Connect with us

Oklahoma

Lawsuit reveals new details about Oklahoma teacher walkout leader’s sexting case

Published

on

Lawsuit reveals new details about Oklahoma teacher walkout leader’s sexting case


Within three years, Alberto Morejon went from one of the most well-known and celebrated teachers in Oklahoma for his instrumental role in the teacher walkout to inmate number 877723, incarcerated for sexting one of his students beginning when she was 14.

Stillwater Public Schools, where Morejon taught from 2015 to 2020, recently settled a civil lawsuit brought by that student. The district has kept details of the agreement confidential. 

School board members held a special meeting Nov. 6 to discuss the lawsuit and, following a closed session lasting more than an hour, voted to approve any resolution reached in mediation and to authorize the superintendent or district’s attorney to proceed as discussed in the executive session, records show.

Advertisement

The district’s records clerk said the district doesn’t have a copy of the agreement and neither does the school board. The district also doesn’t have any record of payment to the plaintiff or her attorney, indicating the district’s insurance will pay the settlement. 

That lack of public information likely means the payout is less than $1 million, said Cameron Spradling, an Oklahoma City attorney who has represented the victims in several school abuse cases but does not represent the former Stillwater student.  

“We’re never going to get rid of predators,” Spradling said, but pursuing civil lawsuits against schools is one way to hold enablers accountable, as well as help victims pay for counseling or therapy.  

Oklahoma Watch is not naming the student because she is a victim of sexual abuse. 

Advertisement

Public court records filed in the lawsuit shed new light on Morejon’s drastic and shocking fall from grace. 

Reports of odd behavior as early as 2017

An attorney for the student argued that as early as the 2017-18 school year there were signs Morejon posed a danger to female students. 

Students frequently gathered in his classroom during his lunch period; they were mostly girls, but also baseball players from the team he coached. According to deposition transcripts, colleagues took notice, occasionally remarking about what they called his harem or entourage. Students often bent school rules to bring him chocolate milk, his favorite. 

Staff described that as odd, but “not odd enough to be crossing any lines,” Crystal Syzmanski, principal of Stillwater Junior High School, wrote in an internal memo in April 2021, nearly a year after Morejon’s arrest. 

But he was crossing lines. Morejon allowed the student to sit behind his desk. He let her sleep there, during class. He entered grades for work she didn’t complete. When they talked, he sometimes touched her thighs. 

Advertisement

And he started messaging her privately, first on Instagram, then on Snapchat, a social media platform that has a feature that makes messages disappear after they are read. 

He started sending her sexually explicit photos, such as so-called imprint pictures of his boxer shorts covering his erect penis. And he asked her to send photos of herself, according to the lawsuit, filed Jan. 10, 2022, in federal court.

Morejon helped organize a statewide teacher walkout 

Meanwhile, educators’ discontent with school funding and stagnant pay was building across the state. Whispers of a possible strike began to spread. About that time, Morejon created a Facebook group called “Oklahoma Teacher Walkout — The Time is Now!” in early 2018. Within days, the group swelled to 75,000 members. 

By March, the group had galvanized teachers across the state. Soon, Morejon picked the walkout date: April 2. The Oklahoma Educators Association wanted to push it into May, allowing more time to organize. But Morejon’s date stuck. 

On April 2, 2018, thousands of educators descended on the state Capitol for a demonstration that ultimately lasted 10 days. Morejon conducted interviews with national media outlets and stood alongside Oklahoma Educators Association officials at press conferences. 

Advertisement

When the walkout ended, Morejon’s influence on education policy didn’t. He continued to lead the Facebook group, posting about legislation and political candidates, until 2020, when his social media accounts abruptly disappeared. The Facebook group, an online community for tens of thousands of educators, was handed off to Jami Cole, then a 5th-grade math teacher in Duncan.

News of Morejon’s arrest answered why he erased his public profile. His student had reported him to the police. Police confirmed his identity, in part, by the American Eagle brand boxer shorts the student said he always wore.  

In a deposition taken July 25, Morejon declined to answer questions, citing his rights under the 5th Amendment, which protects people from self-incrimination, according to a partial transcript filed in the civil lawsuit.

A popular teacher

Stillwater Public Schools, like all others across the state, was not in session in June 2020, when Morejon resigned from his teaching position. But district leaders did little to investigate whether any other students were involved, the student’s attorneys alleged in her lawsuit. 

One other student did come forward with a report to police on May 27, 2020. Prosecutors later dropped that case after the woman declined to cooperate. 

Advertisement

Stillwater schools had in place a policy governing teachers’ social media use that prohibits inappropriate contact with students. It doesn’t prohibit staff from friending students on social media platforms but they aren’t allowed to send messages with sexual content. 

Superintendent Uwe Gordon and Board Chairman Tim Riley declined to be interviewed. In court filings, attorneys argued the school district didn’t know Morejon maintained an inappropriate relationship with the student until after his arrest.

“The fact that Mr. Morejon was a popular teacher who had students — both males and females — coming in and out of his class on a regular basis is not the type of conduct to put the school district on notice that Mr. Morejon was sending sexually explicit messages to a student,” the district’s court filing states.

When the student returned to school, students ridiculed her for having reported Morejon; he had just been voted the students’ favorite teacher. She said in a court affidavit students harassed her online, and she felt targeted by staff, too. Her volleyball coach moved her from the varsity team to the junior varsity team, and her principal banned her from keeping an animal in the Future Farmers of America barn. 

The school, in its response, said the student was disciplined for bringing a boy who decided to rope a chicken into a school barn but was not kicked out of the program.

Advertisement

She withdrew from the district in the fall of 2021.

Morejon pleaded guilty in 2021, released after two years

In the summer of 2021, Morejon pleaded guilty to engaging in sexual communication with a minor. A judge sentenced him to five years in prison, followed by five years of probation. 

He was released from prison in May, after less than 2 years behind bars. A Department of Corrections spokeswoman said Morejon earned early release with credits for good behavior. He is required to register as a sex offender.  

Oklahoma Watch attempted to reach Morejon while incarcerated and since his release, by phone and email. He has not responded. 

Advertisement

Morejon is one of 50 educators stripped of their teaching licenses by the state Board of Education since 2020. 

Several others have also drawn civil lawsuits against their districts. 

Students sued Salina Public Schools over math teacher John Q. Horner III, alleging the school district allowed Horner access to children for years after learning he abused them, The Oklahoman reported. The school agreed to pay $2.6 million. The first $1 million will be paid by the district or another entity on its behalf, indicating it will come from insurance, and the rest will be paid over three years by the school.

Kingfisher Public Schools recently settled a lawsuit for $5 million over accusations of abuse and hazing in its football program. The student who sued described being beaten with wet towels, forced into locker room fights, shocked with a stun gun, forced to wear a urine-soaked helmet, hit during practice, and sexually assaulted, The Oklahoman reported. 

The district will pay $1.25 million from its general fund and the remaining $3.75 million through ad valorem taxes over three years. The lawsuit wasn’t covered by liability insurance because the policy was insolvent then.

Advertisement

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Source link

Oklahoma

How to watch North Alabama vs. Oklahoma women’s basketball: TV channel and streaming options for November 14

Published

on

How to watch North Alabama vs. Oklahoma women’s basketball: TV channel and streaming options for November 14


The North Alabama Lions (3-0) will try to continue a three-game win streak when they visit the No. 6 Oklahoma Sooners (2-1) on Friday, November 14, 2025 at Lloyd Noble Center. The contest airs at 11:30 a.m. ET on SEC Network+.

How to watch North Alabama Lions vs. Oklahoma Sooners

Stats to know

  • Last season, Oklahoma was fifth-best in the nation offensively (84.7 points scored per game) and ranked 284th defensively (68.9 points allowed).
  • Last year, Oklahoma was 22nd-best in the nation in 3-point makes (8.5 per game), and it ranked No. 136 in 3-point percentage (32.1%).
  • Offensively, North Alabama posted 66.9 points per game (140th-ranked in college basketball) last season. It surrendered 68.2 points per contest on defense (268th-ranked).
  • With 6.2 threes per game, North Alabama ranked 168th in the nation. It owned a 34.1% shooting percentage from beyond the arc, which ranked 65th in college basketball.

This watch guide was created using technology provided by Data Skrive.

Betting/odds, ticketing and streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.

Photo: Patrick Smith, Andy Lyons, Steph Chambers, Jamie Squire / Getty Images

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition

Spot the pattern. Connect the terms

Advertisement

Find the hidden link between sports terms



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma death row inmate granted clemency on the morning of his scheduled execution

Published

on

Oklahoma death row inmate granted clemency on the morning of his scheduled execution


A death row inmate in Oklahoma was preparing for his scheduled execution Thursday when Gov. Kevin Sitt spared his life and announced his decision to commute Tremane Wood’s sentence from death to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Wood, 46, is the sixth condemned person to receive clemency in the state in the modern history of capital punishment. 

Clemency came after a vote last week by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board recommended it.

“After a thorough review of the facts and prayerful consideration, I have chosen to accept the Pardon and parole Board’s recommendation to commute Tremane Wood’s sentence to life without parole,” Sitt said in a statement Thursday morning. “This action reflects the same punishment his brother received for their murder of an innocent young man and ensures a severe punishment that keeps a violent offender off the streets forever.”

Advertisement

Wood was convicted and sentenced to death for the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker from Montana, during a botched robbery at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year’s Eve, according to court records. He and his legal representatives maintained Wood’s innocence in the murder, saying the inmate was involved in the robbery but not the killing — which, they say, his brother committed alone.

The brother, Zjaiton Wood, was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for Wipf’s murder and died while incarcerated in 2019, The Associated Press reported. 

“We are profoundly grateful for the moral courage and leadership Governor Stitt has shown in granting mercy to Tremane,” said Amanda Bass Castro-Alves, one of Wood’s current attorneys, in a statement on Thursday. “This decision honors the wishes of Mr. Wipf’s family and the surviving victim, and we hope it allows them a measure of peace.”

The announcement marked Sitt’s second clemency grant since taking office, with the last going to former death row inmate Julius Jones in 2021. Jones’ commutation came on the heels of significant public outcry over his case, as people questioned whether or not his conviction for murder was legitimate.   

Wood and Jones sought to overturn their death sentences in 2017 with a lawsuit that alleged Oklahoma’s capital punishment infrastructure was racist and biased, according to the nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oklahoma

Oklahoma Sheriffs’ Association backs strengthening cockfighting laws

Published

on

Oklahoma Sheriffs’ Association backs strengthening cockfighting laws


COMANCHE COUNTY — The Oklahoma Sheriffs’ Association is calling cockfighting a public safety crisis. The OSS wrote a letter to the Oklahoma Congressional Delegation, strongly supporting the FIGHT (Fighting Illegal Gaming and High-Risk Animal Trafficking) Act, or HR 3946.
 
It is viewed as a positive step by animal rights groups, like Animal Wellness Action, that have often accused Oklahoma law enforcement of turning a “blind eye” to enforcing illegal animal fighting operations.

Local News

Influential campaign donors on video at McIntosh Co. cockfighting event

According to the letter signed by OSA Deputy Director Kyle Keller, the FIGHT act would provide tools that would be indispensable to Oklahoma sheriff’s departments, many of which are limited on budget and manpower.

It states sheriffs often encounter other illegal activity associated with animal fighting events, like gambling, drug dealing, violence and human trafficking.
 
The letter states the FIGHT act would:
• Ban simulcasting and gambling on animal fights
• Prohibit the shipment of mature roosters through the U.S. mail
• Create a citizen suit provision, allowing private individuals to take legal action against illegal animal fighters
• Enhance forfeiture provisions to include real property used in the commission of animal fighting crimes
 
2 News often hears from the gamefowl community after airing stories, and are told their voice isn’t heard. We spoke with B.L. Cozad of Comanche County on his views of the laws.

Advertisement

He believes that banning cockfighting goes against seven amendments of the U.S. Constitution, and that the government shouldn’t place higher value on gamefowl lives than his rights.

2 News interview with gamefowl farmer

2 News’ Erin Christy: Are you a cockfighter?
 
Cozad: I own gamecocks. Yes, I do I’m a gamecock farmer.
 
Christy: Do you fight them?
 
Cozad: You harvest your gamecock, you harvest your livestock.
 
Christy: When you use the term harvest, what do you mean?
 
Cozad: You’re making an economic harvest are you not?
 
Christy: Oh you’re making money. So your ‘economic harvest’ is fighting gamefowl.
 
Cozad: The same way gamecocks have been harvested for more than 3,000 years. You compete them against another gamecock.
               
Christy: You believe cockfighting should be legal because it’s within your right?
 
Cozad: It is legal. The law is unconstitutional. Any law that is unconstitutional is an illegal law.
 
Christy: But you would have to take the issue of cockfighting to the Supreme Court for them to declare it’s unconstitutional. We can’t just make that assumption on our own.
 
Cozad: Oh, yes, we can, because every person every person has their own, ideas and their own understanding of the Constitution of the United States. We don’t have rulers in America.
               
Christy: You believe regardless of whether the state law, the federal law… you just believe that no matter what, the current status is– It is a legal thing to do.
 
Cozad: Here’s the thing…
 
Christy: No, I’m asking you a question.
 
Cozad: I understand you’re asking me a question. The thing is, is what I’m telling you, the law is unconstitutional. Any law that is unconstitutional is illegal.
 
Christy: As one, I’m assuming, goes or has been to cockfighting events, based on what you’re telling me, do you believe the notion that cockfighting events bring along with it other illegal activity?
 
Cozad: No, there’s no notion. Understand, If you criminalize a football… there are drugs at every football game ever played. Okay? And if you criminalize football, Or, can you criminalize football because someone at the football game had drugs?
 
Christy: Football is not illegal.
 
Cozad: If somebody was to show up at a football game with drugs, we could call the police and have them arrested. But if somebody, because I wouldn’t want drugs at the football game, if someone shows up with drugs, we are at a disability (sic).
 
Christy: Because you’re at an illegal event.
 
Cozad: When are you gonna wrap your head around the fact that the law is unconstitutional, and any law that is unconstitutional is an illegal law?
 

Advertisement

Stay in touch with us anytime, anywhere —





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending