Connect with us

Texas

Texas A&M Basketball Suffers Overtime Heartbreaker to SMU

Published

on

Texas A&M Basketball Suffers Overtime Heartbreaker to SMU


Texas A&M took on SMU in the Hoop Hype XL on a neutral-site court Sunday night, where it was a Quad 1 opportunity to add to their resumes.

But Jaron Pierre Jr. kept the Mustangs alive with 35 points as the Aggies’ defense struggled, giving up 36 paint points and 26 free throws made in 93-80 overtime loss in Arlington.

With the loss, A&M moved to 7-3 and has to rest up for the second half of the non-conference schedule before meeting league opponents. 

Advertisement

Texas A&M’s Halftime Rally Not Enough

Texas A&M Aggies head coach Bucky McMillan gestures on the sidelines against the Pittsburgh Panthers during the second half at the Petersen Events Center. | Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images
Advertisement

The Aggies trailed 41-27 at halftime but the rally wasn’t enough in the overtime loss.

Advertisement

It was an excellent start for A&M, and then SMU gave a great answer to start the first period. A&M jumped out to a quick 8-2 lead courtesy of guard Marcus Hill, forward Rashaun Agee, and guard Jacari Lane, who forced SMU’s coach, Andy Enfield, to call its first timeout of the first period. 

After discussion with his team, Mustangs forward Corey Washington scored seven of the first 16 points, helping spark their own 7-0 run to put the game up and take the lead. Then the Aggies never saw the lead again for the rest of the first period, as the defense completely dominated, setting the pace for the entire game. 

For SMU, their big playmakers heated up in a hurry when the Aggies’ best players were constantly being substituted in and out, trying to break the cold spell. Pierre found his groove, igniting the time that no one on coach Bucky McMillan’s team could buy a shot where it didn’t make a field goal in the last 8:17 when it went to the locker room, and evaluated what was going wrong after the zone defense wasn’t appearing to be effective. 

One of the big fellas for the Mustangs who kindled the team’s success was Samet Yigitoglu, who jogged to the locker room at intermission, leading the team with 11 points. As for the Aggies, Hill was the leader for his team when no one could make a shot from three-point land. Going to the break, A&M shot for one of its worst first periods with a field goal percentage of 27.3.

Advertisement

After one of the most sloppy performances to start, the Maroon and White woke up after making 1 of its last 16 field goals. Indiana transfer forward Mackenzie Mgbako and Hill got their team to score five straight points before the Mustangs came riding back with an answer from Pierre, knocking down six of the following eight points. 

Advertisement

Trimming at the deficit worked perfectly for the Ags after forward Federiko Federiko had a massive slam to wake up the crowd in attendance, which caused an eruption before Rylan Griffen and Pop Isaacs got the score within six. The 15-point lead faded to three after an Agee free throw and a Federiko dunk. Buckets got exchanged between both rosters before SMU extended the lead back to nine after A&M didn’t make a field goal in over three minutes. 

After a 69-60 lead for the Mustangs, the Aggies got within five before a Pierre layup when two back-to-back threes by Griffen and Mgbako got the game within one. A 5-0 run got it to 77-73, but SMU forced a turnover with 36 seconds left before tying it to go to overtime. 

Pierre carried his teammates to the finish line after doing it himself, where he scored seven straight points as the A&M defense wore down. Making free throws at the charity stripe was what made SMU the better team. Even with Hill’s 25-point day, A&M loses out on another resume-building chance.



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

USDA reports screwworm spread in Texas

Published

on

USDA reports screwworm spread in Texas


The USDA now confirms 20 cases of the New World screwworm in Texas, with the most recent reported outside Medina County, and four more cases reported Tuesday in Terrell County. Officials are releasing millions of sterile flies to slow the parasite’s spread.



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Why Texas? Explaining ins and outs of NHL exploring team for Houston or Austin

Published

on

Why Texas? Explaining ins and outs of NHL exploring team for Houston or Austin


The NHL took the first step toward expansion in Texas earlier this week, agreeing to terms with billionaire Dan Friedkin and his family to explore the feasibility of putting a franchise in Houston or Austin.

Far enough from the Dallas Stars, who relocated from Minnesota in 1993, a new team would not interfere with their territorial rights. And the league has shown no fear of adding one team at a time, so No. 33 does not have to come with No. 34.

“Symmetry I don’t think should necessarily govern expansion,” Commissioner Gary Bettman said Tuesday. “You expand if you think it makes sense and enhances what the league has.”

What is behind the NHL’s interest in Texas

Money is the obvious answer. Bettman said the total investment of the project would be some $3.5 billion, which would include expansion fees paid to established owners along with the cost of building a new arena.

Advertisement

The Houston Rockets’ arena downtown is publicly owned but controlled by team owner Tilman Fertitta’s Clutch City Sports and Entertainment group. The home of the American Hockey League’s Texas Stars, in the Austin suburb of Cedar Park, has a capacity of 8,000 that is a little over half the size of the NHL’s smallest current rink (Winnipeg).

“I would be surprised if the NHL would be OK with an expansion team that does not have a new arena,” said Brian Mills, an associate professor at the University of Texas who teaches courses on sports economics and strategy. “The revenue potential with the luxury boxes and the way that they set those up and the money that they like to extract from the local cities is way too large to pass up.”

They are also huge markets. Houston at nearly 2.4 million is the fourth-most-populated U.S. city; Austin at just over 1 million is in the top 12.

“Obviously it makes sense if you’re a sports league to have a franchise in the nation’s fifth-largest metro area and one that is growing rapidly,” said Holy Cross professor Victor Matheson, an expert in sports economics. “Houston obviously makes sense in general as a destination for any league.”

Austin is smaller but has doubled its population since the mid-1990s and has seen an infusion of people over the past five years. Only eight of the NHL’s existing markets are bigger.

Advertisement

“It’s becoming more and more of a tech city, so I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more hockey fans here than there used to be,” Mills said. “I would imagine there’s some market for the NHL here in Austin, particularly more than when it was a sleepy, small town capital of Texas 30 years ago.”

History of hockey in Houston and Austin

When hockey was picking up in popularity in the 1960s and ‘70s and the NHL went from six teams to 18, the rival World Hockey Association was founded and Houston got a franchise when the one in Dayton, Ohio, failed to get off the ground.

The Aeros’ inaugural season was in 1972-78, and they were best known for “Mr. Hockey” Gordie Howe playing for them along with sons Mark and Marty. They won four Avco World Trophies as WHA champions before folding.

An AHL team using the same name existed in Houston from 1994-2013. The Texas Stars have played in Austin since ’09.

“There’s some interest of hockey,” University of Houston economics professor Steven G. Craig said. “Houston is full of immigrants from around the country and around the world. And Austin is sort of similar in the sense of a pretty heterogeneous population.”

Advertisement

Pros and cons of a Houston or Austin NHL franchise

Growing the sport in another so-called non-traditional spot is a big benefit. Smashing successes in places like Las Vegas and Tampa, Florida, show what hockey can do across the Sun Belt when strong ownership is involved.

“Southern cities have been doing pretty well now these days in the NHL: the Lightning and the Panthers,” Mills said of the two teams in Florida. “You’ve got some pretty good hockey teams after some pretty miserable failures with some earlier expansion to the South.”

Abandoning the second try in Atlanta (the Thrashers from 2000-11) was more a failure of ownership than the market. The same could be said in Arizona, where a revolving door of owners led to arena miscues and eventually the Coyotes being sold and moved to Salt Lake City in 2024 to become the Utah Mammoth.

A 33rd team also means 20-23 more NHL players and hopefuls in the minors. The changing landscape of hockey development at the junior and college levels has the potential to churn more talent through the pipeline in North America than ever before, along with players coming from Europe.

“You do have a pretty big pool of players,” Matheson said. “I’m not particularly worried about diluting the talent there because I think there’s a lot of skill.”

Advertisement

What’s next and where the 34th team may be

After this six-month exploratory phase is complete, recent history suggests a season-ticket drive would be one of the subsequent steps. Ticket drives validated interest that led to the Vegas Golden Knights and Seattle Kraken.

The Board of Governors would need to approve moving forward in the process. No vote has yet been held, though the executive committee supported exploring Houston and Austin.

And while the NHL is comfortable with unbalanced Eastern and Western conferences, getting to 34 teams seems inevitable if it goes to 33. Bettman said the board on Tuesday was updated on situations in Atlanta and Arizona, and it would be no surprise if one of those places got another crack at it.

ere’s everything you need to know about one of the most recognizable trophies in North American sports — The Stanley Cup.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas lawmakers want fixes to statewide voter registration system ahead of midterms

Published

on

Texas lawmakers want fixes to statewide voter registration system ahead of midterms


This coverage is made possible through Votebeat, a nonpartisan news organization covering local election administration and voting access. Sign up for Votebeat Texas’ free newsletters here.

Texas lawmakers on Tuesday asked the Texas Secretary of State’s Office for assurances that issues with the state’s voter registration and election management system would be fixed before the November midterm election.

“Those fixes have to be done, because if we go into a November election and we don’t, we can’t claim that we have integrity in the voter roll,” said state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, a Republican from Harris County, during a Senate State Affairs Committee hearing that addressed voter registration and voter list maintenance issues.

Bettencourt said he’s heard complaints about the system, known as TEAM, from election officials in Travis, Austin, and Jackson counties, among others.

Advertisement

Christina Adkins, the elections division director at the secretary of state’s office, said the agency is “dedicating every possible resource that we have within our office to resolving these issues.”

“There is nothing more important in our office than this project,” Adkins said.

TEAM was redesigned and redeveloped by the state and relaunched last summer. Election officials say they have struggled with it since then, and though some functionality issues have been resolved, others continue to come up.

For example, election officials have reported that processes such as voter registration status lookups and precinct assignments frequently don’t work properly. In addition, the system often malfunctions when attempting to produce reports of registered voters and voters who have requested a mail ballot, forcing some election officials to produce their own spreadsheets to keep track.

The problems, election officials say, have added financial and staffing strains on counties already strapped for resources.

Advertisement

The system was developed by Civix, a Louisiana-based vendor. The majority of the state’s 254 counties rely on TEAM to plan elections and maintain their voter rolls. Even counties that instead use software from a state-approved private vendor to manage their voter rolls are required by state law to sync their data with TEAM daily, and are required to use TEAM to verify a voter’s identity and their eligibility to cast a ballot.

Groups representing election officials across Texas have asked the agency to halt the TEAM update rollout and address issues that they said “directly impact key parts of the election and jury process.” The groups first outlined their complaints in a letter to Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson in October, and sent another one in February.

Earlier this month, Nelson announced she’d be stepping down as of July 17. Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to appoint her successor.

Secretary of state, vendor working together on fixes

According to public records, the state’s contract with Civix is for $17 million. The secretary of state’s office told Votebeat last year that the money for it came from a mix of state dollars and federal funds allocated under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, earmarked for improving election administration.

Bettencourt raised questions about Civix’s work during the hearing. “When I get half a dozen counties with their hair on fire, and some counties are small, and some of them are big, that means that the vendor is behind on actually delivering fixes to the system,” Bettencourt said.

Advertisement

He directly asked Adkins whether Civix was up for the task. “Yes, sir,” she responded, adding her office is working with the vendor on fixes. Civix did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Civix, Adkins said, also manages voter registration systems for other states, including Louisiana and Iowa, but Texas is the vendor’s biggest election management and voter registration software customer.

The Texas Secretary of State’s Office has said it anticipated technical issues with this “once-in-a-decade upgrade,” though it pointed to some unexpected challenges that have exacerbated the issues.

The agency specified that it didn’t anticipate the updated system having to handle significant amounts of data from large counties that abruptly stopped using a vendor that had financial problems. It also noted that redrawn boundaries following last year’s unexpected midcycle redistricting created additional complications that prevented counties from mailing out voter registration certificates on time.

Disclosure: Texas Secretary of State has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Advertisement

Natalia Contreras is a reporter for Votebeat in partnership with the Texas Tribune. She is based in Corpus Christi. Contact Natalia at ncontreras@votebeat.org.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending