Final Wednesday, on the second anniversary of George Floyd’s dying, President Biden unveiled a long-awaited govt order aimed toward overhauling policing in america.

As my colleagues famous on the time, the ultimate textual content of the order mirrored “the balancing act the president is making an attempt to navigate on policing” — between progressive activists demanding higher constraints on using drive, police teams searching for to restrict the scope of change and Republicans who see rising crime as a successful political situation. It was the product of delicate coalition politics — greater than 120 conferences throughout greater than 100 hours, in response to the White Home.

However all of that balancing work, which earned reward from teams as disparate because the N.A.A.C.P., the A.C.L.U. and the Fraternal Order of Police, masked an everlasting divide amongst Democrats that the bloodbath of 19 youngsters and two lecturers in Uvalde, Texas, has ripped again open: Ought to America make investments extra in its police or redirect funding and a spotlight elsewhere?

The place consensus on the left breaks down

On the subject of how you can shield youngsters in faculties, the nationwide debate bears many hallmarks of the nation’s disagreements over policing, and falls into most of the similar ruts.

After the Texas capturing, there have been fast calls by Democrats to ban military-style rifles and high-capacity magazines, tempered by pessimism that few, if any, Republicans would help something past enhanced background checks and red-flag legal guidelines. Most Democrats agree on that a lot.

Democrats additionally universally ridiculed arguments by Republicans, led in current days by Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, that the reply to mass shootings in faculties is “armed good guys stopping armed unhealthy guys” — not outlawing AR-15s.

“Why these sorts of weapons can be found to residents is past me,” stated Michael Nutter, a former mayor of Philadelphia. “And no one has ever been capable of give a reputable cause or rationale for that.”

However then the consensus amongst Democrats begins to interrupt down.

Talking for a lot of on the left, Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, famous in a tweet that the varsity district in Uvalde had “its personal police drive” however didn’t halt the slaughter. “After a long time of mass shootings, there’s nonetheless 0 proof that police have the flexibility to cease them from occurring,” she wrote. “Gun security and different insurance policies can.”

That’s not what the White Home has been saying. Centrist Democrats, led by Biden, have pushed since taking energy to provide police departments extra sources — and have loudly distanced themselves from calls after George Floyd’s homicide to defund police departments.

The president’s pandemic aid bundle, the American Rescue Plan, directed $10 billion in federal spending towards public security. Throughout his State of the Union deal with in March, the president pounded the lectern as he declared, “We must always all agree the reply is to not defund the police. It’s to fund the police. Fund them. Fund them.”

The federal authorities has additionally poured hundreds of thousands into hardening faculties’ defenses. In April, the Justice Division introduced $53 million in new funding for improved safety at faculties throughout the nation, on prime of almost $64.7 million for proposals to stop and reply to violent episodes.

‘We’re going to see extra cops in faculties’

In case there have been any doubt, the president’s remarks on the signing ceremony for the chief order made clear which aspect he’s on. He criticized “those that search to drive a wedge between regulation enforcement and the folks they serve.” And he praised “courageous native officers and Border Patrol brokers,” who he stated had “intervened to avoid wasting as many youngsters as they might” in Texas.

Days later, as particulars emerged in regards to the native police’s mishandling of the bloodbath in Uvalde, the Justice Division introduced a overview of regulation enforcement companies’ actions.

In a single indicator of the fervour round policing on the left, David Axelrod, a former political adviser to Barack Obama, confronted an onslaught of criticism after he tweeted that Uvalde had proven that the police had been “indispensable.”

“My level was to not reward the indefensible selections police made in Uvalde that day,” Axelrod defined in an e mail. “It was that their inaction for 90 minutes spoke to the indispensability of correct, immediate policing in tragic conditions comparable to this. These youngsters wanted the police that day. They didn’t act till far too late.”

“There’s little or no doubt that we’re going to see extra cops in faculties on account of this,” stated Adam Gelb, the chief govt of the Council on Felony Justice, a nonpartisan coverage and analysis group in Atlanta. “And likewise louder and extra vociferous arguments that extra cops isn’t the answer.”

Hollowed-out faculties

A kind of current when Biden signed the chief order was Udi Ofer, deputy nationwide political director of the A.C.L.U. and a frontrunner of the group’s work on felony justice. The A.C.L.U. has been one of the vital vocal proponents of overhauling policing.

In an interview, Ofer praised the chief order as a “first step” that included a few of the A.C.L.U.’s priorities, comparable to its name for cupboard officers to tug collectively steering and sources selling other ways of responding to “individuals in disaster” — for instance, sending a psychological well being skilled to answer somebody experiencing a psychological well being disaster, as an alternative of a police officer.

Teams on the left argue that growing sources for counseling and psychological well being is essential to figuring out and stopping potential mass shooters, together with in faculties.

A 2019 report by the A.C.L.U. argued that america had over-invested in cops in faculties whereas underinvesting in psychological well being sources. It discovered, for example, that 14 million college students attended faculties with cops however with out counselors, nurses, psychologists or social staff.

Ofer pointed to analysis, within the type of a working paper revealed in March, indicating that investments in early childhood schooling repay by decreasing the chance that college students might be arrested as adults.

“When a tragedy like this occurs, the reflexive response is to place extra policing in faculties,” Ofer stated. “However police truly don’t do a great job of stopping mass shootings.”

‘The difficulty is best police’

To Marc Morial, the chief govt of the Nationwide City League, the ideological debate over policing in America is a supply of countless frustration.

“The difficulty shouldn’t be extra policing or much less policing,” Morial stated in an interview. “The difficulty is best police and higher policing.”

As mayor of New Orleans for eight years, Morial revamped the town’s Police Division and tripled funding in group packages. Now, he worries that the return of “tough-on-crime” messaging might herald a regression to the failed policing methods of the previous.

“I really feel very, very strongly that we might make a mistaken flip and return to yesterday,” Morial stated. “There’s lots of empty, hole political rhetoric on this house.”

What to learn

— Blake

Is there something you suppose we’re lacking? Something you need to see extra of? We’d love to listen to from you. E-mail us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.