Virginia
At Dominion wind hearings, continued disputes over ratepayer protections – Virginia Mercury
After two and a half days of testimony in Richmond, shopper safety advocates proceed to disagree with Dominion Power over whether or not regulators ought to require additional safeguards for ratepayers because the utility seeks approval for its plans to construct an enormous wind farm off the coast of Virginia Seashore.
“There isn’t a clean verify for this challenge,” mentioned Joseph Reid, an legal professional from McGuireWoods who represented Dominion within the case earlier than the State Company Fee, on Tuesday.
However Senior Assistant Legal professional Basic Meade Browder informed the SCC that the workplace’s Division of Client Counsel stays involved that prospects face vital dangers from the Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind challenge.
“Our place is that approval ought to include significant protections that mitigate the chance to ratepayers, who’re presently set as much as bear the monetary threat if the CVOW challenge proves to be extra expensive to assemble and function than is projected or if the efficiency of the challenge doesn’t meet the extent projected by the corporate,” he mentioned.
If constructed, CVOW would be the largest wind farm in the USA, producing 2.6 gigawatts of energy — greater than what’s generated by the state’s nuclear items and its largest gasoline plant mixed — from 176 generators sunk into the Atlantic Ocean 27 miles off Virginia Seashore.
The challenge is each a key element of Dominion’s plans to decarbonize its fleet by midcentury in keeping with the Virginia Clear Economic system Act and, with an estimated price ticket of $9.65 billion, the costliest endeavor the utility has undertaken thus far. If accredited by regulators, the typical residential buyer, outlined as somebody who makes use of 1,000 kilowatts of energy each month, would see their month-to-month invoice initially rise by $1.45. SCC employees have estimated that determine might rise to $14.21 by the point the challenge enters operation in 2027.
What’s ‘cheap and prudent’ in terms of Dominion offshore wind challenge’s prices?
All through this week’s hearings, Dominion argued {that a} negotiated settlement generally known as a stipulation between the utility, SCC employees, the Sierra Membership and the Nansemond Indian Tribe gives adequate protections for ratepayers.
Underneath that settlement, which is topic to regulatory approval, the challenge’s present price ticket of $9.65 billion can be discovered to be “cheap and prudent.” If prices exceeded that threshold, Dominion must return to the fee for its approval to recuperate the surplus.
Dominion would additionally conform to report any value overruns or timeline delays inside 30 days of turning into conscious of them and to offer explanations for any shortfalls within the challenge’s anticipated efficiency.
However the Workplace of the Legal professional Basic, Walmart, environmental and financial improvement nonprofit Appalachian Voices and advocacy group Clear Virginia contended that extra concrete commitments are wanted to make sure ratepayers are protected if plans go awry.
“We might love for every little thing that the corporate guarantees and that’s being adopted within the stipulation to in truth happen. What we wish is for there to be extra protections put in place if materials modifications occur in the middle of building,” mentioned Carrie Grundmann, an legal professional for Walmart.
Most debated throughout this week’s hearings have been proposals for a efficiency assure and for particular timelines Dominion must observe in looking for regulatory approval for potential value overruns.
Underneath a efficiency assure, Dominion can be required to show that the wind farm was working at a sure degree, calculated utilizing a three-year rolling common. If efficiency fell beneath that threshold, firm shareholders must bear the prices of changing shortfalls within the facility’s vitality manufacturing.
Different proposals referred to as for the imposition of a value cap on the challenge, much like one instituted by the SCC in its approval for the Virginia Metropolis Hybrid Power Middle in Clever County in 2008. Clear Virginia requested the SCC to require the usage of an unbiased monitor.
Power guide Scott Norwood, testifying for the Workplace of the Legal professional Basic, mentioned Wednesday that provisions like efficiency ensures and value caps have been used to guard prospects from the price of wind initiatives in states like Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma.
“These provisions have additionally been acknowledged by the utility house owners of the initiatives,” he mentioned. “They’re not so uncommon or unusual that it needs to be ordered by the fee. The businesses have are available proposing protections.”
Dominion officers insisted the stipulation gives sufficient assurance to prospects, and that within the case of a delay or overrun, the utility would carry particulars of the brand new circumstances to the SCC for its evaluation. An “arbitrary” efficiency assure, Dominion Senior Vice President of Mission Building Mark Mitchell mentioned Wednesday, “might put the corporate in danger.”
The stipulation has been “fastidiously crafted to protect the fee’s discretion to cope with this in a way because it sees match,” legal professional Reid mentioned Wednesday.
Firm officers and legal professionals additionally repeatedly expressed confidence all through the hearings that value overruns and delays have been unlikely. Mitchell described “thorough” and “conservative” approaches to building planning and the incorporation of contingencies into the challenge schedule.
Vishwa Hyperlink, one other McGuireWoods legal professional representing Dominion, emphasised that “since 2007, the corporate has been efficiently contracting, proposing, setting up and working many massive, new never-before-done-by-the-company technology initiatives.”
However Grundmann and others questioned the utility’s resistance to proposals for additional guardrails.
“In case your degree of confidence as to your budgeting, estimating and timeline is so excessive, why have such opposition to extra buyer protections?” she requested.
Mitchell replied: “I believe we’ve satisfactory buyer protections within the stipulation.”
As proceedings concluded noon Thursday, SCC Choose Judith Jagdmann requested all events to file closing briefs by June 17. Among the many questions she requested them to contemplate have been what limits may exist on the fee’s authorized authority to undertake shopper protections similar to value caps and efficiency ensures within the case.
Virginia
How Virginia's voter roll purge could impact the election
Jude Joffe-Block:
There’s a pattern where people have visited the DMV, and they at some point there must have made a mistake on a form where they identified — they marked a box identifying themselves as noncitizens somewhere in those forms. We’re not really sure how exactly this happens.
But after that visit to the DMV, they got a letter in the mail from their local election official, saying, we think you might not be a citizen. Please affirm your citizenship.
We spoke to a voter, Nadra Wilson, who that letter was sent to the wrong address. It got forwarded. By the time she got it, the deadline had already passed. She was able to re-register. We spoke to another voter, Rina Shaw. She did get the letter in the mail letting her know that she had to affirm her citizenship. And she did send it back.
But, even then, she was still not on the rolls. And she was able to call and sort that out. But all of this does take time. Both of those voters did end up voting early this week, though.
Virginia
Syracuse football: what to watch for vs Virginia Tech
The Syracuse Orange (5-2, 2-2) welcome the Virginia Tech Hokies (5-3, 3-1)to the Dome on Saturday for a critical ACC match-up. Kickoff is Noon on The CW and here’s what we’re watching for:
Kevin: Protect Kyle
Virginia Tech defensive end Antwaun Powell-Ryland has nine sacks and seventeen hurries on the season and leads a strong Hokies pass rush. Syracuse needs to keep APR from disrupting their passing game so that Kyle McCord can attack a secondary rated the second-worst in coverage by PFF. Will the Orange use screens and draws to force APR to read and react instead of letting him just tee off and attack McCord? If Syracuse can negate APR’s impact they could score enough to win this one.
Mike: Make the Most of Allen
With Yasin Willis doubtful for Saturday’s game, this could be the first time since last season where LeQuint Allen is leaned on as a bell-cow back. How much that affects the offensive gameplan remains to be seen, but it might incite more designed plays as opposed to the RPO package SU has run very frequently. The o-line is struggling to block effectively on option plays lately so to make sure they can get Allen wide lanes to run through, a more traditional approach could work better this week.
Dom: Keeping momentum up for Syracuse’s 12th man
The Orange are once again back in the Dome for the first time in quite a while (September 28 to be exact). Since then, Syracuse’s road trip resulted in two nice wins over UNLV and NC State, then most recently with a bitter blowout loss. Fans will be looking for the Orange to bounce back against an inconsistent but still tough ACC opponent. Considering it’s also alumni weekend, the Dome should have plenty of seats filled and should look to take care of business.
Max: Keep Kyron Drones in the pocket
VT’s quarterback is extremely dangerous in the running game, racking up over 300 rushing yards through eight games, good for 19th in the ACC. The only conference QBs with more rushing yards are Georgia Tech’s Haynes King and Stanford’s Ashton Daniels, who gave the Orange fits on the ground this year. Syracuse’s rush defense still ranks in the top 50 in rush yards allowed per game, and it will need to keep Drones in the pocket to find some success this Saturday.
************************************************************************************
What will you be watching for on Saturday?
Virginia
A GOP-dominated Supreme Court resuscitates Youngkin’s late-game Virginia voter purge • Virginia Mercury
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a partisan vote, did exactly what many feared it would do Wednesday in this pivotal election season and green-lighted a Republican-ordered, late-in-the-game scouring of Virginia voter rolls in search of “noncitizens.”
U.S. Supreme Court grants stay in challenge to Youngkin’s voter purge order
The court’s two-thirds majority of Republican-appointed justices (three by former President and current GOP nominee Donald Trump) granted a stay that Virginia’s Republican-led executive branch sought, after federal district and appellate courts temporarily voided Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s order 90 days before the election to purge Virginia voter rolls.
That means that the 1,600 people who failed to check the correct box on a Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles form and, in many cases, mistakenly identified themselves as noncitizens were excised from rolls of registered voters. Now, they bear the burden, if they’re lucky enough to find out about it in time, of re-registering at this late hour and casting provisional ballots subject to challenge after the polls close.
Youngkin has sought to position himself as a hero standing resolutely against hordes of swarthy outsiders corruptly seeking to influence American elections.
To be clear, Youngkin is legally and morally right in asserting noncitizens have no business voting in U.S. elections. Yet he’s never shown proof that it happens.
According to the Washington Post, no noncitizen has tried to vote in Virginia since he became governor. What’s more, only three people were prosecuted since January 2022 for illegal voting of any kind in Virginia, the Post reported.
Former top state election officials say that maintaining clean, up-to-date voter rolls is work that goes on almost year-round as required under a 2006 state law — except in the three months before elections. Federal law specifically bars states from systematically purging its rolls during a “Quiet Period” 90 days ahead of a federal election.
All of which imparts an unmistakable partisan odor — rooted in Trump-inspired election denialism and nationwide Republican “election integrity” initiatives — to Youngkin’s Aug. 7 order to take extraordinary, expedited steps to find and excise noncitizens during that exact 90-day pre-election period.
Youngkin’s order is much more likely to disenfranchise actual citizens for paperwork snafus than to snare a foreigner hell-bent on voting. But then, this was always about political posturing, irrespective of bad operational outcomes or adverse consequences for legitimate citizen voters like lifelong Republican Christine Rabassa of Henrico County or Rina Shaw of Chesterfield County, both U.S.-born citizens and longtime registered voters.
Clean voter rolls are essential, but Youngkin’s late, politically driven ‘purge’ deserves challenge
Rabassa said in a sworn affidavit in support of litigation filed in U.S. District Court against Youngkin’s Executive Order 35 that she discovered her registration was “canceled” after she showed up for early in-person voting. She said a Henrico election supervisor “took her into a separate room” and told her she was removed for failing to check a box indicating her citizenship when she renewed her driver’s license in August and that she would have to re-register. She was turned away from the polls that day without being offered a provisional ballot and required to return another day to vote, the affidavit states.
Shaw also had no idea that a DMV clerical error compromised her right to vote.
“I actually wasn’t notified by Virginia. I was notified by NPR,” the unemployed computer programmer told the Mercury on Wednesday.
Had the public broadcaster not sought an interview with her for its Oct. 30 story on Youngkin’s order, Shaw said, she would have found out as Rabassa had — by being turned away at the polls. She said she called the Chesterfield registrar’s office and was told her removal was “a mistake,” though there was no explanation for it. She said she was assured that she was being reinstated and found when she checked her registration status online Wednesday that she had.
From this columnist, however, Shaw learned to her dismay that the Supreme Court’s Republican majority prevailed 6-3 in granting Virginia’s request for a stay, halting enforcement of lower court orders to reinstate voters in situations like hers and Rabassa’s.
“That’s ridiculous,” she said, adding, “… and it was the same six votes that struck down Roe v. Wade, wasn’t it?” That decision in June 2022 ended 49 years of federal protection for abortion rights.
Yes, Rina. It was.
So, five days and a wakeup until the nation decides whether Trump or Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris will lead the free world for the next four years, Youngkin and Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares are joining other Republican-led states in imposing restrictions that make voting harder, especially for those with the fewest resources.
Alabama’s Republican secretary of state attempted a voter-removal program similar to Youngkin’s that was also struck down by a federal judge. It was unclear Wednesday whether the Supreme Court will rule similarly in Alabama’s case as it did in Virginia’s.
In the 2020 and 2024 battleground state of Georgia, a state judge struck down a rule approved Sept. 20 by the pro-Trump conservative majority of that state’s electoral board that would have required the hand count of millions of paper ballots. It’s a state Trump narrowly lost in 2020 despite his desperate, corrupt attempt to sandbag Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, “to find 11,780 votes,” the margin by which he trailed Democrat Joe Biden.
There’s a bromide in politics about what motivates the two parties to vote, and there’s a lot of truth to it: “Democrats have to fall in love; Republicans just fall in line.”
Youngkin recognizes that opposing Trump is lethal in today’s Trump-owned GOP where apostates are targeted for primaries and defeated. Just ask outgoing Rep. Bob Good or former Rep. Denver Riggleman, both Virginia Republicans who fell out of favor with Trump during their time in office.
In 2021, Youngkin was hailed nationally as the GOP’s post-Trump path forward when he won the governorship on his first bid for elective office with a genial, pragmatic, avuncular style that played well in Virginia and ended a 12-year GOP drought in statewide elections. Now, mindful of his party’s current landscape and his own lofty national ambitions, he has Super Glued his lips to Trump’s ample derriere.
He fell in line.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Alien Country (2024) – Movie Review
-
Technology7 days ago
OpenAI plans to release its next big AI model by December
-
Health7 days ago
New cervical cancer treatment approach could reduce risk of death by 40%, trial results show
-
Culture1 week ago
Top 45 MLB free agents for 2024-25 with contract predictions, team fits: Will Soto get $600M+?
-
Sports6 days ago
Freddie Freeman's walk-off grand slam gives Dodgers Game 1 World Series win vs. Yankees
-
News5 days ago
Sikh separatist, targeted once for assassination, says India still trying to kill him
-
Culture5 days ago
Freddie Freeman wallops his way into World Series history with walk-off slam that’ll float forever
-
Technology4 days ago
When a Facebook friend request turns into a hacker’s trap