Connect with us

South-Carolina

The Verdict: Gamecocks can’t shy away from moment

Published

on

The Verdict: Gamecocks can’t shy away from moment


South Carolina football superfan Chris Paschal writes a weekly column during the season for GamecockCentral called “The Verdict.” Chris is a lawyer at Goings Law Firm in Columbia.

In 2022, we thought we had turned the corner.

After some early season conference losses, the Gamecocks rolled into a visiting SEC stadium (Kentucky) in October and killed their opponent. A few weeks later, South Carolina whipped Texas A&M in front of a raucous, sold-out Williams-Brice Stadium. After being doubted for most of the season, the 2022 Gamecocks were finally ranked in the AP Top 25 and were hosting an underdog Missouri team. 

Sound familiar? 

Advertisement

[GamecockCentral: $1 for 7 days and 50% off first year]

Just like in 2022, these 2024 Gamecocks host Missouri coming off a massive SEC road win over Oklahoma followed by a whipping of the Aggies. And just like in 2022, we have finally been told we are nice and pretty and accomplished and that we should beat the Missouri Tigers for a late-season conference victory.

In 2022, Missouri dismantled the Gamecocks in front of their home fans. They had the edge, the gameplan, and the physicality needed to win a Southeastern Conference football game. We did not. 

It is almost inherent for a South Carolinian to be the underdog. Our state is smaller than our neighbors. Our state is not as wealthy as other states. We are a little grittier. We are a little tougher. We are underestimated at times.

I felt it all the time in mock trial competitions while a student at the South Carolina law school. We competed against North Carolina, Wake Forest, Duke, Georgia, NYU, University of Denver, William & Mary, Washington & Lee, and on and on. Many of them thought they were better than us simply because they went to some school not named South Carolina. And many of them left the weekend wiser and sadder following a resounding Gamecock victory. (My team never lost to a team from a North Carolina law school.) 

Advertisement

Our football team under head coach Shane Beamer has taken on that same mindset. If you doubt us, if you think we are the underdog, if you think we can’t beat No. 5 Tennessee or No. 8 Clemson or No. 10 Texas A&M, then you better think again. Some people take offense to Beamer’s postgame rants where he can sometimes come across as defensive (or vindictive), but to me, that just shows how much he truly cares about this program and how in many ways he is just like the people that fill Williams-Brice Stadium every Saturday.

If he feels as if someone is disrespecting the Gamecocks, then I hope he always possesses that hellfire to prove them wrong. We have wanted that in our football coach for years. We have wanted a coach that believes in Carolina, fights for Carolina, and wins for Carolina. 

But what about when Carolina is finally deemed the favorite? I’m not talking about being the favorite in a few one-off games against Vanderbilt or Mississippi State or fill-in-the-blank bottom dweller. I’m talking about being tabbed a double-digit favorite over a team that has won 18 of their last 22 games. 

This team has been fueled by being doubted. And certainly, there are still plenty of doubters. But can there be something else from within this program that fuels their fire other than being the underdog? I don’t worry about the Gamecocks being outmanned by Missouri, because I think we have the better team. What I am worried about is that the moment is just too big for us. For Carolina to win this weekend, they must go out and prove that the past few weeks were not just nice wins but the status quo. A win this Saturday proves that these Gamecocks win not in spite of being Gamecocks, but because they are Gamecocks. 

[Win two tickets to the South Carolina-Missouri football game]

Advertisement

For years, heck for decades, when South Carolina wins it’s because they did something outside their character. When Carolina wins, it’s because they didn’t play like Carolina and instead played like winners. That’s what the national media and rival fanbases think when we win. 

In years past, if Carolina won, it was because Carolina decided that weekend to buck the usual trend. That is what they all thought. And (withstanding the 2011-2013 seasons) the second the narrative outside Columbia was anything remotely close to “we think these Gamecocks are actually pretty good,” the very next second was when they all pointed and laughed as we failed to live up to the moment. 

The national media, the playoff committee, the rival fan bases, they all think deep down inside that a massive letup is right around the corner. Sure, they may pick us to win this game, but they all know a choke job is a matter of when not if. 

Almost everything positive being said about this team is still somewhat backhanded. This Carolina team is ranked? This defense has elite players? This quarterback – the quarterback some preseason prognosticators picked last in the conference – is playing good football? Wow, good for them! Many pundits and fans didn’t have much hope for this team in August and September and October. And those same pundits and those same fans are just waiting for the other shoe to drop. 

A win this weekend is not only a win over Missouri and their smug head coach, but it’s also a win for living up to expectations. It’s a win for proving you do belong. It’s a win that allows you to still sit at the table, even if the rest of the college football community doesn’t want you there. A win this weekend tells the wolves dressed in sheeps’ clothing that they’ll have to wait a little longer than expected before they can turn their back on this team. 

Advertisement



Source link

South-Carolina

Former SC Lt. Gov. André Bauer nominated to be next US Ambassador to Belize

Published

on

Former SC Lt. Gov. André Bauer nominated to be next US Ambassador to Belize


NOTE: The above video is a livestream of WIS featuring current newscasts, Soda City Living and Gray Media’s Local News Live.

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – Former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer has been nominated for a position in foreign diplomacy.

The White House on Tuesday listed Bauer as a nominee to be the next U.S. Ambassador to Belize, a Central American country bordering Guatemala.

It’s unclear when a confirmation hearing will take place. WIS has reached out to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee for more information.

Advertisement

Bauer was South Carolina’s lieutenant governor from 2003-2011, serving under then-Gov. Mark Sanford. Before that, he served terms in the South Carolina House of Representatives and the South Carolina Senate.

More recently, Bauer entered the race for U.S. Senate in July 2025, looking to unseat Sen. Lindsey Graham in the Republican primary. He ended his campaign the following month.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.

Copyright 2026 WIS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston

Published

on

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston


Six Republican candidates vying to become South Carolina’s next governor met in downtown Charleston for a wide-ranging debate that put abortion, infrastructure and the future of data centers at the center of the race.

The forum was held at the Sottile Theatre, where Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy and Attorney General Alan Wilson took the stage.

Questions included whether they would support a state hate crime law, how they would address concerns about growth and infrastructure, how to navigate collaboration, abortion and the future of data centers in the state.

One issue that drew near-unanimous opposition was state Senate Bill 1095, a proposed total abortion ban that passed out of committee earlier in the day. All of the candidates opposed the bill, but they differed on what they would do if it reached the governor’s desk.

Advertisement

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Norman said he would sign it.

“You know, this is an emotional issue, but I will tell you if this bill came to my desk as governor. If it passed the House and the Senate, I would sign it,” Norman said.

All of the other candidates on stage said they would veto the bill if it came across their desk as governor, with Reddy arguing the question should be decided by voters.

“The Supreme Court did not say the loudest voice in the ruling class prevails. It said it’s up to the people in the state, so let’s put it to a referendum,” Reddy said.

Advertisement

On infrastructure, candidates discussed reforming the South Carolina Department of Transportation and allowing private-sector involvement to help pay for improvements.

Wilson outlined ideas that included leasing interstate easements and expanding private express lanes.

“We privatized that grass between the interstates. We turn it into private express lanes that can be told we leased the easements on the sides of interstates to telecommunication companies and energy companies, and charge them for natural gas line and fiber optic fiber optic cables,” Wilson said.

Evette also pointed to public-private partnerships and the possibility of fast-pass lanes.

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Advertisement

“We want to make sure that we’re innovative public private partnerships coming in and creating fast pass lanes to allow people that are in a hurry to be able to utilize that,” Evette said.

The final question focused on data centers, with candidates agreeing corporations should “pay their way.”

“They should pay for their water. They should pay for their infrastructure, any roads around it, and we should look at what Governor Ron DeSantis has done in Florida with the large data centers that are coming to Florida. That should be the model in South Carolina and everywhere,” Mace said.

Kimbrell said the state should set limits to protect natural resources and guard against higher power costs for residents.

“Put parameters around data centers to ensure that the water consumption does not impact places like the ACE Basin,” Kimbrell said. “Ensuring that the Public Service Commission makes absolutely sure nobody’s power rate goes up and we try to get behind the meter energy grids in place so they can be self-sufficient.”

Advertisement

Two more debates are planned ahead of the primaries on June 9.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending