Connect with us

Maryland

Maryland lawmakers will weigh legalizing internet gambling. How would it work?

Published

on

Maryland lawmakers will weigh legalizing internet gambling. How would it work?


As Maryland lawmakers look for ways to raise money to close a budget gap and fund the state’s priorities, some are looking to online gambling as part of the solution.

Lawmakers again will consider allowing Marylanders to legally play poker, blackjack, roulette and other forms of gambling — with the state taking a hefty cut, primarily to fund education programs.

The proposal, dubbed “iGaming” in Annapolis, will get its first airing at the General Assembly on Wednesday. Lawmakers have wrestled with the idea of internet gambling multiple times but never settled on a plan. Last year, an internet gambling measure passed the House of Delegates but went nowhere in the Senate.

Sen. Ron Watson, one of the measure’s sponsors, said he hopes now is the year, given the state’s budget picture and the momentum of internet gambling in other states. Under the bill he is sponsoring along with Del. Vanessa Atterbeary, a Howard County Democrat, most of the proceeds would be directed to pay for the state’s ambitious education plan, the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future.

Advertisement

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

“Everybody makes such a big deal out of the Blueprint, and now we want to slow the rollout and push things back — and nobody wants to experience this revenue,” said Watson, a Prince George’s County Democrat.

Here’s how the internet gambling proposal would work.

Voters get a say

Maryland voters would get an up-or-down vote on internet gambling during the 2026 election, in the form of an amendment to the state constitution.

That’s how the existing forms of gambling — slot machines, followed by casino table games and then sports betting — became legal in the state.

Advertisement

That means it would take some time to get internet gambling up and running, because the state would have to solicit applicants for licenses and pick who would get to participate in the industry.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Money for education

The state government would take a cut of each internet gambling company’s profits, plowing most of that money into the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future Fund.

Nonpartisan analysts estimate that once the internet gambling companies are up and running, the state would bring in $225 million in the first full year — a number that would grow in future years.

The state’s cut would be 20% of the proceeds from live dealer games and 45% of the proceeds from other types of gambling.

Advertisement

A small portion of the money would be sent to the state’s problem gambling fund, state regulators, horse racing subsidies and local governments. There also would be a fund set up to assist casino workers who lose their jobs due to internet gambling.

The bill has a complicated licensing regime that offers opportunities for existing casinos to gain licenses, as well as opportunities for minority and disadvantaged businesses to get into the industry. Casinos could gain additional licenses if they launch joint ventures with minority companies.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

An inevitable gambling expansion?

Supporters of internet gambling argue that millions of Marylanders are gambling online already, but they’re doing it illegally.

“Just type, ‘Can I play online poker?’ or ‘Can I play online slots?’ while sitting in Maryland and you’ll be directed to dozens of websites that say they are legal and legitimate. But the reality is they are not licensed and they are not regulated and the state gets zero revenue,” said John Pappas with iDEA Growth, a nonprofit that represents companies involved with internet gambling.

Advertisement

Pappas said seven states already have internet gambling, including nearby Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Cannibalizing existing gambling?

One of the arguments against online gambling — at least the one made by some casino operators — is that it would take away business from the existing forms of gambling.

Nonpartisan state analysts estimate that once internet gambling is fully operational, the state’s six casinos could see a 10% loss of profits from their slot machines and table games. If that plays out, there would be a corresponding loss in money going to the state funds that casinos support, including education, horse racing subsidies and aid to local governments.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Baltimore-based Cordish Companies, which owns the Live! Casino Hotel in Hanover, opposed internet gambling last year, with the company’s top lawyer saying it would a “jobs killer” that could end up causing losses in important revenues from the state.

Advertisement

Mark Stewart, Cordish’s general counsel, wrote to lawmakers last year that they should study the issue more to understand the possible consequences. “There is too much at stake for the State in terms of jobs, comprehensive tax revenues and potential social costs to rush this important public policy decision,” he wrote. (The Baltimore Banner leases an office in a Cordish-owned building.)

Proponents say the concerns about internet gambling cannibalizing bricks-and-mortar gambling are overblown. Pappas points to an analysis his organization did using data from Pennsylvania, where revenue from slots and table games have rebounded to pre-pandemic levels and overall gambling revenue has increased since internet gambling was legalized in 2019.

Concerns have also been raised that the ease of internet gambling — having access in one’s phone in the palm of their hand — may drive problem gambling. Republicans voiced opposition to internet gambling last year citing worries over problem gambling, with one lawmaker calling it a “bad bet” for Maryland.

Uncertain prospects

Internet gambling has been debated multiple times in Annapolis, where there is more interest in the House of Delegates than in the state Senate.

The Baltimore Banner thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Advertisement

The House approved internet gambling last year and included it in their version of the state budget, but the Senate did not go along with it.

Senate President Bill Ferguson, a Baltimore Democrat, did not predict good odds this year.

“I think there are a lot of issues when it comes to internet gaming that we have to work through,” Ferguson told reporters Tuesday. “I don’t know that there’s been a significant change for members of the [Budget and Taxation] committee from last year.”

Ferguson said lawmakers should be thoughtful in their approach to the issue.

“Just because we are in need of new revenues doesn’t mean that everything all of a sudden makes sense,” he said.

Advertisement





Source link

Maryland

Full-length Replay: Maryland | FOX Sports

Published

on

Full-length Replay: Maryland | FOX Sports



Full-length Replay: Maryland | FOX Sports































Advertisement

From Maryland International Raceway in Mechanicsville, MD



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maryland

Man found dead in South Carolina after shooting ex-girlfriend in Maryland

Published

on

Man found dead in South Carolina after shooting ex-girlfriend in Maryland


A South Carolina man is dead after he shot his ex-girlfriend in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, on Tuesday, the Prince George’s County Police Department (PGPD) said.

The man was identified as 30-year-old Dante Morris of Fort Mill, South Carolina.

Police said officers were called to the 10400 block of Birdie Lane around 7:15 a.m. on Tuesday for the domestic-related shooting. A woman was found outside with gunshot wounds. She remains in the hospital in critical condition.

READ | Stolen car chase across Montgomery County and DC leads to 4 juveniles arrested

Advertisement

PGPD obtained an arrest warrant for Morris, but learned that he had driven back to South Carolina after the shooting. He was found dead on Tuesday evening.

Police confirmed Morris and the woman had been a prior relationship.

SEE ALSO | Prince George’s County steps up enforcement, penalties against illegal dumping

Anyone with information that could help police in their investigation should call 301-516-2512.

If you or someone you know is facing domestic violence, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 800-799-7233 or text BEGIN to 88788.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland Dem lawmaker runs taxpayer-funded nonprofit with audit struggles

Published

on

Maryland Dem lawmaker runs taxpayer-funded nonprofit with audit struggles


A Baltimore nonprofit run by a Maryland lawmaker received more than $100 million in taxpayer dollars while auditors repeatedly flagged problems with its financial reporting and internal oversight, according to a Spotlight on Maryland investigation.

Del. Dana Stein, a Baltimore County Democrat, has worked as the executive director of Civic Works for roughly two decades while serving in the statehouse. Civic Works, which has received about $145 million in taxpayer funding since 2016, runs workforce, housing, environmental and community revitalization programs, primarily in the Baltimore area.

Stein earns more than $200,000 annually at Civic Works and has served in the General Assembly since 2007. He chairs the Maryland House environmental subcommittee. Civic Works receives government funding for programs involving weatherization, energy efficiency, clean-energy workforce development and environmental projects.

Stein insisted he goes through the proper process of reporting conflicts of interest to the State House and recusing himself from relevant votes. Meanwhile, critics say that State House policies are not enough to prevent Stein from taking advantage of his legislative influence over billions of taxpayer dollars, especially amid ongoing audit struggles at his organization.

Advertisement

A Spotlight on Maryland analysis of the nonprofit’s federal single audits—the annual audits required for organizations that spend at least $750,000 in federal funds—shows Civic Works received about $145 million in taxpayer funding between 2016 and 2025. Government funding averaged about $14.5 million per year and accounted for roughly 80% of the organization’s support during that period when stacked against private donations.

Audits show that federal funds were passed through to Civic Works by an extensive list of agencies within the Maryland and Baltimore City governments.

In 2006, the year before Stein took office, Civic Works received $1.9 million in government grants, according to IRS tax filings. By 2016, Civic Works received $8.2 million in government grants—a roughly 330% increase over a decade.

IRS tax filings from Civic Works show Stein earned about $96,000 in 2014 and approximately $231,000 in 2024—an increase of about 140%.

Maryland Del. Brian Chisholm, an Anne Arundel County Republican, questioned the ethics of Stein making more than $200,000 at a taxpayer-funded nonprofit as he works in the State House. He also questioned how Stein could manage tens of millions of taxpayer dollars while he worked full-time as a lawmaker for roughly a quarter of the year.

Advertisement

“I think it’s a waste of taxpayer money, in my opinion, because I don’t see the return on investment,” he told Spotlight on Maryland. “I would assume they’re political payoffs It goes back to the dawn of time when we first got into politics and power. How do you influence politics? You influence with money.”

What the audits found

The most recent single audit, covering fiscal 2025, reported a significant deficiency in financial reporting at Civic Works—a repeat finding from the previous year. Auditors said Civic Works had to correct more than $2.2 million in financial records after auditors identified errors in the organization’s financial records. Civic Works told auditors it implemented new grant-tracking and financial reporting procedures in response.

Auditors also determined the nonprofit did not qualify for the federal government’s low-risk auditee designation.

The 2024 audit identified both a significant deficiency and a material weakness, a more severe audit finding. Auditors said the organization’s initial federal expenditures schedule omitted programs, misclassified expenditures and left off about $1 million in federal spending before it was corrected. Auditors again determined Civic Works did not qualify as a low-risk auditee.

The pattern stretches back years. In 2023, auditors reported a material weakness involving lease accounting and financial reporting that resulted in a restatement of prior-year balances. In 2021, auditors reported a material weakness involving revenue recognition and accounting, resulting in another financial restatement.

Advertisement

In 2019, auditors identified a significant deficiency involving federal grant compliance after required documentation for an employee background check could not be produced. In 2017, auditors reported a significant deficiency after required federal grant reports were submitted without documented review.

Linda Parsons, a professor at The University of Alabama focused on nonprofit accounting, said the repeated audit findings, paired with a determination that Civic Works is not a low-risk auditee, show the organization should not continue to receive taxpayer dollars.

“I would be particularly careful with this organization if I were providing grant funding,” she told Spotlight on Maryland. “What I see is that a lawmaker with influence and power in the granting process is moving increasingly large grants to an organization with which that lawmaker is affiliated, and that there’s trouble with the reports that are overseeing the use of those grants.”

Chisholm agreed that Civic Works should not receive any more taxpayer money.

“I think they need to be looked at with a fine-tooth comb. Why are you failing so many audits, and do you actually deserve the millions of dollars?” he told Spotlight on Maryland. “The funding should dry up at some point because you can’t prove that you’re spending the public’s money in a responsible way.”

Advertisement

Civic Works responds

A spokeswoman for Civic Works emailed Spotlight on Maryland a statement on behalf of the organization and Stein, emphasizing that the lawmaker takes necessary steps to ensure there is not a conflict of interest between his two jobs.

“Since his election in 2006, Mr. Stein has regularly consulted with the legislature’s ethics adviser to avoid actual and potential conflicts between his legislative and non-profit roles. He has always followed the ethics adviser’s advice regarding disclosure of potential conflicts and actual recusal on votes. He has disclosed and disclaimed potential or appearances of a conflict and those forms are on the Maryland General Assembly website,” the Civic Works spokeswoman wrote.

“Mr. Stein has followed all advice from the legislature’s ethics adviser regarding recusal from matters that would create a conflict of interest between his legislative and non-profit roles. He does not interact with government officials in matters related to procurements or negotiation of contracts,” she added.

Salary spending increases 100%

IRS filings show Civic Works expanded rapidly in recent years amid audit struggles. The nonprofit reported 286 employees in 2020 and 347 employees in 2024—a roughly 21% increase—while spending on salaries increased from $5.8 million to $12 million—a roughly 100% increase. Payroll accounted for between 58% and 68% of annual spending during those years.

Stein lists his position with Civic Works on his financial disclosure statement. His disclosure also lists the state agencies from which his nonprofit receives funding.

Advertisement

Stein filed a Form D disclaimer of an apparent or presumed conflict of interest this year, noting that while Civic Works has a partnership with BGE, he is “able to participate in legislative action relating to the above fairly, objectively, and in the public interest.”

Since 2013, Stein has filed 25 Form E statements of recusal from voting and other legislative actions due to a reported conflict of interest arising from his employment with Civic Works. However, the last recusal he reported was in 2023, even though his organization received taxpayer dollars from the Maryland government in subsequent years.

‘Accountable to the public’

Parsons said that while Stein may be following legally required conflict-of-interest policies, he still has a concerning level of influence over the grantmaking process.

“The conflict of interest, that to me is probably the most troubling thing,” she told Spotlight on Maryland. “If you have an individual that’s in charge of a nonprofit that’s also elected to office, that’s not necessarily a problem. But when money is steered toward that organization and increasing amounts at all levels, then I would want to know who’s making sure that this is operating properly.”

A spokeswoman for Maryland Gov. Wes Moore’s office emailed a statement to Spotlight on Maryland that emphasized the federal single audits of Civic Works do not assess how state funding is spent. Maryland state agencies, she wrote, have their own individual oversight mechanisms in place.

Advertisement

“The Moore-Miller administration is committed to ensuring every dollar of taxpayer funding is awarded fairly, spent responsibly, and accountable to the public,” Moore’s spokeswoman wrote.

Several agencies within the Maryland government provided written statements to Spotlight on Maryland detailing various individual oversight policies for programs they fund at Civic Works. The Maryland agencies stated that no action has been taken in response to findings in Civic Works’ federal single audits.

$1 lease in Baltimore

Civic Works operates at Clifton Mansion, the former estate of philanthropist Johns Hopkins. The nonprofit has a lease agreement with Baltimore City that allows them to pay just $1 per year to use, maintain and renovate the property.

Additionally, Civic Works has received $13.5 million in taxpayer dollars through the Baltimore City government since August 2022, according to a government database. This included $4.5 million in taxpayer dollars from the Baltimore City Health Department to Civic Works from 2022 to 2024, described in the database as being for “Coronavirus.”

A spokesperson for Baltimore City Mayor Brandon Scott’s office emphasized that the city “employs best practices for grant administration, signing grant agreements that ensure transparency and accountability.”

Advertisement

The spokesperson noted that recent federal audits of Civic Works “identified no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal controls over federal programs, finding that Civic Works complied with all requirements that could have a material effect on its major federal programs.”

The mayor’s office did not respond to additional questions on audit concerns at Civic Works regarding financial reporting and scheduled expenditures for federal awards.

Civic Works is partnered with Baltimore City Public Schools to operate the “Reach! Partnership School,” which prepares students for college and careers. The 2025 federal single audits revealed the organization received $9.7 million from Baltimore City Public Schools that year. Reach is incorporated separately but included in the audits because Civic Works manages the organization.

A spokeswoman for City Schools said they consider federal audit findings as part of their oversight of Civic Works.

“We will continue to monitor the Operator’s progress to confirm that the audit issues have been appropriately resolved,” the spokeswoman emailed Spotlight on Maryland. “City Schools will also continue to review audits and other financial documents to ensure the organization is on track and making progress consistent with its Corrective Action plan and regular contractual requirements.”

Advertisement

Spotlight on Maryland is a joint venture by The Baltimore Sun, FOX45 News and WJLA in Washington, D.C. Have a news tip? Call 410-467-4670 or emailSpotlightOnMaryland@sbgtv.com. Contact Patrick Hauf atpjhauf@sbgtv.comand @PatrickHauf.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending