Connect with us

Texas

It’s time for Texas energy to go nuclear

Published

on

It’s time for Texas energy to go nuclear


A nuclear reactor isn’t the first image conjured by the words “Texas energy.” But that’s quickly changing — and must — as the state’s energy demands balloon.

Texas has never needed more reliable and affordable energy than now. Within five years, electricity demand could more than double, straining our grid by truly Texan proportions, according to a higher-end estimate by ERCOT.

That demand is driven in large part by the rapid growth of new data centers, which are critical to advancing our strategic interests in artificial intelligence. But it’s also about personal choice. With a welcoming business environment, people from across the country have been choosing Texas as the new home for their families and businesses, pushing the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex to become the fastest-growing metropolitan area in the country.

This is a perfect example of the Texas miracle. Yet, the scale and speed of this growth is unprecedented, and we cannot rely solely on existing tools and market incentives. To meet rising Texas demand, we need to embrace a bigger vision for our energy mix. We need to go nuclear.

Advertisement

Opinion

Get smart opinions on the topics North Texans care about.

The recent executive orders issued by the Trump administration are a clear signal that America — and Texas — are ready to win on nuclear power. They are also an important step toward the bold action needed to ensure American technologies can compete against state-owned entities from Russia and China. We are at a pivotal moment and must act on the opportunity to embrace nuclear energy to protect our country’s energy, technological and economic strength.

Today, reliability matters more than ever. With hot summer days and icy winter nights, the grid is constantly whipsawed between the peaks and valleys of demand. Data centers, with large energy demands of their own, need a stable baseload of power to run smoothly. Curtailing operations even for a short time will incur massive costs.

Nuclear energy is better than any other energy source at consistently producing at expected levels year round. Wind and solar generate only when the weather allows. Natural gas can be ramped up and down, but it can (and often does) face infrastructure constraints, along with other supply chain challenges.

Advertisement

The good news is Texas and its leaders are positioning the state to be the national leader in advanced nuclear energy. Through university-led initiatives, state investment and strong bipartisan support, the momentum for more investment in Texas advanced nuclear has never been greater.

As Jimmy Glotfelty, a former member of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, noted: “Everybody in the nuclear space would like to build plants here in Texas. We are the low regulatory, low cost state. We have the supply chain. We have the labor.” Simply put, we know how to build big things.

My company, X-energy, is proposing to install next-generation nuclear facilities in Texas at commercial scale. We will provide Dow’s UCC Seadrift manufacturing site in Calhoun County with reliable and clean power and industrial steam with our Xe-100 small modular reactors.

Three years ago, China beat the U.S. and connected its first commercial advanced nuclear reactor to the grid. China’s nuclear program is growing faster than any other nation’s. If this trend persists, China will overtake the U.S. as the world’s top nuclear energy producer by 2030. We cannot let China win the advanced nuclear race, and we’re already well behind.

The Texas energy sector has underpinned America’s global dominance in many decades over the last century, supporting communities with good-paying jobs and bolstering national security by reducing our reliance on foreign energy sources. Nuclear is now a critical piece of this energy puzzle, and Texas can — indeed must — lead the next generation of this technology.

Advertisement

The time to expand nuclear energy in Texas is now.

J. Clay Sell is CEO of X-energy. He was deputy secretary of energy in the George W. Bush administration.



Source link

Texas

Glamorous triathlete shared haunting post before drowning during Texas Ironman competition

Published

on

Glamorous triathlete shared haunting post before drowning during Texas Ironman competition


A glamorous triathlete who drowned during an Ironman competition in Texas shared a photo from a swimming pool during a final training session just two days before the tragic race.

Brazilian influencer Mara Flávia, 38, shared the shot of her on the edge of a pool on Thursday — two days before she vanished during an open-water swim in The Woodlands Saturday morning.

“Just another day at work,” Flávia, 38, wrote in Portuguese alongside the pic of her wearing a matching pink swimming costume and cap.

Triathlete Mara Flávia was seen sitting by the side of the pool in a snap shared hours before her death. Instagram / @maraflavia

The influencer, who had more than 60,000 followers online, chose the Robin S track “Show Me Love” for her post with the hashtags “triathlon,” “swimming” and “triathlete.”

Advertisement

Flávia vanished during an open-water swim in The Woodlands Saturday morning – the first of three grueling trials that competitors face during the 140-mile race.

Fire crews were told about a “lost swimmer” at around 7:30 a.m., one hour into the pro-female swim, KPRC reported.

Rescuers battled challenging visibility conditions before Flávia’s body was pulled from the water just after 9:30 a.m. 

Montgomery County Sheriffs confirmed that the victim “drowned while participating in the swim portion of the event,” according to a statement. The office said its Major Crimes unit will continue the investigation “per normal protocols.”

Shawn McDonald, a volunteer, recounted the commotion before the swimmer’s body was recovered.

Advertisement
The athlete boasted 60,000 followers online. Instagram / @maraflavia
Mara Flávia seen beaming in a poolside snap. maraflavia/Instagram

The dad, who volunteered with his daughter Mila, 12, said a group of younger volunteers in a kayak raised a flag and blew their whistles, “yelling for help.”

“I heard them say she went under,” he wrote on Facebook. 

“I had Mila hand me the paddle and I started calling out to the athletes around us to stop so I could cross. I made my way over in about 30 seconds.

“When I got there and asked what happened, they all said the same thing: She went under. Right here. Right below us. The panic and fear on their faces won’t leave me for a long time.”

The volunteer recalled how one man had a “thousand-yard stare” on his face – before diving into the water in a desperate bid to find Flávia.

Advertisement
She drowned during a swimming event at The Woodlands. Getty Images for IRONMAN

“I dove in immediately and began searching. After about a minute underwater, I felt her body with my foot. I surfaced, took what seemed like the deepest breath I have ever taken and went back down. She was gone.”

Boats with sonar combed the area – and McDonald was told to leave the water before the body was recovered.

“The victim was found in about 10 feet of water on the bottom of the lake,” Buck said. “The dive team accessed the victim, brought her up about 9:37 and then brought her over to the shore where she was pronounced DOS [deceased on scene],” Palmer Buck, the Woodlands fire chief, said.

It’s not known what caused the triathlete to go under the water.

Journalism grad Flávia previously worked in radio and television before pursuing a sporting career at age 28.

Advertisement

She previously twice won the Brazilian Grand Prix, and finished third in the Brasilia triathlon event.  





Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Texas A&M Forward Transfer Seemingly on Visit to See Lady Vols Basketball | Rocky Top Insider

Published

on

Texas A&M Forward Transfer Seemingly on Visit to See Lady Vols Basketball | Rocky Top Insider


fatmata janneh lady vols basketball
Photo via Texas A&M Athletics

Lady Vols basketball is looking to add more pieces to its 2026-27 roster with high-level experience. After completing her junior season at Texas A&M, Fatmata Janneh has emerged as a Tennessee target for her final year of eligibility. According to her Instagram story on Sunday night, she is in Knoxville.

With the Aggies a year ago, the 6-foot-2 forward averaged 11.4 points per game on 43.3% shooting from the field. She also showed off an ability to hit from range, posting 1.1 makes per game on 33% shooting from three.

Perhaps Janneh’s biggest strength is her rebounding, though. She ripped down 9.7 boards per contest, good for the fifth-most in the SEC. This featured 2.6 rebounds on the offensive end per outing.

Janneh also averaged 1.1 assists, 1.4 steals and 0.4 blocks per game. She appeared in 27 games, starting in each.

More From RTI: How Watching The NCAA Tournament Drew Terrence Hill Jr. To Tennessee Basketball

Janneh started her career with a pair of seasons at St. Peter’s. As a sophomore, she averaged a double-double, posting 18.2 points and 11.6 rebounds per game. This made her a sought-after transfer in the portal before landing at Texas A&M as the nation’s leading defensive rebounder. As a freshman, she averaged 11.0 points and 8.0 rebounds.

Advertisement

The forward is from London, England, attending Barking Abbey Sixth Form for her prep ball. She would be the second player from England to join the Tennessee roster if she committed. UT also added the commitment of incoming freshman and former Boston College signee Irene Oboavwoduo this offseason.

So far, Caldwell and the Lady Vols have landed five transfers in this portal cycle. This features Liberty guard Avery Mills, Northern Arizona guard Naomi White, Stanford forward Harper Peterson and Georgia forward Zhen Craft and guard Rylie Theuerkauf.

Tennessee will also roster a pair of incoming freshmen. Four-star recruit and top-50 prospect Gabby Minus is staying true to her signing despite the roster overhaul and assistant coaching changes, along with the addition of Oboavwoduo.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Texas

Texas needs at least $174 billion to avoid water crisis, state says

Published

on

Texas needs at least 4 billion to avoid water crisis, state says


AUSTIN (Texas Tribune) — Texas communities will need to spend $174 billion in the next 50 years to avert a severe water crisis, a new state analysis revealed Thursday. That’s more than double the $80 billion projected four years ago, when the Texas Water Development Board last passed a state water plan.

The three-member board presiding over the agency authorized the highly anticipated draft blueprint Thursday, the first administrative step toward adopting the water development board’s plans for the next 50 years. The plan, released every five years, encompasses the projects that 16 regional water planning groups in Texas said are the most urgent, water development board officials said. 

The board’s latest estimates come as the state’s water supply faces numerous threats. Growing communities across Texas are scrambling to secure water, keep up with construction costs and cope with a yearslong drought. This week, Corpus Christi officials said the city may be just months away from declaring a water emergency. Meanwhile, other rural cities by the Coastal Bend are rapidly drilling wells to avoid a crisis. Residents in North Texas have also been bracing for groundwater shortages.

In an effort to restrain the crisis, lawmakers last year called an election in which voters approved a $20 billion boost for communities to use on water-related expenses. The water development board’s estimate shows that what lawmakers proposed on the ballot falls dramatically short of the needed cash, experts said.

Advertisement

“What this number tells me at the end of the day is if we don’t get serious about (funding water projects), there are going to be serious consequences for Texas,” said Perry Fowler, executive director of the Texas Water Infrastructure Network. “Even with the billion-dollar-a-year plan kicking in, it’s not going to be enough to offset the costs of the projects that are going to have to be executed.”

The new estimate accounts for 3,000 projects, from regional infrastructure upgrades to smaller endeavors such as drilling new water wells. Texas’ water supplies are expected to drop by roughly 10% between 2030 and 2080, according to the water plan. In that same time frame, the maximum amount of water communities can draw is also expected to decline by 9%.

The 80-page plan notes approximately 6,700 recommended strategies that would add water to the state’s dwindling portfolio. The recommendations — which are not accounted for in the cost — include developing new supplies from aquifer storage and recovery, brackish groundwater, desalination and recycled water. It also calls for water conservation.

The report suggested that if Texas does not implement the plans and recommendations, the state is one severe drought away from an estimated $91 billion in economic damages in 2030.

The state’s plan attributes a variety of reasons for the bigger price tag, such as higher costs of construction due to inflation, impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on supply chains, and a growing backlog of water supply projects.

Advertisement

“There’s a plan that can meet our needs,” said Matt Nelson, deputy executive administrator for the Office of Planning at the water development board, adding that they take their cues from the regional planning groups. “These are local projects that folks need to implement; they’re needed regardless of how they’re funded. It’s important to remember these are not top-down projects or state projects.”

Experts told The Texas Tribune that the board’s estimate is only a fraction of what Texas communities will need to ensure they have water in 50 years’ time, saying growth and development are outpacing the state’s ability to keep up.

“This is a bigger water plan in terms of volume strategies and capital costs compared to anything we’ve ever seen before,” said Jeremy Mazur, the director of infrastructure and natural resources policy at think tank Texas 2036.

Mazur suggested that the $174 billion only covers water supply projects and does not account for updating aging infrastructure, adding that the actual price could amount to a quarter of a trillion dollars.

“There’s a substantial magnitude with regard to the capital investment needed to both fix our aging and current systems and potentially develop the water infrastructure, water supply projects that we need.“

Advertisement

The report largely confirmed what many water experts have warned regarding threats to the state’s water supply, said Sarah Kirkle, director of policy at the Texas Water Association.

“Population growth, extreme weather, and economic development needs are all increasing demands on our infrastructure, and the state is going to need more water, sooner,” Kirkle said. “This is all while water projects are becoming more costly and complex because the easiest and cheapest local projects have already been developed.”

Fowler, with the infrastructure network, said he expects the Texas Legislature to take up the issue next year, when lawmakers meet for the 90th legislative session. He said the state should take a bigger role in ensuring that communities can afford their respective water projects.

“It’s going to have to be a top-down priority, there’s no way around it,” he said. “The challenges are so immense that it’s going to take all hands on deck.”

Texas residents have until the end of May to comment on the proposal. Water development board officials must adopt it by January 2027.

Advertisement

Alejandra Martinez contributed to this story.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at www.texastribune.org. The Texas Tribune is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans – and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending