Connect with us

Texas

Kate Cox, abortion in Texas and religious freedom

Published

on

Kate Cox, abortion in Texas and religious freedom


It’s a tragedy when a pregnant person learns their own health and pregnancy are at risk, especially when it’s apparent the baby will die hours after birth. Being in this position is a terrifying and lonely place to be.

Unfortunately, that’s where Kate Cox found herself recently when she sought a medically necessary abortion. Then it took an unimaginable turn when she learned, like the rest of us, that the Texas Supreme Court was more than willing to make matters worse. In states with abortion bans like ours, even those with medical exceptions, the last person who gets to decide is the first person impacted by this diagnosis: the pregnant person.

Even after being granted immunity from prosecution on medical grounds by a district court, Cox was ultimately blocked from terminating her ill-fated pregnancy and forced to leave the state so she could receive the pregnancy care she needed. This is no longer unusual in Texas, as many women now face this agonizing choice.

Current Texas law prohibits abortion except to save the life of the pregnant patient. Both Cox’s doctor and the district judge believed her case fit the criteria of Texas’ already restrictive abortion law. Molly Duane, one of Cox’s attorneys, said that Cox is at “high risk for multiple pregnancy complications, including hypertension, gestational diabetes, and infection.” If she didn’t have an abortion, Cox would have been unable to have another healthy pregnancy, which would devastate her and her family’s dream to have a larger family.

Advertisement

Opinion

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

As Jewish women, we know this is wrong. But in Texas, we face double discrimination with anti-abortion laws that deny both our bodily autonomy and freedom to practice our religious beliefs. This is why my organization, National Council of Jewish Women of Greater Dallas, and our sister organizations in Austin, San Antonio and Houston, fully support Cox’s right — and the right of any pregnant person — to decide whether to continue a pregnancy.

In Jewish tradition, we are taught to value a pregnant person’s life and health above other considerations. Our Jewish teachings also uphold that abortion is not only permitted but required when the life of the pregnant person is at risk. We acknowledge there is diversity of thought and interpretation across the Jewish denominations, yet the Reform, Reconstructionist and Conservative Jewish movements all believe health care includes abortion care.

Jewish women are not alone in this experience. The denial of medically necessary abortion care under Texas law also impinges on the religious beliefs of others. In solidarity, NCJW initiated a coalition of diverse religious traditions and submitted an amicus brief in the case Zurawski vs. State of Texas that seeks clarification on the medical emergency exception under current law. All who signed on hold a faith-informed belief that a pregnant person has the moral right to decide whether to continue a pregnancy that threatens their life or health.

Advertisement

Despite the distress she has suffered during her pregnancy, and the Texas law that takes away her individual agency, Cox is fortunate. She left Texas to have her medically necessary abortion because she has the means and support to travel. Many do not. As people of faith, we must emphasize the moral urgency of abortion access for all, including people in marginalized communities who are disproportionately impacted by this unjust Texas law that currently denies medically necessary abortion care.

Denying an abortion under Texas law despite health and religious beliefs goes against both the U.S. and Texas constitutions. The latter says: “Equality under the law shall not be denied or abridged because of sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.”

Although our Jewish faith supports abortion rights, the imperative lies in ensuring universal access to safe abortions. It is a fundamental right that transcends religious doctrines and calls on us to forge alliances across religious divides, uniting in the pursuit of comprehensive bodily autonomy for all individuals, irrespective of faith.

Shannon Morse is the executive director of the National Council of Jewish Women-Greater Dallas. The NCJW in Austin, Houston and San Antonio co-signed this essay.

We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com

Advertisement



Source link

Texas

Co‑worker confesses to killing missing North Texas man and stealing his car, police say

Published

on

Co‑worker confesses to killing missing North Texas man and stealing his car, police say



A North Texas man reported missing earlier this week was found dead Friday, and police say a co‑worker has confessed to fatally shooting him and stealing his car.

The suspect, Gregory D. Lewis, 34, remains in custody and faces a forthcoming capital murder charge, according to the Fort Worth Police Department. 

Lewis is accused of killing 31‑year‑old Thomas King, who had been last seen in his Taco Casa work uniform. King was reported missing on Tuesday after failing to return home Monday from the fast‑food restaurant in the 1100 block of Bridgewood Drive.

Advertisement

Car found at Arlington motel 

Police said King’s car was found at the Quality Inn on I‑20 in Arlington, and surveillance video showed Lewis arriving in King’s vehicle shortly after King left work. 

Detectives identified the man in the video and arrested him on unrelated charges.

  Gregory D. Lewis, 34

Tarrant County Jail

Advertisement


Body discovered on Fort Worth’s East Side 

King’s body was located on Friday in an open field on Fort Worth’s East Side, authorities said. 

According to police, Lewis confessed to shooting the victim and stealing his car. 

Medical examiner review pending 

The Tarrant County Medical Examiner will determine the cause of death. 

CBS News Texas has reached out to Taco Casa for comment.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Exclusive | Mexican mayor urged relatives in US to vote for Texas Dem for Congress who would ‘take care’ of their city

Published

on

Exclusive | Mexican mayor urged relatives in US to vote for Texas Dem for Congress who would ‘take care’ of their city


WASHINGTON — A Mexican mayor earlier this month urged her constituents to get their relatives in Texas to vote for House Democratic candidate Bobby Pulido because he would “take care” of their city if elected to Congress.

“We need to get out the vote for him,” said Patricia Frinee Cantú Garza, mayor of General Bravo in Nuevo León, less than two hours from the US border, in a recent Spanish-speaking Facebook reel,which The Post reviewed and translated.

“Talk to your families in the United States. Make sure they go vote,” Garza added, noting that she would be presenting the keys to the city to Pulido, a two-time Latin Grammy winner, on April 3.

A Mexican mayor earlier this month urged residents of her municipality to get their relatives in Texas to vote for House Democratic candidate Bobby Pulido because he would “take care” of their city if elected to Congress. Politigranja/ Facebook

“When he becomes a congressman,” she also said, “we want him to take care of Bravo.”

Advertisement

The city ceremony celebrating Pulido in General Bravo never received enough funding and was cancelled, the Mexican outlet El Norte reported.

Pulido has headlined concerts in General Bravo as recently as November 2023. Local officials promoted the show and the current mayor and her husband, then-mayor Edgar Cantu Fernandez, appeared.

“Bobby doesn’t know the mayor and has never met her,” a Pulido campaign spokesperson said in a statement. “He declined the invitation, didn’t attend the event, and isn’t responsible for unsolicited comments made by other people.”

Bradley Smith, a former chairman of the Federal Election Commission, said the statements wouldn’t pose legal or ethical issues for Pulido — but that the remarks may have a political cost, given the focus on foreign involvement in US elections in recent years.

“Bobby doesn’t know the mayor and has never met her,” a Pulido campaign spokesperson said in a statement. Bobby Pulido for Texas

“If you were making financial contributions, that would be a different thing, but just to exhort people to vote,” Smith said, “I don’t think that’s going to be a problem for them.”

Advertisement

Jessica Furst Johnson, a partner at the Republican-aligned campaign finance and election law firm Lex Politica, noted that event appeared to function as an in-kind contribution to Pulido’s campaign but it would be difficult to determine without “more details.”

Congressional Republicans have thus far failed to pass a bill this session aimed at beefing up identification requirements for voters when registering, though many have said laws as currently written are too lax and could lead to non-citizens casting ballots.

State investigations and audits have shown in recent years that thousands of non-citizens ended up being registered, but few have ever illegally voted. Those who have are federally prosecuted.

Pulido has headlined concerts in General Bravo in the city as recently as November 2023, which local officials promoted and where the now-mayor and her husband, then-mayor Edgar Cantu Fernandez appeared. Obtained by NY Post
Pulido is challenging incumbent GOP Rep. Monica De La Cruz in the Texas district this November and has faced questions from the press about his ties to Mexico, where he has said he maintains a home for parts of the year. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Pulido is challenging incumbent GOP Rep. Monica De La Cruz in the Texas district this November and has faced questions from the press about his ties to Mexico, where he has said he maintains a home for parts of the year.

The Latino music star admitted to splitting time with his family between there and Texas just two years before launching his campaign, telling a YouTube show in a 2023 interview that he’s a “summer Mexican” but “winter Texan.”

Advertisement

“We live on the border,” he has also said. “My wife and I have a house in Mexico. So, we travel there, and we spend time over there.”

“Bobby lives in his family home in Edinburg, Texas, where he was born, raised, and is raising his own family,” the Pulido campaign rep noted. Getty Images

There was no indication of a current mortgage on a property either there or in the US, according to financial disclosures that Pulido filed April 15 with the House. Those filings also revealed he holds a checking account at a Mexican bank.

“Bobby lives in his family home in Edinburg, Texas, where he was born, raised, and is raising his own family,” the Pulido campaign rep noted. “He is in complete compliance with all House disclosure rules — the property you are referencing is not his primary residence so is not required to be listed.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Pushback grows over Texas governor’s threat to withhold public safety money

Published

on

Pushback grows over Texas governor’s threat to withhold public safety money


Criticism is mounting over the threat to withhold public safety grants from Austin and other major Texas cities, with opponents arguing the move is politically motivated as both the governor and attorney general seek office this year.

“Defunding the public safety for political reasons was wrong when the Democrats did it; still wrong when the Republicans do it,” the former executive director of the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas, Charley Wilkison, wrote on X.

Criticism is mounting over the threat to withhold public safety grants from Austin and other major Texas cities, with opponents arguing the move is politically motivated as both the governor and attorney general seek office this year. (Photo: CBS Austin)

The statement came hours after Governor Greg Abbott threatened to cut $2.5 million in public safety funding to Austin. The governor expressed opposition to Austin’s decision to update its policy governing how police handle administrative warrants used by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in immigration detentions.

Advertisement

“The city has updated its general orders to align with state and federal law and also to protect the Fourth Amendment of Austin residents who should be free from unlawful search and seizure,” said Austin City Councilmember Mike Siegel.

ALSO| Gov. Abbott threatens to withhold $2.5 million from Austin regarding APD ICE policies

KEYE

Advertisement

Houston and Dallas are also facing similar threats from the governor.

“The statement from the governor’s office was really disappointing and frankly it’s wrong on the law and it’s wrong on what’s good for public safety,” Siegel said.

In a statement provided in response to a request for an interview, the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas said, “Law enforcement officers continue to be dragged into political warfare while real public safety issues are ignored.”

The president of the Austin Police Association did not respond to a request for comment regarding the potential impact on officers.

A request for comment to the governor’s office received a previously issued statement from Abbott’s press secretary, which read: “A city’s failure to comply with its contract agreement with the state to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws makes the state less safe. It can have deadly consequences. Cities in Texas are expected to make the streets safer, not more deadly.”

Advertisement

Siegel defended the city council’s position, stating, “I can speak for myself as one of 11 voting members of our city council. We’re not going to sell our values for a couple million dollars in public safety grants.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending