Connect with us

Texas

Texas blocked from forcing 1.5 million people to change health plans

Published

on

Texas blocked from forcing 1.5 million people to change health plans


A Texas judge has blocked the state from dropping 1.5 million residents from their health insurance plans.

District Judge Laurie Eiserloh blocked Texas Health and Human Services from approving contracts that would drop millions from the Cook Children’s Health Plan, Driscoll Health Plan and Texas Children Health plans.

These plans were available from south Texas to the Houston area and offered Medicaid STAR and CHIP coverage to predominantly children.

The state’s new $116 billion Medicaid contract proposal was scheduled to remove the three hospital plans, impacting low-income families and forcing them to choose plans under a different provider.

Advertisement
A hospital bed is seen placed outside the entrance of Fort Duncan Regional Medical Center on June 29, 2023 in Eagle Pass, Texas. Millions of Texans were slated to lose health care coverage before a…


Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Eiserloh’s temporary block order comes amid increasing concerns that the new Medicaid options could hurt overall healthcare in the state, especially for the financially needy, who often rely on STAR and CHIP coverage.

“The intended contract awards will impose significant harm and confusion on millions of Texas’ STAR & CHIP members,” Eiserloh wrote in a 10-page order.

In response to the ruling, Cook Children’s Health Care System said this will “help to ensure that our members continue to have access to the care they need, when they need it.”

Cook Children’s Health plan primarily serves Tarrant County families under Medicaid and CHIP.

While CHIP was created for children in families that earn too much to receive Medicaid but too little for private insurance, STAR is available to pregnant women, low-income children and adults.

Advertisement

“We would like to express our gratitude to the court for their careful consideration of this matter and for their decision in our favor,” a Cook Children’s spokesperson said in a statement. “Cook Children’s will continue to monitor the situation closely and work with all stakeholders to ensure that our Members continue to receive the best possible care.”

Newsweek has emailed the Texas Health and Human Services Wednesday afternoon for comment.

Cook Children’s Hospital originally filed a petition against the head of the Health and Human Services Commission to stop the new Medicaid contracts four months ago. The new coverage options were set to go into effect in September 2025.

“Our families are worth fighting for, and we’re going to continue to fight until the state does the right thing,” Karen Love, president of Cook Children’s Health Plan, said during a press conference in June. “The stakes are too high, and the consequences are too great to have this flawed decision set in stone. We are determined to ensure that it does not.”

Cook Children’s also accused the state agency of giving Aetna an “unfair advantage” by disclosing copies of competitors’ proposals prematurely.

Advertisement

The trial to decide the overall fate of Medicaid contracts in Texas is scheduled for Nov. 3, 2025, but the state could appeal the ruling or change their proposal before then.

Texas contracts with various managed care organizations, from health insurers to hospital system health plans, to administer its Medicaid and CHIP coverage.

The state has been looking to drop several of the organizations in September 2025, but the new ruling said Texas failed to follow the state code.

Under the new contracts, 43 percent of Texas STAR and CHIP members would have to switch to new health plans.

“So, for the time being, the new contracts are blocked, meaning there are no scheduled changes to the health plan options that STAR and CHIP members can choose,” Louise Norris, a health policy analyst for healthinsurance.org, told Newsweek.

Advertisement

Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, called the decision a “huge win” for families that have health plans under the three providers.

“Over the past few months, there’s been a building fear that the dropping of these programs from the state would create an absolute mess when it came to not just finding families other plans, but also ensuring the same level of care currently being distributed to these patients would continue,” Beene told Newsweek in an email response Wednesday.

“There’s no guarantee this won’t be challenged legally again, as it very well could be. However, this decision does provide a ray of light to those currently being assisted through one of these providers that the service they’re receiving could continue after September of next year.”

For many, the judge’s block order ensures low to moderate income families have access to care that would otherwise be unaffordable, said Kevin Thompson, a finance expert and the founder and CEO of 9i Capital Group.

“This is a win for many families who would otherwise have to rely on stock-based plans like Aetna or Molina, whose primary responsibility is to shareholders, not patient care,” Thompson told Newsweek via email Wednesday.

Advertisement

Thompson, who lives in Fort Worth, said the Texas CHIP program and Cook Children’s were a “lifeline” for his family when his son was born at just one pound 13 ounces 13 years ago.

“These programs are built for families that cannot afford private health insurance or need Medicaid support,” Thompson said.



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

Some Venezuelans in North Texas celebrate Maduro’s capture, hopeful for the future: “We know this is just a first step.”

Published

on

Some Venezuelans in North Texas celebrate Maduro’s capture, hopeful for the future: “We know this is just a first step.”



The celebration continues among the Venezuelan community in the Dallas-Fort Worth area following Nicolás Maduro’s capture. Sunday afternoon, several dozen people gathered at Vitruvian Park in Addison.

Advertisement

“It’s something amazing. You feel relieved because we’ve been in this situation for 27 years,” said Jani Mendez. “We’re glad this country. They opened their arms to us, but we’re here because it was a necessity; because we- they- were afraid to be in Venezuela.”

Among the crowd was a Venezuelan politician, Angel Caridad.

“I’ve been in the United States for five years now,” said Caridad. “We had to flee because our lives were in danger. My house was shot up.”

According to data from the U.S. Census, Texas has the second-largest population of Venezuelans in the U.S., behind Florida. An estimated 122,000 Venezuelans live in the state, with approximately 20,000 in the DFW area.

“At this moment at this point, all my family is here. I brought all my family because I was scared something happened to them,” said Mendez.

Advertisement

Many celebrating also say this is something they are doing for those in Venezuela who cannot.

“Imagine not being able to express how you feel, or not being able to say what you think, simply because you’ll be accused of being a terrorist,” said Maria Huerta.

Those attending were also asked their thoughts on the U.S. running Venezuela during the transition.

“It’s very good, it’s very important, and it’s very necessary,” said Caridad.

“We know this is just a first step, and many things still need to happen and will happen over the next few days, but knowing that the person at the top has been taken down is a relief,” said Huerta.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Rumors Surrounding Parker Livingstone’s Transfer Decision Gets Cleared Up

Published

on

Rumors Surrounding Parker Livingstone’s Transfer Decision Gets Cleared Up


Former Texas Longhorns wide receiver Parker Livingstone remains in the transfer portal, and it seems as though fans don’t know how to feel about it.

Different rumors and hypotheticals have surfaced to explain his departure, leaving people unsure of what to believe.

However, Bobby Burton of On Texas Football has set the record straight regarding the Livingstone situation.

Advertisement

Livingstone reportedly not forced out of Texas

Nov 22, 2025; Austin, Texas, USA; Texas Longhorns wide receiver Parker Livingstone (13) runs for a touchdown after making a catch during the first half against the Arkansas Razorbacks at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Scott Wachter-Imagn Images | Scott Wachter-Imagn Images
Advertisement

In Livingstone’s goodbye message to Longhorn fans, he said that his decision to transfer was “out of my control.” While this statement could have some truth to it, and fans looking inward will probably never get a full explanation, it doesn’t appear as though the redshirt freshman was forced out the door with no alternative. 

Advertisement

According to Burton, he was actually offered a mid-six figure NIL/ revenue sharing deal with the Longhorns. He turned the deal down, choosing to become one of over 15 Longhorns to enter his name into the transfer portal instead. 

Burton revealed these details about Livingstone’s offer in response to an article published by The Athletic, which used Livingstone as an example of players who had to enter into the portal involuntarily.

The business behind college football in the modern era is complicated. That much is undeniable. 

That being said, describing his departure as involuntary when a significant amount of money existed for him at Texas seems somewhat contradictory.

Advertisement

Livingstone could’ve been told that his playing time would be at risk, or he could’ve come to a realization that he could probably get a better deal with a different program. There also could’ve been factors playing into his decision that no one has even thought of. 

Advertisement

It’s hard to determine exactly what goes on behind closed doors, especially as college players become more involved in the business side of the game.

Livingstone likely couldn’t have anticipated the way in which his particular case would be used as one to critique the transfer portal at large, but that seems to be a byproduct of being a well-known and well-respected player within a program. 

Right now, his main priority is probably finding a future home that suits him and what he hopes to achieve throughout the rest of his college career. The Indiana Hoosiers and Oklahoma Sooners have both emerged as schools he will take a closer look at, and more will be revealed soon about where Livingstone will set up shop for this next chapter of his football career. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Sam Leavitt leaves Kentucky without committing and is now visiting Texas Tech

Published

on

Sam Leavitt leaves Kentucky without committing and is now visiting Texas Tech


Portal season is going to keep coaching staffs and program front offices up at night.

Apparently, it’s going to keep fans up at night as well. Kentucky fans are going to face that reality these next few days, maybe even a week or more, regarding quarterback Sam Leavitt, who visited Kentucky this weekend.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, Leavitt left Lexington without signing with the Wildcats. He’s now set to visit Texas Tech on Sunday, per On3’s Pete Nakos

Advertisement

Leavitt is one of the top players to enter the transfer portal after the window opened on Friday. He currently ranks as the No. 2 overall player and top quarterback to hit the open market, according to the On3 Industry Transfer Portal Rankings.

Leavitt is expected to be one of the most sought-after transfer quarterbacks this cycle after spending the last two seasons at Arizona State. He helped lead the Sun Devils to the College Football Playoff in 2024 before injuries impacted his production in 2025.

Wildcats fans are excited about the tantalizing prospect Leavitt is, but now the waiting game begins.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending