Connect with us

Mississippi

Officer for second Mississippi department implicated in alleged torture, shooting and attempted sexual assault of two men | CNN

Published

on

Officer for second Mississippi department implicated in alleged torture, shooting and attempted sexual assault of two men | CNN




CNN
 — 

A second Mississippi law enforcement department says that one of its officers was “implicated” in an incident of alleged torture, shooting and attempted sexual assault of two men in police control.

Richland Police Department says Officer Joshua Hartfield, who was off duty at the time of the incident, has resigned, according to an open letter from the chief of the department.

“Upon receiving the information regarding the allegations against Hartfield, immediate action was taken in line with our strict standards of responsibility and accountability. Hartfield was placed on administrative leave, subjected to disciplinary action, and subsequently tendered his resignation,” Chief Nick McLendon of the Richland Police Department said.

Advertisement

“If proven factual, this incident taints the respected badge,” McLendon added.

CNN has reached out to Hartfield for comment and he has not responded.

The incident occurred on January 24 in Braxton, Mississippi, just southeast of Jackson. It came to light last month after two men, Michael Jenkins and Eddie Parker, filed a federal lawsuit. Hartfield was not named in the lawsuit, which only identifies Rankin County Sheriff’s deputies. It’s not clear how Hartfield was possibly involved in the incident or what his role might have been.

The two men, who are Black, say that six White law enforcement officers entered the home they were in and tortured them for nearly two hours, culminating with Jenkins being shot in the mouth.

Rankin County Sheriff Bryan Bailey said at a news conference last week that some of his department’s deputies were no longer with the department, although he didn’t confirm the number or their names.

Advertisement

Bailey said that initially “deputies involved with this incident were placed on administrative leave pending final investigative findings.”

“Due to recent developments, including findings during our internal investigation, those deputies that were still employed by this department have all been terminated,” Bailey added.

“Black Lawyers for Justice commends Chief McClendon for taking the first step toward justice in his well-written letter. The next step in the fight for justice for the victims is the criminal prosecution of the rogue officers involved in the actions,” the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, Malik Zuku Shabazz, told CNN affiliate WLBT.

In the lawsuit filed June 12 in US District Court in Mississippi, Jenkins and Parker allege deputies handcuffed, kicked, waterboarded, repeatedly used Tasers and attempted to sexually assault them during the January incident. The lawsuit states a deputy placed a gun in Jenkins’ mouth and shot him, lacerating his tongue and breaking his jaw.

Three Rankin County Sheriff’s deputies – Hunter Elward, Brett McAlpin and Christian Dedmon – are named as defendants, with three more defendants being named as John Does. The lawsuit also names Bailey and Rankin County as defendants.

Advertisement

CNN has reached out to Elward, McAlpin and Dedmon but has not received a response.

The lawsuit filed last month describes the John Does as Rankin County deputies who participated in the alleged torture but whose names were unknown to the plaintiffs.

“We believe Hartfield is one of the John Doe deputies,” Shabazz told CNN in a phone interview Wednesday.

During the incident, the lawsuit alleges, the deputies repeatedly directed racial slurs at the men and accused them of “dating White women.”

Jenkins and Parker claim the deputies, “in their repeated use of racial slurs in the course of their violent acts, were oppressive and hateful against their African-American victims. Defendants were motivated on the basis of race and the color of the skin of the persons they assaulted,” the lawsuit states.

Advertisement

Attorneys for both Jenkins and Parker say the pair “were in complete custody and control” of deputies during the incident.

“Throughout the nearly two-hour ordeal, the six deputies would punch and beat two handcuffed men at will, hurting and humiliating both Jenkins and Parker. Deputies also repeatedly and gratuitously kicked the men as if they were animals while they lay subdued and handcuffed,” the lawsuit alleges.

The deputies used their Tasers on the men, and “included multiple drive-stuns into the bodies of both,” the lawsuit states. Drive-stuns are when a Taser makes direct contact with a person’s body.

Jenkins and Parker were waterboarded by the deputies, “continuously pouring the liquids on their faces while both men were handcuffed and forced on their backs,” according to the lawsuit. During the alleged waterboarding the deputies continued to use racial slurs.

The deputies then, “attempted to use a dildo or sexual device against Mr. Jenkins and Mr. Parker in the course of this torture session,” the lawsuit says. In their lawsuit, the men say photos from the scene show such a device.

Advertisement

The lawsuit goes on to say deputies threw eggs at the pair, and “in an effort to sanitize their acts” forced both men to disrobe and shower together.

“To shower together was designed to humiliate and intimidate them and also to conceal evidence of the eggs being hurled and the Plaintiff’s defecating on themselves after the attempted sexual assault against them,” the lawsuit says.

“At the crescendo of this nearly two-hour torture session,” according to the lawsuit, “Deputy Hunter Elward shoved his service weapon inside Michael Jenkins’s mouth while he was handcuffed.”

The victims allege a deputy then “spoke angrily,” and fired his weapon inside Jenkins’ mouth, shattering his jaw and severely lacerating his tongue. The lawsuit says that Jenkins nearly died from his injuries.

“His tongue was severed; it was holding on by a sliver when the bullet went through,” Jenkins’ mother, Mary Jenkins, said during a news conference.

Advertisement

The deputies had turned off their body cameras during the incident and did not have warrants, the lawsuit alleges.

Since the lawsuit has been filed, attorneys for the victims say they have developed more information.

This case is “the most serious and outrageous case of police brutality,” attorney Shabazz said. “Criminal charges are warranted. We expect criminal charges soon,” he added.

The incident is under federal and state investigation.

McLendon said his department would continue to cooperate in the investigations.

Advertisement

The FBI Jackson Field Office, the US Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, and the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Mississippi have opened a civil rights investigation into the incident.

“The FBI will conduct the investigation in a fair, thorough, and impartial manner. As this is an ongoing investigation, we are not able to comment further at this time,” Aryele N. Bradford, a spokeswoman for the US Department of Justice, told CNN in an emailed statement.

Shabazz said his clients have been interviewed by federal investigators.

“This is being taken seriously at the highest level of the Department of Justice,” Shabazz added.

Mississippi Bureau of Investigation (MBI) conducted an independent investigation of the incident. CNN has asked the MBI for details of the investigation but has not received a response.

Advertisement

Jenkins and Parker’s attorney said that they have also been formally interviewed by MBI as well.

A release from the Mississippi Department of Public Safety the day after the incident gave no hint of what the victims would later allege, saying the MBI was investigating an “officer involved shooting.”

“Rankin County Sheriff’s Department deputies were conducting a narcotics investigation when they encountered a subject that displayed a gun towards the deputies. The subjects were transported to a nearby hospital. The officer received no injuries,” it said in the January 25 release.

In their lawsuit, Jenkins and Parker deny possessing or displaying any weapon.

Both Jenkins and Parker continue to recover from the events, both physically and mentally, Shabazz said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mississippi

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusual

Published

on

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusual


By EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Mississippi’s Jim Crow-era practice of removing voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies, including nonviolent crimes such as forgery and timber theft, attorneys say in new court papers.

Most of the people affected are disenfranchised for life because the state provides few options for restoring ballot access.

“Mississippi’s harsh and unforgiving felony disenfranchisement scheme is a national outlier,” attorneys representing some who lost voting rights said in an appeal filed Wednesday. They wrote that states “have consistently moved away from lifetime felony disenfranchisement over the past few decades.”

Advertisement

This case is the second in recent years — and the third since the late 19th century — that asks the Supreme Court to overturn Mississippi’s disenfranchisement for some felonies. The cases use different legal arguments, and the court rejected the most recent attempt in 2023.

The new appeal asks justices to reverse a July ruling from the conservative 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said Mississippi legislators, not the courts, must decide whether to change the laws.

Stripping away voting rights for some crimes is unconstitutional because it is cruel and unusual punishment, the appeal argues. A majority of justices rejected arguments over cruel and unusual punishment in June when they cleared the way for cities to enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outside in public places.

Attorneys who sued Mississippi over voting rights say the authors of the state’s 1890 constitution based disenfranchisement on a list of crimes they thought Black people were more likely to commit. A majority of the appeals judges wrote that the Supreme Court in 1974 reaffirmed constitutional law allowing states to disenfranchise felons.

About 38% of Mississippi residents are Black. Nearly 50,000 people were disenfranchised under the state’s felony voting ban between 1994 and 2017. More than 29,000 of them have completed their sentences, and about 58% of that group are Black, according to an expert who analyzed data for plaintiffs challenging the voting ban.

Advertisement

To regain voting rights in Mississippi, a person convicted of a disenfranchising crime must receive a governor’s pardon or win permission from two-thirds of the state House and Senate. In recent years, legislators have restored voting rights for only a few people.

The other recent case that went to the Supreme Court argued that authors of Mississippi’s constitution showed racist intent when they chose which felonies would cause people to lose the right to vote.

In that ruling, justices declined to reconsider a 2022 appeals court decision that said Mississippi remedied the discriminatory intent of the original provisions in the state constitution by later altering the list of disenfranchising crimes.

In 1950, Mississippi dropped burglary from the list. Murder and rape were added in 1968. The Mississippi attorney general issued an opinion in 2009 that expanded the list to 22 crimes, including timber larceny, carjacking, felony-level shoplifting and felony-level writing bad checks.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a 2023 dissent that Mississippi’s list of disenfranchising crimes was “adopted for an illicit discriminatory purpose.”

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Mississippi's judicial runoff elections

Published

on

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Mississippi's judicial runoff elections


Voters in central Mississippi and the Delta and Gulf Coast areas will return to the polls Tuesday for a runoff election to resolve two state judicial races in which no candidate received the required vote majority in the Nov. 5 general election



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court balance of power at stake in upcoming runoff

Published

on

Mississippi Supreme Court balance of power at stake in upcoming runoff


JACKSON, Miss. (WLBT) – Four of Mississippi’s Supreme Court Justices were up for re-election this year. Two of those had opponents. One lost in the general election and the other is going to a runoff.

The outcome of next Tuesday’s runoff could change the overall balance of power on the court.

Michigan State University College of Law Professor Quinn Yeargain explains that nonpartisan elections make it tough to get a sense of the ideology of state supreme courts.

The best way to get a glimpse of how the court leans is to look at previous decisions. Yeargain pulled six notable cases to examine.

Advertisement

“In recent years the Mississippi Supreme Court has been more of a far-right court or very conservative court than a moderate-conservative court,” noted Yeargain who is a state constitutional law scholar.

He created a color-coded chart with pink indicating more conservative decisions and green the more moderate ones.

“And so a lot of the decisions that it has reached have been or have had a tendency to be a little bit more extreme, more deferential to the state legislature, more deferential to the governor, less willing to recognize individual rights and liberties, less willing to believe that the government has isolated peoples, individual rights and liberties,” said Yeargain.

The more conservative opinion won out in all of the example cases. But one of those four justices that leaned that way every time referenced is now being replaced. Justice Dawn Beam was defeated by Gulfport lawyer David Sullivan.

Advertisement

“There’s still a lot that will need to be learned about the ideology of the new justice,” Yeargain noted.

Then there’s this runoff for Central District 1 Position 3 with Jim Kitchens and Jenifer Branning.

“Justice Kitchens has been more willing to hold the government to account, to express skepticism about the nature of what the government is doing, and how it is acting,” he said. “But Senator Branning, for example, has been in the government. She has been one of these actors and I think it’s fair to conclude that she might be more deferential to the legislature or to the Governor in how she approached her rulings.”

Yeargain notes that it’s not to say that would be the case for Branning.

He hopes voters will do research about the positions of the judges before returning to the polls for the runoff.

Advertisement

WATCH: Justice Jim Kitchen’s Interview on WLBT+

Want more WLBT news in your inbox? Click here to subscribe to our newsletter.

See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Please click here to report it and include the headline of the story in your email.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending