Connect with us

North Carolina

North Carolina House approves election board takeover ahead of 2024

Published

on

North Carolina House approves election board takeover ahead of 2024


RALEIGH, N.C. — A Republican effort to shift control of the North Carolina State Board of Elections from the governor to legislators closed in on final General Assembly approval Tuesday as the House passed a bill that could oust the state elections director a few months before the November 2024 election.

On a party-line vote of 60-41, the chamber approved a slightly different version of a bill the Senate passed in June that would strip the governor’s power to appoint state elections officials, as well as local administrators in all 100 counties. One more Senate vote is required before it reaches the desk of Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper, who is expected to veto it. Republicans hold narrow supermajorities needed to override his vetoes.

Should the bill become law, the change could result in potentially hundreds of new election board members taking office next summer as the nation’s ninth-largest state prepares to cast ballots for president, governor and scores of other positions.

The board, which currently consists of three Democrats and two Republicans, would grow to eight members under the bill and likely become an even split between the two major parties. The House speaker, the Senate leader and the minority party leaders in each chamber would each get two picks.

Advertisement

Rep. Destin Hall, a Caldwell County Republican, said the changes are needed to improve fairness and public trust.

“It’s not hard to see how folks might think there are problems in our elections when the very entity that’s overseeing those has a partisan lean,” Hall said during floor debate Tuesday. “This bill takes that partisan lean out of it.”

Former President Donald Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was riddled with fraud have prompted a wave of GOP election laws and administrative overhauls as he mounts his campaign to take back the White House. North Carolina was Trump’s narrowest victory in 2020 and is expected to be a battleground next year.

The legislation also raises the possibility of replacing current Executive Director Karen Brinson Bell if she is not retained by the new board. If the board cannot hire an executive director by next July 15, Republican legislative leaders would make the appointment themselves. A new top administrator could start work fewer than four months before Election Day.

“This is a recipe for potential chaos in a state where elections have been run very well in the past, and where the margins of victory have been among the most narrow in the country,” David Becker, executive director of The Center for Election Innovation & Research and a former U.S. Justice Department lawyer, said recently.

Advertisement

Democratic Rep. Allen Buansi, of Orange County, raised concern that crucial decisions could “essentially get held hostage because of a tied board.” That gridlock, he argued, would benefit the party that controls the legislature because the bill would let the General Assembly intervene in some cases when election boards can’t make personnel decisions.

The bill is the latest in a yearslong struggle between the GOP-led legislature and the Democratic governor to reshape the power balance in a Southern swing state. Past attempts to erode Cooper’s election authority have been have been struck down by courts or defeated by voters.

North Carolina’s 7.3 million registered voters already must navigate new voter identification requirements, beginning with local elections this fall, after the Republican-controlled state Supreme Court upheld a 2018 law in April.

Another bill that the House approved and sent to the Senate on Tuesday would create a public electronic record of voter choices for each ballot item. Under current law, voted ballots and related records are confidential and only election officials may access them.

Although identifying information would be redacted from those records, state elections board attorney Paul Cox raised concern Tuesday that some precincts are so small or receive so few ballots that voters could still be identified.

Advertisement

“You have only a few Democrats in one precinct or you only have a few Republicans in one precinct, so using the cast vote record, seeing which contests were voted on by each ballot, you could use that and other information that’s publicly available to identify how a particular voter voted,” Cox said.

An election bill Cooper vetoed last month that is awaiting override votes in the legislature would end a grace period for voting by mail and allow partisan poll observers to move about voting locations, which critics say could lead to voter intimidation.

___

Hannah Schoenbaum is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Carolina

Gamethread/How to watch Northwestern vs. North Carolina in the NCAA women’s lacrosse championship

Published

on

Gamethread/How to watch Northwestern vs. North Carolina in the NCAA women’s lacrosse championship


It’s championship Sunday! The No. 3-seeded Northwestern lacrosse looks to win its ninth national championship, but it will have to get past the undefeated No. 1 North Carolina to do so. Follow along here or at @insidenu on X for coverage of the game.

Location: Gilette Stadium (Foxborough, MA)

Game Time: 11:00 a.m. CT

TV/Streaming: ESPN

Advertisement

Radio: WNUR Sports 89.3 FM



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Obituary for Aris Mora Moles at Market Street Chapel

Published

on

Obituary for Aris Mora Moles at Market Street Chapel


It is with great sorrow we announce the passing of our beloved Aris, My Sweets. Aris Mora Moles passed away on May 16th, 2025, after almost 9 years of Shining Bright with an unmatched Resiliency and Perseverance against many medical complexities. Aris was born on June 30th, 2016, to parents



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina court says it's OK to swap jurors while they are deliberating

Published

on

North Carolina court says it's OK to swap jurors while they are deliberating


RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina’s highest court on Friday left intact a murder conviction that a lower appeals court had thrown out on the grounds that a jury shake-up during deliberations violated the defendant’s rights and required a new trial.

By a 5-2 decision, the state Supreme Court reversed last year’s decision of a state Court of Appeals panel that had sided with Eric Ramond Chambers, who has been serving a sentence of life in prison without parole.

The state constitution says no one can be convicted of a crime except by “the unanimous verdict of a jury in open court” that state justices have declared in the past repeatedly must be composed of 12 people.

A 2021 state law says an alternate juror can be substituted for one of the 12 after deliberations begin as long as the judge instructs the amended jury to begin deliberations anew. The judge at Chambers’ 2022 trial did just that when an alternate juror joined deliberations because an original juror couldn’t continue the next day due to a medical appointment.

Advertisement

The original 12 had deliberated for less than 30 minutes the day before. Chambers, who was representing himself in the trial, was not in the courtroom when the substitution occurred. By midday the reconstituted jury had reached a verdict, and Chambers was convicted of first-degree murder and a serious assault charge for the 2018 shooting in a Raleigh motel room.

Chambers petitioned the Court of Appeals, which later ruled that his right to a “properly constituted jury” had been violated and the 2021 law couldn’t supersede the state constitution because 13 people had reached the verdict. State attorneys then appealed.

Writing for Friday’s majority, Chief Justice Paul Newby said the 2021 law doesn’t violate Chamber’s right because it provides “critical safeguards that ensure that the twelve-juror threshold remains sacrosanct.”

Newby wrote the law says no more than 12 jurors can participate in the jury’s deliberations and that a judge’s instruction to begin deliberations anew means “any discussion in which the excused juror participated is disregarded and entirely new deliberations are commenced by the newly-constituted twelve.”

The four other justices who are registered Republicans joined Newby in his opinion.

Advertisement

In a dissenting opinion to retain the new trial, Associate Justice Allison Riggs wrote the 2021 law is an unconstitutional departure from the concept of 12-member juries and “endangers the impartiality and unanimity of the jury.”

No matter what directions a trial judge gives to jurors to begin deliberations anew, Riggs added, “we must assume by law that the original juror’s mere presence impacted the verdict.”

Associate Justice Anita Earls — who with Riggs are the court’s two registered Democrats — also dissented.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending