.
It’s the longest opening drive by plays and time of possession in ACC Championship game history.
There were several instances on the possession that it seemed like Duke might not get any points, let alone seven. The Blue Devils faced four third-downs, converting three of them, and went for it on a fourth-and-2 from the Virginia 41-yard line.
Despite going 7-5 in the regular season, which included losses to Tulane and UConn, Duke finds itself 60 minutes away from a conference title. How, exactly, did the Blue Devils get there?
Even with its subpar overall mark, coach Manny Diaz’s team went 6-2 in conference play, putting it in a five-way tie for second place in the conference standings behind Virginia. Duke ended up getting the edge over the four other teams because of the ACC’s sixth tiebreaker: conference opponent record. Duke’s ACC opponents had a combined win percentage of .500, while Miami and Georgia Tech came in behind them at .438.
Here’s a look at the injury situation for Virginia heading into its ACC championship matchup against Duke, according to the ACC’s latest athlete availability report:
Out
- CB #1 Dre Walker
- WR #2 Andre Greene Jr.
- LB #5 Kam Robinson
- DB #7 Ja’Maric Morris
- CB #9 Jam Jackson
- TE #9 Dakota Twitty
- QB #19 Grady Brosterhous
- RB #20 Xavier Brown
- RB #28 Noah Vaughn
- S #38 Armstrong Jones
- OL #54 Makilan Thomas
- DL #56 Tyler Simmons
- OL #56 Tyshawn Wyatt
- OL #71 Monroe Mills
- WR #80 Trevor Ladd
Game-time decision
- WR #6 Cam Ross
- WR #8 Jayden Thomas
- OL #52 McKale Boley
Ross is the Hoos’ third-leading wide receiver this season, with 459 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
Here’s a look at the players who will be out for Duke in Saturday’s ACC championship game against Virginia, according to the ACC’s latest athlete availability report:
- S #1 Terry Moore
- CB #5 Kimari Robinson
- DE #14 Bryce Davis
- LB #24 Bradley Gompers
- LB #31 Elliott Schaper
- LB #36 Nick Morris Jr.
- OL #52 Micah Sahakian
- OL #73 Evan Scott
- OL #78 Nathan Kutufaris
Virginia is favored by -3.5 over Duke in the ACC championship game, according to the latest odds from BetMGM.
The ACC championship game between Virginia and Duke will be airing on ABC, with Sean McDonough (play-by-play) and Greg McElroy (analyst) on the call while Molly McGrath and Taylor McGregor report from the sideline.
What time does Virginia vs Duke start?
- Date: Saturday, Dec. 6
- Time: 8 p.m. ET
- Where: Bank of American Stadium (Charlotte, N.C.)
Virginia vs Duke will kick off at 8 p.m. ET on Saturday, Dec. 6 from Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, North Carolina.
What TV channel is Virginia vs Duke on today?
The ACC championship game between Virginia and Duke will be broadcast on ABC. Streaming options for the game include Fubo, which carries ABC and offers a free trial to new subscribers.
Virginia vs Duke predictions
Craig Meyer, USA TODAY Sports: Duke 27, Virginia 24
The Blue Devils were handled by the Cavaliers in their regular-season matchup, but Virginia, for all of its success, has been inconsistent this season. With a better effort from quarterback Mensah this time around, Duke earns a tight win and potentially shuts the ACC out of the playoff.
Virginia football schedule 2025
Here’s a look at Virginia’s schedule in 2025, including past scores.
- Saturday, Aug. 30: Virginia 48, Coastal Carolina 7
- Saturday, Sept. 6: NC State 35, Virginia 31
- Saturday, Sept. 13: Virginia 55, Williams & Mary 16
- Saturday, Sept. 20: Virginia 48, Stanford 20 *
- Friday, Sept. 26: Virginia 46, Florida State 38 (2OT) *
- Saturday, Oct. 4: Virginia 30, Louisville 27 (OT) *
- Saturday, Oct. 11: BYE
- Saturday, Oct. 18: Virginia 22, Washington State 20
- Saturday, Oct. 25: Virginia 17, North Carolina 16 (OT) *
- Saturday, Nov. 1: Virginia 31, Cal 21 *
- Saturday, Nov. 8: Wake Forest 16, Virginia 9 *
- Saturday, Nov. 15: Virginia 34, Duke 17 *
- Saturday, Nov. 22: BYE
- Saturday, Nov. 29: Virginia 27, Virginia Tech 7 *
- Saturday, Dec. 6: Virginia vs Duke | ESPN, 8 p.m. ET **
* – denotes ACC game
** – denotes ACC championship game
Duke football schedule 2025
Here’s a look at Duke’s schedule in 2025, including past scores.
- Thursday, Aug. 28: Duke 45, Elon 17
- Saturday, Sept. 6: Illinois 45, Duke 19
- Saturday, Sept. 13: Tulane 34, Duke 27
- Saturday, Sept. 20: Duke 45, NC State 33 *
- Saturday, Sept. 27: Duke 38, Syracuse 3 *
- Saturday, Oct. 4: Duke 45, Cal 21 *
- Saturday, Oct. 11: BYE
- Saturday, Oct. 18: Georgia Tech 27, Duke 18 *
- Saturday, Oct. 25: BYE
- Saturday, Nov. 1: Duke 46, Clemson 45 *
- Saturday, Nov. 8: UConn 37, Duke 34
- Saturday, Nov. 15: Virginia 34, Duke 17 *
- Saturday, Nov. 22: Duke 32, North Carolina 25 *
- Saturday, Nov. 29: Duke 49, Wake Forest 32 *
- Saturday, Dec. 6: Virginia vs Duke | ESPN, 8 p.m. ET **
* – denotes ACC game
** – denotes ACC championship game
Virginia
Virginia’s new blue trifecta puts right-to-work on the line
Given its proximity to Washington, D.C., Virginia has long had a reputation for its off-year elections swinging to whatever political party does not control the White House. After four years of Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin—whose victory came on the back of Joe Biden’s first year as president—the commonwealth went strongly Democratic this year, electing incoming Gov. Abigail Spanberger amid President Donald Trump’s second term.
Virginia Democrats now have a trifecta in Richmond, and political winds suggest that this could finally spell the end of right-to-work in the state, after nearly 80 years of the law being on the books.
Spanberger’s term doesn’t start until January, but state Democratic lawmakers have already introduced right-to-work repeal legislation that they hope to send to her desk. So far, Spanberger claims to oppose right-to-work’s repeal, but the coming weeks will show if she reverts to her career-long pro-union track record.
In late November, State Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy (D–Woodbridge) introduced Senate Bill 32, which would repeal Virginia’s right-to-work law that prevents private sector workers from being forced to join a union or pay union agency fees as a condition of employment. During her gubernatorial campaign, Spanberger reiterated numerous times that she did not support repealing Virginia’s right-to-work law, saying that supporting repeal was a false litmus test for being pro-worker.
“I know there are those who think you can be pro-business or pro-union….I reject that idea,” said Spanberger in a campaign trail speech to the Virginia Chamber of Commerce. After the introduction of Foy’s repeal bill, a Spanberger spokesperson told the media the incoming governor “does not support repealing the current statute.”
But it’s unclear exactly what Spanberger does support, and a more granular reading of her campaign trail pledge leaves notable wiggle room. In her statements during the election, she claimed she did not support “full repeal,” while leaving the door open by saying “reforms may be necessary.”
Although it’s unclear what “partial” right-to-work repeal might look like, one potential clue may come from Virginia’s not-too-distant past. In 2020, then-Senate Majority Leader Dick Saslaw (D–Springfield) introduced legislation that was billed as a “partial repeal” of Virginia’s right-to-work law in that it did not force workers to join a union but could require the compulsory collection of so-called “agency fees” from non-union members.
Agency fees function as a union workaround for workers who refuse to join a union by still putting them on the hook to financially contribute to the union. In the 2018 case of Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down this practice for public sector employees as a violation of First Amendment rights, but agency fees can still be collected in the private sector if permitted under state law. A similar approach to Saslaw’s prior effort could perhaps be used by Virginia Democrats to effectively gut right-to-work, while simultaneously claiming it does not technically constitute Spanberger reneging on her campaign promise.
Past right-to-work repeal bills in Virginia have had a poor track record, even among state Democrats. A 2021 repeal bill was voted down in resounding—and bipartisan—fashion by a tally of 88–13 in the House of Delegates. But since that time, numerous moderate Democrats have retired from the state legislature, making it far from certain what a vote might look like now.
For her part, Spanberger’s past record includes cosponsoring the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act while serving in the House of Representatives. The PRO Act, which included a laundry list of pro-union desires, was notable for containing provisions that would have effectively overridden state-level right-to-work laws. The incoming governor also received substantial support from labor unions, including AFSCME, during her campaign.
Spanberger is right that the choice between being pro-business and pro-worker is often a false dichotomy. But there are better ways to strike this balance than “partial” repeals of right-to-work. For instance, Virginia could look to its neighbor, Maryland, where Democratic Gov. Wes Moore has initiated a portable benefits pilot program for gig economy workers. Portable benefit models allow gig workers to use Simplified Employee Pension-style funds to purchase benefits on exchanges, which they can then take with them from job to job.
As workers increasingly show a preference for flexible work and scheduling autonomy—which often means more gig and freelancing work—this is the type of pro-worker reform that moves labor policy into the 21st century, instead of staying stuck in the labor battles of yesteryear. In addition to Maryland, deep red states like Tennessee and Utah have also implemented portable benefit models, suggesting the bipartisan appeal of such an approach.
We’ll soon see if Virginia holds the line or becomes the second state since Michigan in 2023 to repeal right-to-work. Whatever happens, Virginia’s—and America’s—labor policy debate is badly in need of an update.
-
Politics5 days agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio3 days ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Alaska1 day agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
News5 days agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World5 days agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Texas1 day agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
Politics6 days agoTrump highlights comments by ‘Obama sycophant’ Eric Holder, continues pressing Senate GOP to nix filibuster
-
Politics7 days agoWar Sec Pete Hegseth shares meme of children’s book character firing on narco terrorist drug boat