Connect with us

South-Carolina

Why Illinois Football Has No CFP Case Over South Carolina, Ole Miss, Alabama

Published

on

Why Illinois Football Has No CFP Case Over South Carolina, Ole Miss, Alabama


In the latest College Football Playoff rankings, Illinois clocked in at No. 21, clearly on the outside looking in and with no shot at making the field, regardless of what happens throughout the college football world this weekend. For Illini fans, it’s a major-league bummer.

The issue, for many, is this: Illinois’ 9-3 record is no different than that of 9-3 Alabama, which sits at No. 11 in the latest CFP rankings, and as of today would slip into the CFP.

But is it really?

The slotting of Alabama in the last CFP at-large spot has some key figures in the college football world in a frenzy, including Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin and even Illinois’ own Bret Bielema.

Advertisement

But outrage doesn’t automatically equal controversy. There are good reasons why the Illini rank no higher than No. 19 and, frankly, have absolutely no argument for a spot in the CFP. Disregarding 10-2 Miami (that’s an entirely difference conversation), let’s compare the resumes of the three-loss teams in the CFP mix with that of Illinois:

South Carolina (No. 14 CFP)

The Gamecocks’ three defeats came against No. 13 Ole Miss (27-3), No. 11 Alabama (27-25) and LSU (36-33). Compare those to Illinois’ three losses: No. 1 Oregon (38-9), No. 3 Penn State (21-7) and Minnesota (27-25). Basically a coin flip. Each team lost two games to current top-15 teams, although the Illini’s losses came against the highest caliber of opponent. Moreover, South Carolina lost two of its three at home (Ole Miss and LSU), while Illinois dropped just one in Champaign (Minnesota). When comparing the “quality” of losses, give the Illini a slight edge.

And the wins? Illinois beat three teams that were ranked at the time, but Kansas finished the year 5-7 (though strung together three straight wins against ranked foes in November); Nebraska stumbled to a 6-6 season (3-6 Big Ten); and Michigan closed the regular season at 7-5 (5-4 Big Ten), its worst showing since before Jim Harbaugh arrived in Ann Arbor. (It didn’t stop the Wolverines from beating Ohio State for the fourth consecutive time, but that merits as little more than a footnote in this conversation.)

Meanwhile, South Carolina beat No. 17 Clemson just last week, took down No. 19 Missouri and dominated a solid Texas A&M team that entered their Week 10 game ranked 10th in the country. Those wins easily vault South Carolina ahead of Illinois. If you need the numbers to back it up, ESPN’s analytics give the Gamecocks college football’s 11th-best Strength of Record (which reflects a team’s results as compared to the projections of an average top-25 team against the same schedule). Illinois’ Strength of Record: No. 21.

Advertisement

South Carolina wins this one. On to the next. 

Ole Miss (No. 13 CFP)

Let’s start with the losses again. Ole Miss fell at home to a Kentucky squad that finished the year 4-8, then lost at Death Valley to 8-4 LSU, as well as at 7-5 Florida. Each of those teams is unranked, but in the Rebels’ defense, playing at LSU or Florida is a tall order in any season. As for the Kentucky loss, there’s no excuse. The Illini, whose losses we covered above, blow the Rebels out of the water here.

Moving on to the wins, Ole Miss thrashed No. 13 South Carolina on the road and handily beat No. 3 Georgia at home, 28-10.

Illinois’ best win: 7-5 Michigan.

Credit the Illini for beating the teams they were supposed to (aside from Minnesota) and not playing down to their competition, but the CFP committee is seeking teams with the ability to compete with anyone – and Illinois’ double-digit losses to the Ducks and Nittany Lions would seem to keep them from fitting that mold.

Advertisement

Ole Miss takes this one, although it’s perhaps a closer call than the South Carolina comparison.

Alabama (No. 11 CFP)

Speed round.

Losses: at Vanderbilt, at No. 7 Tennessee, at Oklahoma – a 24-3 stinker. (The Sooners finished with only two conference wins.)

The losses are not pretty. Tennessee is understandable. Even a road loss to Vanderbilt, which was in and out of the top 25 all year, isn’t unconscionable. But mustering three points and falling by three touchdowns to a Sooners squad that went 2-6 in the SEC is the textbook definition of a bad loss.

As history – meaning Ole Miss and South Carolina – has taught us, however, the losses don’t matter nearly as much as the wins. And the Tide have a handful of high-quality wins: a 42-13 blowout at LSU, a 41-34 win over No. 5 Georgia and a 34-0 whitewashing of No. 19 Missouri. 

Advertisement

Three marquee wins. Two in extremely dominant fashion.

No need to rehash Illinois’ biggest wins. (Sorry, Illini fans – it’s still just Michigan.)

The Tide easily clear the Illini here. As for whether or not they deserve to go in over Ole Miss and South Carolina – let alone Miami – is a debate for another time and place.

Now, enough with the negativity. 

The Illini have already locked up their ninth victory to reach that plateau for the first time since 2007), and in their upcoming bowl game they have a chance to tie the school record with a 10th win.

Advertisement

And regardless of how things shake out this weekend, Illinois is all but guaranteed to get a shot at one of the aforementioned SEC squads and a chance to prove it should have been ranked higher and been a larger part of the CFP discussion.

In any case, coach Bret Bielema and the Illini have put together one of the best campaigns in Illinois’ 100-years-plus football history and parlayed it into a top-50 incoming recruiting class. More help could be on the way. The Illini are one of the youngest teams in the FBS and next year welcome back quarterback Luke Altmyer. A bowl win over an SEC power and a 10-win season would set them up for an excellent season and a prolonged stretch of success that would be impossible for recruits not to notice.

Even with no CFP appearance this season, bigger things for Illinois may be very close at hand.

Advertisement

Illinois Football Receiver Pat Bryant Declares for NFL Draft

Why Illinois Football Fans Should Be Laser-Focused on SMU vs. Clemson

Illinois Football Finalizes 2025 Recruiting Class on National Signing Day





Source link

South-Carolina

Star Fox Review: Can’t quite teach an old Fox new tricks

Published

on

Star Fox Review: Can’t quite teach an old Fox new tricks


Did anyone want this? A slick remake of Star Fox 64, minus the “64.” The same rickety rail-shooter from nearly three decades ago, glossed up with gorgeous environments and uncanny photorealistic animals. A modern game peeks through the haze of this nostalgia. But it’s not altogether worth the $50 pricetag ($60 if you want a physical cartridge).

The Star Fox campaign begins with a cinematic dramatization of the original game’s opening text crawl — the scene of Fox McCloud’s father betrayed by an ally into the hands of the evil Dr. Andross. Three years later, Fox commands his dad’s mercenary band against Andross. Each successive mission briefing gets reworked from its original clipped dialogue into fully animated mini-movies.

James Mastromarino/Nintendo /

Advertisement
Fox McCloud navigates through an asteroid field.

But the visuals are a mixed bag. Detailed as the planets and ships might be, fans objected to Fox’s unflattering appearance after the game’s trailer dropped. His original character designer, who wasn’t involved in the new game, admitted to preferring the Super Mario Galaxy Movie version of Fox to this remake’s. For my money, the lighting is more of a problem than the models. In nearly every scene, the cockpit illuminates Fox in a gross green glow.

This campaign doesn’t take long to complete — between an hour to two hours, depending on how often you die and reload. But to reach the game’s true ending, you’ll have to restart and hunt for secret paths, easily quadrupling the runtime. You can also play cooperatively on two systems if you’re in the same room, or you can split your Joy-Cons to have one player steer and the other use mouse controls to fire lasers (an example of Nintendo sacrificing ease for a new gimmick). I’d have loved this mode much more if you could have a second player aim with a joystick, as in Donkey Kong Bananza.

One of many skirmishes in Star Fox's campaign.
One of many skirmishes in Star Fox‘s campaign.

Battle Mode makes for a more entertaining multiplayer experience, but you can’t play it on the same system. I tried it through an online session Nintendo set up, diving and gunning my way through 4v4 matches that required us to capture points or collect energy from meteorites. If you’re hooked up to a webcam, you can use an augmented reality feature to puppet a character’s portrait in GameChat. The facetracking is pretty good: raise your eyebrows, and your character will raise their eyebrows back. Open your mouth to speak and they’ll do the same. If you’re playing as Slippy Toad and puff out your cheeks, you’ll see him inflate his chin.

A team of players in the 4v4 Battle Mode demonstrate Star Fox's augmented reality GameChat.
A team of players in the 4v4 Battle Mode demonstrate Star Fox‘s augmented reality GameChat.

But even with these charming flourishes, Star Fox remains awkward. It’s got the production values of a modern blockbuster, but the sensibility of a 1990s arcade game. The campaign feels particularly antiquated, even with its expanded script and cutscenes. Perhaps I shouldn’t have expected more. This story’s already been reheated three times since the 1990s, after all.

If you’ve got buddies to battle or a tolerance for odd co-op, go for it. Otherwise, you’re better off skipping this remake and saving up for an original game.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 NPR





Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Admiral fired in Hegseth purge wins Democratic primary in South Carolina

Published

on

Admiral fired in Hegseth purge wins Democratic primary in South Carolina


A three-star navy rear-admiral fired by Pete Hegseth last year in the defense secretary’s purge of senior US military officials has won the Democratic primary in a closely watched congressional race.

Nancy Lacore secured the party’s nomination for the US House of Representatives in South Carolina’s first congressional district on Tuesday after defeating Mac Deford, a US Coast Guard veteran, in a runoff.

Lacore’s focus will now turn to November, when she will lead an ambitious Democratic bid to flip the Republican seat in the US midterm elections.

The district is currently represented by the Republican Nancy Mace, who chose to forgo seeking re-election to focus on her failed challenge for South Carolina governor. Jenny Costa Honeycutt, a member of Charleston county council, secured the Republican nomination for the election on Tuesday.

Advertisement

Lacore was among dozens of officers fired during Hegseth’s ongoing elimination from senior military roles of those considered to have crossed the Trump administration, or who do not fit the US defense secretary’s vision for the makeup of the armed services.

She is backed by several veterans’ groups, and Emilys List, which supports Democratic pro-choice candidates running for office. She raised $500,000 in her first two weeks as a candidate, and more than $1.4m through late May, according to a New York Times analysis of federal campaign finance records.

She is also one of 12 House candidates backed by the Bench, a Democratic strategy group advising candidates in districts seen as harder to win, the outlet said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Inside TCMU’s new SC 250 exhibit

Published

on

Inside TCMU’s new SC 250 exhibit


A new exhibit allows children to explore what life was like in the Upstate of South Carolina during the time of the American Revolution. “Life in the Upstate: 1776” officially opens Saturday, June 27 at The Children’s Museum of the Upstate in Greenville



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending