Connect with us

Mississippi

Crash threat over Mississippi skies ends with pilot’s arrest

Published

on

Crash threat over Mississippi skies ends with pilot’s arrest


RIPLEY, Miss. — An airport employee who knew tips on how to take off however not land stole a small airplane Saturday and threatened to crash it right into a Walmart, circling for 5 hours over unnerved Mississippians earlier than ending the flight safely in a soybean area the place police arrested him.

Cory Wayne Patterson, 29, was unhurt after the tough touchdown shortly after posting a goodbye message to his mother and father and sister on Fb, authorities mentioned at a information convention. The message mentioned he “by no means really needed to harm anybody.”

After an anxious morning of watching the aircraft’s meandering path overhead, Tupelo Mayor Todd Jordan referred to as the decision “the very best case situation.”

Nobody was injured.

Advertisement

Patterson was employed fueling planes on the Tupelo Regional Airport, giving him entry to the twin-engine Beechcraft King Air C90A, police Chief John Quaka mentioned.

It was not instantly identified why, shortly after 5 a.m., the 10-year Tupelo Aviation worker took off within the totally fueled aircraft. Fifteen minutes later, Patterson referred to as a Lee County 911 dispatcher to say he deliberate to crash the aircraft right into a Tupelo Walmart, Quaka mentioned. Officers evacuated individuals from the Walmart and a close-by comfort retailer.

“That is extra doubtless a criminal offense of alternative,” mentioned Quaka, including that the airport’s tower will not be staffed till 6 a.m.

Police negotiators have been capable of make contact in the course of the flight and persuade Patterson to land, however he did not understand how. He was coached by a personal pilot into practically touchdown on the Tupelo airport however he aborted the try on the final minute and resumed the flight, authorities mentioned.

A negotiator re-established contact round 10 a.m., and realized Patterson had landed in a area and was unhurt, Quaka mentioned. The aircraft landed close to Ripley, Mississippi, about about 85 miles (140 kilometers) southeast of Memphis, Tennessee, and about 45 miles (70 kilometers) northwest of Tupelo.

Advertisement

“There’s injury however consider it or not, the plane is undamaged,” the chief instructed reporters.

Patterson, whose Fb web page mentioned he’s from Shannon, was charged with grand larceny and making terroristic threats. Quaka mentioned federal authorities additionally may deliver expenses. Police mentioned Patterson will not be believed to be a licensed pilot however has some flight instruction.

Jordan mentioned Patterson contacted members of the family in the course of the flight. The mayor mentioned he hopes Patterson “will get the assistance he wants.”

“Sorry everybody. By no means needed to truly harm anybody. I really like my mother and father and sister this isn’t your fault. Goodbye,” learn Patterson’s Fb message posted at about 9:30 a.m.

Peter Goelz, former managing director on the Nationwide Transportation Security Board, mentioned the vulnerability of small airports, which cater to small planes and company jets, has apprehensive safety specialists for years.

Advertisement

“For those who’ve bought a educated pilot who can get in and seize a enterprise jet, you’ve bought a reasonably deadly weapon there,” he mentioned.

Ripley resident Roxanne Ward instructed The Related Press she had been monitoring the aircraft on-line and went to her father-in-law’s home with plans to enter the basement for security. She mentioned she heard the thud because the aircraft hit the bottom on her father-in-law’s property.

She and others bought onto four-wheelers to trip over.

“As quickly because it crashed, police have been there and ready,” mentioned Ward, who watched from a distance. “Police coaxed him out. They yelled at him, ‘Arms within the air.’” She mentioned the pilot bought out of the aircraft with out resisting police.

Michael Canders, director of the Aviation Middle at Farmingdale State Faculty in New York, referred to as the incident “a wake-up name” for basic aviation airports and their workers.

Advertisement

The Transportation Safety Administration requires annual coaching emphasizing a “see one thing, say one thing” method to try to stop a situation like what police consider occurred in Tupelo — an worker with entry to plane, Canders mentioned.

“This very factor is mentioned within the course, the potential for any person gaining entry and intent on injury,” he mentioned. “It’s depending on all of those that work at an airport. For those who see somebody you do not acknowledge or some uncommon exercise, you’re speculated to report that.”

A web-based flight monitoring service confirmed the aircraft’s swirling path by means of the sky early Saturday.

Leslie Criss, {a magazine} editor who lives in Tupelo, awoke early and was watching the state of affairs on TV and social media. A number of of her mates have been outdoors watching the aircraft circle overhead.

“I’ve by no means seen something like this on this city,” Criss instructed AP. “It is a scary approach to get up on a Saturday morning.”

Advertisement

Goelz mentioned the FAA and Division of Homeland Safety would doubtless look at the incident and situation steerage targeted on tightening up safety, a doubtlessly expensive prospect.

“For an airport like Tupelo, for them to crank up safety for Saturday morning at 5 a.m., when their tower doesn’t open till 6 — that’s costly,’’ Goelz mentioned. “They’re not going to have the funds except the feds are going to offer it.’’

The airplane drama unfolded as tens of 1000’s of school soccer followers have been headed to north Mississippi for Saturday soccer video games on the College of Mississippi in Oxford and Mississippi State College in Starkville. Tupelo is between these two cities.

Jane and Daniel Alsup stood out of their entrance yard close to the place the aircraft landed and watched it circle low over the pine and oak timber.

“He left for some time, then we heard him come again. Only a few seconds later, we heard a giant outdated ‘flump’ and he landed out within the soybean area,” Jane Alsup mentioned.

Advertisement

Daniel Alsup mentioned the aircraft landed on the opposite aspect of some timber, so they didn’t see it hit the bottom.

“This was the very best place it may have occurred,” he mentioned of the agricultural touchdown website.

————

Wagster Pettus reported from Jackson, Mississippi. Related Press writers Michael Balsamo in New York, Kathleen Foody in Chicago and Paul Wiseman in Martinsburg, West Virginia, contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mississippi

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusual

Published

on

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusual


By EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Mississippi’s Jim Crow-era practice of removing voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies, including nonviolent crimes such as forgery and timber theft, attorneys say in new court papers.

Most of the people affected are disenfranchised for life because the state provides few options for restoring ballot access.

“Mississippi’s harsh and unforgiving felony disenfranchisement scheme is a national outlier,” attorneys representing some who lost voting rights said in an appeal filed Wednesday. They wrote that states “have consistently moved away from lifetime felony disenfranchisement over the past few decades.”

Advertisement

This case is the second in recent years — and the third since the late 19th century — that asks the Supreme Court to overturn Mississippi’s disenfranchisement for some felonies. The cases use different legal arguments, and the court rejected the most recent attempt in 2023.

The new appeal asks justices to reverse a July ruling from the conservative 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said Mississippi legislators, not the courts, must decide whether to change the laws.

Stripping away voting rights for some crimes is unconstitutional because it is cruel and unusual punishment, the appeal argues. A majority of justices rejected arguments over cruel and unusual punishment in June when they cleared the way for cities to enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outside in public places.

Attorneys who sued Mississippi over voting rights say the authors of the state’s 1890 constitution based disenfranchisement on a list of crimes they thought Black people were more likely to commit. A majority of the appeals judges wrote that the Supreme Court in 1974 reaffirmed constitutional law allowing states to disenfranchise felons.

About 38% of Mississippi residents are Black. Nearly 50,000 people were disenfranchised under the state’s felony voting ban between 1994 and 2017. More than 29,000 of them have completed their sentences, and about 58% of that group are Black, according to an expert who analyzed data for plaintiffs challenging the voting ban.

Advertisement

To regain voting rights in Mississippi, a person convicted of a disenfranchising crime must receive a governor’s pardon or win permission from two-thirds of the state House and Senate. In recent years, legislators have restored voting rights for only a few people.

The other recent case that went to the Supreme Court argued that authors of Mississippi’s constitution showed racist intent when they chose which felonies would cause people to lose the right to vote.

In that ruling, justices declined to reconsider a 2022 appeals court decision that said Mississippi remedied the discriminatory intent of the original provisions in the state constitution by later altering the list of disenfranchising crimes.

In 1950, Mississippi dropped burglary from the list. Murder and rape were added in 1968. The Mississippi attorney general issued an opinion in 2009 that expanded the list to 22 crimes, including timber larceny, carjacking, felony-level shoplifting and felony-level writing bad checks.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a 2023 dissent that Mississippi’s list of disenfranchising crimes was “adopted for an illicit discriminatory purpose.”

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Mississippi's judicial runoff elections

Published

on

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Mississippi's judicial runoff elections


Voters in central Mississippi and the Delta and Gulf Coast areas will return to the polls Tuesday for a runoff election to resolve two state judicial races in which no candidate received the required vote majority in the Nov. 5 general election



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court balance of power at stake in upcoming runoff

Published

on

Mississippi Supreme Court balance of power at stake in upcoming runoff


JACKSON, Miss. (WLBT) – Four of Mississippi’s Supreme Court Justices were up for re-election this year. Two of those had opponents. One lost in the general election and the other is going to a runoff.

The outcome of next Tuesday’s runoff could change the overall balance of power on the court.

Michigan State University College of Law Professor Quinn Yeargain explains that nonpartisan elections make it tough to get a sense of the ideology of state supreme courts.

The best way to get a glimpse of how the court leans is to look at previous decisions. Yeargain pulled six notable cases to examine.

Advertisement

“In recent years the Mississippi Supreme Court has been more of a far-right court or very conservative court than a moderate-conservative court,” noted Yeargain who is a state constitutional law scholar.

He created a color-coded chart with pink indicating more conservative decisions and green the more moderate ones.

“And so a lot of the decisions that it has reached have been or have had a tendency to be a little bit more extreme, more deferential to the state legislature, more deferential to the governor, less willing to recognize individual rights and liberties, less willing to believe that the government has isolated peoples, individual rights and liberties,” said Yeargain.

The more conservative opinion won out in all of the example cases. But one of those four justices that leaned that way every time referenced is now being replaced. Justice Dawn Beam was defeated by Gulfport lawyer David Sullivan.

Advertisement

“There’s still a lot that will need to be learned about the ideology of the new justice,” Yeargain noted.

Then there’s this runoff for Central District 1 Position 3 with Jim Kitchens and Jenifer Branning.

“Justice Kitchens has been more willing to hold the government to account, to express skepticism about the nature of what the government is doing, and how it is acting,” he said. “But Senator Branning, for example, has been in the government. She has been one of these actors and I think it’s fair to conclude that she might be more deferential to the legislature or to the Governor in how she approached her rulings.”

Yeargain notes that it’s not to say that would be the case for Branning.

He hopes voters will do research about the positions of the judges before returning to the polls for the runoff.

Advertisement

WATCH: Justice Jim Kitchen’s Interview on WLBT+

Want more WLBT news in your inbox? Click here to subscribe to our newsletter.

See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Please click here to report it and include the headline of the story in your email.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending