Texas
CenterPoint intends to ask Texas PUC for rate increase to recoup losses from Hurricane Beryl response
AUSTIN, Texas – As CenterPoint Energy remains in the hot seat, facing scrutiny for its response to Hurricane Beryl, the CEO has promised the energy giant will do better, but Texas lawmakers are wondering how much of that weight taxpayers will have to carry going forward.
During a hearing Monday held by a special senate committee in Austin, Senator Carol Alvarado asked CenterPoint CEO Jason Wells if the energy giant had any plans to go forward before the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) for a rate increase and what that would look like and how taxpayers would be affected.
In summation, Wells admitted CenterPoint would ask for a rate increase, with the Senator sharing a brief bit of that exchange on X, formerly known as Twitter.
CenterPoint intends to increase their rates to recoup the cost of recovering from Hurricane Beryl, passing the cost on to the customer.
That dog won’t hunt. pic.twitter.com/QpTrJK9BkF
— Carol Alvarado (@CarolforTexas) July 30, 2024
“CenterPoint intends to increase their rates to recoup the cost of recovering from Hurricane Beryl, passing the cost on to the customer,” Alvarado said. “That dog won’t hunt.”
SEE ALSO: ‘We make no excuses:’ CenterPoint CEO sends letter to customers apologizing over Beryl response
Before the exchange shown on social media, Sen. Alvarado hoped to get a look at the bigger picture and asked Wells what CenterPoint looks for when they ask PUC for a rate increase to recoup efforts, noting they have to be “just and reasonable.”
Wells claimed the vast majority is to payback the lineworkers, vegetation management, and people who helped restore power, as well as materials used in the restoration efforts like power poles, and transformers. However, he emphasized the more than 50,000 workforce who helped restore service to over 2 million customers left in the dark for nearly a week.
Some customers, however, didn’t get their power back for more than a week and were forced to live in dangerously hot conditions inside their homes with no air conditioning, while temperatures outside soared into the 90s. Some of them lost their lives to heat illness.
What would a rate increase look like?
In pressing Wells during the hearing, Sen. Alvarado felt uneasy about even a $1 or $2 rate per customer per month “that never goes away,” and asked if the buck would stop there. That’s because CenterPoint already has a contending rate case with the PUC.
“We were required to file this rate case back in March of this year as part of our 2019 rate case for the company,” he said. “We made a commitment to file no later than the middle of March 2024 so we made it earlier this year.”
“What were you trying to recoup for?” Alvarado asked.
“This rate case covered all our capital investments that the company has made since the 2019 rate case as well as an update on our current level of operating and maintenance costs as well as a current update on the allowed return on the investment of our electric system,” Wells explained.
Is CenterPoint allowed to add additional costs?
“We basically submit the amount we spent for 2023 and use that as the basis for the request moving forward,” Wells added.
Still, Sen. Alvarado didn’t seem pleased with his response and pressed him again to ensure the rate increase would benefit the taxpayers despite having to pay extra on their electric bills.
“I just want to make sure you’re not doing less on proactive maintenance on vegetation,” Alvarado explained. “And waiting till a storm hits because you can recoup the cost once a tree hits the wire on a stem.”
“I can assure you, Senator we took proactive measures well beyond what we can recover in rates because it was the right thing to do given the impact the last several growing seasons have had on the trees in our area,” Wells said. “In the instance of the 35,000 trees we worked – that’s part of the restoration – that’s part of the cost we’d like to recover.”
That’s when the senator asked the question she shared in her video on social media: “Are you planning to go to the PUC on this storm and ask for a rate increase?”
“Yes, we are intending to file for recovery on the cost of this restoration,” Wells replied. “We have the burden of proof to prove those costs are prudent and reasonable but it is a cost – historically has been a cost that has been supported by the PUC.”
Sen. Alvarado, however, felt otherwise suggesting Wells would have to “jump through hoops” with the PUC to try and recoup the loss.
“I hope folks are really going to hone in on this and look carefully at what you’re asking for because there’s a lot of folks that are going to tune in; we’ve got a lot of our constituents [who] don’t want to pay – even if it’s a dollar or two extra a month when a lot of these costs could have been avoided.”
The hearing began at 10 a.m. Monday and the state livestreamed it, which you can find by clicking here.
Wells’ testimony comes just a week after his meeting with the PUC where he apologized to Houstonians.
“Let me begin by being very clear: our response to the impacts of Hurricane Beryl, including our communications, did not meet the high standard we expect of ourselves, let alone what the public expects of us,” Wells said.
‘Talk is cheap’: Outage victims react to CenterPoint’s apologies and promises to do better
As he did last week, Wells also announced initial action plans Monday to increase resiliency. For starters, CenterPoint has assured the public it will be introducing a new and improved online outage tracker by August 1.
“I take accountability for those areas where we fell short of our customer’s expectations, and I want to apologize for the frustration our customers and their families experienced as a result. There are no excuses. We will do better. We will improve. And we will act with a greater sense of urgency,” Wells said. “Hurricane Beryl impacted so many lives, and I want to express my condolences to the families and friends who lost loved ones.”
CenterPoint’s plan of action, which was initially announced during a hearing with the Public Utility Commission of Texas on Thursday, July 25, reflects more than 40 initial actions that the company is taking immediately and over the intermediate- and long-term, including:
-
Resiliency Investments: By accelerating the adoption of the latest construction standards, retrofitting existing assets on an accelerated basis, and using predictive modeling, AI and other advanced technologies, CenterPoint will harden its distribution system and speed restoration. The company will also take action to protect its electrical assets by nearly doubling the size of its vegetation management crews and targeting higher-risk vegetation to address the number one cause of damage and outages in Hurricane Beryl.
-
Best-in-Class Customer Communications: To ensure customers have the information they need when they need it, CenterPoint will launch a new and more customer-oriented outage tracker by August 1. This online tool will provide better and more complete information during storms and is designed to handle increased demand during such events.
-
Strengthened Partnerships: Effective emergency preparedness and response requires close coordination with government officials. CenterPoint will hire a seasoned emergency response leader to help the company rapidly accelerate its planning capabilities and develop close community partnerships to ease the burden of storm events on more vulnerable communities.
Copyright 2024 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.
Texas
NTSB Confirms Texas Tesla Had 100% Floored Accelerator Pedal During Fatal Crash
In an incident that was horrific beyond words, late last month, a stunned family watched in horror as a car plowed into the Katy, Texas home of a 76-year-old mother and grandmother, killing her. The driver has been charged with manslaughter.
In the aftermath of the crash, it emerged that the car in question was a Tesla, and that the driver was making use of full self-driving mode (FSD) around the time the crash occurred. The victim’s family has named Tesla and the driver as defendants in a lawsuit. But per Electrek, Tesla was able to view crash data very quickly after the incident, and the head of AI at the company, Ashok Elluswamy, said the driver “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area.”
In the days after the crash, Tesla fans took issue with coverage that characterized the car as in FSD when the crash occurred. CEO Elon Musk seemed to agree, replying to a post, “Yes, this makes no sense. FSD drives slowly through neighborhood streets and this was a high speed crash!”
But Musk seems to be assuming bad faith, as if coverage implied FSD had suddenly shifted into, perhaps, some kind of previously unannounced homicidal maniac mode and attacked a house. If anyone was saying this is what happened, they should apologize. It’s clearly not what happened.
And on Wednesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) largely confirmed Tesla’s version of events. Their report reads, in part:
“Electronic data recovered from the vehicle indicated that before the crash, the driver manually overrode FSD (Supervised) by pressing the accelerator pedal to 100%, and the vehicle’s speed was greater than 70 mph when the crash occurred.”
But cooler heads had noted weeks earlier that, like with good old fashioned cruise control, accelerating doesn’t boot you from FSD. The car takes the input, and stays in FSD. The question isn’t one of mechanics and technology, but one of philosophy: if FSD is meant to be “driving” when someone jams on the accelerator in a residential area, FSD may not be the “driver” in one important sense, but the car was still in FSD mode.
Because as much as Tesla would probably like FSD to be a total non-factor in the incident, that may not be the case either.
ABC News noted that, according to court documents, the driver claimed he “passed out” with the car in FSD on the highway, and that’s the last thing he remembers before the crash. He says he wasn’t sick, and medical records show no seizures, cardiac episodes, drugs, or alcohol.
A local Fox affiliate says records show the car was making deliveries for DoorDash while in FSD in the “hours and minutes leading up to the crash.” While in a neighborhood, it apparently signaled it was going to turn left onto one street, but instead the pedal went to the metal. This took the Tesla onto the victim’s cul-de-sac instead, and put it on its fateful collision course with her house.
To make matters weirder, other court records now show, per Electrek, that the driver had Googled the terms, “Tesla fsd not aggressive enough 2026,” “FSD is not aggressive enough for city driving,” and “Tesla fsd too timid.” That’s the kind of thing you Google when you’re looking for a Reddit post from someone sharing your consumer gripe.
In any case, the odds aren’t good that the driver wanted this to happen, nor that Tesla programmed its cars with evil intent. But FSD was being used around the time of this unusual fatal incident, and the public deserves to know more. Fortunately, a lot more will come out as the lawsuit progresses.
Texas
Texas AG secures 23andMe bankruptcy settlement after 2023 data breach
AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Wednesday he has secured a settlement of bankruptcy claims against genetic testing company 23andMe stemming from a 2023 data breach that exposed personal information, including some genetic ancestry data, of 6.9 million customers worldwide.
Paxton’s office said the settlement includes $150 million for a multistate coalition of 42 states. But because of limited funds in 23andMe’s bankruptcy estate and competing claims, the states’ recovery will be $18 million paid immediately, with Texas receiving $1,266,860.
23andMe disclosed in October 2023 that attackers had accessed accounts affecting 6.9 million consumers. Some of the information was later posted for sale on the dark web, according to Paxton’s office, which said the company learned of the breach months after the data became publicly available. The office said 23andMe initially denied a breach and later blamed consumers’ account settings and password practices.
Paxton joined a multistate investigation that concluded 23andMe used unreasonable security practices and failed to implement adequate safeguards against hacking, the office said.
23andMe filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2025. Paxton’s office said the settlement incorporates privacy and cybersecurity requirements, including enhanced security standards, comprehensive risk assessments and creation of an independent advisory board, along with enforcement of state privacy laws and continued consumer data deletion rights.
“Companies that collect and profit from Texans’ most personal information have a legal duty to protect it,” Paxton said in a statement.
The company also agreed to a $46.75 million class-action settlement in the bankruptcy case for affected U.S. consumers who submitted claims by Feb. 17, 2026, Paxton’s office said.
Copyright 2026 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.
Texas
Texas Makes Announcement Featuring Arch Manning
-
Health5 minutes agoGame-changing cholesterol pill wins FDA approval after cutting LDL nearly 60%
-
Sports11 minutes ago2026 AL, NL MVP Odds: Ohtani Favored; Alvarez Holding Off Challengers
-
Technology17 minutes agoTesla helped save a driver. Is your car ready?
-
Business23 minutes agoSpaceX stock erases all its gains and slides below IPO price in intraday trading
-
Entertainment29 minutes agoContributor: Hollywood will stop fueling racism when audiences demand better
-
Politics41 minutes agoTrump seeks prime-time spotlight for election claims, sparking concerns he’ll intervene
-
Science47 minutes agoCalifornia employer health premiums will cost as much as a new car in 2027
-
Sports53 minutes agoHow Spain ‘recaptured the spirit of 2010’ in its run to the World Cup final