Connect with us

Texas

Water supply top of mind for Texas lawmakers this spring

Published

on

Water supply top of mind for Texas lawmakers this spring


The consensus in Austin is clear: the state is running out of water to keep up with a growing population. Recognizing the problem is one thing, solving it is another.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) pegged it as one of his seven emergency items in his State of the State address earlier in the month.

“We’re going to put Texas on a path to have plenty of water for the next five decades. We will make the largest investment in water in the history of the State of Texas,” said Abbott.

State leaders said the water supply is one of their top priorities this spring in the legislative session. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) signaled Senate Bill 7 will be one of that chamber’s solutions. Every session, he puts out his top 20 priorities.

Advertisement

This will all build on what the state government has already done. In 2023, voters approved the creation of the Texas Water Fund and diverted a billion dollars to upgrade water pipes and start new projects. That is a drop in the bucket to what’s needed. The business group Texas 2036 predicts the state will need more than $100 billion in the coming decades to keep up with demand.

The water supply has been a basic component in building the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, where there is a scramble to find more water to keep up with the growing suburbs.

When the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dammed up Lake Lavon in 1953, they planned for it to be the water supply feeding the growing suburbs around Dallas. Plano, Allen, Richardson, Garland, and a collection of other cities formed the North Texas Municipal Water District, taking water from its Wylie Water Treatment Plant and pumping it to homes and businesses in member communities.

Executive Director of the North Texas Municipal Water District, Jenna Covington, told NBC 5 their story is about growth and trying to keep up.

“The largest challenge that we work through on a daily basis is keeping up with the growth here in the North Texas area,” she said.

Advertisement

The water in Lake Lavon is no longer enough. Since its founding, the district has tapped into reservoirs in the east, including Lake Tawakoni and Jim Chapman Lake, and to the north, in Lake Texoma and the newest reservoir, Bois d’Arc Lake. The district is currently expanding that pipe route through an expansion of the Leonard Water Treatment Plant northeast of DFW.

Those projects are all aimed at pumping out 400 million gallons per day to keep up with an estimated 70,000-80,000 new people arriving in their district in every recent year.

“Water development is something that takes decades to accomplish. A lot of the investment that is being made on the front end of these projects is being paid by the existing ratepayers for the people who are yet to come,” said Covington.

According to the district, all that may still not be enough. Their planning documents show demand may far outpace supply if people do not conserve water during dry years. Covington said not watering lawns so much is the low-hanging fruit. The entire state is in a similar situation.

Lone Star Politics speaks with Jenna Covington, executive director of the North Texas Municipal Water District about the demand for new supplies of water. State Senator Kelly Hancock tells NBC 5 what state lawmakers are working on this year in Austin now that East Texas plans are in limbo. 

Advertisement

The Texas Water Development Board predicts Texas will have to invest much more to keep up with what’s needed. Its leaders spoke to the Texas Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs earlier this month and told them the grant money they have set aside has a lengthy waiting list.

Senator Charles Perry, R – Lubbock, and committee chair will spearhead Senate Bill 7. A prominent idea is getting a dedicated funding stream from state sales taxes for water projects.

“It’s in conversation with members to get the full bye in. We feel pretty good about that,” said Perry in the committee.

Those changes will eventually need to be approved by voters amending the state constitution.

Until then, Covington told NBC 5 they plan to put $1.1 billion into new projects and maintain current pipes in North Texas. She said they will need five times more than that in the next 10 years.

Advertisement

According to planning documents, some possible long-term plans include buying more water from Lake Texoma, buying more water from a new reservoir in Toledo Bend along the Louisiana border, or converting more from Lake Wright Patman from flood control to water supply.

“There’s a tremendous need for water infrastructure, not only in our local organization here in the North Texas area but for utilities across the state,” said Covington.

As of February, one major solution looks less likely. Earlier, the Texas Water Development Board moved the creation of the Marvin Nichols reservoir in East Texas up from 2070 to 2050. The $4 billion creation of a 66,000-acre reservoir lake seems to be in jeopardy after intense pushback from East Texans trying to protect their land.

In January, the TWDB reported that it was still feasible to build the project, but bills have been filed in the legislature to kill the idea.

A backup plan is also getting pushback from East Texas. Five of the seven communities around Lake O’ The Pines must approve a deal to sell water to the North Texas Municipal Water District. Last week, hundreds also voiced opposition to that plan, organized by Longview Republican Jay Dean.

Advertisement

“If they got the type of water volume that they’d like to get, this lake would drop seven to eight feet, which would be catastrophic to a lot of homeowners,” said Dean. “Not only that, but it’d be catastrophic to the bayous and Caddo Lake downstream.”

A petition to stop the sale of water already has more than a thousand signatures.

In an interview with NBC 5, Vice Chair of the Senate Committee on Water, Agriculture, and Rural Affairs, Sen. Kelly Hancock, R – North Richland Hills, said the state needs a “Texas-sized solution.”

“We have revenues,” said Hancock, pointing to the multi-billion dollar state surplus.

“I think we have to be sending consistent money but we need a large influx this time. We need a Texas-sized plan,” he said. “The less we move into that fund, the longer it’s going to take, the more expensive it’s going to be.”

Advertisement

Hancock said new state money could go to maintenance, new agreements with neighboring states, and more reservoirs.

“We aren’t just looking to get reelected. We’re looking out for Texas and for Texans yet to be born,” said Hancock.



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

Texas Rangers Announce 2027 Regular Season Schedule

Published

on

Texas Rangers Announce 2027 Regular Season Schedule


Arlington, Texas — The Texas Rangers will open the 2027 regular season with road series in Houston and Seattle before
hosting the Athletics in the club’s home opener on Thursday, April 1. The complete 2027 schedule was announced today
by Major League Baseball.
The Rangers’ season opener on March 25



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

NTSB Confirms Texas Tesla Had 100% Floored Accelerator Pedal During Fatal Crash

Published

on

NTSB Confirms Texas Tesla Had 100% Floored Accelerator Pedal During Fatal Crash


In an incident that was horrific beyond words, late last month, a stunned family watched in horror as a car plowed into the Katy, Texas home of a 76-year-old mother and grandmother, killing her. The driver has been charged with manslaughter.

In the aftermath of the crash, it emerged that the car in question was a Tesla, and that the driver was making use of full self-driving mode (FSD) around the time the crash occurred. The victim’s family has named Tesla and the driver as defendants in a lawsuit. But per Electrek, Tesla was able to view crash data very quickly after the incident, and the head of AI at the company, Ashok Elluswamy, said the driver “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area.”

In the days after the crash, Tesla fans took issue with coverage that characterized the car as in FSD when the crash occurred. CEO Elon Musk seemed to agree, replying to a post, “Yes, this makes no sense. FSD drives slowly through neighborhood streets and this was a high speed crash!”

But Musk seems to be assuming bad faith, as if coverage implied FSD had suddenly shifted into, perhaps, some kind of previously unannounced homicidal maniac mode and attacked a house. If anyone was saying this is what happened, they should apologize. It’s clearly not what happened.

Advertisement

And on Wednesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) largely confirmed Tesla’s version of events. Their report reads, in part:

“Electronic data recovered from the vehicle indicated that before the crash, the driver manually overrode FSD (Supervised) by pressing the accelerator pedal to 100%, and the vehicle’s speed was greater than 70 mph when the crash occurred.”

But cooler heads had noted weeks earlier that, like with good old fashioned cruise control, accelerating doesn’t boot you from FSD. The car takes the input, and stays in FSD. The question isn’t one of mechanics and technology, but one of philosophy: if FSD is meant to be “driving” when someone jams on the accelerator in a residential area, FSD may not be the “driver” in one important sense, but the car was still in FSD mode.

Because as much as Tesla would probably like FSD to be a total non-factor in the incident, that may not be the case either.

ABC News noted that, according to court documents, the driver claimed he “passed out” with the car in FSD on the highway, and that’s the last thing he remembers before the crash. He says he wasn’t sick, and medical records show no seizures, cardiac episodes, drugs, or alcohol.

A local Fox affiliate says records show the car was making deliveries for DoorDash while in FSD in the “hours and minutes leading up to the crash.” While in a neighborhood, it apparently signaled it was going to turn left onto one street, but instead the pedal went to the metal. This took the Tesla onto the victim’s cul-de-sac instead, and put it on its fateful collision course with her house.

Advertisement

To make matters weirder, other court records now show, per Electrek, that the driver had Googled the terms, “Tesla fsd not aggressive enough 2026,” “FSD is not aggressive enough for city driving,” and “Tesla fsd too timid.” That’s the kind of thing you Google when you’re looking for a Reddit post from someone sharing your consumer gripe.

In any case, the odds aren’t good that the driver wanted this to happen, nor that Tesla programmed its cars with evil intent. But FSD was being used around the time of this unusual fatal incident, and the public deserves to know more. Fortunately, a lot more will come out as the lawsuit progresses.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Texas AG secures 23andMe bankruptcy settlement after 2023 data breach

Published

on

Texas AG secures 23andMe bankruptcy settlement after 2023 data breach


AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Wednesday he has secured a settlement of bankruptcy claims against genetic testing company 23andMe stemming from a 2023 data breach that exposed personal information, including some genetic ancestry data, of 6.9 million customers worldwide.

Paxton’s office said the settlement includes $150 million for a multistate coalition of 42 states. But because of limited funds in 23andMe’s bankruptcy estate and competing claims, the states’ recovery will be $18 million paid immediately, with Texas receiving $1,266,860.

23andMe disclosed in October 2023 that attackers had accessed accounts affecting 6.9 million consumers. Some of the information was later posted for sale on the dark web, according to Paxton’s office, which said the company learned of the breach months after the data became publicly available. The office said 23andMe initially denied a breach and later blamed consumers’ account settings and password practices.

Paxton joined a multistate investigation that concluded 23andMe used unreasonable security practices and failed to implement adequate safeguards against hacking, the office said.

23andMe filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2025. Paxton’s office said the settlement incorporates privacy and cybersecurity requirements, including enhanced security standards, comprehensive risk assessments and creation of an independent advisory board, along with enforcement of state privacy laws and continued consumer data deletion rights.

“Companies that collect and profit from Texans’ most personal information have a legal duty to protect it,” Paxton said in a statement.

Advertisement

The company also agreed to a $46.75 million class-action settlement in the bankruptcy case for affected U.S. consumers who submitted claims by Feb. 17, 2026, Paxton’s office said.

Copyright 2026 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending