Connect with us

Texas

Texas A&M Football's All-Time Results vs. Notre Dame

Published

on

Texas A&M Football's All-Time Results vs. Notre Dame


With the 2024 college football season less than four months away, a slew of kick-off times have been released to the public. The most notable is Texas A&M’s season-opening matchup vs. Notre Dame on Saturday, Aug. 31, which will air on ABC, the new home for SEC Football.

For the next three months, we at Aggies Wire will provide as much content as possible regarding the matchup, which will be the first between both programs since the 2001 season, and returning to Kyle Field to open up the inaugural campaign for Aggies head coach Mike Elko.

For older Aggies and Notre Dame alums, the first meeting between the two schools dates back to New Year’s Day in 1988 in the Cotton Bowl. The Cotton Bowl was a popular bowl game for Texas A&M during the Jackie Sherrill and R.C. Slocum coaching eras, with seven appearances dating back to the mid-1980s. After their first meeting, back-to-back matchups occurred in 2000 and 2001 before the recent drought.

This big-time matchup could dictate both team’s postseason hopes, so what a way to open up the 2024 season for these two squads. Looking back at the matchup history, we analyzed the All-Time results of the five All-Time meetings.

Advertisement

1988 Cotton Bowl Classic — Texas A&M 35, Notre Dame 10

Texas A&M’s 1987 season was a massive success. The team finished the regular season with a 9-2 record, including an impressive 6-1 record in the Southwest conference. For Notre Dame, legendary Lou Holtz finished his second season at 8-4, as Hall of Fame WR Tim Brown would finish his collegiate career with a 35-10 blowout loss to the Aggies.

1993 Cotton Bowl Classic Notre Dame 28, Texas A&M 3

(Photo by Stephen Dunn/Getty Images)

Coming off a perfect 12-0 finish, Texas A&M’s staunch “wrecking crew” defense apparently took a break in the 1993 Cotton Bowl, allowing Notre Dame to run all over the place, including 34 consecutive rushing attempts in the second half.

1994 Cotton Bowl Classic — Notre Dame 24, Texas A&M 21

USA TODAY Sports

Advertisement

A controversial year for Notre Dame, Florida State was rewarded the 1993 National Championship after receiving more votes in the final poll, even though the Irish had defeated the Seminoles earlier in the season. A 10-1 regular finish for the Aggies meant another trip to the Cotton Bowl to take on Notre Dame for the second consecutive season, only to fall in a close 24-21 contest.

2000 Season Opener — Notre Dame 24, Texas A&M 10

Tom Hauck /Allsport

Another beatdown for the Maroon & White against the Fighting Irish, Texas A&M traveled to South Bend to face an option-based offense behind quarterback turned wide receiver Arnaz Battle. The Aggies failed to find their mojo until the second week of the season. Oh, and this remains the only visit to South Bend in program history.

Advertisement

2001 Season Opener — Texas A&M 24, Notre Dame 3

Ronald Martinez/Allsport

Finally, a win against Notre Dame, this time inside Kyle Field during the third week of the 2001 season, even though this was by far one of the worst Irish offenses in program history. Hey, a win is a win!

All-Time Results

Ronald Martinez/Allsport

As it stands, Notre Dame holds a slight 3-2 lead in the series as the 2024 season-opening battle will be the first matchup since 2001, as new Aggies head coach Mike Elko, who served as Notre Dame’s defensive coordinator in 2017, will also face his former Duke Quarterback, Riley Leonard, who transferred to Notre Dame this offseason. In 2025, Texas A&M will travel to South Bend for a Sept 13 matchup for just the second time in program history.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Texas

Volunteers rally to rebuild flood-damaged Texas camp serving children with disabilities

Published

on

Volunteers rally to rebuild flood-damaged Texas camp serving children with disabilities


Since the tragic floods in Central Texas, hundreds of volunteers have made their way to Kerr County to help with the flood aftermath. But for many, the Hill Country flood aftermath is hard to process.

Advertisement

“It’s the kids’ shoes. Every time I see one, it pulls at your heartstrings,” said Jared Ronning, who came to Kerrville from Orange, Texas. “Yesterday, I found a baby purple Croc and, like, a baby life jacket next to it, and you don’t know until you look.”

Ronning is one of hundreds of volunteers who have inundated Kerr County to help with flood clean-up. Ronning found out the Children’s Association for Maximum Potential, also known as Camp CAMP, needed help rebuilding. The camp serves children with disabilities.

“It’s easy to sit and look at your phone and think, ‘man that’s sad.’ It’s a lot harder to put it down and come out here,” Ronning said. “I feel like if I was able to help, I might as well anyway I could. I know there are a lot of families going through a lot worse than I am.”

Approximately 6-8 acres of land at Camp CAMP were damaged. On Saturday, the Texas Division of Emergency Management began requiring volunteers to register to better coordinate efforts.  

“Compared to the losses at some other camps, and what communities have faced, we’re blessed because our campers weren’t here when the flooding event happened,” said Brandon Briery, the chief operating officer. “The flooding, the debris, has just completely changed the landscape of this.”

Advertisement

Briery said many families who attend the camp were worried it would close for the remainder of the summer because of the damage at the grounds and in the county.

“We have been inundated with calls from camper families saying, ‘When are you going to reopen? We want to make sure we get to come,’” Briery said.

He added that the camp has received criticism for trying to reopen too soon.

“For our campers and families who don’t have opportunities to go to camp anywhere else, because of the severity of their disabilities or their illnesses, for the families to be able to get a break from caregiving,” said Briery. “Because of the special nature of who we serve and the limited opportunities that they have to have this type of experience, when we look at all of the needs, there’s no way we could keep from opening.”

The camp hoped to reopen its doors Sunday, but because of another flash flood warning in the area, they pushed it back until Monday. While Briery said he understands the concerns of the community, it’s a moment of normalcy for their families, a moment to recover and rebuild together.

Advertisement

“There is also hope, that hope that tomorrow can be better because there are people who are willing to come together to make things like this happen,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Trump’s Bonkers Response to Texas Flood Tragedy

Published

on

Trump’s Bonkers Response to Texas Flood Tragedy


President Donald Trump suggested the tragic loss of life that occurred in Texas as a result of historic flooding could have been mitigated if the county had “bells… or something, go off.”

In an interview with his daughter-in-law Lara Trump on her Fox News show, My View with Lara Trump, the president spoke about the floods that have killed at least 129 people. On Friday, he visited Kerrville, Texas, where he met with officials and spoke to the media alongside wife Melania.

Lara asked her father-in-law, ”What is your message to the people who are suffering down there, to the parents of the young girls at the camp who were killed?”

US President Donald Trump, Texas Governor Greg Abbott, and First Lady Melania Trump meet with local officials and first responders near the Guadalupe River following the devastating floods over the July 4 weekend, in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

The president replied, ”There can be nothing worse than losing a child, and the way this happened… there was very early warning, they warned the day before, they warned even two days before, they warned four hours before…”

Advertisement

He added, ”Maybe they should have had bells… or something, go off. But it’s pretty dangerous territory when you think of all the times they’ve had this problem.”

Local officials have come under scrutiny in the aftermath of the floods, with many questioning why—unlike other flood-prone counties—Kerr County did not have an alert system in place.

Camp Mystic, which lost 27 campers and counselors in the floods, is located in a high-risk flood zone, and a hazard mitigation report sent to FEMA by Kerr County in October 2024 said that a flood that might. exceed historical records was likely within a year, The New York Times reported.

Camp Mystic grounds
Camp Mystic’s century-old campgrounds were severely damaged by the flood, which also claimed the life of its longtime director, Dick Eastland. Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP via Getty Images

County officials said in a statement to The Times, “Our city and county leadership are committed to a transparent and full review of past actions.”

On at least three occasions between 2017 and 2024, Kerr County officials applied for funding for an alarm-based flood warning system, but their requests were denied by the state, the report added.

Following the devastating floods, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said there “should have been sirens” in Kerr County, and that if local officials could not afford them, “the state will step up.”

Advertisement
President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump sit with Texas governor Greg Abbott (R) as they attend a roundtable meeting with local officials and first responders in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025.
President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump sit with Texas governor Greg Abbott (R) at a roundtable meeting with local officials and first responders in Kerrville, Texas, on July 11, 2025. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

While Gov. Greg Abbott said that the state legislature would investigate the floods, he hit back at attempts to assign blame earlier this week, arguing that ”every team makes mistakes” and that blame was ”the word choice of losers.”

Trump echoed these sentiments at his press conference in Kerrville on Friday, lashing out at a CBS News reporter who asked what the president would say to families who were upset about not receiving alerts in time.

“Well, I think everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances,” Trump responded, before adding, “only a bad person would ask a question like that, to be honest with you.”

“I don’t know who you are, but only a very evil person would ask a question like that.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

As Texas cleans up, ex-officials say Fema has ‘eroded capacity’ for multiple disasters

Published

on

As Texas cleans up, ex-officials say Fema has ‘eroded capacity’ for multiple disasters


As the cleanup continues from this month’s torrential rain storms and flooding in Texas that left more than 120 dead, recently departed officials from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) say the organization is dangerously underresourced and overstretched in the event of further natural catastrophes.

A mass staff exodus, plunging morale and a loss of key leaders has left the main US disaster-relief organization ill-equipped to cope with an anticipated deadly spate of storms in the current hurricane season, former agency insiders say.

Fema’s weakness, exacerbated by grant cuts imposed by the Trump administration and the loss of institutional knowledge in strategic leadership positions, will be exposed if the nation is faced with more than one disaster simultaneously, according to Michael Coen, the agency’s former chief of staff.

In an interview, Coen – who left his post in January after Donald Trump took office – said the officials at Fema had been preparing contingency plans that would enable the agency to meet the demands of hurricane season, which generally runs from early June until the end of November, with fewer resources.

Advertisement

“They understand that they don’t have the resources they’ve had in past years, whether it’s funding or even some contracts have lapsed,” he said. “They are trying to make decisions so that they can handle multiple events at one time.”

But since Trump’s inauguration, the agency has seen an estimated 2,000 departures through resignations or retirements, which may have rendered it incapable of coping with the widespread carnage likely to be wreaked by a succession of tropical storms.

“I’m concerned that Fema is going to be at a disadvantage because they don’t have the resources to respond to the disasters we know could happen, which could be two or three concurrent disasters at the same time,” said Coen.

“Fema has eroded capacity since President Trump became president. Staff have departed. There have been cuts to grant programs and they are going to be running into a financial challenge with the disaster relief fund, because the president hasn’t requested supplemental funding from Congress.”

Coen – a disaster relief career official who was also Fema’s chief of staff during Barack Obama’s presidency – said the cuts could mean the agency running out of funds to respond to disasters by the end of this month.

Advertisement

“Fema is currently supporting the state of Texas with the flooding and the urban search and rescue. But if in a week or two they also have to respond to a hurricane in the Gulf coast or an earthquake on the west coast, Fema is not going to be able to meet the expectations of the American people.”

The concerns over Fema’s state of readiness come amid signs that Trump may have had a change of heart about the agency’s future after months of signaling that he favored its abolition.

Last month, he said the administration planned to “phase out” Fema after the current hurricane season to put more responsibility on individual states to respond to disasters.

He previously described the agency – established in 1979 by Jimmy Carter with the goal of coordinating the US government’s response to disasters – as “not good” and said he would “recommend that Fema go away”.

But ahead of Trump’s Friday visit to the worst-hit Texas flood areas, White House officials indicated that eliminating Fema entirely was no longer under consideration, the Washington Post reported.

Advertisement

The newspaper quoted an unnamed official as saying changes would probably amount to “rebranding” the agency while stressing the leadership role of the states in disaster response.

Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary – who has overall responsibility for Fema and has chaired a review council looking into the agency’s future – said in the wake of the Texas floods that Fema would be “eliminated as it exists today and remade into a responsive agency”, a hardline stance that nonetheless stopped short of abolition.

Coen said the Texas floods had proved Fema’s worth: “This flood is a defining moment and brings clarity for the necessity of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Fema is an essential agency for the federal government to support states and support the American people in their greatest time of need.”

But he said grant cuts had rendered it less effective and may have caused “an unnecessary loss of life” in the Guadalupe River area of the Texas Hill Country, the worst-hit flood region.

“One of the grant programs they cut was the Building Resilient Infrastructure Communities, which was a program that would have funded things like the siren system to line a river like the [Guadalupe] in Kerr county,” he said.

Advertisement

“Not that many people needed to lose their lives if more mitigation measures had been put in place. With the president cutting a grant program that provides federal funding to increase mitigation in the country, it only is foreboding for the future on what could happen to other communities if they don’t mitigate and they don’t have access to federal funds.”

The picture of an agency undermined by the Trump administration’s hostility was corroborated by a former mid-level Fema official, who told the Guardian that staff had left because they felt disrespected.

skip past newsletter promotion

“It’s no secret that a lot of high-level leaders have left the agency,” the ex-official said. “It’s clear that Fema has lost a lot of leadership capability.”

Among those who have left are Tony Robinson, who was Fema’s head administrator for the region that includes Texas, as well as his deputy. Also recently departing was Robert Samaan, the administrator for the region that covers Florida and several other states in the hurricane-prone south-east.

“Those are two of the three most critical regional administrators for hurricane season, and for them to leave at this time leaves people shaken for sure,” the former staffer said.

“The lack of experienced leadership is certainly going to hamstring efforts. It’s not to say that there aren’t other good leaders who will step up. But LinkedIn is littered with people whose names I knew who have left.”

Advertisement

The departure of 16 senior executives was announced on a single day in May.

Compounding the problem is the damage to the morale of those remaining from what insiders say is the scornful attitude of Noem and Fema’s acting administrator, David Richardson, a former marine artillery officer with no previous experience in disaster management.

Richardson, who has been in the post since May, caused a stir among senior staff when he said during a briefing that he did not know there was a hurricane season. It was unclear if the comments were meant as a joke.

Richardson was installed after Noem ousted his predecessor, Cameron Hamilton, after he told a congressional hearing that he did not favor Fema’s abolition. The new administrator also threatened to “run right over” any staff members who resisted reforms.

“I, and I alone in Fema, speak for Fema. I’m here to carry out the president’s intent for Fema,” he reportedly said.

Advertisement

Coen affirmed the picture of staff leaving due to fears for Fema’s future. “The reason many employees have departed since January 20 is because they had a fear that they were going to lose their job,” he said. “Also, they didn’t feel respected by the current administration. The current employees still there are supporting each other, but if they feel they are not getting support and understanding of how much they sacrifice when they go to disasters, it does have an impact on their mental health and wellbeing.”

Noem, meanwhile, has drawn criticism for issuing a decree requiring that any expenditures or contracts worth $100,000 or more are submitted to her for prior approval – a requirement that critics say could impede rapid disaster response.

“Typically, pre-Trump, a decision like that would come at a much lower level than the secretary of homeland security so you could get out and mobilize,” the former official said.

“It’s just unconscionable that you would centralize a decision like that, [which] truly, on reflection, would have led to the loss of life, or at least the loss of the ability to find the remains of the victims.”

The Department of Homeland Security has publicly defended the directive as necessary to root out “waste, fraud and abuse” and deliver “accountability” to US taxpayers.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending