Connect with us

Maryland

Speaker Jones: ‘We aren’t going to deny children their constitutional rights’ – Maryland Matters

Published

on

Speaker Jones: ‘We aren’t going to deny children their constitutional rights’ – Maryland Matters


House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones (D-Baltimore County) testifies on a juvenile justice reform bill before the House Judiciary Committee on Feb. 8, 2024. Jones is sitting beside Del. Luke Clippinger (D-Baltimore), chair of the committee. Photo by William J. Ford.

As Maryland lawmakers take on criticism for a proposed juvenile justice reform bill, House Speaker Adrienne A. Jones (D-Baltimore County) testified Thursday in its support.

Jones, who rarely appears at bill hearings, spoke first before a packed Judiciary Committee room on House Bill 814 – Juvenile Law Reform. She expressed some frustration at how the legislation has been characterized by critics.

“I brought this bill forward because our juvenile system is clearly failing a small set of children who are repeat offenders. They are not monsters or teen villains,” she said. “They’re children and they are increasingly calling out for our help because they are not getting the services they need.”

Jones continued: “I know this bill is going to disappoint both sides of the debate, and I’m comfortable with that reality. What I’m not comfortable with is the way the debate around this bill…has been framed. In fact, I’m incredibly disappointed. We aren’t going to deny children their constitutional rights.”

Advertisement

Jones’ presence at Thursday’s marathon hearing represents lawmakers’ willingness to tweak the current juvenile justice system to combine rehabilitation with accountability. While she possesses plenty of political clout within the General Assembly, the question is how much weight she carries with the general public, many of whom call crime their top worry and are seeking tougher penalties for juvenile offenders.

The speaker has said the legislature won’t roll back juvenile justice reform measures that the legislature passed in 2022, but instead would work this year to improve the overall system.

The state Department of Juvenile Services (DJS), which oversees programs for troubled youth, has been criticized by some state’s attorneys, law enforcement officials and residents for not doing enough to help those young people and their families.

Del. Luke Clippinger (D-Baltimore City), chair of the Judiciary Committee, which reviewed the legislation for slightly more than five hours Thursday, said the proposed juvenile bill would require a review of data relating to arrests, completion of programs and recidivism from the Maryland Longitudinal Data System Center.

The legislation would also require the Commission on Juvenile Justice Reform and Emerging and Best Practices to complete several tasks such as reviewing the department’s education and diversionary programs, researching evidence-based programs and reviewing fatalities that involve children under the supervision of DJS. That commission was established by the 2022 legislation but hasn’t been fully seated.

Advertisement

The bill would more than double the number of members on the commission to include representatives with the state Department of Health, a private child welfare agency, the state Department of Education and Department of State Police.

“I believe this is sorely needed,” Clippinger said about the commission.

Alice Wilkerson, executive director of Advance Maryland, a nonprofit organization that assists other groups with advocacy efforts, praised the bill for including a commission.

But that’s where the compliments on the bill ended.

Wilkerson, who appeared on behalf of the Maryland Youth Justice Coalition, joined at least two dozen criminal justice advocates, lawyers and residents who testified against the legislation. A committee’s speaker list showed a total of 80 people who offered written or oral testimony opposing the measure.

Advertisement

“This bill will exacerbate racial disparities,” Wilkerson told the committee. “How will this improve safety? Will this lead to positive behavioral change? This legislation will grow the juvenile justice system, placing further personnel and budget strain on DJS that will lead to more cuts to services and programs.”

‘Fear, rather than evidence’

Maryland Public Defender Natasha Dartigue led those who opposed the bill who raised one central question: Where’s the data?

They were criticizing a part of the bill that would allow the Department of Juvenile Services to send to juvenile court children as young as 10 who have been arrested for serious offenses, including those involving a firearm, motor vehicle theft, animal abuse, or a third-degree sexual offense.

Alycia Capozello, deputy district public defender in Baltimore, speaks against juvenile justice legislation before the House Judiciary Committee on Feb. 8, 2024. Maryland Public Defender Natasha Dartigue, center, listens. Photo by William J. Ford.

Advertisement

According to the Department of Juvenile Services, complaints for youth under age 13 decreased by nearly 1,100 in fiscal year 2022 to 301 last fiscal year. Those complaints include crimes of violence, misdemeanors and Children in Need of Supervision referrals, which involve youths who need guidance, treatment, or rehabilitation.

“Proponents of the bill have alluded that the intent is to improve public safety. The impact of the bill is it that will impact it will incarcerate more Black children in marginalized communities,” Dartigue said. “We must base our discussions on facts, data and the evidence-based information. Despite the intent of public safety, House Bill 814 raises concerns about the perpetuation of systemic biases and the potential for decisions based on fear, rather than evidence.”

Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy (D), who spoke in support of the legislation, cited some figures from the county’s police department.

Larceny arrests of juveniles decreased from 387 in 2019 to 128 last year; arrests for disorderly conduct went down from 32 in 2019 to five last year.

McCarthy said the numbers of more serious crimes by juveniles in his jurisdiction increased, such as shootings from 16 in 2019 to 40 last year, and auto thefts from 44 to 364. He also discussed those figures at a Jan. 17 briefing before the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee.

Advertisement

“There have been declines in crime, but when it comes to violent crime and the crime that people care about, the numbers are exploding,” McCarthy said.

Some of the same people who testified Thursday may return to Annapolis on Friday because the Senate version legislation will be discussed before the Judicial Proceedings Committee.



Source link

Maryland

Maryland Dem lawmaker runs taxpayer-funded nonprofit with audit struggles

Published

on

Maryland Dem lawmaker runs taxpayer-funded nonprofit with audit struggles


A Baltimore nonprofit run by a Maryland lawmaker received more than $100 million in taxpayer dollars while auditors repeatedly flagged problems with its financial reporting and internal oversight, according to a Spotlight on Maryland investigation.

Del. Dana Stein, a Baltimore County Democrat, has worked as the executive director of Civic Works for roughly two decades while serving in the statehouse. Civic Works, which has received about $145 million in taxpayer funding since 2016, runs workforce, housing, environmental and community revitalization programs, primarily in the Baltimore area.

Stein earns more than $200,000 annually at Civic Works and has served in the General Assembly since 2007. He chairs the Maryland House environmental subcommittee. Civic Works receives government funding for programs involving weatherization, energy efficiency, clean-energy workforce development and environmental projects.

Stein insisted he goes through the proper process of reporting conflicts of interest to the State House and recusing himself from relevant votes. Meanwhile, critics say that State House policies are not enough to prevent Stein from taking advantage of his legislative influence over billions of taxpayer dollars, especially amid ongoing audit struggles at his organization.

Advertisement

A Spotlight on Maryland analysis of the nonprofit’s federal single audits—the annual audits required for organizations that spend at least $750,000 in federal funds—shows Civic Works received about $145 million in taxpayer funding between 2016 and 2025. Government funding averaged about $14.5 million per year and accounted for roughly 80% of the organization’s support during that period when stacked against private donations.

Audits show that federal funds were passed through to Civic Works by an extensive list of agencies within the Maryland and Baltimore City governments.

In 2006, the year before Stein took office, Civic Works received $1.9 million in government grants, according to IRS tax filings. By 2016, Civic Works received $8.2 million in government grants—a roughly 330% increase over a decade.

IRS tax filings from Civic Works show Stein earned about $96,000 in 2014 and approximately $231,000 in 2024—an increase of about 140%.

Maryland Del. Brian Chisholm, an Anne Arundel County Republican, questioned the ethics of Stein making more than $200,000 at a taxpayer-funded nonprofit as he works in the State House. He also questioned how Stein could manage tens of millions of taxpayer dollars while he worked full-time as a lawmaker for roughly a quarter of the year.

Advertisement

“I think it’s a waste of taxpayer money, in my opinion, because I don’t see the return on investment,” he told Spotlight on Maryland. “I would assume they’re political payoffs It goes back to the dawn of time when we first got into politics and power. How do you influence politics? You influence with money.”

What the audits found

The most recent single audit, covering fiscal 2025, reported a significant deficiency in financial reporting at Civic Works—a repeat finding from the previous year. Auditors said Civic Works had to correct more than $2.2 million in financial records after auditors identified errors in the organization’s financial records. Civic Works told auditors it implemented new grant-tracking and financial reporting procedures in response.

Auditors also determined the nonprofit did not qualify for the federal government’s low-risk auditee designation.

The 2024 audit identified both a significant deficiency and a material weakness, a more severe audit finding. Auditors said the organization’s initial federal expenditures schedule omitted programs, misclassified expenditures and left off about $1 million in federal spending before it was corrected. Auditors again determined Civic Works did not qualify as a low-risk auditee.

The pattern stretches back years. In 2023, auditors reported a material weakness involving lease accounting and financial reporting that resulted in a restatement of prior-year balances. In 2021, auditors reported a material weakness involving revenue recognition and accounting, resulting in another financial restatement.

Advertisement

In 2019, auditors identified a significant deficiency involving federal grant compliance after required documentation for an employee background check could not be produced. In 2017, auditors reported a significant deficiency after required federal grant reports were submitted without documented review.

Linda Parsons, a professor at The University of Alabama focused on nonprofit accounting, said the repeated audit findings, paired with a determination that Civic Works is not a low-risk auditee, show the organization should not continue to receive taxpayer dollars.

“I would be particularly careful with this organization if I were providing grant funding,” she told Spotlight on Maryland. “What I see is that a lawmaker with influence and power in the granting process is moving increasingly large grants to an organization with which that lawmaker is affiliated, and that there’s trouble with the reports that are overseeing the use of those grants.”

Chisholm agreed that Civic Works should not receive any more taxpayer money.

“I think they need to be looked at with a fine-tooth comb. Why are you failing so many audits, and do you actually deserve the millions of dollars?” he told Spotlight on Maryland. “The funding should dry up at some point because you can’t prove that you’re spending the public’s money in a responsible way.”

Advertisement

Civic Works responds

A spokeswoman for Civic Works emailed Spotlight on Maryland a statement on behalf of the organization and Stein, emphasizing that the lawmaker takes necessary steps to ensure there is not a conflict of interest between his two jobs.

“Since his election in 2006, Mr. Stein has regularly consulted with the legislature’s ethics adviser to avoid actual and potential conflicts between his legislative and non-profit roles. He has always followed the ethics adviser’s advice regarding disclosure of potential conflicts and actual recusal on votes. He has disclosed and disclaimed potential or appearances of a conflict and those forms are on the Maryland General Assembly website,” the Civic Works spokeswoman wrote.

“Mr. Stein has followed all advice from the legislature’s ethics adviser regarding recusal from matters that would create a conflict of interest between his legislative and non-profit roles. He does not interact with government officials in matters related to procurements or negotiation of contracts,” she added.

Salary spending increases 100%

IRS filings show Civic Works expanded rapidly in recent years amid audit struggles. The nonprofit reported 286 employees in 2020 and 347 employees in 2024—a roughly 21% increase—while spending on salaries increased from $5.8 million to $12 million—a roughly 100% increase. Payroll accounted for between 58% and 68% of annual spending during those years.

Stein lists his position with Civic Works on his financial disclosure statement. His disclosure also lists the state agencies from which his nonprofit receives funding.

Advertisement

Stein filed a Form D disclaimer of an apparent or presumed conflict of interest this year, noting that while Civic Works has a partnership with BGE, he is “able to participate in legislative action relating to the above fairly, objectively, and in the public interest.”

Since 2013, Stein has filed 25 Form E statements of recusal from voting and other legislative actions due to a reported conflict of interest arising from his employment with Civic Works. However, the last recusal he reported was in 2023, even though his organization received taxpayer dollars from the Maryland government in subsequent years.

‘Accountable to the public’

Parsons said that while Stein may be following legally required conflict-of-interest policies, he still has a concerning level of influence over the grantmaking process.

“The conflict of interest, that to me is probably the most troubling thing,” she told Spotlight on Maryland. “If you have an individual that’s in charge of a nonprofit that’s also elected to office, that’s not necessarily a problem. But when money is steered toward that organization and increasing amounts at all levels, then I would want to know who’s making sure that this is operating properly.”

A spokeswoman for Maryland Gov. Wes Moore’s office emailed a statement to Spotlight on Maryland that emphasized the federal single audits of Civic Works do not assess how state funding is spent. Maryland state agencies, she wrote, have their own individual oversight mechanisms in place.

Advertisement

“The Moore-Miller administration is committed to ensuring every dollar of taxpayer funding is awarded fairly, spent responsibly, and accountable to the public,” Moore’s spokeswoman wrote.

Several agencies within the Maryland government provided written statements to Spotlight on Maryland detailing various individual oversight policies for programs they fund at Civic Works. The Maryland agencies stated that no action has been taken in response to findings in Civic Works’ federal single audits.

$1 lease in Baltimore

Civic Works operates at Clifton Mansion, the former estate of philanthropist Johns Hopkins. The nonprofit has a lease agreement with Baltimore City that allows them to pay just $1 per year to use, maintain and renovate the property.

Additionally, Civic Works has received $13.5 million in taxpayer dollars through the Baltimore City government since August 2022, according to a government database. This included $4.5 million in taxpayer dollars from the Baltimore City Health Department to Civic Works from 2022 to 2024, described in the database as being for “Coronavirus.”

A spokesperson for Baltimore City Mayor Brandon Scott’s office emphasized that the city “employs best practices for grant administration, signing grant agreements that ensure transparency and accountability.”

Advertisement

The spokesperson noted that recent federal audits of Civic Works “identified no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal controls over federal programs, finding that Civic Works complied with all requirements that could have a material effect on its major federal programs.”

The mayor’s office did not respond to additional questions on audit concerns at Civic Works regarding financial reporting and scheduled expenditures for federal awards.

Civic Works is partnered with Baltimore City Public Schools to operate the “Reach! Partnership School,” which prepares students for college and careers. The 2025 federal single audits revealed the organization received $9.7 million from Baltimore City Public Schools that year. Reach is incorporated separately but included in the audits because Civic Works manages the organization.

A spokeswoman for City Schools said they consider federal audit findings as part of their oversight of Civic Works.

“We will continue to monitor the Operator’s progress to confirm that the audit issues have been appropriately resolved,” the spokeswoman emailed Spotlight on Maryland. “City Schools will also continue to review audits and other financial documents to ensure the organization is on track and making progress consistent with its Corrective Action plan and regular contractual requirements.”

Advertisement

Spotlight on Maryland is a joint venture by The Baltimore Sun, FOX45 News and WJLA in Washington, D.C. Have a news tip? Call 410-467-4670 or emailSpotlightOnMaryland@sbgtv.com. Contact Patrick Hauf atpjhauf@sbgtv.comand @PatrickHauf.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland Governor calls out Apple over Towson Town Center store closure – 9to5Mac

Published

on

Maryland Governor calls out Apple over Towson Town Center store closure – 9to5Mac


Apple Towson Town Center employees received an endorsement from Maryland Governor Wes Moore in their fight against Apple over the company’s decision to close its first US unionized store. Here are the details.

Apple faces new pressure over Towson store closure

A couple of months ago, Apple announced that its Towson Town Center would close its doors for good on June 20, alongside two other stores located in commercial centers in California and Connecticut.

The Apple Towson Town Center workers have been represented by the IAM Union since 2022, after becoming the first Apple retail store in the US to unionize.

Advertisement

Soon after the announcement, IAM Union decried Apple’s handling of the store closure. While the company says that the union agreement only requires transfers within 50 miles of the Towson store, with severance offered otherwise, the IAM Union argues that Apple is denying them the broader relocation options available to employees at non-union stores.

Since then, in addition to the pushback from the IAM Union, Apple has also received letters from Maryland lawmakers and, just yesterday, from40 members of Congress, asking it to reconsider closing the store or to provide Towson employees with the same transfer opportunities offered to workers at non-union stores.

Today, Maryland Governor Wes Moore chimed in, manifesting his support for the Towson workers.

Although Governor Moore stopped short of accusing Apple of union-busting practices, as members of Congress did in their letter to the company, he did explicitly call on Apple to give Towson workers the same transfer rights and opportunities afforded to other employees.

Here’s Governor Moore’s statement:

Advertisement

“The Towson Town Center Apple Store has been a retail anchor for the region since 2022. (…) It’s provided good-paying jobs, increased economic activity, and been an important localized service hub for the region. As the first unionized Apple retail store in the country and a strong-performing location, its workers proved that economic growth and workers’ rights go hand-in-hand. Now, the rug is being pulled out from underneath them. These Marylanders deserve the same transfer rights and opportunities afforded to other Apple employees, and we stand with them.”

The IAM Union praised Governor Moore’s support and called on the company to act before the June 20 deadline.

Apple, for its part, remains silent on the issue, ever since it provided the following statement to 9to5Mac when the IAM Union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board on April 28:

We strongly disagree with the claims made, and we will continue to abide by the agreement that was negotiated and agreed with the union. We look forward to presenting all of the facts to the NLRB.

As of right now, the Apple Towson Town Center’s page says the store will close on June 20 at 8:00 p.m.

Worth checking out on Amazon

Add 9to5Mac as a preferred source on Google
Add 9to5Mac as a preferred source on Google

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland 6th District race: Mariela Roca (R)

Published

on

Maryland 6th District race: Mariela Roca (R)


Republican candidate Mariela Roca is making another play for Maryland’s 6th Congressional District. On The Final 5 with Jim Lokay, she talks about her campaign ahead of the June primary, and the lessons she’s learned on the campaign trail.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending