Connect with us

Louisiana

Money, Influence and Louisiana: the fight over a Cedar Rapids Casino

Published

on

Money, Influence and Louisiana: the fight over a Cedar Rapids Casino


CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (KCRG) – More than 800 miles separate Cedar Rapids and Bossier City, Louisiana. But they both are communities banking on transformation with gaming, and one casino closure in Louisiana could share something with the proposed one in Cedar Rapids: they share the same operator, Peninsula Pacific Entertainment.

When Peninsula Pacific bought DiamondJacks casino in Bossier City, it promised to re-invest in the aging riverboat and accompanying hotel. But instead, DiamondJacks closed during the pandemic and never re-opened; eventually the empty property became a magnet for criminals.

The city leaders and state gaming regulators were enraged.

Ronnie Jones was the head of the Louisiana Gaming Control Board and says he tried to take away DiamondJack’s gaming license since it wasn’t open.

Advertisement

“That week I directed the Attorney General’s office to get me an opinion on what the state of Louisiana needed to do to take his license away from him, because he had violated the terms and the conditions of that license,” said Jones.

DiamondJacks was one of many casinos in the northwest Louisiana region called the Shreveport- Bossier City Metro. DiamondJacks’ operator, Peninsula Pacific, blamed the pandemic’s financial impact for making it impossible to reopen. The same operator, now called Peninsula Pacific Entertainment or P2E, is behind Linn County’s bid for a casino.

Jones described how he learned that Peninsula Pacific wasn’t reopening after the pandemic shutdown. And he takes particular issue with how the founder and chairman, Brent Stevens, communicated with state regulators and the casino’s 349 workers.

“I get a call from a reporter from a TV station in Shreveport, and she goes ‘Chairman Jones. What’s this about Diamond Jack’s not reopening?’ I said, excuse me. She goes yeah, there’s a Facebook post to their employees that they’re closing permanently,” said Jones.

Jones, who led the Louisiana Gaming Board from 2013 to 2020, reached out to KCRG after seeing that Stevens was part of the group looking to open a new casino in Linn County.

Advertisement

“The only thing that I would urge is as a former regulator that they get Brent Stevens before them under oath and ask him the right questions. And I’m not suggesting he’s not deserving of a license. I’m not suggesting that he might not build a beautiful property that’s great for Iowa, but the last year experience that I had with Brent, who I considered a friend as well as a licensee, just raised some issues with me as a regulator. That’s all,” said Jones.

Steve Gray, who has led the investor group for a Cedar Rapids casino for nearly 13 years, does not share Jones’ concerns about Brent Stevens and Peninsula Pacific. Gray researched potential operators and saw the success Peninsula Pacific had running other casinos in Iowa – namely Diamond Jo Casino in Dubuque and Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Sioux City.

Diamond Jo’s revenue grew 56 percent under Peninsula Pacific’s ownership.

Steve Gray: “I mean who are those people that have a good reputation with the commission that have done a good job, financially that have done a good job with problem gamblers that have really exemplified what the statue really intends for gaming in Iowa and our partners and now P2E that they were then known as The Diamond Jo in Dubuque they, they were just head and above everybody else from third party references.”

Beth Malicki, KCRG-TV9: “Do you have, or have you heard any concerns about Brent Stevens, Peninsula? Any of it?”

Advertisement

Gray: “No, no. Okay. And you know, doing what we do in life. If we were measured by our stumbles, instead of our accomplishments, investors would never invest.”

Malicki: “So, you don’t have concerns about this operator. In fact, you would elevate his performance to say, one of the best.”

Gray: “I, we, continue to believe, so when we pick them, we’d spent about a year understanding how they operated, you know, what would the project look like? How would they operate? Who would they hire? Or what would the culture be in the gaming operation and the surrounding amenities? That was really important to the local investor group. And we became convinced that they were the right people, but the sanity checks that we did with the Racing and Gaming Commission, also, provided us a little comfort… But over the last 12 years, we have really got to know them. So not only do I refer to them as partners, I refer to them as friends. They have done nothing in the last 12 years to make us, even for a second, question them as the right operator. In fact, if anything we are just absolutely thrilled with our choice.”

Those like Gray who’ve been pushing for a casino in Linn County have had to be resilient. They’ve been through two failed efforts to get a license from the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission in 2014 and 2017; state lawmakers passing a two-year moratorium in 2022 to pause any new casinos in Iowa; and, now, an organized effort by existing casinos to prevent any new competition.

Gray: “I’m beginning to feel like General Custer felt in [the Battle of] Little Bighorn. There are a lot of different arrows, coming from a lot of different places… But this ‘Iowans for Common Sense’ is unequivocally not grassroots.”

Advertisement

Gray: “It’s 50 percent funded by Riverside, Elite [Casino Resorts], and the other 50 percent by other operators in the state. One thing that I do want to make very clear is that not all of the other operators are participating in this. I mean I happen to have friends that own casinos in the state and they’re not participating. So it’s just a select few people that are financially contributing to this grassroots organization.”

Malicki: “Do you think the arrows and those who are shooting them toward this project are behaving above board?”

Gray: “You know, we’re all competitive. And you know, Beth, my career over the last 40 years, I’ve competed with AT&T, US West, very dominant providers with huge balance sheets. And, by and large, we’ve done pretty well. But we’ve never stooped morally, ethically, and we’ve never even gotten into a gray area, you know, pun intended. I mean, we’ve tried to conduct ourselves above board. We don’t have the water park that we were promised.”

That water park reference is from 2013. That’s when Linn County voters were deciding if they’d support gaming and the Chief Executive Officer of Riverside Casino and Golf Resort, Dan Kehl, promised to build a water park if people in Cedar Rapids voted ‘No.’ The county voted ‘yes,’ so no water park, even though the community never got a casino.

Now Kehl is trying again to prevent competition from encroaching on his property in Washington County. Kehl employs about 700 people and his revenues at Riverside have grown 43.5 percent in five years with gaming revenue reaching $129 million in fiscal year 2024.

Advertisement

We asked for an interview with Kehl and did not receive a response. But he did speak to the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission in November of 2024 at a public forum.

“We are opposed to the Cedar Rapids casino license because of cannibalization in a saturated market will significantly hurt our Iowa company,” Kehl said to the Commission.

Steve Gray and other supporters of Cedar Crossing say Kehl is pulling every lever available to stop a casino. From claiming the Linn County ballot language from 2021 is not clear enough to allow a casino to urging lawmakers to extend a moratorium to ban any new licenses.

Gray says Kehl is the main driver of a campaign called “Iowans for Common Sense.” That campaign is running commercials and gathering signatures to oppose any new casinos, but especially one in Cedar Rapids.

“Now with this petition, that was put forward as a grassroots organization, and then when we saw this email and how it’s being organized by the Iowa Gaming Association and pushed out to all the other operators and asking for their financial participation. Yeah, that’s just not right,” said Gray.

Advertisement

Gray provided a copy of what he says is an email from the Iowa Gaming Association. That is the trade organization supporting the state’s existing 19 commercial casinos. Iowa has four tribal casinos, but they aren’t part of the Iowa Gaming Association and don’t need a license to operate from the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission.

The email from the Iowa Gaming Association is urging the state’s casinos to join Riverside in stopping Cedar Crossing before it starts.

Back in Louisiana, the place where DiamondJacks once sat empty, is transforming. The new casino will have a new owner and open on February 13. It will bring back hundreds of jobs and invest $270 million to build a new casino.

Diamond Jacks serves as a worst case scenario of what can happen if a casino goes bust, which is exactly what Iowa’s regulators want to avoid. And while the Shreveport – Bossier City market has a population of about 100 thousand more people than the Cedar Rapids Metro, that region alone has six casinos. Cedar Rapids is hoping for one.

And those behind the project are sure they have the right plan, with the right operator, the only question is if it’s the right time.

Advertisement

“This is round three to your question. Will there be a Round four? Or a round 5? Probably. But you know we’re all doing this because of what we think could be very beneficial to our home county and our hometown,” said Gray.

Cedar Rapids Casino investor Steve Gray speaks about the effort to get a license to build a casino and the push back from the casino industry against it.

What one casino backer calls cannibalization, another calls competition. And the casino poised to lose the most if Cedar Crossing receives a license is Riverside.

Damon John is the General Manager at Riverside. He spoke to KCRG in early January of 2025.

“If you look at a nearly 30 percent reduction on our revenues, extrapolating that on our staff of nearly 700 employees here, I mean we’re talking 200 employees, 200 jobs on the line,” said John.

Gray acknowledges the hit Riverside would take.

Advertisement

“So if 30 percent, 40 percent, even 50 percent of the revenues that they enjoy come from Linn County, why hasn’t Linn County participated in the nonprofit dollars that are being distributed? It’s just disproportionate. I mean, they commit more to their nonprofit in a year than Linn County has received in the last 15,” said Gray.

Riverside is the third most visited casino in Iowa, and fourth in terms of revenue. In Fiscal Year 2024, its adjusted gross revenue reached nearly $130 million, a growth of 47 percent in a decade. And many of the Riverside patrons come from Linn County.

“Riverside’s investors have done very well in that project. They would continue to do well; it’s not going to render that facility bankrupt or insolvent. Would it be smaller? Yes. But you know what? Let’s compete. I mean create a better product as I’ve always done and let’s just compete,” said Gray.

If Cedar Crossing gets a license, Linn County is poised to get more than $6 million a year to give to local nonprofits. State law requires casinos to give three percent of gaming revenue to nonprofits. Cedar Crossing says it will give nearly triple that amount and commit eight percent to nonprofits.

In Washington County, it’s clear the impact of those nonprofit dollars. The Washington County Riverboat Foundation holds the gaming license for the Riverside Casino and Golf Resort.

Advertisement

Since 2006, the Foundation has given out grants totaling $58 million, with the vast majority staying in Washington County. Like the more than half a million-dollar grant for Kalona, in Washington County, from the casino-funded Foundation, and $630 thousand for an expansion on the Wellman Public Library.

The mayor of Cedar Falls, Danny Laudick, spoke to the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission to oppose a Cedar Rapids Casino.

“This decision not only impacts one city or one county, but all of eastern Iowa, including the small communities that rely on the amenities and services that we’re able to provide as a region because of the support of the existing casinos,” said Laudick.

Parts of Iowa that don’t have casinos also receive a portion of the gaming revenues. But it’s a pittance compared to what counties with casinos get.

In 2022, the Washington County Riverboat Foundation gave the Washington County YMCA $3 million for its new pool.

Advertisement

That same year, Linn County received a total of $37,000 in grants from gaming revenue. The YMCA in Cedar Rapids received a grant funded through gaming revenue for $10,000 – the largest amount awarded in Linn County.

The state regulators who award licenses commissioned two studies to determine the impact Cedar Crossing would have. On the positive side, one study notes the “Cedar Crossing Casino and Entertainment Center is attractively designed and well located, such that we expect it will be successful in drawing large numbers of Iowa gamblers.”

The studies touted the 300 new jobs, the $6.8 million in added tax revenue for the state and $13.7 million in local tax revenue.

On the negative side, roughly half of Cedar Crossings’ revenue would come from cannibalization – taking money from other casinos.

The largest impact would be on Riverside Casino and Golf Resort. The Marquette Advisors Market Analysis shows Riverside would lose 26 percent of its annual revenue, starting in fiscal year 2029 with a new Cedar Rapids casino. That comes to $34 million Riverside would lose a year.

Advertisement

Isle of Capri in Waterloo is poised to lose 10 percent of its revenue to cannibalization, or $8.8 million a year. And tribal casino, Meskwaki in Tama, would lose 11 percent or $14.1 million.

“If Cedar Crossing were to go through we’re talking $1.32 million dollars on an annual basis from our commitment to the Riverboat Foundation that would be evaporated,” said Damon.

The money that gaming pumps into the economy, the government and nonprofits is why those outside Linn County want to stop a casino as much as those within it want to have one.



Source link

Advertisement

Louisiana

Louisiana task force confronts future of Greek life, pushes new hazing safeguards

Published

on

Louisiana task force confronts future of Greek life, pushes new hazing safeguards


BATON ROUGE, La (Louisiana First) — The final meeting for the Caleb Wilson Hazing Prevention Task Force took place Thursday.

The committee, organized by the Louisiana Board of Regents, brought together lawmakers, university leaders, student advisors, and hazing prevention stakeholders to make sure no Louisiana family loses another student to hazing.

State representative Vanessa LaFleur, a leading voice on this task force, said, “We don’t want there to ever be another Max [Gruver], or another Caleb in the state of Louisiana.”

Her statement referenced two high-profile hazing deaths that reshaped the conversation around student organizations in the state. Members echoed the sentiment that this isn’t just an isolated issue; it’s a culture issue.

Advertisement

“There are things that shift culture, things that create culture,” said Winton Anderson. “And what we were doing today was not only dealing with the prevention piece as much as dealing with the accountability piece.”

Task force leaders said Thursday’s meeting was about closing gaps in oversight, enforcement, and advisor responsibility for all Louisiana schools.

“Today, what you saw is closing the gap of our attempt to close the gap on what we believe are going to be the next phase of policies to help us ensure that there’s accountability at every level,” said Anderson.

The policy reform is key, but leaders said education is the foundation.

“The key to this is education,” said LaFleur. “And I think we’ve put in the safeguards for that. Safeguards will be there when the legislation drops. We’ve got to show them why hazing does not create sisterhood, why hazing does not create. But what it does is it destroys.”

Advertisement

Latest News



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Louisiana races to hire AI workers as majority of pilot projects fail

Published

on

Louisiana races to hire AI workers as majority of pilot projects fail


play

Nearly all corporate artificial intelligence pilot projects fail to deliver measurable business value, according to new research — a finding that comes as Louisiana companies accelerate AI hiring faster than the data workforce needed to support it.

A national analysis by data consultancy DoubleTrack found that 95% of generative AI pilot projects fail to produce measurable profits, a rate that researchers attribute largely to weak data infrastructure rather than shortcomings in AI technology itself.

Advertisement

Despite that failure rate, Louisiana employers are hiring AI specialists far faster than data infrastructure workers. The study found Louisiana companies posted 151% more AI and machine-learning jobs than data infrastructure roles, ranking the state among the most imbalanced AI labor markets in the country.

According to the analysis, Louisiana employers advertised 548 AI-related positions compared with 218 data infrastructure jobs, meaning companies are hiring more than two AI specialists for every data engineer or platform specialist; the reverse of what experts recommend.

According to the study, industry consensus suggests that organizations should hire at least two data infrastructure professionals for every AI specialist to ensure that data is reliable, integrated, and usable. Without that foundation, AI systems often stall or are abandoned.

Advertisement

The consequences are already visible nationwide. Research cited in the report shows 42% of companies scrapped most of their AI initiatives in 2025, more than double the abandonment rate from the year before.

The findings carry particular significance for Louisiana as the state courts data centers, advanced manufacturing and digital infrastructure projects, including large-scale developments proposed in Caddo and Bossier parishes. While such projects promise billions in capital investment, they depend on robust data pipelines, power reliability and utility coordination — areas that require deep data infrastructure expertise.

Data centers, in particular, employ relatively few permanent workers but rely heavily on specialized data engineers to manage system redundancy, cybersecurity, data flow and integration with cloud and AI platforms. A shortage of those workers could limit the long-term impact of the projects Louisiana is working to attract.

The report also raises questions for workforce development and higher education. Louisiana universities have expanded AI-related coursework in recent years, but researchers say data engineering, database management and system integration skills are just as critical — and often in shorter supply.

Advertisement

Only 6% of enterprise AI leaders nationwide believe their data systems are ready to support AI projects, and 71% of AI teams spend more than a quarter of their time on basic data preparation and system integration rather than advanced analytics or model development, according to research cited in the study.

Those infrastructure gaps can have ripple effects beyond technology firms. Utilities, energy producers, health systems and logistics companies — all major pillars of Louisiana’s economy — increasingly rely on AI tools that require clean, connected data to function reliably.

DoubleTrack recommends companies adopt a 2-to-1 hiring ratio, with two data infrastructure hires for every AI specialist, to reduce failure rates.

“The businesses most at risk aren’t the ones moving slowly on AI,” said Andy Boettcher, the firm’s chief innovation officer. “They’re the ones who hired aggressively for AI roles without investing in data quality and infrastructure.”

As Louisiana pushes to position itself as a hub for data-driven industries, researchers say closing the gap between AI ambition and data readiness may determine whether those investments succeed — or quietly join the 95% that do not.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Women and men in Louisiana experience different kinds of violence, study finds

Published

on

Women and men in Louisiana experience different kinds of violence, study finds


BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana Illuminator) – More than half of adults in Louisiana have experienced physical violence during their lifetime but what those acts look like largely depends on the victim’s gender, according to an annual survey conducted last year.

In Louisiana, gun violence is much more likely to be carried out against men, while severe intimate partner violence — sometimes referred to as domestic abuse — is much more likely to happen to women, showed the result of a study by Tulane University, the University of California San Diego and the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.

“Violence is a gendered issue. It is different if you are a man or a woman or a boy or a girl,” Anita Raj, executive director of the Newcomb Institute at Tulane University and the study’s lead author, said in an interview.

Raj’s survey, the Louisiana Study on Violence Experiences Across the Lifespan, is the only comprehensive research of its kind conducted in the state. It was administered online in English and Spanish between May 13 and June 18, 2025, to more than 1,000 Louisiana residents 18 and older.

Advertisement

The survey shows Louisiana residents experience violence at an alarmingly high rate. Eight percent of people surveyed said they were subjected to physical violence in the past year, including 3% who said they were threatened with either a knife or a gun.

Who commits the violence and what form it takes largely depends on the victim’s gender.

Over half of women (58%) who had experienced physical violence within a year of the survey reported their spouse or partner were responsible for the incidents, compared with just 14% of men. Most men (53%) who had experienced physical violence in that time period said they were targeted by a stranger, compared with just 5% of women, according to the report.

Men were much more likely to be subjected to gun violence than women, however; 4% of men reported they had been threatened or attacked with a gun in the year before the survey was taken, compared with just 1% of women, according to the report.

Yet women (13%) were more likely to experience sexual harassment and sexual violence than men (6%). Almost one in four women (23%) surveyed also said they had been subjected to forced sex during their lifetimes, compared with 7% of men.

Advertisement

Severe intimate partner violence, sometimes called domestic violence, was also much more prevalent for women.

Almost 25% of women reported they had been subjected to potentially lethal forms of intimate partner violence — such as choking, suffocation, burns, beatings and use of a weapon — during their lifetimes. Only 6% of men reported being the victims of life-threatening violence from a spouse or dating partner.

Mariah Wineski, executive director of the Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, said the study’s findings align with what domestic violence shelters and other victim advocacy groups see on a daily basis.

“Many times, the most dangerous place for a woman is in her home or in her relationship,” Wineski said.

Intimate partner violence is more widespread among younger people. Twelve percent of respondents who are 18-24 years old and 15% of those ages 25-34 experienced violence and controlling behavior from a partner in the year before the survey was taken. Only 1-2% over people 55 and older reported the same problem.

Advertisement

Raj and Wineski said prevention programs aimed at reducing intimate partner violence need to start with adolescents in order to have the greatest impact.

“It is much more effective to change the attitudes and beliefs of a child or adolescent,” Wineski said. “They are at a better place in their lives for learning all sorts of new things, including how to interact with other people.”

Programs that promote economic stability and lift people out of poverty also help curb violence, according to Raj’s report.

Survey participants who reported not having enough money for food or other basic necessities were five times more likely to have experienced physical violence in the past year and six times more likely to experience intimate partner violence. People who are homeless were nine times more likely to experience intimate partner violence, according to the report.

“Policies that expand women’s economic and political participation, promote safety in workplaces and public spaces, and protect LGBTQ+ people advance not only equity but also safety for all,” the report concluded.

Advertisement

Louisiana Illuminator is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Louisiana Illuminator maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Greg LaRose for questions: info@lailluminator.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending