North Carolina
Court sides with homeowners in NC ski country who want short-term rentals
HIGH COUNTRY, N.C. — After a homeowners association in the North Carolina High Country tried to block short-term rentals during ski season, a court has ruled against the HOA.
The Reserve II sits feet from the slopes on the top of Sugar Mountain in Avery County. Jeff and Martha Wells have had their home there for more than 10 years. At one time, they rented their condominium.
They spoke to Channel 9â²s Dave Faherty about the three-year-long battle over whether or not short-term rentals should be allowed there.
âI feel like the people who are suing really have the right to a short-term rental because they bought with that intent,â Martha Wells said.
In January 2021, the board of the homeowners association received complaints of overcrowding, noise, garbage, and unauthorized parking during ski season. Itâs why they voted to ban short-term rentals during the winter months.
Tom Drasites lives just down the street and told Faherty that ski season can be overwhelming at times.
âThree-day weekends, bachelor parties, kids coming in and partying hard — Iâm not too much into it. Iâd rather have a long-term rental,â he said.
The court of appeals found that the trial court was correct when it ruled in favor of the homeowners. They wanted short-term rentals, explaining âan amendment to a condominium associationâs declaration which contained a prohibition on short-term rentals was unreasonable where the original declaration expressly contemplated the units being rented.â
Jeff Wells believes many of the problems came during the pandemic, which was when he said short-term rentals increased in the mountains.
âPeople werenât following any of the rules,â he said. âTheyâd leave their trash out. And theyâd bring extra cars. Thatâs what started the whole thing.â
Faherty is still trying to find out if the homeowners association will have to pay all of the attorneyâs fees for the court battle.
(WATCH BELOW: High Country skiers get snow just in time for holiday weekend)
©2024 Cox Media Group
North Carolina
NC appeals board to review disqualification that cost track team a state championship
A state-run appeals board is reviewing a call by an official that cost a Charlotte high school the state track and field championship last weekend.
A three-member panel appointed from members of the North Carolina State Board of Education’s Independent Interscholastic Athletic Appeals Board will review the disqualification of Mallard Creek High School, which has drawn national attention. The state legislature created the appeals board in 2023 as part of a broader reshaping of high school athletics administration.
The appeals board is appointed by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, an elected official. A spokesperson for the Department’s Office of Athletics told WRAL News that they will issue a decision within 30 days.
“This process is intended to provide a fair opportunity for a thorough review of the officiating decision,” the North Carolina High School Athletic Association said in a statement Tuesday morning. “Following the established appeals process outlined in the NCHSAA Handbook and state procedures, Mallard Creek High School has exercised its right to such an appeal through the Independent Interscholastic Athletic Appeals Board administered by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. The NCHSAA respects the right of member schools to utilize that process and appreciates the importance of ensuring all concerns are heard through the appropriate review structure.“
The appeals board is composed of retired professional educators with experience overseeing high school athletics programs, including former superintendents and athletic directors. The panel for this appeal has not yet been finalized.
The board is now tasked with making a determination about the events that took place Saturday at the 8A state track championship in Greensboro.
Mallard Creek boys track and field athlete Nyan Brown held his hand up in celebration as he prepared to cross the finish line to win the 4×400-meter relay, the meet’s final event. An official near the finish line deemed the action a disqualifier, calling it unsportsmanlike behavior.
In 2025, Brown won the 4A Indoor Track and Field Farm Bureau Sportsmanship Award, which recognizes “players who have demonstrated the ideals of outstanding character and sportsmanship throughout the 2024-25 season.”
Without the points from the final relay, the Mallard Creek boys track and field team finished second. Durham’s Jordan High School won the title.
Mallard Creek head coach Samuel Willoughby said that Brown held up his hand to indicate what would’ve been Mallard Creek’s fifth overall state championship in boys track and field.
“After the 4×400 relay, we were so excited because we knew going in that we could win the state championship if we got the points we needed in the relay,” Mallard Creek head coach Samuel Willoughby said. “So, we just were thrilled that it happened and the way it happened and to end in good fashion with our ace, Nyan, at the anchor.
“So, it was a great feeling to see it actually happen, but then, once I saw the official threw the flag up, I just couldn’t believe it. I was in disbelief.”
Coaches and athletes are expected to show “good sportsmanship” and competitors who engage in taunting, profanity, baton throwing and refuse to follow the instructions of meet officials can be disqualified from the event or the meet, according to meet information. The same rule sheet also says “showboating” will not be tolerated and will result in disqualification. Those terms are not described further in the rules.
Willoughby said he knew the flag was against his team. He said he also got called into the infield on Saturday for the disqualification of another runner.
“I was in the infield more than I needed to be,” Willoughby said. “So, when I saw the flag, I was like, ‘Here we go again.’”
The officials said Mallard Creek received a warning for taunting after Brown won the 300-meter hurdles earlier in the day, setting a state record. Brown appeared to briefly flex toward photographers after winning the race, according to video from the meet. Mallard Creek disputed claims that they were given an initial warning.
“[There are] claims that she gave Nyan a warning beforehand, but that never happened,” Willoughby said. “She said that she gave him a warning to justify the flag that she gave at the end.”
Willoughby said he spoke with Brown and asked him to speak with the official.
“When did we have this conversation of you warning me?” Willoughby said. “And, it never happened. The only thing she said was, “Yeah, I spoke to him. I spoke to him.’
“It became my word against hers.”
The disqualification has attracted intense interest on social media with former players, track athletes and commentators weighing in on the issue.
Watch: Mallard Creek track coach discusses disqualification: ‘I was in disbelief’
On Tuesday morning, the NCHSAA released a new statement as backlash over the call against Brown has continued to mount. The association confirmed the start of the larger appeal process and said it would not comment as the process is in motion.
“Over the past several days, the conclusion of the 8A Men’s Track and Field Championship has generated significant discussion across North Carolina and beyond. The NCHSAA recognizes and understands there is deep disappointment experienced by the student-athletes, coaches, and the school community involved. “As previously stated, officiating decisions made during competition are judgment calls administered by certified meet officials under NFHS playing rules and NCHSAA rules relative to unsporting behavior and actions, and are considered final decisions. The Association appreciates the efforts of the officials who are tasked with applying and enforcing those rules during our championship events. “Under state law, an aggrieved party may challenge the decision of an official that results in disqualification by appealing to an independent appeals board appointed by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. This process is intended to provide a fair opportunity for a thorough review of the officiating decision. Following the established appeals process outlined in the NCHSAA Handbook and state procedures, Mallard Creek High School has exercised its right to such an appeal through the Independent Interscholastic Athletic Appeals Board administered by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. The NCHSAA respects the right of member schools to utilize that process and appreciates the importance of ensuring all concerns are heard through the appropriate review structure.
“Because that process is underway, the NCHSAA will not provide further public comment regarding the specifics of the matter.”
Watch: North Carolina high school runner’s raised hand costs team state track and field title
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Director Brad Alford also released a statement on Tuesday.
“The Independent Interscholastic Athletics Appeals Board has received an appeal from Mallard Creek High School regarding a ruling at the State Track & Field Meet,” Alford wrote. “State Board of Education Policy ATHL-013 outlines a detailed process for reviewing appeals of decisions by an athletics rule administrator, in this case the NCHSAA.
“The Appeals Board is currently reviewing the appeal and will issue a decision within 30 days. Since the appeal remains pending before the Appeals Board, we are unable to comment further on the case at this time.”
A spokesperson for the Department’s Office of Athletics tells WRAL News that they will issue a decision within 30 days.
At this point, the three-member appeals panel hasn’t been selected.
As this is not a time-sensitive case, with the season concluded, the review process could take time to complete.
According to Alford, the appeals board is made up of retired professional educators with experience overseeing high school athletics programs, including former superintendents and athletic directors. Appeals are heard by three-member panels, but the panel for this particular appeal has not yet been finalized.
Note: HighSchoolOT Managing Editor Joel Bryant and WRAL anchor/reporter Ashley Rowe contributed to this story.
North Carolina
‘Blessed and thankful’: New home dedicated to Helene-impacted veteran in WNC
SWANNANOA, N.C. (WLOS) — After more than a year and a half spent living in the aftermath of what Hurricane Helene took from him, one Marine Corps veteran has finally stepped into his new home.
During the storm, a tree fell on the home of local veteran Billy Ricketts III, and he had been living in a camper on his property ever since. On Monday, May 18, Purple Heart Homes and Valley Strong Disaster Relief dedicated a new home to him.
Purple Heart Homes, Inc. has helped over 4,000 veterans all across the country. The nonprofit organization serves veterans with critical home repairs, building ramps, HVAC systems and building modular homes to give to veterans.
‘YOU JUST HAVE TO FIX IT’: CANTON FAMILY RETURNS HOME 19 MONTHS AFTER HELENE
Leah Gutierrez, director of program services for Purple Heart Homes, said the organization wanted to send homes to western North Carolinian veterans impacted by Helene. The nonprofit partnered with Valley Strong Disaster Relief to meet Ricketts and get him the help he needed.
“He was a little hesitant at first, you know, most veterans are because some feel that they’re not as deserving or that someone else deserves it more than them,” Gutierrez said.
But on Monday, it felt surreal.
19 MONTHS LATER, HELENE RECOVERY IN MADISON COUNTY IS FAR FROM OVER
“[I’m] just blessed and thankful for my community,” Ricketts said. “Means a lot, coming home and seeing members of the community are pitching in to help one another.”
“For him to be able to transition from that to a stable home, I mean, our logo is ‘Healing Hearts One Home at a Time,’ and so if we’re able to do that for each veteran, then we’ve done our mission,” Gutierrez said.
Ricketts said he is looking forward to some peace and quiet as the new home represents the next chapter of his life.
North Carolina
Evaluating North Carolina’s 2026 Ceiling and Floor in ACC
With North Carolina’s activity in the transfer portal and recruiting pool coming to a close, although there are a couple of players to keep tabs on in the coming days, it is time to start evaluating how next season could look in Chapel Hill.
Big picture, 2026 is about head coach Michael Malone establishing a foundational culture for multiple years. Tar Heel fans are going to expect nothing less than a deep tournament run, but North Carolina needs to take the required baby steps. Coming off a second consecutive first-round exit, the Tar Heels need to at least win one game in the NCAA Tournament, but even then, their fans will not be satisfied if they fail to advance past the first weekend.
If North Carolina wants to be in the best position possible in the revamped 76-team field, winning as many games in conference play and orchestrating a formidable run in the ACC tournament will go a long way in setting itself up nicely for a potential run in March. With that being said, here are the Tar Heels’ ceiling and floor in the ACC next season.
Ceiling: Third Place
It is tough to imagine North Carolina cracking the top-two threshold in the conference, with Duke and Louisville as the clear top ACC teams. While the Blue Devils retained four key rotational players and compiled the No. 1 overall 2026 class, the Cardinals went all in on the transfer portal, signing Flory Bidunga, Jackson Sheldstad, Karter Knox, and Alvaro Folgueiras. Not to mention, Louisville landed five-star center Obinna Ekezie Jr., who reclassified from 2027 and will be part of the 2026 rotation.
Quite frankly, there is too much firepower on those two teams for North Carolina to keep pace with. That being said, Malone’s coaching should elevate the Tar Heels and at least surpass their fourth-place finish last season.
Floor: Fifth Place
This would be a major disappointment, and there would be salt in the wound when assessing that this would be a worse finish than last season. North Carolina has the coaching and talent to finish inside the top three, but a couple of under-the-radar teams could emerge as legitimate threats in the ACC.
Virginia and Miami each finished above the Tar Heels in 2025, and the Cavaliers are returning the majority of their roster. Meanwhile, Miami has signed a couple of underrated players from the transfer portal who should help offset losses across the roster. Nevertheless, North Carolina cannot afford to miss out on a double-bye in the conference tournament, which is awarded to the top four teams at the end of the regular season.
Follow
-
Indianapolis, IN4 minutes agoAmerican Red Cross opens new donation centers in Indianapolis and Noblesville
-
Pittsburg, PA10 minutes agoNew Pittsburgh Public Schools board taking up controversial plan to close 7 schools
-
Augusta, GA16 minutes agoRick Allen wins the Republican nomination for U.S. House District 12
-
Washington, D.C22 minutes agoFBI offers $5K reward in Navy Yard Chipotle assault investigation
-
Cleveland, OH28 minutes ago
Cleveland Hopkins finishes Central Security Checkpoint Expansion Project
-
Austin, TX33 minutes agoLive Updates: Severe storm, flood threat across Central Texas Tuesday
-
Alabama40 minutes agoSen. Tommy Tuberville wins Republican primary for governor of Alabama
-
Alaska46 minutes ago
Western Alaska high school seniors walk across the stage after tumultuous year